Category: Psychology

An ethical decision-making model is a tool that can be used by professionals in psychology to help develop the ability to think through an ethical dilemma and arrive at a responsible and ethical decision. This assignment assesses your application of ethical decision-making by requiring critical thinking and analysis through your recommendations to an ethical dilemma.
Read the following scenario:
You work for a large corporation in human resources as a psychologist. In that capacity, it is your job to select and administer psychological tests that measure intelligence and cognitive ability as part of the employee selection process. The company has been hiring engineers and you notice that in the next group of prospects, many are recent immigrants from Pakistan, Korea, and India. You realize that the standardized tests you have been using do not seem to be culture-neutral and are biased toward native English speakers.
Develop an 8- to 10-slide Microsoft PowerPoint® presentation to corporate managers with detailed speaker notes on the selection process of a culture-neutral assessment. The cover and reference page is NOT counted.
Address the following questions or objectives:
Should you use different tests that are less culture-bound? 
How would you select assessments that are culture-neutral? 
What criteria would you use? What, if any, ethical issues are involved? 
How and why would using culturally biased tests be an ethical issue here? 
What does the APA Ethics Code say about the importance of culture-neutral assessment? 
Include examples of ways in which culture-biased assessments have been problematic. 
How would you select tests that are culture-neutral? 
Include examples of when culture-biased assessments have been problematic.
Explain the consequences of not following the selection process for both the client and psychologist.
Describe how the APA decision-making process facilitates more ethical professional behavior.

observe a child. identify the concept or phenomenon you think you observed. briefly describe the conditions of your observation. tell exactly what you saw and explain how the behavior you observed exemplifies the concept you identified. also note your reactions to the observations. was it what you expected? was it consistent in every way with what you learned in class? did your observation give you any additional insight? 

For this assignment, I would like you to watch a movie or episode from a series of your choice that presents a psychological disorder discussed in Chapter 14.  As you watch the video, take notes that reflect examples of the criteria/symptoms for the disorder that are represented in the movie or episode.
1. Give a short description of the psychological disorder you have chosen; include detailed information of three main signs or symptoms associated with this specific disorder. You may use your textbook or the website for the National Institutes of Mental Health as resources.
https://www.nimh.nih.gov/index.shtml (Links to an external site.)
Be sure that you use your own words for all text that is not in quotations, and that you adequately cite sources you use when referring to specific details or claims.
2. Give a short synopsis of the chosen video, including the main plot and who are the main characters. Make sure to describe why you have chosen the specific video. Please summarize the video IN YOUR OWN WORDS, not using a synopsis from the internet; this would be considered plagiarism.
3. Provide at least two examples describing in detail how the signs or symptoms for the psychological disorder (that are mentioned in step 1) are represented in the video.
Here is a list of movies that might help you in choosing, although you don’t have to stick to this list. 
Link (Links to an external site.)
Rubric:
Accurate description of the disorder you’re choosing (5 points)
Synopsis of video with pertinent info as it relates to the disorder (5 points) 
Examples of how the disorder’s symptoms are represented in the movie/series (5 points)
Submitted on time via canvas (5 points) 
Proper references/citations (5 points) 

