Category: Research methods

  • Title: Investigating the Effects of Mindfulness-Based Interventions on Stress and Anxiety in College Students: A Mixed Methods Study

    Compile previous assignments and incorporate previous feedback into a final APA formatted written research proposal.
    The final proposal should include all of the following:
    a title page,
    an abstract (new!),
    an introduction,
    a literature review,
    a proposed study section,
    a proposed method,
    a newly added limitations or future directions section where students will briefly discuss limitations associated with the selected methodology and how future research could address it (approximately one new page),
    a reference list,
    appendices (as needed depending on method). 
    Your final paper should include at least 10 peer-reviewed publications in the reference list

  • Title: “Evaluating the Effectiveness of a High School Vocational Education Program: A Correlational Study of Recent Graduates”

    Scenario: The superintendent of a large school district wants an answer to this question: “How effective is the district’s high school vocational education program in helping students gain meaningful employment after graduation?” The superintendent thinks that a relatively cost-effective way of addressing this question is to conduct a questionnaire-based survey of recent graduates of the program, with specific items related to the following topics:
    Graduates’ satisfaction with their overall technical and other vocational training in the program
    The relative importance of various educational activities included in the program, as perceived by graduates
    Graduates’ satisfaction with the career guidance counseling they received while in the program
    The various educational and career opportunities that graduates explored and pursued after they finished the program
    Question: How might the school district’s survey also take the form of a correlational study? What particular advantages might such a research design have?

  • Refining Research Questions in Organizational Development and Leadership

    My Discipline: Organizational development and leadership
    Prior to beginning work on this assignment,
    Review “Prologue: Planning Your Project—An Overview,” Chapter 3, and Chapter 4 in The Craft of Research.
    Review The Ultimate Cheatsheet for Critical Thinking.
    In this assignment, you will refine your general topic to distill specific, researchable questions.
    Long description
    Choose a broad topic from your discipline that interests you. In your paper,
    Summarize existing information on this topic.
    Discuss who, what, when, where, how, and why, as well as context and other questions suggested by your sources in order to develop your focus.
    Refer to the Writing Center’s Narrowing Topic and Developing a Research Question resource for additional guidance.
    Present a list of at least 10 specific and distinct questions about your topic.
    Evaluate each of the questions you have developed. In your evaluation, address the following questions.
    Does the existing literature address each of these questions?
    Which is most significant and why?
    How will the answer to this question solve a practical or conceptual problem?
    The Refining Research Questions paper
    must be five to seven double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA Styleas outlined in the Writing Center’s APA Formatting for Microsoft Word resource.
    must include a separate title page with the following in title case:
    title of paper in bold font
    space should appear between the title and the rest of the information on the title page.
    student’s name
    name of institution (The University of Arizona Global Campus)
    course name and number
    instructor’s name
    due date
    must utilize academic voice.
    See the Academic Voice resource for additional guidance.
    must include an introduction and conclusion paragraph.
    Your introduction paragraph needs to end with a clear thesis statement that indicates the purpose of your paper.
    For assistance on writing Introductions & Conclusions and Writing a Thesis Statement, refer to the Writing Center resources.
    must use at least 10 peer-reviewed sources in addition to the course text.
    The Scholarly, Peer-Reviewed, and Other Credible Sources table offers additional guidance on appropriate source types. If you have questions about whether a specific source is appropriate for this assignment, please contact your instructor. Your instructor has the final say about the appropriateness of a specific source.
    To assist you in completing the research required for this assignment, view Quick and Easy Library Researchtutorial, which introduces the University of Arizona Global Campus Library and the research process, and provides some library search tips.
    must document any information used from sources in APA Style as outlined in the Writing Center’s APA: Citing Within Your Paper guide.
    must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA Style as outlined in the Writing Center.
    See the APA: Formatting Your References List resource in the Writing Center for specifications.

  • “Midterm Exam Review: A Comprehensive Analysis of Research Methods in Psychology and Sociology”

    REVIEW
    Jhangiani Chapters 1,2,35and6 

    Cover


    Blackstone Chapters 4,6 and 10 
    https://saylordotorg.github.io/text_principles-of-sociological-inquiry-qualitative-and-quantitative-methods/
    This midterm exam is comprised of 42 questions including multiple choice and (some) true/false questions. Each questions is worth .5 pts., therefore you have an opportunity to gain 1 bonus point if you answer all correctly. Be sure to prepare before you open the exam. The exam must be completed in one sitting.  Questions appear in random order.
    You will have 75 minutes to take this exam. Please note that it is important to begin the exam well before the exam closes (and at least 75 minutes before the close date/time). If you time-out, your score will be determined based on whatever you finished. You must take the exam in one sitting. If there is a technical difficulty with the exam, please screen shot the message on the screen and email your instructor immediately for further guidance. It is up to you to ensure that you have a secure connection when you take the exam. 

