Category: Public administration

Please read the case analysis “Corrosive Culture in the Veterans Health Administration” at the end of Chapter 9. Answer the following questions:
What are the roots of culture and the organizational commitments in the VA health system? What dimensions of structure are important for understanding the work of the VA health system? How do the structure and culture dimensions interact? What public service values, ethics, and motives are evident among VA health system employees? Is it possible to change the culture of the VA health system? If the reforms Nabors suggests are implemented, what would be the effects on culture?
Review the Veterans Access, Choice, and Accountability Act of 2014. Identify structural changes that would influence culture or would be influenced by culture. Do you recommend any additional reforms? What are they, and why do you recommend them?

“Each student will develop a program proposal which could be submitted to a grantor as part of a grant application.  To assist in devleoping your learning in crafting a grant proposal, students will complete the following five assignments.”
This is the second assignment:
Market and Customers Analysis & Description of Proposed Program
Students will conduct a market and customer analysi along with descriping the core needs the grant funds.
Included in the Market and Customer Analysis should  be the current population served including socioeconomic status, ethnicity, gender, age, and geographic location
Included in the Descrption of the Proposed Program should be a statement of need for the program and a description of how the funds from the grant will address that need.

In the “Overview of Evaluation” assignment, you will be asked to upload 3-4 pages response on “Why Evaluation Matter?”.
Use the links and chapter pdf for resources. 
Instructions
Use Microsoft Word to response the assignment. You can also save it in pdf (optional). Maximum 4 pages response.
Font size 12 with Times New Romans.
Once you have read all the materials and watch the videos that you feel you can write your response in Microsoft Word, then do the following:
Main Question
Explain in a great detail by using empirical examples to discuss why Evaluation Matter? Why program Evaluation Matter to public administration? Remember to add to your discussion program life cycle and why a program should be associated with the organization’s mission?
Click on The Following URL Links Below to Watch To Attempt Assignment#1
Why and how Evaluation Matters?Links to an external site.
Why does Independent Evaluation Matter?Links to an external site.
Why Evaluation Matters?-2Links to an external site.
Why Evaluation Matters?-3Links to an external site.
What is program evaluation?Links to an external site.
What is a program?Links to an external site.
Links


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zzSPsh6ns0U

What should be included in the Report? 
You will need to demonstrate:
1. An awareness of the major theoretical approaches to sustainability and their implications for urban development analysis.
2. An understanding of the constraints and possibilities of the current framework. 
3. An understanding of the similarities and differences between different areas of sustainable development policy in different countries. 
4. A critical evaluation the Hong Kong’s current situation, for example: what are the recent new developments; comments on the current practices? Government’s policies towards sustainable development etc. 
5. Some international illustrations/experiences or comparisons for the chosen topic. 
6. An appreciation of the opportunities and lessons learned in this project. In addition, any suggestions to improve sustainable development practices in Hong Kong?
This assignment is designed to assess the following learning outcomes:
1. Discern how social, economic, and political pressures for urban change demand careful government plan and management of the urban environment.
2. Explain the evolution and present focus on urban policy (i.e., sustainable development) and consider its effectiveness.
3. Debate policy effectiveness in urban housing, community building, economic development, regeneration and sustainability.

Please follow instructions to its entirety along with following the template. This is a doctoral assignment, therefore I am requesting that you follow APA guidelines along with properly sourcing scholarly academic articles. (all English sources) moreover, this is a Christian based institution, please mirror a biblical prospective on Christianity.

