Category: Other

This is a medical school admissions personal statement. I have attached a file where I included my little story of what motivated me to wanting to be a doctor. I also included a sample file of how the essay should be written. pls, I need an indepth, and passionate Personal statement that would fetch me admission. fell free to ask me anything

Everything is attached. I need my discussion post and then I need two peer reviews.
Important Info
The order was placed through a short procedure (customer skipped some order details).
Please clarify some paper details before starting to work on the order.
Type of paper and subject
Number of sources and formatting style
Type of service (writing, rewriting, etc)

Reflection involves critical thinking, which means rethinking your existing knowledge and previously held opinions in light of what we have learned about theories of ethics, logic, and reasoning. You will need to question your current knowledge and beliefs. Discuss the main points of the debate, what stance you take, support that stance, and discuss the opposing argument. Also, discuss an ethical theory that would apply to defend your view. To complete each scenario assignment: 1. Complete the entire scenario. 2. Fill out the template attached below, ask your professor for details on submission. 3. Compose the last question on the template reflection in a Word document and be sure to address, at a minimum, the following questions: Why do you feel the way you do about the issue presented? Of the four responses offered in the scenario, which do you think is the most ethical and why? Which ethical theory would you use to support your stance? Why does this theory work? 4. Support your conclusions with evidence and specific examples from the textbook, including a minimum of one theory of ethics to defend your stance. 5. Your reflection must be 1 page in length (more if you like, not required) and follow APA formatting and citation guidelines as appropriate, making sure to cite at least two sources. Choose one that you agree is most ethical and defend it using the concepts and theories of ethics (Virtue ethics, social contract theory [hoobes, Rousseau, or Rawls version], care ethics, act utilitarianism, Kantian categorical imperatives, or rule utilitarianism. CHOOSE ONE (A, B, C, or D). See uploaded files specifically the pictures. MAKE SURE SOURCES ARE “PEER REVIEW SCHOLARLY SOURCES. The images have the video presentation of the content.

1. Introduction: Provide an overview of your chosen skill (cup stacking is my chosen skill) and the purpose of your reflection. 2. Stages of Learning: Discuss how you progressed through the three stages of learning according to Fitts and Posner’s model (Chapter 12). 3. Motor Learning Principles: Select three Motor Learning Principles (MLPs) covered in the course (e.g., feedback, practice distribution) and explain how they were applied to your learning experience. 4. References: Include a separate page for your reference list, following APA style format. Do not use the reference section to meet the page requirement. 1. Use the provided template, ensuring you do not delete the titles and page numbers. 2. Follow the formatting requirements: 1. Use 12-point Times New Roman font. 2. Double-space the entire document. 3. Maintain 1-inch margins on all sides. 4. Do not include extra space between paragraphs and sections. 3. Ensure your reflection paper meets the length requirement of a minimum of 6 full pages and a maximum of 10 pages. 4. Cite all sources utilized following APA style format. Only cite Magill and Anderson (YYYY) and/or Danny (2010), but do not cite slides.

You are to work on this case in the Chapter 7 supplement. Regardless of the questions asked, please do the following:
Input everything into DEA Frontier and run it.
Which of the locations are efficient, which are inefficient?
For the inefficient locations, compute the excess resources for each.
Address questions 3 and 4 as asked in the case.
This is a post-first forum, that is, you will not be able to see others’ posts before you make your own. Posting something minimal like ok or 123 to gain access to others’ posts will result in zero credit for the discussion this week.

Identify at least five potential clients using the same online training business you worked on in Module 2.
Determine the closing technique best suited for each client.
Create a matrix providing the following information: (Excel is a good way to do this)
A column with the potential clients
A column that explains a closing technique for each client with a rationale for this decision
You may also add a column with other pertinent information you deem necessary if needed.