  • Neighborhood Exploration and Research: A Walk, a Story, and an Annotated Bibliography

    Disucssion 1: Neighborhood Walk (300 – 500 word writing assignment) Take a half hour walk around your neighborhood. Write a two page narrative about the walk indicating things you noticed for the first time and things that are familiar to you. Indicate your impressions and feelings about this neighborhood, the people, and the social environment.
    Discussion 2: Listen to the Man on the Mountain audio clip. I it about an hour long, so be prepared to take notes while listening.
    Using OER* sources, interpret as best you can the Man on the Mountain Metaphorical Story describing the process, elements, and methodologies of research (i.e. cases, research question, research field, theoretical background, quantitative and qualitative methodologies(jotting, measuring, dependent and independent variables, participant observation, counting, mapping), reporting (articles and journals), longitudinal research, interdisciplinary research. Note the connection of “water” as the theoretical stream leading from the mountain, to lakes, to rivers, to the ‘ocean of research’.
    You created a list in class of several terms integral top research. Using th OER* to understand the terms, indicate elements of the story that “fit” the words.
    And, in the end, create your own ending to the story and post it here.
    Discussion 3:Annotated Bibliography (written form in APA format, as presented in class and sample)Based on a theoretical stream that relates to your social question and research field, annotate five journal articles, with each annotation includinga.
    a.brief summary of the article
    b. how this relates to your specific theoretical stream
    It should about 150 – 200 words per journal article.

  • Title: Critical Analysis of Research Methods and Findings in “The Effects of Social Media on Mental Health” “Assessing Article Credibility and APA Usage: A Grading Rubric for Academic Writing”

    Article below pdf
    and Assignment instructions docx
    can be 3-5 pages (reference page seperate)
    RUBRIC NO DIRECT QUOTES ALLOWED
    Type of claim
    8 pts
    Full Marks
    Indicates type of claim. Explains why.
    6 pts
    most
    4 pts
    Half Marks
    2 pts
    some
    0 pts
    No Marks
    8 pts
    2. Research method
    8 pts
    Full Marks
    Indicates method. Explains why.
    6 pts
    most
    4 pts
    Half Marks
    2 pts
    some
    0 pts
    No Marks
    8 pts
    3. Hypothesis/Hypotheses
    8 pts
    Full Marks
    Specifies each relevant hypothesis.
    6 pts
    most
    4 pts
    Half Marks
    2 pts
    some
    0 pts
    No Marks
    8 pts
    4. Independent variable(s)
    8 pts
    Full Marks
    Specifies conceptual IV(s). Describes operationalization.
    6 pts
    most
    4 pts
    Half Marks
    2 pts
    some
    0 pts
    No Marks
    8 pts
    5. Dependent variable(s)
    8 pts
    Full Marks
    Specifies conceptual DV(s). Describes operationalization.
    6 pts
    most
    4 pts
    Half Marks
    2 pts
    some
    0 pts
    No Marks
    8 pts
    6. Participants
    8 pts
    Full Marks
    Mentions relevant sample characteristics if available. Indicates how participants were recruited. Specifies final N.
    6 pts
    most
    4 pts
    Half Marks
    2 pts
    some
    0 pts
    No Marks
    8 pts
    7. Procedure
    8 pts
    Full Marks
    Mentions what participants did and how. Indicated if there are any differences in tasks.
    6 pts
    most
    4 pts
    Half Marks
    2 pts
    some
    0 pts
    No Marks
    8 pts
    8. Main results
    8 pts
    Full Marks
    Restates relevant hypotheses. Describes results for each. Indicates if each were supported or not. Summarizes conclusions made by the author(s).
    6 pts
    most
    4 pts
    Half Marks
    2 pts
    some
    0 pts
    No Marks
    8 pts
    9. Reliability
    8 pts
    Full Marks
    Indicates if any type of reliability mentioned in article. Specifies any test/measure of such. (If not available, indicates what would be appropriate.)
    6 pts
    most
    4 pts
    Half Marks
    2 pts
    some
    0 pts
    No Marks
    8 pts
    10. Construct validity
    8 pts
    Full Marks
    Says whether construct validity strong or weak. Justifies why.
    6 pts
    most
    4 pts
    Half Marks
    2 pts
    some
    0 pts
    No Marks
    8 pts
    11. External validity
    6 pts
    Full Marks
    Says whether external validity is strong or weak. Justifies why.
    3 pts
    Half Marks
    0 pts
    No Marks
    6 pts
    12. Covariance
    4 pts
    Full Marks
    Says if covariance was established. Justifies why.
    2 pts
    Half Marks
    0 pts
    No Marks
    4 pts
    13. Temporal precedence
    4 pts
    Full Marks
    Says if temporal precedence was established. Justifies why.
    2 pts
    Half Marks
    0 pts
    No Marks
    4 pts
    14. Third-variable problem
    8 pts
    Full Marks
    Says if third-variable problem is present. If yes, provides a possible third variable. Justifies why.
    6 pts
    most
    4 pts
    Half Marks
    2 pts
    some
    0 pts
    No Marks
    8 pts
    15. Conclusions by author(s)
    8 pts
    Full Marks
    Says if author conclusions match their research method. Justifies why.
    6 pts
    most
    4 pts
    Half Marks
    2 pts
    some
    0 pts
    No Marks
    8 pts
    16. Improvements
    8 pts
    Full Marks
    Proposes two improvements. Explains how each would resolve issues with the research based on answers to previous questions.
    6 pts
    most
    4 pts
    Half Marks
    2 pts
    some
    0 pts
    No Marks
    8 pts
    7.1.a Summary of source 1
    2 pts
    Full Marks
    Summary of article’s thesis. Says whether article supports/refutes claim.
    1 pts
    half
    0 pts
    No Marks
    2 pts
    17.1.b Credibility of source 1
    2 pts
    Full Marks
    Statement of article’s credibility (yes or no). Correct explanation of why.
    1 pts
    Half Marks
    Missing either statement of article’s credibility (yes or no) or correct explanation of why.
    0 pts
    No Marks
    2 pts
    7.2.a Summary of source 2
    2 pts
    Full Marks
    Summary of article’s thesis. Says whether article supports/refutes claim.
    1 pts
    Half Marks
    Missing either summary or statement of support/refutation.
    0 pts
    No Marks
    2 pts
    17.2.b Credibility of source 2
    2 pts
    Full Marks
    Statement of article’s credibility (yes or no). Correct explanation of why.
    1 pts
    Half Marks
    Missing either statement of article’s credibility (yes or no) or correct explanation of why.
    0 pts
    No Marks
    2 pts
    17.3.a Summary of source 3
    2 pts
    Full Marks
    Summary of article’s thesis. Says whether article supports/refutes claim.
    1 pts
    Half Marks
    Missing either summary or statement of support/refutation.
    0 pts
    No Marks
    2 pts
    17.3.b Credibility of source 3
    2 pts
    Full Marks
    Statement of article’s credibility (yes or no). Correct explanation of why.
    1 pts
    Half Marks
    Missing either statement of article’s credibility (yes or no) or correct explanation of why.
    0 pts
    No Marks
    2 pts
    18. APA
    10 pts
    Full Marks
    Correctly uses citations in text and reference section
    7.5 pts
    most
    5 pts
    Half marks
    Uses citations but incorrectly in text or in references
    2.5 pts
    some
    0 pts
    No Marks
    0 citations used when needed
    10 pts
    19. Grammar and punctuation are used correctly
    5 pts
    Full Marks
    Little to no mistakes in grammar or spelling
    2.5 pts
    Half marks
    Some mistakes; sentence fragments; errors in agreement in number between subject and verb
    0 pts
    No Marks
    Over 5 mistakes
    5 pts
    20. Writing is clear: positions are clearly stated and supported with data or logic

