Category: Political Science

Describe
the principle of stare decisis. What is stare decisis? Why is stare
decisis thought to be important? What evidence do scholars use to suggest
that stare decisis is a guiding principle, regardless of ideology? What
evidence do scholars use to claim that stare decisis only matters if
it’s compatible with a judge’s ideology? Do you think courts abide by stare
decisis? Why (not)? 

Hello, 
I have a paper that needs to be completed for my American Politics course. This paper will revolve around the following questions: 
-What are some examples where gerrymandering has led to disproportionate representation or undermined the principle of ‘one, person one vote’? 
-How does partisan gerrymandering affect electoral outcomes and the compettivness of elections?
-What are some proposed reforms, such as independent redistricting commisions or mathematical criteria for drawing istricts? How effective are these reforms in promoting fair representation and enhancing electoral integrity? 
Please make sure to include specific examples and evidence to enhance the quality of this paper. To go more in depth, consider real-world case studies or recent developments in gerrymandering and electoral reform. Utilize at least 3 sources and include in-text citations. Strive to have at least 2 pages. 
See attached for a more specific explanation of instructions. 
Thanks. 

Extract A
China has started two days of military exercises around Taiwan, with its military calling them “strong punishment” for the self-ruled island’s “separatist acts”. The drills come three days after the inauguration of President William Lai, who called on China to stop threatening the island and accept the existence of its democracy. China sees Taiwan as a breakaway province that will eventually be under Beijing’s control, but the island sees itself as distinct. Taiwan’s defence ministry condemned the Chinese drills as “irrational provocations”. Taipei dispatched naval, air, and ground forces to “defend the [island’s] sovereignty”, its defence ministry said. Thursday’s drills for the first time simulated a full-scale attack, Taiwanese military experts said, rather than an economic blockade. The exercises took place all around the main island, and for the first time also targeted the Taipei-controlled islands of Kinmen, Matsu, Wuqiu and Dongyin which lie close to the Chinese coast, according to maps released by China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA). 
Ng, Kelly, and Rupert Wingfield-Hayes. “China holds military drills around Taiwan as ‘strong punishment’.” BBC News, 23 May 2024
Using your own research and considering Extract A, explain why military conflict between the People’s Republic of China and the Republic of China in the Pacific Ocean would be a major international event. 
In your answer, you should:
structure your writing with clear organisation,
include your own research,
develop a strong viewpoint on the issue,
fully support your argument,
write with objective language.
450 words.
Please provide links to the articles/research you use, and embed quotes needed throughout the paper.

Write a very
logical, analytical, and an objective critical paper on the chosen subject: War Crimes.

Your task:
To apply two measures of democracy (by Freedom House and V-Dem) to the same country for the period 1974 to the present.
To compare the merits and demerits of the two measures both theoretically and empirically with respect to the country in question.
Maximum length of assignment: 1.500 words (everything included, except a possible appendix).
Information on the measures of the democracy can be found at:
Freedom House (https://freedomhouse.org/)
V-Dem (https://www.v-dem.net/)
Checklist for assignment:
Describe and compare the nature of the measures: Is the measure continuous (measuring degrees), dichotomous (using two categories) or trichotomous (using three categories)? With respect to your country, what are the advantages and disadvantages of using degrees versus categories? What information is gained, what information is lost? If the same measure uses both degrees and categories, how are these related? Where is the boundary drawn and how is this justified? With respect to your country, does the boundary make sense? What does it mean, for your country, to have an aggregate score of, for example, 2 on the combined political rights and civil liberties scale of Freedom House?
For Freedom House, make use of the continuous score (1-7), basic categories (free, partly free, not free), and the country’s status as electoral democracy or not (for the years available). Optional: Consider the scores for the subcategories and the points (0-100) (for the years available): What do they add to the picture in your country?
For V-Dem, work with the electoral and/or liberal democracy index.
Prepare tables or graphs for both measures of democracy over time
(possibly as appendix).
Compare the picture the two measures give of the state of democracy
and its development over time, highlighting similarities and differences.
Please make explicit use of Freedom House country reports
Check whether any differences can be explained by differences in the
definition of democracy.
Check whether any differences can be explained by differences in the
operationalization of democracy.
Check whether any differences can be explained by differences in the
sources used (What kind of information does the measure require? Does it rely on existing data or does it collect its own data? How valid and reliable are these data? How transparent is the coding process?)
Make explicit reference to Boese (2019)
Finish with a conclusion (evaluation): Which measure, according to
your informed opinion, works best for your country? Why?