ASSIGNMENT: Term Paper     PROMPT: Dismantling Fallacies: Illuminating Systemic Education Inequity Media, politicians, and K-12 educators often suggest that the American Dream is achievable for anyone with the “grit” to pursue it. Although these messages told to children from folks in power and/or influence may have come from a good place, the obsession with Black Excellence, Model Minorities, and Token Students, amongst others, often obscure the flawed logic of such exceptionalism among BIPOC students.    The hypervisibility of such narratives can redirect blame, shame, and accountability onto Black, Indigenous, and Students of Color instead of addressing systemic education inequity at its roots. Understanding how to impact underserved students’ educational outcomes positively and meaningfully requires critically analyzing underserved students’ experiences.   KEY TERMS: Racially Minoritized Students: Black, Indigenous, and Student of Color identifying. Non-White groups and communities that historically experience institutional discrimination and exclusion because of unequal power across economic, political, and cultural dimensions.   Secondary Sources: Secondary sources are works that analyze, assess, or interpret an historical event, trend, or phenomenon, generally utilizing primary sources to do so (e.g., textbooks, edited works, and articles).   NOTE: for the purposes of our term paper, we will only utilize scholarly peer-review articles. All articles must be from the LBCC library databases. No outside articles.   PURPOSE: This assignment aims to provide an opportunity for you to research scholarly secondary sources on the topic of racially minoritized student groups in education. Secondly, it’s a chance to practice your skills in interpreting research findings and implications.    SKILLS:  A research paper will provide you with foundational skills in learning to survey the literature on a chosen topic, which includes learning to interpret secondary sources and get familiar with keywords and concepts in the field of education studies. Learn to examine and explain trends and phenomena related to the experiences of racially minoritized student groups in education. Lastly, you will learn to articulate your analysis in writing.    KNOWLEDGE: By doing this research, you will better understand the inequity and achievement gap of racially minoritized student groups in education. More specifically, you will gain insight into structural and institutional variables perpetuating inequity and education disparity among racially minoritized student groups. Above all, you will learn to dismantle fallacies about education achievement that do more harm than good.   TASKS: I am asking you to research the barriers that have shaped the educational experiences of racially minoritized student groups: Mexican American, Southeast Asian American, African American, and Native Indian American.You will choose one and only one of these student groups on the highlighted list, and you will search for three scholarly (peer-review) articles that center on the impact of minoritized students’ educational barriers. Again, you are not allowed to research any other student groups. It must be one of these four groups.   INTERCHANGEABLE TERMS: Terminology changes overtime, so if one key term limit the results of your research for scholarly peer-review articles, please try a few terms when searching the library databases. Here are a few examples:   a) Mexican American: Mexican American students, Chicano students, Chicana students, Chicanx students, Hispanic students, Latino Students, Latina Students, Latinx Students. b) Southeast Asian American: Southeast Asian American students, Cambodian American students, Laotian American students, Hmong American students, Vietnamese American students. c) African American: African American students, Black students. d) Native American: Native American students, Native Indian American students, Indigenous students in the United States.   NOTE:  All students’ groups should be based in the United States. You should not be using articles based on students outside of the United States.   What to look for when researching the group, you have chosen:  a) high school graduation rate, high school retention, high school persistence b) college graduation rate, college retention, college persistence c) Barriers and challenges to their education/graduation studies (e.g., citizenship status, deportation, language, refugeeexperience, violence, financial hardships).   NOTE: List of barriers and challenges are not exhausted. If you find others in your research that is not listed above, feel free to save those sources to support your thesis.