  • “Identifying and Addressing Internal Validity Issues in a Factorial Design Study”

    RUBRIC
    Correctly identifies a study with an internal validity issue
    2.5 pts
    Full Marks
    0 pts
    No Marks
    2.5 pts
    Provides way to handle the internal validity issue
    2.5 pts
    Full Marks
    0 pts
    No Marks
    2.5 pts
    Correctly identifies the other study with an internal validity issue
    2.5 pts
    Full Marks
    0 pts
    No Marks
    2.5 pts
    Provides way to handle second internal validity issue
    2.5 pts
    Full Marks
    0 pts
    No Marks
    2.5 pts
    Identifies Factorial Design Scenario 1
    1 pts
    Full Marks
    0 pts
    No Marks
    1 pts
    Lists two research questions
    2 pts
    Full Marks
    0 pts
    No Marks
    2 pts
    Interprets 3 Graphs
    3 pts
    Full Marks
    0 pts
    No Marks
    3 pts
    Scenario 2 Design Notation
    1 pts
    Full Marks
    0 pts
    No Marks
    1 pts
    Interprets 2 Graphs

  • Title: “Exploring the Impact of Social Media on Mental Health: An Analysis of Current Research and Recommendations for Responsible Usage”

    Please see the attached instructions, template and rubric. Also more can be added onto what you have already created. 

  • “Review of Research Methods in Psychology and Sociology”

    REVIEW
    Jhangiani Chapters 1,2,35and6 https://kpu.pressbooks.pub/psychmethods4e/
    Blackstone Chapters 4,6 and 10 https://saylordotorg.github.io/text_principles-of-sociological-inquiry-qualitative-and-quantitative-methods/
    This midterm exam is comprised of 42 questions including multiple choice and (some) true/false questions. Each questions is worth .5 pts., therefore you have an opportunity to gain 1 bonus point if you answer all correctly. Be sure to prepare before you open the exam. The exam must be completed in one sitting.  Questions appear in random order.
    You will have 75 minutes to take this exam. Please note that it is important to begin the exam well before the exam closes (and at least 75 minutes before the close date/time). If you time-out, your score will be determined based on whatever you finished. You must take the exam in one sitting. If there is a technical difficulty with the exam, please screen shot the message on the screen and email your instructor immediately for further guidance. It is up to you to ensure that you have a secure connection when you take the exam.