Written Essay Question:
How do liberal analysts such as Michael McFaul interpret the ‘New
Cold War’ between the United States and Russia? In contrast, how do
realists such as Stephen Cohen understand the ‘New Cold War’? Make sure
to cover each author’s historical narrative or story on how US-Russia
relations evolved since the 1990s. Also, how does each side understand
the nature of Putin’s foreign policy decision-making? Is it rational or
irrational? In your view, which side makes a stronger argument? Make
sure to explain the underlying theoretical framework of each author.
Use many short quotations from the readings. Focus solely on the
course materials (i.e., no other research is required). For references,
use author names and page numbers in parentheses – for example: (Cohen,
3). Your assignment should be 2000-2500 words. Worth 30% of your final grade. Upload to Blackboard. Use of AI is prohibited. Any essays suspected of plagiarism and cheating will receive ZERO.
only use the attached materials. Do not use the outside sources.
here is the link:- use this link also to write essay   https://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-shifrinson-russia-us-nato-deal–20160530-snap-story.html

Topic:
The candidacy of Donald Trump in the 2024 U.S. presidential election has sparked a heated
debate over whether he should be allowed to run for office or be removed from the ballot under
Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, also known as the Insurrection Clause, which states that:
“No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of
President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the
United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a
member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any
State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the
Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion
against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof”.
This issue encompasses constitutional, legal, and political dimensions that warrant a
comprehensive examination to understand its implications for U.S. democracy, as well as the
potential for political violence if Trump were to be disqualified.
1. Constitutional Scrutiny: Begin by delving into the constitutional basis for considering
the disqualification of Donald Trump under the 14th Amendment. Analyze the relevant
section of the amendment that addresses insurrection and rebellion, exploring its
historical context and how it aligns with contemporary circumstances, specifically, does
the President count as an “officer” sworn to uphold the Constitution, or does the 14th
amendment not apply here, and the language used by Trump on the day of the
insurrection, as argued by the lawyers, is actually protected as free speech?
2. Implications for U.S. Democracy: Evaluate the broader implications for U.S.
democracy if Donald Trump were to be disqualified from running for president. Consider
how such an action might be perceived in terms of democratic norms, principles of
political representation, and the overall health of the democratic process. Analyze the
potential consequences for public trust in democratic institutions.
3. Potential for Political Violence: Address the sensitive issue of the potential for political
violence in the event that Donald Trump is disqualified via the 14th Amendment.
Examine historical instances of political violence in the U.S. and assess whether the
current political climate could escalate tensions. Also, while the focus has been on the
potential for violence in wake of an exclusion of Trump from the ballot, what about the
potential for violence if he is allowed to run and becomes president once again given his
highly polarizing nature? Consider the role of rhetoric, misinformation, and the
polarization of society in shaping this potential outcome.
4. Pathways to Mitigate Conflict: Conclude by exploring potential pathways to mitigate
political tensions and the risk of violence in the aftermath of a decision to disqualify
Trump. Consider strategies for fostering national unity, encouraging constructive
dialogue, and reaffirming commitment to democratic values.
The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that President Trump could not be removed from the ballot by
individual states, as it would create a potential patchwork of elections rules which vary from
state to state and throw the system into chaos as a result, and that the people should be allowed to
speak on this through their vote as opposed to the court’s ruling on the validity/fitness of one
candidate or another. The court also claimed concern for what this could mean for any future
presidential candidates who might be disliked by some should this option be “weaponized”. This
comprehensive examination of the issue provides a foundation for understanding the
complexities surrounding Donald Trump’s potential candidacy, the constitutional and legal
aspects, and the potential implications for U.S. democracy now and in the future, including the
sensitive issue of political violence.
https://www.cnn.com/2023/09/08/opinions/donald-trump-disqualified-14th-amendment-wrong-
orentlicher/index.html
https://www.politico.com/news/2024/01/26/trump-ballot-eligibility-challengers-00138118?
cid=apn
https://www.vox.com/politics/23880607/trump-14th-amendment-lawsuits-federalist-society
Other Excellent Searchable Databases for Source Material:
Heritage Foundation
https://www.heritage.org/
Cato Institute
https://www.cato.org/
Brookings Institute