Instructions: 
Assignment 1: Evaluation of Information Systems (27 points)  
Review the stages of the systems development life cycle (SDLC) in course readings and presentations. Utilize readings from the textbook, modules, and a search for information sources to formulate your responses.
This assignment is one formal paper that contains two parts.
Part 1
These questions require answers after an electronic health record (EHR) or new EHR application/feature has already been selected and implemented by an organization. For example, an organization may have just implemented a new EHR, replaced an existing EHR, or added new functionality such as clinical decision support system features or a patient portal. Consider which additional or new HIT application/feature interests your DNP practice and will result in improved care.
Part 2
Students will analyze one unintended consequence (e-iatrogenesis) of the proposed EHR or EHR application/feature from Part 1. The unintended result may be either “good” or “bad.” Students will create a visual fishbone diagram that shows the cause(s) and effect(s) of the problem with the EHR/EHR application/feature. Review the readings and the content found in the modules regarding fishbone diagrams and e-iatrogenesis.
 Assignment Criteria:
Develop a scholarly paper that addresses the following:
Complete Part 1: System Development Life Cycle (SDLC) Implementation and Evaluation Stages: Proposed EHR/EHR Application/Feature
Briefly define the SSDLC′s implementation and evaluation stages and describe the DNP′s specific and expected role activities as an interprofessional team member during these two stages. Cite one or more sources.
Describe the new EHR or one new EHR feature, function, or application of interest that may benefit or supplement the current EHR for a healthcare organization.
Students should search the Internet for specific names and information about existing commercial products for the selected system application, EHR application/feature, or function.
Students are not designing the application/feature or function for an EHR but selecting an existing, new, or additional product.
Briefly describe the name, purpose, and vendor for the proposed new EHR application/feature or function to be added to an existing EHR or an electronic clinical information system.
Identify the type of healthcare organization (e.g., hospital, clinic, public health agency, healthcare software company, government health information website, private virtual health information site, etc.) that will utilize the proposed system. Explain how the EHR/EHR application/feature is utilized for clinical, administrative, educational, or research purposes.
Explain how this proposed EHR or EHR application/feature meets two Healthy People 2030 objectives for the topic, Health IT (See Modules/Week 2). Cite one or more sources to support your response.
Define” system interoperability” and “medical device integration” and explain how the proposed EHR or EHR application/ feature meets these HITECH standards. Cite sources.
Search the NQF database or other sources and identify and explain one quality metric that can be used to evaluate end-user or stakeholder satisfaction with the system post-implementation.
Discuss the evidence needed to determine whether further training for system users is needed post-implementation. Cite sources.
Identify the name, characteristics, and type of one additional metric you will propose to assess the effectiveness, quality, or safety of the proposed EHR or EHR application/feature. Cite sources.
Complete Part 2: Assessing E-iatrogenesis or the Unintended Consequences of the EHR/EHR application/feature.
Analyze the system in Part 1 for one possible unintended consequence that has or may occur post-implementing the proposed system/feature. Cite sources.
Describe the unintended consequence and cite sources.
Generate a fishbone diagram to show the specific causes and effects of the problem (see Modules/Week 2).
Create this as Figure 1 and insert it into an appendix.
See the APA 7th edition manual for the format.
Provide one or more priority solutions that could be implemented (proposed Remediation Plan) by the interprofessional team to alleviate the causes and effects of the problem. Cite sources.
The scholarly paper should be in narrative format, 5 to 6 pages, excluding the appendix, title page, and reference page.
Include an introductory paragraph with the purpose of the paper and a conclusion to the paper.
Include level 1 and 2 headings to organize the content of the paper.
Write the paper in the third person, not the first person (meaning do not use ‘′e’′or ‘′’′ and in a scholarly manner. I, we, you, me, or our may not be used. In addition, describing yourself as the researcher or the author should not be used.
To support the paper, include a minimum of five professional, peer-reviewed scholarly journal references (review in Ulrich Periodical Directory). References should be less than five (5) years old unless they are classic or historical articles.
APA 7th edition format required (attention to spelling/grammar, format for a title page and a reference page, use of paraphrasing/quotes, and format for in-text citations).
Submit the assignment to Turnitin before the final submission date, review the originality report, and make any needed changes.
Important Info
The order was placed through a short procedure (customer skipped some order details).
Please clarify some paper details before starting to work on the order.
Type of paper and subject
Number of sources and formatting style
Type of service (writing, rewriting, etc)

Scope Creep (GROUP B)
(1) What is scope creep? Do a little research (in the UMGC library, for instance) to see what factors are involved. Then give a definition of Scope Creep in your own words (but also properly citing any references you used).)
(2) Is scope creep inevitable? That is, is it normal? Will we always (or at least, usually) have to deal with scope creep on any given project? Why or why not?
(3) How can we deal with scope creep? What can we do to prevent it, and especially what can we do to handle it if and when it does occur?

HCM 506 Discuss in detail the process that a researcher hypothetically would go through when they become aware of a population health problem that arises during the Hajj. What research would be needed to protect the population of the Kingdom? Embed course material concepts, principles, and theories (which require supporting citations) in your initial response along with at least tow scholarly, peer-reviewed journal article. Keep in mind that these scholarly references can be found in the Saudi Digital Library by conducting an advanced search specific to scholarly references. Use Saudi Electronic University academic writing standards and APA style guidelines. You are required to reply to at least two peer discussion question post answers to this weekly discussion question and/or your instructor’s response to your posting. These post replies need to be substantial and constructive in nature. They should add to the content of the post and evaluate/analyze that post’s answer. Normal course dialogue doesn’t fulfill these two peer replies but is expected throughout the course. Answering all course questions is also required.