INSTRUCTIONS
Introduction: This final paper invites you to delve into a specific aspect of lifespan development and analyze its portrayal in popular media, empirical research, and review articles. By comparing and contrasting these sources, you’ll gain insight into the application of developmental theories and their depiction in real-world contexts.
Instructions:
Choose a Topic: Select a focused topic within lifespan development that interests you. For instance, you might explore “Adolescent Identity Formation” or “The Impact of Parenting Styles on Child Behavior.”
Find Articles: Locate: one popular media article, one empirical research article, and one review article related to your chosen topic (3 in total), and your book Bio (chapter), Psychosocial, (chapter), and Cognitive (chatper). Ensure that each article offers comprehensive insights and analysis.
Find one popular media article, one empirical research article, and one review article that all focus on your chosen topic.
Ensure that the empirical research article presents original research findings and includes a clear methodology section.
Summarize and review the 3 chapters related to the developmental time period in your paper. Highlight majoy concepts themes and definitions
The review article should provide a synthesis of existing research and theoretical perspectives related to the chosen topic.
Paper Structure:
Write a paper that includes the following sections:
Introduction
Literature Review (divided into subsections for each article and textbook)
Comparison and Analysis
Real-Life Examples
Conclusion
References
Content Guidelines:
In the literature review section, provide a summary of each article, including the specific developmental time period discussed, methodology used (for the empirical research article), and key findings.
Compare and contrast the findings, conclusions, and theoretical perspectives presented in each article.
Include real-life examples related to the chosen topic and analyze how they align with or diverge from the findings and theories discussed in the literature review.
Formatting Requirements:
Your paper should be written in APA style, including proper citations and a reference list. Review at Purdue Owl or the Writing Center
Use clear and concise language, and ensure that your paper is well-organized and free of grammatical errors.
Comparison:
Content: Summarize the main arguments, findings, and methodologies of each article. Analyze how the topic is addressed and discussed in different contexts.
Theoretical Perspectives: Compare the portrayal of developmental theories in the popular media, empirical research, and review articles. Consider how each source emphasizes theories such as Erikson’s Psychosocial Development, Piaget’s Cognitive Development, or Bronfenbrenner’s Ecological Systems Theory.
Accuracy and Depth: Evaluate the accuracy and depth of information provided in each source. Assess whether the popular media article oversimplifies or misrepresents developmental theories compared to the empirical research and review articles.
Relevance: Determine the relevance and applicability of the information presented in each article to real-life developmental processes and outcomes.
Identify Developmental Time Period: Specify the developmental time period relevant to your topic (e.g., adolescence, early childhood). Highlight major theorists associated with this period and their perspectives on the topic. For example, in exploring adolescent identity formation, discuss Erikson’s theory of Identity vs. Role Confusion, Freud’s Psychosocial Development, and Kohlberg’s Moral Development. Compare and contrast the articles to the theory. Students must compare 3 theories.
Provide Real-Life Examples: Describe real-life examples or scenarios that illustrate the concepts discussed in the articles. Relate these examples to the developmental theories presented, demonstrating how they manifest in everyday experiences.
Conclusion: Summarize your findings, emphasizing the importance of critically analyzing information about developmental processes from various sources. Reflect on the significance of understanding developmental theories and their implications for real-world contexts.
Topic Selection:
Choose a specific topic related to lifespan development. You may select from the provided list of topics or propose your own, subject to approval by the instructor.
Suggested outline:
Introduction
Brief overview of the chosen topic and its significance in lifespan development.
Explanation of the purpose of the paper: to compare and contrast a popular media article, an empirical research article, and a review article on the same topic and your book (bio, psychosocial, and cognitive chapters)
Thesis statement highlighting the importance of integrating findings from different sources to gain a comprehensive understanding of the topic.
Literature Review
A. Overview of the Popular Media Article
Summary of the main points and findings presented in the popular media article.
Identification of the specific developmental time period discussed in the article.
Discussion of any real-life examples or case studies provided.
Empirical Research Article Analysis
Summary of the selected empirical research article.
Identification of the specific developmental time period studied in the research.
Examination of the research methodology, including sample size, design, and data analysis.
Discussion of the key findings and their implications for lifespan development.
Review Article Analysis
Summary of the chosen review article.
Overview of the developmental theories and perspectives discussed in the review article. GO INDEPTH HERE AND COMPARE TO YOUR MEDIA ARTICLE
Identification of major theorists (e.g., Piaget, Erikson, Vygotsky) and their contributions to understanding the chosen topic.
Discussion of how the review article synthesizes existing research and its implications for understanding lifespan development.
Comparison and Analysis
Comparison of the findings, conclusions, and theoretical perspectives presented in the popular media article, empirical research article, and review article.
Analysis of any discrepancies or similarities between the three sources.
Why do you believe one over the other? What does your book say?
Evaluation of the strengths and limitations of each source in contributing to the understanding of the chosen topic.
Real-Life Examples
Identification, definition, and description of real-life examples related to the chosen topic.
Analysis of how these real-life examples align with or diverge from the findings and theories discussed in the literature review.
Conclusion
Summary of the main findings and arguments presented in the paper.
Reflection on the significance of integrating findings from different sources to gain a comprehensive understanding of lifespan development.
Suggestions for future research directions or implications for practice in the field of developmental psychology.
References
Proper citation of all sources used in the paper, following APA style guidelines.