Overview:
Although Yin and Stake base their approaches to case studies on a constructivist paradigm
(researcher and participant are in close collaboration), they offer different definitions and
approaches.
Define case study qualitative research design, what are the Yin and Stake approaches, and which
one do you think should be used in public administration?
As doctoral students, your assignments are expected to follow the principles of high-quality
scientific standards and promote knowledge and understanding in the field of public
administration. You should apply a rigorous and critical assessment of a body of theory and
empirical research, articulating what is known about the phenomenon and ways to advance
research about the topic under review. Research syntheses should identify significant variables, a
systematic and reproducible search strategy, and a clear framework for studies included in the
larger analysis. Your writing should be scholarly and avoid irrelevant facts. 
Cite only literature and theory pertinent to the specific issue and not those that are of only
tangential or general significance. When summarizing earlier works, avoid nonessential details;
instead, emphasize pertinent findings, relevant methodological issues, and major conclusions.
Citation of relevant earlier literature is a sign of scholarly responsibility and it is critical for the
growth of a doctoral student in public administration. 
Manuscripts should not be written in first person (“I”). All material should be 12-point, Times
New Roman type, double-spaced with margins of one inch. 
All manuscripts should be written clearly and concisely. Please do not use jargon, slang, idioms,
colloquialisms, or bureaucratese. Use acronyms sparingly and spell them out the first time you
use them. Please do not construct acronyms from phrases you repeat frequently in the text.
Instructions:
Items to include are outlined as follows: 
• Headings should be included and must conform to the content categories mentioned
above. Use sections and section titles. Begin with an introduction section and end with a
conclusion section. 
• All ideas must be supported with sound reason and citations from the required readings
and presentations for the module, and additional research. Use 10 peer reviewed sources
including required readings and presentations. No business sources; use public
administration sources. 
• All cites/references must be from peer-reviewed journal articles, dissertations, textbooks,
and government documents. No blogs, Wikipedia, encyclopedias, dictionaries, or non-
peer reviewed websites or other sources should be used. 
• Integrate biblical principles within the analysis of the paper.
• Documents should be double-spaced, 8 to 10-pages (not including references and title
page), and in APA current edition format including any cites and references. 
Read:
(Chapter 10) Lune, Howard, & Berg, Bruce L. (2017). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (9th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education. ISBN: 9780134202136
On Doctoral Student Development: Exploring Faculty Mentoring in the Shaping of African American Doctoral Student Success
Connections and Collaborations of Local Water Management Organizations of Utah
Watch:
https://youtu.be/4S_xiW_vwWM?si=RQMZT_m_A0iKLdkl
https://cdnapisec.kaltura.com/index.php/extwidget/preview/partner_id/2167581/uiconf_id/39959791/entry_id/1_1f2363bm/embed/dynamic
https://cdnapisec.kaltura.com/index.php/extwidget/preview/partner_id/2167581/uiconf_id/39959791/entry_id/1_a4llebjs/embed/dynamic
https://cdnapisec.kaltura.com/index.php/extwidget/preview/partner_id/2167581/uiconf_id/39959791/entry_id/1_a2zobk8r/embed/dynamic

Your final research paper will be based
on a topic of your choice. You may use some of the readings assigned in the
class and expand on a particular topic.
In order to complete this task, you will need to write the first half of your
final paper. To be successful, a minimum of five (5) pages of substantive
content for your final paper must be submitted in APA format.
Research paper topic: Organizational
Culture

Review:
Review the rubric for this assignment below.
Review the Example Capstone Literature Review.Download Example Capstone Literature Review.
Research: Conduct a review of peer-reviewed academic research (the literature) that relates to your policy issue. You will need to include at least 8 academic peer-reviewed journal articles in this submission. The sources you include should demonstrate you have synthesized a critical mass of scholarly research. The peer-reviewed articles you submitted in Literature Review Prep can (and should) be part of this submission, if appropriate. Analyze and synthesize all of your sources to identify the current state of knowledge on issues related to your policy.
Consider key themes, major debates, gaps, overlaps, and areas where further research is needed.
Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of existing studies.
Identify the research findings from each study.
Tip: Use Franklin’s LibraryLinks to an external site. for your research. Consider visiting the Franklin MPA LibguideLinks to an external site. for a list of public administration academic journals. You are also encouraged to use:
Google Scholar Button:Links to an external site. Install the Scholar button to look up papers as you browse research.
Libkey Nomad:Links to an external site. LibKey Nomad is a browser plugin you can use to access scholarly articles you find on publisher websites for free using your Franklin University Library account.
Unpaywall:Links to an external site. This site collects Open Access content from publishers and repositories, making it easier for you to find articles. Download the browser extension to find articles as you browse.
Compose: Draft your submission using the subheadings below.
Title Page: Include an APA-formatted title page with an updated version of your working title.
Introduction:
Begin with a mini-introduction paragraph that serves as a roadmap for your literature review.
Outline the structure you are using, subtopics, categories of research perspectives, and/or themes that you will cover.
Include the high-level insights you have noticed about the research you’ve discovered.
Finally, address what will not be included in your literature review to establish boundaries for your work.
Suggestion: Write the introduction after you completed writing the literature review.
Literature Review: Organize your academic journal articles by category or theme.
Use a subheading to identify each theme.
Within each theme, present research articles chronologically by publication date.
Present the progression of the research as you would recounting a conversation among scholars.
Summarize the studies, highlight the research findings, point to where scholars agree and disagree, and mention what areas have yet to be explored.
Conclusion: Summarize your high-level insights about the current state of knowledge on your chosen policy issue.
References: Include all and only the sources you used to inform your writing. Must be in APA format. Use the APA Resources provided above
Polish:
Word Count: Your submission should fall between 1500 to 3500 words, including the title page and References. Be sure you adhere to this word count.
Format: Papers must conform to American Psychological Association (APA)Links to an external site. formatting standards. Use the APA Resources provided above.
Editing and Flow: Your submission should reflect a careful editing process and demonstrate your best graduate-level writing and critical analysis. Sections should be woven together in a logical and cohesive way using topic sentences, fully developed paragraphs, transition sentences, and properly formatted subheadings.
Turnitin: Submit the completed first draft of your Word document. Your work will automatically be checked by Turnitin. Access your Turnitin report by reviewing your Submission Details for this assignment. Revise your work if needed based on the feedback.
Submit: By the due date indicated, submit the final version of your work.

