Category: Research & Summaries

I am in need of a 400 word discussion post, as well as two 250 word responses. I will provide response posts as soon as they are available.
Discussion: How should the United States government deal with the heightened concern about homegrown violent extremism and the growing concern for the preservation of civil liberties within the nation? What are some of the political and constitutional consequences of counter-terrorism that US forces (military or law enforcement) conduct within the United States and its territories? Lastly, how do we assess the tradeoffs between freedom and security in the United States?

Part 1: For this presentation, you will create a 6-8-minute video of the fact that vaccines are safe and effective. This speech needs to have at least five sources from articles written by expert authors. Three of them I have attached as PDFs, While you can use internet articles for the other 2 sources, they must have authors and be evaluated using the CRAAP method. Please have at least one cited in each of your main points during speech. This is a speech that needs to persuade your audience. Your proposition should be what organizes your speech. In other words, all your main points should be in support of your proposition, explaining why it is true, should be believed, or should lead to change.
While this speech can include personal stories, explanations, or hypothetical examples, it should only be used to support your research. If you have a personal story that supports your position, it should only be used if it aligns with your research.
The speech should include all the outlining components that were discussed within Module 2. Your speech should have an attention grab to open up your speech, a clear proposition, a reason for the audience to listen, and a preview in the introduction.
The speech should also include a body with at least 3 main points that support your proposition. Each main point needs to include subpoints that explain or support your main points. Remember, this is not a speech about your personal knowledge, but should be grounded with the research you conducted.
Finally, the speech should also include a conclusion that has a summary of your main points and a clincher to wrap up your speech.
RUBRIC:
-The introduction has an effective Attention Grab, Thesis/Specific Purpose, Reason to Listen, and Preview. -There are transitions from introduction to body to conclusion. There are transitions between main points and clear signposts.
-Main points are related to the thesis, enhances understanding, and uses strategies to maintain interest. Speech is grounded in a minimum of 5 sources effectively cited throughout the speech and provided depth to the topic.
-Student summarizes their main points and concludes with an effective closure to the speech.
Part 2: Outline on the speech -The outline should not include full sentences or paragraphs, but phrases or sentence fragments. Each component should just contain enough information to keep you on track and remind you what comes next. (I have attached an example of what the outline should look like). -Includes an attention grab, a thesis/specific purpose, a reason to listen and a preview.
-Includes an attention grab, a thesis/specific purpose, a reason to listen and a preview.
-Connected to the main point – indented and clear hierarchal labeling.
-Includes a summary and a clincher
-Includes 5 MLA or APA formatted sources.
Part 3: Powerpoint:
The final component of the persuasive speech will include a PowerPoint to go along with your persuasive research speech. This PowerPoint should utilize the strategies that were discussed in this video (. The PowerPoint needs to have a minimum of 6 slides, including a title slide, an introduction slide, one for each main points (3-5 main points), and a conclusion slide. This assignment is worth 30 points and will be evaluated using the Persuasive Research Speech PowerPoint Rubric.
Rubric: -Has a minimum of 6 slides to cover all the major components. Introduction, main points, and conclusion are well conveyed. -Design is pleasing – not distracting – not just plain white. Good spacing – not too much going on in the slide. Minimal text – no large paragraphs or big blocks of text Lacki
ng typos or grammar mistakes.