Outstanding (90-100 points)
______A thorough and accurate account of the topic of study and includes a
comprehensive description of what is known to be true and also supplies less commonly
known information that has relevance, identifies important issues or contradictions and
misconceptions, and provides a logical and well-developed explanation of the research
methodology which reflects complex thinking as well as thoughtful attention to details.
______Uses comprehensive information gathering techniques to identify both common
and little known information resources, analyzes and interprets information accurately,
insightfully determines credibility and relevance, and provides a highly creative and
unique synthesis of the information.
______Reflects appropriate form and style (APA) while meeting quality standards for
publication.
______Writing demonstrates high quality by utilizing complex mechanics and syntax that
engage and challenge the reader.
Points to be based upon following areas:
*Punctuation/Grammar Usage:
Proper use of punctuation
Agreement between subject and verb
Proper sentence structure
*Coherence/Flow:
Consistency of tense
Writing is clear, concise, uncluttered
Smooth use of transitions
Proper organization
*Format:
Proper usage (APA)
*Coverage of Content:
Thoroughness
Relevance
Accuracy

Overview
This is the first of three course assignments. This week you will select a topic related to families in a global context and prepare a short annotated bibliography. In later assignments you will expand that bibliography into a literature review, and then write a critical analysis of the topic based upon your review of the literature.
Preparation
If you have not yet done so, complete the Week 5 Prepare: Topic Selection and Annotated Bibliography activities. Then review the Advanced Studies in Human Behavior Ph.D. Library GuideLinks to an external site. for guidance on conducting research in the Capella University Library.
Instructions
This assignment has two parts.
Part 1: Topic Description
Select a topic from one of the following issues related to families in a global context:
Family violence.
Immigration and migration.
Refugee health and wellness.
Family stressors and crisis.
Health policy.
Family resource allocation.
Cultural diversity, and prevention.
Prevention and intervention.
Use current literature to inform your selection. This topic will be the focus of the literature review you will critically analyze for your Week 9 assignment. The literature review will result in a clearer understanding and refined definition of your topic.
In a few brief paragraphs, identify your topic and explain, with at least three supporting sources, how current family science literature provides a rationale for its selection.
Part 2: Annotated Bibliography
As you review the scholarly research relevant to the topic you have selected, develop an annotated bibliography to organize your sources. The Annotated Bibliography guide can help you with this part of the assignment.
In your annotated bibliography, include the following for each source, as applicable:
Source
Article or book citation.
Link (URL) for the source.
Verify that the source is peer-reviewed.
Study
Research method used in the study.
Measurement of test used in the study.
Findings
Major findings
Other findings of interest.
Questions you have.
Gaps or ideas for additional research suggested by the source.
Other notes.
You are encouraged to continue using your annotated bibliography to organize any additional articles you find to complete the assignments in this course.
Submission Requirements
To successfully complete this assignment, your assignment must meet the following requirements:
Written communication: Written communication is professional, scholarly, and free from errors that detract from the overall message.
Length: Minimum of 5 double-spaced, typed pages, excluding the title page and reference page.
Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.
Resources: Support your findings with a minimum of 8 peer-reviewed, scholarly journal references, primarily journal articles published within the last 5 years. You may include up to two authored chapters in edited, scholarly books. Textbooks do not fulfill this requirement. See How Do I Find Peer-Reviewed Articles? for help.
APA formatting: References and in-text citations are formatted according to current APA style and format. See Evidence and APALinks to an external site..
Refer to the assignment rubric to ensure that you meet all criteria. To earn full points for each criterion, be sure to note the details on what constitutes distinguished performance.
Competencies Measured
By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and rubric criteria:
Competency 1: Evaluate the research of families across multiple topics of study within a global context.
Explain, with at least three supporting sources, how current family science literature provides rationale for the selection of a topic.
Create an annotated bibliography containing at least 5 peer-reviewed scholarly sources that supports a selected topic.
Competency 2: Identify progress and growth areas in the understanding of the role of family within the context of a global community.
Summarize the major findings of peer-reviewed sources.
Competency 4: Communicate in a professional, scholarly manner.
Convey purpose in a well-organized text, incorporating appropriate evidence and tone in grammatically sound sentences.
Apply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing.
View Rubric
Week 5 Assignment – Topic Selection and Annotated Bibliography
Week 5 Assignment – Topic Selection and Annotated Bibliography
Criteria Ratings Pts
Explain, with at least three supporting sources, how current family science literature provides rationale for the selection of a topic.
52 to >44.2 pts
DISTINGUISHED
Explains, with at least three supporting sources, how current family science literature provides rationale for the selection of a topic. The rationale provided is exceptionally clear and compelling.
44.2 to >36.4 pts
PROFICIENT
Explains, with at least three supporting sources, how current family science literature provides rationale for the selection of a topic.
36.4 to >0 pts
BASIC
Explains how current family science literature provides rationale for the selection of a topic, but does not cite at least three sources to support the explanation.
0 pts
NON_PERFORMANCE
Does not explain how current family science literature provides rationale for the selection of a topic.
/ 52 pts
Create an annotated bibliography containing at least 5 peer-reviewed scholarly sources that supports a selected topic.
54 to >45.9 pts
DISTINGUISHED
Creates an annotated bibliography containing at least 5 peer-reviewed scholarly sources that supports a selected topic. The annotations are particularly detailed and relevant.
45.9 to >37.8 pts
PROFICIENT
Creates an annotated bibliography containing at least 5 peer-reviewed scholarly sources that supports a selected topic.
37.8 to >0 pts
BASIC
Creates an annotated bibliography, but it does not contain at least 5 peer-reviewed scholarly sources or the sources do not adequately support a selected topic.
0 pts
NON_PERFORMANCE
Does not create an annotated bibliography.
/ 54 pts
Summarize the major findings of peer-reviewed sources.
54 to >45.9 pts
DISTINGUISHED
Summarizes the major findings of peer-reviewed sources. Explains how these findings are relevant to a selected topic.
45.9 to >37.8 pts
PROFICIENT
Summarizes the major findings of peer-reviewed sources.
37.8 to >0 pts
BASIC
Summarizes the major findings of peer-reviewed sources, but the summary is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise flawed.
0 pts
NON_PERFORMANCE
Does not summarize the major findings of peer-reviewed sources.
/ 54 pts
Convey purpose in a well-organized text, incorporating appropriate evidence and tone in grammatically sound sentences.
20 to >17 pts
DISTINGUISHED
Conveys clear purpose in a tone and style well-suited to the intended audience. Supports assertions, arguments, and conclusions with relevant, credible, and convincing evidence. Exhibits strict and nearly flawless adherence to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards, including APA style and formatting.
17 to >14 pts
PROFICIENT
Conveys purpose in a well-organized text, incorporating appropriate evidence and tone in grammatically sound sentences.
14 to >0 pts
BASIC
Conveys purpose in an appropriate tone or style. Clear, effective communication is inhibited by insufficient supporting evidence and/or minimal adherence to applicable writing standards.
0 pts
NON_PERFORMANCE
Does not convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and writing scholarly standards.
/ 20 pts
Apply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing.
20 to >17 pts
DISTINGUISHED
Applies APA style and formatting to scholarly writing. Exhibits strict and nearly flawless adherence to stylistic conventions, document structure, and source attributions.
17 to >14 pts
PROFICIENT
Applies APA style and formatting to scholarly writing.
14 to >0 pts
BASIC
Applies APA style and formatting to scholarly writing incorrectly and/or inconsistently, detracting noticeably from good scholarship.
0 pts
NON_PERFORMANCE
Does not apply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing.
/ 20 pts
Total Points: 0