Home

Paper Criteria
 Title Page: Please include a title page for your research paper. Include:
o Your name
o The title of your paper
o The course you are in (ex. GOVT 2306)
Content: 
Using at least 4 sources (Internet, and/or library resources), with a minimum of 1
source being an academic journal/article relating to the topic, address the various sides (or
positions) of the assigned issue, come up with your own personal conclusions based on your
analysis of the issue, and demonstrate an understanding of its complexities. Wikipedia and other
online encyclopedias are NOT valid sources!! 
Sources must be verifiable and
journalistically/academically sound. Excellent databases where you can often find a wealth of
information on the subject matter include https://www.cato.org/ and https://www.heritage.org/,
https://www.brookings.edu/.
All of these websites are clearinghouses containing keyword
searchable databases and should be able to provide you with all the scholarly articles you will
need to craft an excellent paper.
o Include a brief history of the assigned issue.
o Compare and contrast at least (2) different political perspectives (viewpoints)
o Identify the strengths and weaknesses of each position you include
o Present an informed evaluation of the evidence and different viewpoint surrounding
the topic
o What do you conclude? Which position do you agree with most and why?
 Paper length: In a Word document, write a research paper with a minimum (no maximum)
of 1,500 words on the topic of choice, (not counting headings), double-spaced with 12-point
font. The paper should be created in Word, typewritten and double-spaced, and based on
information from a minimum of four (4) primary sources (no maximum). Your title and
works cited pages DO NOT count towards the 1,500-word minimum.
The 1500 word minimum is non-negotiable and is a basic expectation/requirement, not
merely a suggestion. When a minimum word limit is set, it MUST be met fully and
completely. Failure to meet the minimum requirements for word count will result in 10
points being deducted automatically for each 100 words that the paper is short of the
minimum requirement by.
 Writing Style: APA format. DO NOT include an abstract in your paper. You may include
one if you wish, but it will not count towards your requirements. Proofread your paper to
eliminate spelling and grammatical errors. Please use spell check and grammar check. Use
proper paragraphing and improve your writing style by revising the paper as many times as
necessary. You may also take your paper to the writing center for additional assistance!
 Citations: Any time you borrow someone’s ideas, paraphrase or quote them, (see plagiarism
section in syllabus) cite all sources using the APA citation style. Be sure to cite specific
information you found in your research to support your claims. Use the same citation format
throughout your paper. Analyze and question your sources assumptions. Remember to use
at least 4 sources and that Wikipedia and other online encyclopedias are not valid sources!
 A bibliography or “work cited” page also using your above citation style