InstructionSheet:Chapter1-Introduction/ProblemStatement Objective: The purpose of this instruction sheet is to guide you in writing an effective introduction and problem statement for your Master′s thesis in Public Administration. This chapter sets the stage for your research by providing an overview of the problem, its significance, and the research question you aim to address. Instructions: 1. Contextualize the Problem: • Begin by providing background information on the broader context in which the problem exists. Explain why it is important to study this problem within the field of Public Administration. • Identify any key trends, events, or policy changes that have contributed to the emergence or relevance of the problem. 2. Define the Problem: • Clearly define the specific problem or research question your thesis aims to address. Be precise and concise in formulating the problem statement. • Consider using statistics, data, or real-world examples to illustrate the significance and urgency of the problem. 3. Significance of the Problem: • Discuss why it is essential to investigate this problem. Explain its potential impact on public administration theory, practice, or policymaking. • Highlight any gaps in existing knowledge or previous research that your study aims to fill. 4. Research Objectives: • Clearly state the main objectives of your research. These objectives should align with the problem statement and guide your study. • Outline the specific questions you seek to answer or the hypotheses you aim to test. 5. Scope and Limitations: • Define the boundaries and scope of your research. Explain what aspects of the problem you will focus on and what aspects you will exclude. • Discuss any potential limitations or challenges that may affect the validity or generalizability of your findings. 6 6. Structure of the Thesis: • Provide an overview of how your thesis is organized. Briefly describe the subsequent chapters and explain how they contribute to addressing the research problem. 7. Referencing: • Throughout the introduction, include references to relevant literature, theories, or empirical studies to support your statements and provide context. • Use proper citation and referencing techniques following the APA style guide. Remember, the introduction and problem statement should capture the reader′s attention, provide a clear understanding of the problem, and justify the importance of your research. The chapter should be well-structured, concise, and supported by relevant sources. 7 4. InstructionSheet: Chapter2-Background Objective: The purpose of this instruction sheet is to guide you in writing an effective background chapter for your Master′s thesis in Public Administration. The background chapter provides a comprehensive overview of the historical context, the policy under analysis (in the case of policy analysis), or a thorough presentation of the research problem without overlapping the literature review that follows. Instructions: 1. Historical Context: • If you choose to focus on the historical context, provide a detailed account of the historical developments, events, and factors that are relevant to your research topic. • Discuss the historical evolution of the problem, policy, or phenomenon you are studying within the field of Public Administration. • Analyze the historical trends, changes, or reforms that have influenced the development of the topic and its current significance. 2. Policy Analysis (if applicable): • If you choose to analyze a specific policy, provide a comprehensive overview of the policy itself. Explain its objectives, scope, implementation, and impact. • Identify the key stakeholders, institutions, and actors involved in the policy- making process. • Discuss the historical background and rationale behind the policy, including any major policy shifts, reforms, or controversies associated with it. • Analyze the policy′s intended goals and assess its effectiveness in achieving them. 3. In-depth Presentation of the Research Problem: • If you choose to present an in-depth analysis of the research problem, provide a comprehensive overview of the problem′s context, scope, and significance. • Clearly define the research problem and explain why it is important to study it within the field of Public Administration. • Identify the key factors, trends, or challenges associated with the research problem and discuss their implications. 8 4. Conceptual Framework • If you have developed a conceptual framework, briefly introduce it in this chapter. Provide an overview of the main concepts, variables, and relationships within the framework. • Explain how the conceptual framework aligns with the research problem and contributes to understanding it. • However, avoid providing an in-depth discussion of the conceptual framework, as it will be covered in detail in a separate chapter. 5. Referencing: • Throughout the chapter, include references to relevant literature, historical documents, policy documents, or scholarly sources to support your statements and provide context. • Use proper citation and referencing techniques following the APA style guide. Remember, the background chapter sets the stage for your research by providing the necessary context and understanding of the historical developments, policy under analysis, or the research problem itself. Choose one of the three approaches based on your research focus. Present a well-structured, concise, and supported chapter that provides the necessary background information to comprehend the significance and relevance of your study in the field of Public Administration 3. bjective: The purpose of this instruction sheet is to guide you in developing the methodology chapter for your Master′s thesis in Public Administration. The focus will be on using a qualitative analysis approach with secondary data. You will present your methodology for source identification in the scientific literature in a transparent manner, including the specific search engines used and how they were employed. Additionally, you will outline your process of paring down or narrowing down, which involves applying criteria and filters to reduce the number of articles for analysis. You will also address the selection criteria for non-scientific sources, clearly listing them separately as they should be limited in number. Finally, you will include a paragraph identifying the themes that will serve as headers in the literature review chapter and emphasize the use of sources to inform readers about the state-of-the-art methods employed in qualitative analysis of secondary data. Ensure the methodology chapter explains the analytical strategies involved in analyzing secondary data qualitatively.

