Home

Review the Week 4 Descriptive Statistics SPSS Output provided in this week’s Learning Resources.
Review the Learning Resources on how to interpret descriptive statistics, including how to interpret research outcomes.
Consider the results presented in the SPSS output and reflect on how you might interpret the frequency distributions and the descriptive statistics presented.Summarize your interpretation of the frequency data provided in the output for respondent’s age, highest school grade completed, and family income from prior month.
Note: A frequency analysis is way of summarizing data by depicting the number of times a data value occurs in the data table or output. It is used to analyze the data set including where the data are concentrated or clustered, the range of values, observation of extreme values, and to determine intervals for analysis that could make sense in categorizing your variable values.
Summarize your interpretation of the descriptive statistics provided in the output for respondent’s age, highest school grade completed, race and ethnicity, currently employed, and family income from prior month.
Note: The descriptive analysis includes N (size of your sample), the mean, the median, the standard deviation, the size and spread of your data to determine the variability/variance in your data.

TASK: Utilise literature/research that underlines compassionate person-centred care and shared decision-making IN OBESITY TREATMENT (UK), Nursing care deliveryIMPORTANT- THIS QUESTION IS PART OF A LARGER ESSAY. THIS IS NOT THE FULL ESSAY ITSELFMake sure to do the following when producing the literature review.
• Discuss fundamental theories and concepts of person-centred care and shared decision-making- develop an authoritative argument and make sound judgements wherever possible.• Show evidence of a search conducted to find higher quality evidence – the ability to show this is higher quality evidence, e.g., students can present their evidence and discuss the type of evidence this is.• Link the usefulness of the evidence to PRACTICAL APPLICATION in relation to PROMOTING HEALTH AND PREVENTING ILL HEALTH: being able to link the evidence to practice clearly. *VERY IMPORTANT*• Include evidence of literature that discusses person-centred care and shared decision-making in different nursing sectors (primary, secondary and tertiary)APA 7TH REFERENCINGPlease ensure all these points are covered to the best of your ability. Without doing so, I will not pass. If you have any issues, feel free to contact me.

1 – Critically apply appropriate evidence to support the formulation of person centred, individualised care.
2 – Critically apply the principles of professional practice, regulatory guidance, law and ethics in relation to patient care.
3 – Critically evaluate effective leadership and management skills in relation to nursing practice and service delivery.
4 – Critically evaluate the influencing factors of effective interdisciplinary team working and the role of the Registered Nurse.

Attached are the documents needed to complete part 2 of the research project. The second part of the project is the literature review.1. Please do your best work. It has to be scholarly written work.2. My PICOT question/clinical problem I picked to address is in part 1 of the project that I attached. My picot question is best tackled using quantitative research methods3. The other 3 documents attached are the template my professor wants to be followed, the instructions for the assignment, and the literature matrix table that the 10 articles have to be inserted into. The instructions on how to complete and input the table is included in the instructions. The sources that is to be used for this assignment are the 10 articles that must be selected.4. Please make sure the APA format is correct and 7th edition only. Original work only and please cite references correctly. No plagiarism..I will be running it through turnitin.5. References no older than 5 years and must be within United States. Sources cannot be from .com resources. Only scholarly resources ( org, edu., )6. Please read all directions/documents attached. If you need clarification regarding the paper, please reach out prior to finishing it.

Please use the learning outcome/assignment guideline and marking criteria as a guide to writing this coursework. the references should be from credible source and should not be more than 10yrs.The assignment is a masters level assignment therefore, it must be critical and analytical. the coursework should not be descriptive. An exemplar essay showing the legislature and complexity part of Bob’s scenario has been attached to show you the standard required. Please use the documents I attached as they contain almost all the resources you will be needing for this coursework and explore the references on the documents as well as they will lead you to more useful materialsPlease note: This assignment is not about the clinical care of Bob but how Bob’s care will be coordinated outside now that he is discharged.Assignment scenario
BOB
Bob is an 82 years old gentleman who lives in a bungalow with his wife Beryl. Bob was diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease five years ago by the local memory service. Bob is prescribed medication for his Alzheimer’s disease. He is also prescribed medication for hypertension, type 2 diabetes, and takes analgesia for Arthritis.
Bob has just been discharged from an orthopaedic ward at his local hospital, following a fall at home. Bob sustained a fractured neck of femur that required surgery and physiotherapy treatment. As the hospital has been extremely busy Bob has been discharged with no follow up in place or care provision at home. It has been noted that Bob has become more confused whilst in hospital, and although mobilising he often forgets to use his walking frame. Beryl is really pleased to have Bob home but is very worried about the lack of formal care package and has no family support locally.Module aim
To define and understand complex health
across the life span
Analyse current policy and legislation which
impacts on care delivery
Explore the principles of collaborative multi
professional working
Understand how complex care is co-ordinated.Please note: this coursework is not about the clinical treatment of Bob. it is about how Bob’s care will be coordinated. Please do not focus on Bob’s illness.
Assignment Outline
Introduction:
Outline the scope of your assignment providing a small amount of context for the reader
Why might their health needs require long term intervention/input?How would you prioritise Bob’s health needs?
How can a wider perspective of his needs be addressed?Main body: Rationale
This section should include the following detail which should all relate back to your chosen scenario
A brief rationale for your choice of patient including a definition of why their care is considered to be complex
How might you define complex?
How would that apply to Bob – what aspects of his individual care constitute complexity?
How might you prioritise what is going to be discussed whilst recognising there is a wider context to be co-ordinated?Main body: Overview of policy
An overview of the policy that impacts on the delivery of their care needs
What policies might be specific to Bob’s needs? e.g NHS long term plan, NHS England five years forward view (2014) and NHS England five years forward view for mental health (2016).Main body: Legislature e.g care act (2014), health and social care act (2012) etc.
Acknowledgement of the legislation which helps to co-ordinate their care using a systematic approach.
What legislation may apply to Bob in this scenario?
Analysis and discussion of the principles of joined up working applied to this scenario. This may include partnership, collaboration and interagency workingMain body: Analysis and discussion
Who else might be involved in Bob’s care?
How can that be coordinated to deliver the most effective care for Bob?
What are the pros and cons of ‘joined up’ working?
How might that apply to Bob?conclusion:

