Category: Writing

Hello there,
I need your assistance in completely rewriting my essay. My professor from College Writing II has informed me that my essay includes more than 10% AI-generated content, and therefore, this essay cannot be graded. Please maintain the original topic but thoroughly read through the essay to grasp its context before rephrasing. The revised essay should be entirely free of plagiarism and AI-generated text. I would appreciate any proof you can provide to verify that the essay is free from these elements. As for the sources, I suggest using the works cited page if you need more information. I have also included instructions and the Rubric for the essay in case you need them; I do not expect the length of the paper to be the same length as the original one as I am requiring you to paraphrase it, but still make sure to cover all the main talking points. If you need clarification on anything, feel free to reach out to me.

Now it is your turn to play around with perspective. Select a story or event and re-tell it from another perspective.  You don’t have to be 100% factual.
One of the easiest things to work with is a fairy tale (such as telling the story of Cinderella from the step-sisters’ point of view), but you are not restricted to that genre.  Other ideas include re-telling a historical even from the non-victor’s perspective or telling a story from a non-main character point of view (such as in the previously mentioned musical Wicked or the book The Other Einstein).  
You can have fun with this and take the newscaster’s perspective as he/she waits for cue cards or stumbles on pronouncing an unknown name.  You might even tell about an earthquake or hurricane from the story of a dog as opposed to the normal perspective of its human owner.  Be creative if you want!
Submission
Your response must be a minimum of 200 words.  Please put your response directly into your discussion reply so that fellow students can easily read it without needing to open an attachment.   You must note the situation and the perspective at the end of your post.
This is an article to help with the writing: https://canvas.fscj.edu/courses/87199/files/11771137?verifier=yqRJD34DUKATjwDMudTkTpL4oEfUqtw1GfWogeoc&wrap=1

Write the third chapter of my thesis on the government measures to prevent recurrences of the genocide. My full subject is: “the role of national media in the preparation and the execution of the genocide against the tutsis in 1994. Gouvernment measures installed to prevent recurrences of media abuse”. 
To write this chapter of my thesis, you must follow this outline and the information i want you to give in it, please note that this work should be as precise as possible and sources should be cited (use reliable sources like the constitution of rwanda, MINUBUMWE,…) :
Chapter 3: Government Measures to Prevent Recurrences
Contextualization: 
I. Government in Place After the Genocide 
II. Gouvernement measures to prevent hate speech and division 
1. National awareness campaigns to promote unity and reconciliation: 
– Organization of large-scale media campaigns aimed at educating the population on the destructive consequences of hate speech and division. (Provide one or more concrete examples)
– Use of various means of communication, including television, radio, social networks, and public posters, to disseminate messages of unity and peaceful coexistence. (+ analyze a speech, a message, or a poster) 
– Collaboration with influential personalities and community leaders to amplify the impact of the campaigns and encourage public adherence. (Concrete example) 
2.  Educational program aimed at combating ethnic stereotypes and prejudices (optional) 
– Integration of modules on tolerance, diversity, and peaceful         conflict resolution in school curricula at all levels. 
– Training of teachers to effectively transmit these values and            encourage interethnic dialogue in the classroom. 
– Organization of workshops and seminars for young people, religious leaders, and members of civil society to promote mutual understanding and interethnic cooperation. 
3. Creation of early detection mechanisms for social and ethnic tensions for rapid intervention (are there any?) 
III. Government measures to control the media 
1.  Creation of media regulatory institutions: 
– Establishment of government bodies such as the High Media Authority (HAM) tasked with supervising and regulating national media activities. (Presentation of HAM + objectives + concrete achievements) 
– Granting specific powers to these institutions to monitor media content, investigate potential violations, and take disciplinary actions in case of non-compliance. (What does the law allow them to do in terms of media surveillance? And for punishments?) 
2. Development of laws to monitor and sanction media spreading hate speech: 
– Adoption of specific legislation prohibiting the spread of speech inciting violence, ethnic discrimination, or racial hatred. (Cite some laws) 
– Clear definition of criteria to determine what constitutes hate speech and the penalties associated with its dissemination, including fines and sanctions.
IV. Evaluation of Measures Taken 
1. Analysis of the effectiveness of the laws and media regulatory institutions 
2. Evaluation of the impact of awareness campaigns and educational programs on Rwandan society 
3. Identification of persistent challenges and areas needing improvement 
V. Future Perspectives to Improve Government Reforms (your personal input to be added here )