I am in need of a 400 word discussion post as well as two 250 word responses.
Discussion: Should the US Military or other US Federal agency conduct surveillance and collection within the United States, without a warrant or other legal means, at any time? What about outside of the United States at any time on American citizens? Should the various law enforcement agencies found at state and local levels be able to conduct surveillance and collection within the United States when they have a warrant, but also be able to do it when they do not have a warrant?
Response #1 (Seth Dugan): Good Morning Professor and Classmates,
Lawmakers are divided over legislation that permits the U.S. government to surveil noncitizens overseas without a warrant, known as Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). The legislation, set to expire last December, allows the National Security Agency (NSA) to collect communications of foreigners who are located outside the U.S. and have been deemed intelligence targets. Critics argue that this legislation threatens the civil liberties of Americans, as some of the communications collected could be about or with U.S. citizens, allowing the government to track Americans through those communications.
Those in favor of the legislation argue that it is critical to the nation’s security, as losing this vital provision would raise profound risks. The National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC) also expressed concern about the potential loss of Section 702, stating that it is essential for finding and disrupting serious security threats.
Groups like the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) have voiced concerns that not reforming Section 702 could lead to “backdoor” surveillance on Americans. They pointed to examples of the FBI using Section 702 to conduct searches on Americans’ communications around racial justice movements and protests, as well as to surveil journalists and members of Congress.
The House Judiciary Committee bill proposed by the ACLU would reform Section 702 to require federal agencies to obtain a warrant before conducting queries on U.S. citizens and ensure accountability for those who violate the civil liberties of Americans. However, the “Queen of the Hill” showdown vote was postponed until 2024, and FISA approval was extended until April 2024 to give lawmakers more time to come to an agreement on a best path forward for Section 702.
Wishing everyone a great week!
Best,
Seth
Congressional Digest » Pros and cons of warrantless surveillance. (n.d.). https://congressionaldigest.com/pros-and-cons-of-warrantless-surveillance/
Response #2 (Oyatoki): Hi Class and Professor,
Should the US Military or other US Federal agency conduct surveillance and collection within the United States, without a warrant or other legal means, at any time?
The answer is a resounding NO. The debate over whether the U.S. military or other federal agencies should conduct surveillance within the U.S. without a warrant is highly contentious, raising significant constitutional and ethical concerns. Unwarranted surveillance violates constitutional protections and threatens civil liberties. The National Security Agency’s (NSA) mass data collection program, revealed by Edward Snowden, highlights the dangers of unwarranted surveillance and the potential for misuse. The USA PATRIOT Act expanded the government’s surveillance powers, allowing broader data collection without traditional warrants under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). Recent disclosures by the Justice Department Inspector General underscore these worries. Michael Horowitz’s report on the FBI’s handling of the Trump-Russia investigation revealed significant errors and omissions in the FBI’s FISA applications (Washington Examiner, 2024). These findings emphasize the potential for abuse in the absence of rigorous oversight and legal protections. What about outside of the United States at any time on American citizens?
Surveillance of U.S. citizens, both within the country and abroad, should always require a warrant to protect their rights. The Supreme Court has recognized that U.S. citizens have constitutional rights abroad (Reid v. Covert, 1957). Despite the Fourth Amendment’s limitations outside the U.S., U.S. citizens have constitutional rights overseas. Unauthorized surveillance can lead to privacy breaches and diminish trust in the government. While Executive Order 12333 (1981) aims to protect national security, it grants broad surveillance powers that can be exploited. Balancing national security and individual rights is crucial, and it is essential to ensure transparency, accountability, and compliance with constitutional principles to maintain trust and uphold democratic values.
Should the various law enforcement agencies found at state and local levels be able to conduct surveillance and collection within the United States when they have a warrant, but also be able to do it when they do not have a warrant?
State and local law enforcement bodies also grapple with reconciling effective law enforcement with respect for constitutional rights. The necessity for a warrant, grounded on probable cause and issued by an impartial judge, is a fundamental aspect of American legal safeguards against random government interference (Illinois v. Gates, 1983). Permitting law enforcement to carry out surveillance without a warrant weakens these safeguards and opens the door to significant power abuses. There exist situations, such as urgent cases, where the courts have acknowledged exceptions to the warrant requirement (Brigham City v. Stuart, 2006). These exceptions are strictly defined to ensure that pressing situations can be managed without infringing on constitutional rights. However, broadening these exceptions to permit routine warrantless surveillance by law enforcement would undermine fundamental civil liberties and establish a perilous precedent.
Reference
Brigham City v. Stuart, 547 U.S. 398 (2006).
Exec. Order No. 12333, 3 C.F.R. 200 (1981).
Washington Examiner. (2024). Of course the FBI abused FISA to surveil Carter Page; FISA has been a Fourth Amendment travesty from the start. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/2138887/of-course-the-fbi-abused-fisa-to-surveil-carter-page-fisa-has-been-a-fourth-amendment-travesty-from-the-start
Oyatoki

select a peer reviewed article that is no more than five (5) years old that interests you personally; however, it must be related to one of the following topic areas:
National security law
Homeland security laws, policies, and executive orders
Constitutional impact
Civil liberties
Individual Rights
Immigration and border security A critical analysis includes:
An Introduction – introduce the thesis
Summary – provide the main idea
Analysis – critically state the positive and negative points of the article and assess if the intended goal of the author was met
Conclusion – summarize the main ideas Include at least two (2) additional references as part of your critique. These additional references should support your analysis. Technical Requirements
Your paper must be at a minimum of 3 pages (the Title and Reference pages do not count towards the minimum limit).
Scholarly references should be used. A good rule of thumb is at least 2 scholarly sources per page of content.
Type in Times New Roman, 12 point and double space.
Students will follow the current APA Style as the sole citation and reference style used in written work submitted as part of coursework. Points will be deducted for the use of Wikipedia or encyclopedic type sources. It is highly advised to utilize books, peer-reviewed journals, articles, archived documents, etc.
All submissions will be graded using the assignment rubric.