Whether you choose to do the research paper or the creative project, a PowerPoint presentation of
your work must be submitted as well. This PowerPoint should of a quality that one would expect to see
accompanying an oral presentation. The PowerPoint should be no more than ten slides long, present your topic
clearly, and yet adhere to the standards set forth below in the grading criteria. 

*Introduction*: Briefly introduce the classic psychology experiment you’ll be presenting.
*Purpose and Methodology*: Explain the experiment’s purpose, methods, and key variables.
*Key Findings*: Summarize the main findings and their significance.
*Ethical Considerations*: Address any ethical concerns associated with the experiment.
*Replications and Critiques*: Discuss any replications, extensions, or criticisms of the study.
*Real-World Applications*: Highlight how the experiment’s findings are relevant to psychology and everyday life.

Use the Literacy-Rich Environments Checklist, linked above, as you search around the internet for many pictures of preschool classrooms (or even preschool outdoor spaces). Check off the boxes in the checklist or just keep notes as you find or don’t find items.   
Then write a standard “Summary & Reflection” (like you do for Reading Assignments) and submit it here. 
For the Summary, write about some of the interesting things you found or didn’t find.  Then, for your Reflection, write about your opinions: Which items were common? Which were not seen in pics very often? Why do you suppose this is?  What do you think would be important to include in a literacy-rich preschool classroom environment if you were the teacher?

this is the topic that I would like to do for the paper * The role of play in learning and development