Please provide summary of significant items in the significant items column from the screenshots provided.. please answer the bullets in the significant items with the screenshot support provided.

I recently went to the Dominican Republic on a community service trip with an organization called courts for kids and I must write a paper about it.
I need you to write 2 pages about the benefits of community service, especially in a third world country. Why sports is crucial in poor communities or/and third world countries (for kids growing up).
I need you to write another 2 pages about the courts for kids organization.

Write a six paragraph argumentation essay (no less than 500  words) on one of the topics listed below. You need an introduction, four body paragraphs (3 dealing with your argument; 1 dealing with refuting the opposition’s viewpoint), and a conclusion.This is NOT a sourced essay. It should come strictly from you, not outside sources.
Your essay needs to be typed in 12 point, Times New Roman font and double spaced. Look at Sample Argumentative Essay.rtf Download Sample Argumentative Essay.rtf to see what your essay should “LOOK” like (notice, however, that in the sample essay is missing the refutation paragraph. 
The essay must be composed in MS Word and saved as a doc document or saved as a PDF. DO NOT CUT, COPY, AND PASTE YOUR ESSAY INTO THE MESSAGE BOX. IT WILL NOT BE GRADED.
The essay must be uploaded using the submit feature you access by clicking on the assignment in either the syllabus or grade book. Failure to include your name ON THE ESSAY will result in a zero.

Discuss the life-giving properties of blood and the symbolism with
respect to atonement for sins—blood is a symbol of life given by God.
Blood and breath were the necessary elements given by God to give us life.
Discuss the relationship between the cardiovascular and respiratory
systems and how these systems function together to keep us alive.
Requirements
300 + words
1 APA  formatted source