It is important to learn and practice how to find research articles in an electronic academic library. In the library, conduct a search in the Advanced Search mode in the EBSCO Discovery Service by following the steps below:
Click on the following: EBSCO Library Search
In Search Options, scroll down to the “Limit your results” area and be sure that “Full Text” and “Scholarly (Peer Reviewed) Journals” are both checked for each search you do.
Enter a search term for a psychological topic of interest to you (e.g., anxiety, depression, or autism) and add “research study” to the end of your search term in the following location.For example, if you chose to look for articles about “emotional intelligence,” you would type “emotional intelligence research study” as your search term. This helps to ensure that your search yields research articles instead of review papers or commentaries.
From the search results, choose one research article to focus on for this week’s Discussion Board.
Using the information from the research article, please respond to the following:
What is the difference between a research article and a review article? How do you know that your article is a research article?
What was the topic the researchers were studying? If they stated their hypothesis, what was it?
Who was in the study, and what were they asked to do?
What were the main findings of the study?
What additional information do you think would be interesting to know on this topic?https://accounts.ebsco.com/public/consent?consentToken=eyJraWQiOiIxNjg2MTQ5MjEzNjMxIiwiYWxnIjoiUlMyNTYifQ.eyJyZWRpcmVjdFVyaSI6Imh0dHBzOlwvXC9zZWFyY2guZWJzY29ob3N0LmNvbVwvd2ViYXV0aFwvQ29uc2VudENhbGxiYWNrLmFzcHg_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_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.HutMvJxo1xW3o0eLOkn9S6f7fQe8yj7HDUb5hg3fq6sWSUCXuvM3WuS6F-AcPItMNvICC0PMAZlFqEfFj_HFiv2wZy_CCyjR0AxyRPNY-R-IMz6Mb1b6mM8bvaA2PUclp_5UCy749NoDCWoelhY-Efh6O3yBOc9NUzHj50wo_RF5jE_Y9TNt3HoTtuuBcNu5eNPinw7SJswXwL0g1rleXYL8u10gyQeK2ZnZ9CIiYEGICyXsegDChmyAmjmZd5fKE1zdN1fHliYsu-Apff6WnDdZeZKqGmlA7ixkoRO7DQg0tYSBWGpA0Jj02qGR8S1ST6q0JLR4jhSpcLI9h4ZmOg&lang=en

I am in need of a 400 word discussion post as well as two 200 word responses.
Discussion: Pick a current Executive Order, one that you strongly agree pick another current Executive Order that you oppose. Discuss both. Be sure to include information on why you feel the way you do about the particular Executive Orders and what makes you feel the way that you do. Include the number of and the title of the Executive Orders in the heading. https://www.federalregister.gov/presidential-documents/executive-orders
Response #1 (Powell): Hello Everyone, For this weeks discussion, I have chosen Executive Order 14120 as the doctrine in which I can agree and Executive Order as the one I disagree with. Executive Order 14120 was published on behalf of the First Lady of the United States and the Biden administration as a means to counteract lackluster women-specific health research methods which, according to this Executive Order have long been in place. Many of the medical advancements that face out modern society originated around men. After having two relatives suffer from conditions such as PCOS and cervical cancers, it is tempting to believe that medical research for women is inadequate, and could a serious revision. Many doctors will emphasize their work as “practice” and this is often due to our limited understand of medicine as it pertains to absolutes and cures. With the the vast physiological differences between men and women, the need for female specific medical practice is beyond overdue, thus earning my concurrence. Executive Order 14092 was set in motion to reduce gun violence. I feel as if it is important to address this from the same administration to emphasize my neutral stance on politics. Gun violence is a significant problem in the United States, without question. Gathering analytical data to support both sides is easily accomplished. This Executive Order seeks to reinforce the Biden administrations stance on assault weapon and high capacity magazine bans. As someone who has been in law enforcement for more than 10 years now, I can confidently say that the vast majority of violence that plagues our society is not from these high capacity magazines and assault weapons, but rather, handguns. I have taken an obscene amount of these weapons from convicted felons, minors, in conjunction with narcotics, etc. and have seen first hand how this Executive Order misses the mark. After living in Europe for a period of time, I have learned that the total withdrawal of guns, does not equate to less violence. Violence will find a way if desired and sought after by someone. I disagree with the bans mentioned in this Executive Order as actions should be taken to increase punishment for those who disobey (significantly) as the repercussions, while they vary state to state, are often inadequate when seen objectively. Creating a system tailored to reducing crime rather than monetizing it should be the best temporary solution until change on a larger scale can be made. I hope you all have a great week!
-Ryan
Resources: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/03/17/2023-05714/reducing-gun-violence-and-making-our-communities-safer
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2024/03/21/2024-06123/advancing-womens-health-research-and-innovation
Response #2 (Brian): For this discussion, I chose to write about Executive Order 14113 – one which I agree with. This Executive Order, signed by President Biden on December 26, 2023, makes an adjustment to certain rates of pay within the Government. This Executive Order is usually signed by the sitting President every year just before the end of the calendar year. This Executive Order gives pay raises to Government employees. It is designed to ensure that the salaries of Federal employees remain fair and consistent with the rate of inflation and the competitive market. One reason why I strongly agree with this order is that it is what gives the uniformed military members a pay raise every year. With the rising costs of goods and services, it is extremely difficult for many military members to make ends meet. This Executive Order, while not a complete solution, gives military members and federal employees the chance to keep up with the economy and ensure that they can afford the basics of living.
One Executive Order that I don’t necessarily agree with is Executive Order 14043. This Executive Order, signed by President Biden on September 9, 2021, made it mandatory for all federal employees to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. I do not agree with this Executive Order because I feel that it infringes upon the employee’s rights to decide what type of medical vaccine and treatment they want to receive. I don’t think that the government should have made this a mandatory requirement. At a time when people were financially suffering and there were many unknowns, people did not want to lose their jobs or face reprimand because they refused to get the vaccine. This Executive Order was later revoked through Executive Order 14099, where government employees were no longer required to receive the vaccine. While the COVID era was confusing and a learning opportunity for everyone, I strongly believe that Executive Order 14043 was unnecessary and did not allow American citizens to make choices on what to do with their own health and body.
Biden, J. R., Jr. (2023, December 21). Executive Order 14113: Adjustments of Certain Rates of Pay. The American Presidency Project.
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/12/…
Biden, J. R. (2021). Executive Order 14043: Requiring coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination for federal employees. Federal Register, 86(175), 50989-50990. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/09/14/2021-19927/requiring-coronavirus-disease-2019-vaccination-for-federal-employees