1. Describe the patient’s presentation and your initial assessment of the patient based on the history and physical you completed in i-Human. What are your top three concerns for this patient and why (based on objective and subjective data)?Patient is CHarlie Harris who presented with fevers in the last 3-weeks, progressive dyspnea at rest and on exertion, and a 5-pound unintentional weight loss. Physical exam revealed a fever of 101 F/38.3C, hypoxemia with a pulse ox of 82%, and cervical and axillary adenopathy.2. Based on your initial assessment, describe the top five differentials you selected, and discuss which tests you ordered to either rule in or rule out those conditions. Address if the tests you ordered are both time/cost effective, or if a better approach could have been used.Asthma, COPD, HIV, lung neoplasm, bacterial pneumonia3. Present the patient’s final diagnosis, and discuss the pathophysiology behind the condition.
HIV/AIDS with Pneumocystis jirovecci pneumonia4. Describe how you plan to treat this patient based on current clinical guidelines.5. Support your analysis with at least five reliable references from the text, clinical guidelines, and research. At least two of the five references must come from peer-reviewed research that is less than five years old.

The aim of this assessment Task 3 is for you to learn about and make the links between how our shared history and past Australian government policies relating to Indigenous Australians, has generated the current politically engineered Indigenous Australian health crises.

I have attached the assessment brief with this email. I am a UK student and my assignment is a 2500 word essay. Harvard referencing and in-text citations need to be used including a reference list in alphabetical order. I am a mental health nursing student so the essay needs to be in relation to my specific field of nursing. word count includes the assignment and in text citations only. The reference page is not included in the word count. The word count can run over by 10% of the word count. I would really appreciate your help with this as I am already trying to complete 2 other assignments.

The assessment brief
Completion of an audit in practice (university ethics must be applied for and granted prior to any collection of data) or an audit proposal with a clear review of the literature to demonstrate the justification for the audit proposal.
2,000 -3,000 words
Introduction
Brief introduction to topic of audit, what you are planning to discuss and the rationale. Identify at this point if the audit has already been undertaken or if you are auditing an area of practice that you are re-auditing or undertaking a new audit in.
Main Body
 Introduce in detail the audit with rationale.
 Describe how the literature search was conducted.
 Critically evaluate the underpinning literature surrounding the audit area.
 Discuss how the audit was approached.
 Describe critically how the audit was actually undertaken.
 What were the findings
 Critically evaluate the findings.
 How may these findings correlate/ demonstrate disagreement with previous literature
 why may this be the case?
 How may these findings impact upon practice?
 What may be the recommendations for future practice?
Conclusion
Summarise the main points of the audit. Include any pertinent points that may affect practice.General points
To be submitted via Turnitin only.
Double line spaced.
All referencing must be in line with the Harvard standard of referencing.
Your academic supervisor can only review 1 draft of 600 words of your work, and will not review anything within the week before submission.
Important points for consideration
Ensure that any clinical areas are anonymised.
If the audit has been undertaken previously ensure consent is gained to utilise this.
If the audit has not taken place please ensure consent is granted from the audit lead to undertake the audit.
General points to assist with academic writing
 Demonstrate evidence of wider and relevant reading to support your case.
 Within the literature review there should be evidence of an interpretation and evaluation of current issues; it should not just consist of your “opinions”.
 Avoid description unnecessarily
 Avoid long sentences
 Paragraphs – to introduce a new issue.
 Avoid grammatical errors – proof read your work prior to submission.

1)Identify a range of different reasons why people communicate in the care setting and how they might do this? Remember, methods of communication might be verbal and non-verbal.
2)Think about 3 different examples of when you need to communicate with others in your care setting. For example, a service user, family member, colleague, representative from an External Agency. Think about verbal and non verbal methods of communication and explain how different communication styles can affect relationships.