Touchstone 3.2: Draft an Argumentative Research Essay
ASSIGNMENT: Using your outline and annotated bibliography from Touchstones 1.2 and 2.2, draft a 6-8 page argumentative research essay on your chosen topic.
As this assignment builds on Touchstone 2.2: Create an Annotated Bibliography, that Touchstone must be graded before you can submit your research essay draft. Although unrelated by topic, Touchstone 3.1 must also be graded before you can submit your research essay draft.
Sample Touchstone 3.2
In order to foster learning and growth, all work you submit must be newly written specifically for this course. Any plagiarized or recycled work will result in a Plagiarism Detected alert. Review Touchstones: Academic Integrity Guidelines for more about plagiarism and the Plagiarism Detected alert. For guidance on the use of generative AI technology, review Ethical Standards and Appropriate Use of AI.
A. Assignment Guidelines
DIRECTIONS: Refer to the list below throughout the writing process. Do not submit your Touchstone until it meets these guidelines. Refer to the Sample Touchstone for additional guidance on structure, formatting, and citation.
1. Argumentative Thesis Statement
❒ Have you included a thesis in your introduction that includes a clear, arguable stance and supporting reasons?
2. Argument Development
❒ Are all of the details relevant to the purpose of your essay?
❒ Is the argument supported using persuasive rhetorical appeals and page/paragraph-numbered source material (i.e., direct quotations, paraphrasing, and summary)?
❒ Is your essay 6-8 pages (approximately 1500-2000 words, not including your references or reflection question responses)? If not, which details do you need to add or remove?
❒ Does the essay consist of at least seven paragraphs – an introduction, five body paragraphs (with at least one for the counterarguments and rebuttals), and a conclusion? Are the body paragraphs ordered logically to strengthen the argument, and do they all contain accurate evidence from credible sources?
❒ Do your topic sentences make original and supportable points? Do your topic sentences directly support your thesis statement?
3. Research
❒ Have you introduced, contextualized, and cited outside sources effectively using at least some direct quotation, summary, and paraphrase techniques and included page/paragraph-numbered parenthetical citations?
❒ Are the sources incorporated smoothly, providing the reader with signal phrases and context for the source information?
❒ Have you referenced a range of at least 7 credible sources, and does each source have at least one accurate in-text citation in the essay?
❒ Have you properly formatted your citations according to APA style guidelines?
❒ Have you included an APA style reference page below your essay and do the sources listed there match those cited in the essay?
4. Reflection
❒ Have you answered all reflection questions including specific and concrete examples that provide thoughtful insight in all responses?
❒ Are your answers included on a separate page below the main assignment?
B. Reflection
DIRECTIONS: Below your assignment, include answers to all of the following reflection questions.
Provide one example of a place where you have used rhetorical appeals or source material to support your argument. How does this enhance your essay? (2-3 sentences)
Touchstone 4 is a revision of this draft. What kind of feedback would be helpful for you as you revise? Are there parts of your draft that you’re uncertain of? (3-4 sentences)
C. Rubric
Advanced (100%) Proficient (85%) Acceptable (75%) Needs Improvement (50%) Non-Performance (0%)
Argument Development and Support (40 points)
Provide a clear argument with sufficient support.
The argument is thoroughly developed with highly relevant details to support it, including the use of rhetorical appeals and accurately cited direct quotations and paraphrasing. The argument is well-developed with relevant details to support it, including the use of rhetorical appeals and accurately cited direct quotations and paraphrasing. The argument is not fully developed; while it is supported by some relevant details, including rhetorical appeals and accurately cited direct quotations and paraphrasing, some aspects of the argument are neglected. The argument is poorly developed with irrelevant details that frequently distract from the argument; there is little evidence of the use of rhetorical appeals and/or direct quotations and paraphrasing. Source material included might not be cited. The argument is not developed and/or the composition is not argumentative; details are irrelevant and distract from the argument OR are not supported with accurately cited source material.
Research (30 points)
Incorporate sources through effective quotations, paraphrases, and summaries.
Cites all outside sources appropriately; incorporates credible sources smoothly and effectively through some direct quotation, paraphrase, or summary. Primarily cites outside sources appropriately; incorporates credible sources effectively through some direct quotation, paraphrase, or summary. Generally cites outside sources appropriately; incorporates credible sources adequately through some direct quotation, paraphrase, or summary. Cites outside sources, but most are cited improperly; incorporates sources through some direct quotation, paraphrase, or summary, but the integration is not smooth and/or the credibility of the sources is unclear. Does not cite or reference sources accurately, or citation is consistently inappropriate and/or inaccurate, and/or sources are not credible or appropriate.
Organization (15 points)
Exhibit competent organizational writing techniques.
Includes all of the required components of an argumentative research paper, including an introduction with relevant and engaging background information and an argumentative thesis, an adequate number of body paragraphs with topic sentences, a body paragraph addressing counterargument(s), and a conclusion with a concluding statement. Includes all of the required components of an argumentative research paper, including an introduction with background information, an argumentative thesis, an adequate number of body paragraphs with topic sentences, a body paragraph addressing counterargument(s), and a conclusion with a concluding statement. Includes nearly all of the required components of an argumentative research paper; however, one component is missing. Includes most of the required components of an argumentative research paper, but is lacking two components; sequences ideas and paragraphs such that the connections between ideas (within and between paragraphs) are sometimes unclear and the reader may have difficulty following the progression of the argument. Lacks several or all of the components of an argumentative research paper; sequences ideas and paragraphs such that the connections between ideas (within and between paragraphs) are often unclear and the reader has difficulty following the progression of the argument.
Style (5 points)
Establish a consistent, informative and argumentative tone and make thoughtful stylistic choices.
Demonstrates thoughtful and effective word choices, avoids redundancy and imprecise language, and uses a wide variety of sentence structures. Demonstrates effective word choices, primarily avoids redundancy and imprecise language, and uses a variety of sentence structures. Demonstrates generally effective style choices, but may include occasional redundancies, imprecise language, poor word choice, and/or repetitive sentence structures. Frequently includes poor word choices, redundancies, imprecise language, and/or repetitive sentence structures. Consistently demonstrates poor word choices, redundancies, imprecise language, and/or repetitive sentence structures.
Conventions (5 points)
Follow conventions for standard written English.
There are only a few, if any, negligible errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage. There are occasional minor errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage. There are some significant errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage. There are frequent significant errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage. There are consistent significant errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage.
Reflection (5 points)
Answer reflection questions thoroughly and thoughtfully.
Demonstrates thoughtful reflection; consistently includes specific and concrete examples that provide thoughtful insight, following or exceeding response length guidelines. Demonstrates thoughtful reflection; includes multiple specific and concrete examples that provide thoughtful insight, following response length guidelines. Primarily demonstrates thoughtful reflection, but some responses are lacking in detail or insight; primarily follows response length guidelines. Shows limited reflection; the majority of responses are lacking in detail or insight, with some questions left unanswered or falling short of response length guidelines. No reflection responses are present.
D. Requirements
The following requirements must be met for your submission to be graded:
Composition must be 6-8 pages (approximately 1500-2000 words, not including your references or reflection question responses).
Double-space the composition and use one-inch margins.
Use a readable 12-point font.
All writing must be appropriate for an academic context.
Composition must be original and written for this assignment.
Use of generative chatbot artificial intelligence tools (ChatGPT, Bing Chat, Bard) in place of original writing is strictly prohibited for this assignment.
Plagiarism of any kind is strictly prohibited.
Submission must include your name, the name of the course, the date, and the title of your composition.
Include all of the assignment components in a single file.
Acceptable file formats include .doc and .docx.
Your annotated bibliography must be graded before your research essay draft will be accepted.