Assignment 1: “Issue I Care About”
Article Summary: In this class you will be writing a paper which will describe a specific issue area and a set of activities
undertaken by global organizations to address the issue. The first step in this process is to select an issue
area and to familiarize yourself with it by finding and describing a current article that addresses it.
After selecting an issue of interest to you, find a news article from a reputable source, and summarize the
article. Please see Handout “Respected News Sources” to be found in the Weekly Course Materials tab.
This handout is in the folder for the session labeled “Introduction-9/3/20.” This handout contains some
news outlets that are known for using formal sources of information in their reporting and are widely seen
as reputable and reliable. You may use other sources since the list provided is not complete but be sure
they are sources that use information from formal and varied sources.
In your summary address the following questions:
What is the issue addressed by the article? Very briefly describe the nature of the problem. Use
concrete examples offered in the article such as:
o Where is the problem taking place?
o Who is affected by it?
o What are the consequences for the affected individuals?
o Their community?
Does the article cite an organization that is addressing the problem? If so, what is this
organization and what are they doing? Do you think they are doing a good job?
What is your reaction to the article (e.g. surprise, insights, anger, helplessness, optimism,
ambivalence, fear, feelings of inspiration?) Explain your reactions.
Make sure you provide citations for the article you are using in APA format.
Length: 2 pages
Tool: Blackboard “Assignments Tab”
Due: See Sylabus

Must be at least 2500 words
Only talk about future autonomous flight topics
discuss how The future of aviation includes reducing the required number of pilots from two to one even possibly zero. The use of artificial intelligence can be potentially used to act as another pilot in the event of a single pilot operation- so we will discuss that.
also discuss how Another way single pilot operations will be feasible with AI is because it will be able to provide solutions and calculate the best route or decision for the scenario at hand with a high degree of accuracy. With the increase of advanced technology, while cutting a pilot out of the cockpit, airlines would be able to crew flights easier since only one pilot is now required and possibly operate an airline with flights 24 hours a day and with less downtime for quick turns.
discuss how Aviation authorities around the world are researching the efficiency of single pilot operations to lower costs for their airlines, maintain or increase safety as well as the the feasibility of using advanced technology for single pilot operations.

do a reserch for unotherios access and ID check in airports please do it with word doucument include some photos .
with the refrences when you take the information from the website please

Answer the question: The high School principal wanted to obtain student opinion about bullying. She selected 25 boys and 24 girls for Group A and 10 girls and 15 boys for Group B. Which group do you think will provide her with the best and most reliable outcome and opinion?
Site sources if needed.