The Palestinian-Israeli conflict is often seen as an intractable conflict. while partition (a two-state solution) has been the dominant proposal, others have suggested a democratic, one-state solution. One-state proponents usually suggest that the political structure should be a binational or consociational structure of some kind. In this paper develop an argument in support of either a one-state or a two-state solution as the preferred resolution to this conflict. If you contend that a one-state solution is best, you must also engage with your critics that argue that a two-state solution is better, and vice versa. Your introduction should specify both your claim and the reasons that you advance in support of it. Your paper should be 5 to 7 pages in length.
Sources
You may only use approved sources for this paper. Any reading from the syllabus and the list of articles and books on the following page are approved. If you find that you need another source for this paper, you must clear it with me
Approved Sources
Abulof, Uriel. 2016. “Mirage or Vision: Binationalism in Theory and Practice.” Ethnopolitics 15(4):
422-427.
Dabhour, Omar. 2016. “Self-Determination and Power-Sharing in Israel/Palestine.” Ethnopolitics
15(4): 393-407..
Dajani, Omar. 2016. “Divorce Without Separation? Reimagining the Two-State Solution.”
Ethnopolitics 15(4): 366-379.
Farsakh, Leila H. 2016. “A Common State in Israel–Palestine: Historical Origins and Lingering
Challenges .” Ethnopolitics 15(4): 380-392.
Farsakh, Leila H. 2021. Rethinking Statehood in Palestine: Self-Determination and Decolonization beyond
Partition. Oakland: University of California Press.
Accessible here: https://www.ucpress.edu/book/9780520385627/rethinking-statehood-in-
palestine
Indyk, Martin. 2024. “The Strange Resurrection of the Two-State Solution.” Foreign Affairs 103(20):
8-22.
Lustik, Ian. 2019. Paradigm Lost: From Two-State Solution to One-State Reality. Philadelphia. University
of Pennsylvania Press.
Miller, Benjamin. 2016. “ Israel–Palestine: One State or Two: Why a Two-State Solution is
Desirable, Necessary, and Feasible.” Ethnopolitics 15(4): 438-452.
Morris, Benny. 2009. One State, Two State: Resolving the Israel-Palestine Conflict. New Haven: Yale
University Press.
O’Leary, Brendan. 2016. “Power-Sharing and Partition amid Israel–Palestine.” Ethnopolitics 15(4):
345-365.
Oren, Michael. 2023. “Can the Two-State Solution Be Saved? Debating Israel’s One-State Reality.”
Foreign Affairs 102(4): 196-8.
Sambanis, Nicholas, and Jonah Schulhofer-Wohl. 2009. “What’s in a Line? Is Partition the Solution
to Civil War?” International Security 34(2): 82–118.
Scott, Lucas. 2016. “Escaping the Two-State Cul-de-Sac: The ‘Regional’, the International, and a
New Environment for Israeli–Palestinian Negotiations.” Ethnopolitics 15(4): 408-421.
Shafir, Gershon. 2017. A Half Century of Occupation: Israel. Palestine, and the World’s Most Intractable
Conflict. Oakland: University of California Press.

This is Part II of the assignment you submitted in Week 6.
Using the case outline (Part I: How the Courts Address or Respect Our Rights as Citizens) you submitted in Week 6, prepare and submit a presentation, either a narrated PowerPoint, a Kaltura Video, or some other format approved by your instructor. Verify the presentation format with your instructor before starting work on this assignment.
Here are some helpful resources from the GenEd Resource Center to assist you with the technological aspects of the assignment:
KalturaLinks to an external site.
PowerPointLinks to an external site.
The presentation Point presentation will need to include:
Name the case
Discuss the facts of the case
Discuss the history of the case (what laws or legal action was taken)
Discuss the issues or the facts of the case and legal questions the court must decide
Discuss if the court’s decision or holdings were for the plaintiff or the defendant and the reasons for the decision.
Discuss the concurring and dissenting opinions from the judge or if a jury trial, the jury
References slide with a minimum of 2 scholarly sources.
Important: In this assignment, you are expected to elaborate on the points you made in the prior assignment in Week 6. This assignment will be graded on your strength to elaborate and explain the facts of the case, proper use of visual aids, good narration, presentation of the case, and how well you stick to the case. For example, using PowerPoint, you must include proper visuals relevant to the case. Do not copy-paste the outline into this and call it complete.
This assignment is worth 225 points.
RequirementsLength: The presentation must be 10-15 slides long if using PowerPoint (excluding cover and reference pages) or 3-5 minute long if using a video presentation.
Font should not be smaller than size 16-point  
Parenthetical in-text citations included and formatted in APA style  
Title/Introduction slide required
References slide minimum of 2 scholarly sources in addition to textbook if cited)
Use the speaker notes to elaborate on the content on the slides

I want an essay covering my point of view in: Money is the problem in the USA.
Beginning with early slavery where southern states needed salvery to do unpaid work in    order for them to benefit economicly the most, later on with the war on Irak and what are   the economic reasons behind it and lastly the gun laws and how important is money         above saftey of the people where lobbies use money to keep laws allows them to still sell guns