Instructions:
Refer to the Project Descriptions section of the course syllabus for detailed guidelines.
Review all of the learning resources for the week.
Post a response to the questions below. Your response is due on Sunday of Week 1 at 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time. Your response should incorporate what you have learned from the weekly learning resources, but you may also include credible information from outside sources, provided you include a citation and a corresponding reference list. 
PLEASE NOTE: The goal of this exercise is to give up some form of technology during this week. Do NOT rely on reflections from the past as memories can be imperfect and subject to bias. 
On July 30, 2012, the world’s biggest blackout took place in India when three major power grids collapsed.
How do you think you would survive a power blackout?
Although it may seem a little counter-intuitive, we are going to start our consideration of technology in modern society by removing technology from our modern lives.  This will lay an important foundation for the remainder of the course. This week, you are to pick one 24-hour period in which you avoid technology as much as possible. This includes the use of the following:
Smart phones
Cell phone and handheld devices
Computers, laptops, tablets
Television
Video games
Stove/Oven/Microwave
Dishwasher
Obviously, if you must use any of these devices to perform your job or to keep children safe and healthy, you may do so. You may use kitchen appliances to prepare your meals (I don’t want your family to go hungry!) and turn your air conditioning or heat on to keep your family comfortable, but during your blackout day, avoid as much modern technology as possible while you are at home. Be very mindful of the technologies that you use or avoid during the day and how this impacts your ability to function. The objective of this exercise is to help you to appreciate the ways in which technology impacts your functioning in everyday life. If you have other family members, see if they will participate with you and use this opportunity to talk about how technology impacts your life as a family. 

Instructions
You are expected to produce materials (executive summary, report, powerpoint, spreadsheets, etc.) that would be presented to your boss/leader demonstrating your knowledge and understanding about the key logistics and supply chain issues. In developing the PowerPoint presentation, please include narration within the Notes section of the presentation. All documents should include appropriate citations and a reference list using APA style.