Case Discussion Questions 1 
Which aspects of Deloitte’s new performance management system do you find most radical?
If you were a manager at Deloitte, how would you have reacted to such a system? Would your answer change if you were an employee?
What are your thoughts regarding measuring performance with four simple questions? Do you think these are the right questions? How would you know if a particular question is effective?
How would you motivate managers to conduct frequent check-in meetings with employees? How would you counter the argument that these meetings take a lot of time?
How transparent is this system? Do you think Deloitte’s decision not to share individual ratings with employees is warranted?
Click to learn more …
Read the Deloitte University Press report titled “Performance Management Is Broken: Replace ‘Rank and Yank’ With Coaching and Development.”
https://dupress.deloitte.com/dup-us-en/focus/human-capital-trends/2014/hc-trends-2014-performance-management.html 
Case Discussion Questions 2 
Exercise 10.2: Creating a Retention Management System
You are working at Shek, Inc., an organization providing private and group surfing and scuba diving lessons, adventure tours, and rental services to tourists in Hawaii. Your company has around 200 employees consisting of instructors, sales, marketing, and office personnel. The company has an annual turnover rate of 80%, which you suspect is too high.
Questions
How would you assess why employees are leaving? After you choose your method of measurement (survey, interviews), develop questions to include in your instrument. How would you analyze the data to identify the top reasons for employee departures?
Let’s assume that you found out the following top three reasons for turnover in this company:
Management is very authoritarian and not supportive of employees.
Employee schedules vary a lot and often are announced with very short notice.
Employees feel they are working all the time with little downtime.
Case Discussion Questions 3 
Exercise 11.2: Conducting a Market Review
A video game company named Zenyah with 8,000 employees recently hired your consulting firm to develop a more externally equitable pay structure. Zenyah began as a start-up 10 years ago and has grown very rapidly ever since. Lately, the company has been having difficulty recruiting and selecting talented candidates for key software development, marketing, and sales jobs, which is likely due to the external labor shortage for individuals qualified for those jobs. As such, Zenyah has asked your consulting firm to conduct a market review for the following benchmark jobs:
Computer programmer
Systems software developer
Applications software developer
Market research analyst
Marketing manager
Advertising sales agent
Advertising and promotions manager
Sales representative
As part of the contract, Zenyah has requested that your consulting firm conduct new job analyses on the benchmark jobs, as it suspects that the job descriptions are out of date and inaccurate. As a starting point, you decide to use O*NET (ONETonline.org) to draft initial job description summaries that you can use to compare to the job description summaries that appear in the market review sources.
Questions
Using O*NET, write three- to five-sentence job description summaries for each benchmark job.
Using Salary.com and CareerOneStop.com as free market review sources, gather pay data for as many of the benchmark jobs as you can, and enter the data into a table. Be sure to match the job description summaries you created for Zenyah with the job description summaries in the market review sources to ensure you are making an appropriate comparison.