For this assessment, you can use a supplied template to conduct a root-cause analysis. The completed assessment will be a scholarly paper focusing on a quality or safety issue in a health care setting of your choice as well as a safety improvement plan.
Scenario
For this assessment, use the specific safety concern identified in your previous assessment as the subject of a root-cause analysis and safety improvement plan
Instructions
The purpose of this assessment is to demonstrate your understanding of and ability to analyze a root cause of a specific safety concern in a health care setting. You will create a plan to improve the safety of patients related to the safety quality issue presented in your Assessment Supplement PDF in Assessment 1. Based on the results of your analysis, using the literature and professional best practices as well as the existing resources at your chosen health care setting, provide a rationale for your plan.
Use the Root-Cause Analysis and Improvement Plan [DOCX] Download Root-Cause Analysis and Improvement Plan [DOCX]template to help you to stay organized and concise. This will guide you step-by-step through the root cause analysis process.
Additionally, be sure that your plan addresses the following, which corresponds to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Please study the scoring guide carefully so you understand what is needed for a distinguished score.
Analyze the root cause of a specific patient safety issue in an organization.
Apply evidence-based and best-practice strategies to address the safety issue.
Create a feasible, evidence-based safety improvement plan to address a specific patient safety issue.
Identify organizational resources that could be leveraged to improve your plan.
Communicate in writing that is clear, logical, and professional, with correct grammar and spelling, using current APA style.
Example Assessment: You may use the following to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like but keep in mind that your Assessment 2 will focus on the quality issue you selected in Assessment 1.
Category: Nursing
-
Title: Root-Cause Analysis and Safety Improvement Plan for Reducing Medication Errors in a Hospital Setting Introduction Patient safety is a critical aspect of healthcare, and medication errors are a major concern for healthcare organizations. According to the World Health Organization
-
Title: Middle Range Theories for Literature Review Paper Introduction The field of nursing is constantly evolving, with new research and evidence-based practices emerging every day. As nurses, it is crucial to not only stay updated on the latest advancements, but
work on 3 Middle Range Theories for the Literature Review Paper.
· Maximum of 5 pages (not including title and reference page).
· Must be APA format
· Four references within 5 years.
· The introduction includes a statement of the problem and the PICOT question briefly explains the
Significance of your topic study and acts as a way to introduce the reader to your definitions and background. -
“The Ethical Dilemma of Nursing Staffing: Balancing Nonmaleficence and Patient Safety”
Nursing staffing have become a topic of debate due to concerns relating
to patient safety, quality of care, the workforce and financial costs.
Particularly, there has been a major decline in number of people entering the
nursing field as well as an issue due to stress, burnout and job discontent
which has caused many registered nurses to quit. Poor nursing staffing has
shown numerous adverse outcomes in hospital settings such as falls, infections
and pressure ulcers.
When nurse staffing is insufficient, the ability to perform morally is
called into question. The ethical principle under discussion is nonmaleficence,
which involves nurses to behave in such a way that patients are not harmed (Burkhardt & Nathaniel, 2002). -
“Building on the Assessment and Safety Plan for Jill: A Case Study”
instructions:
For this assignment, you will build on your initial assessment and safety plan from the Week 4 Case Study. The case study is listed below for your review.
Jill is a 50-year-old woman who lives with her husband and two children (aged 20 and 18). She has come to see her PMHNP with worries about a number of health problems including extreme tiredness, agitation and pains in her chest. Past history Jill has been a frequent attender at the practice over the years, often with concerns about her or her children’s health. She experienced postpartum depression with her second child. She has a history of GAD and Depression and has been on and off antidepressants for the past 30 years. When she was 23 she took an overdose following the break-up of a relationship. She had some sessions of counseling about 10 years ago that she found helpful. She was referred to a primary care mental health worker in the practice two years ago for help with anxiety and low mood. She had some sessions of individual guided self-help, but she found that this made no difference. She was put in touch with a voluntary sector self-help group for people with anxiety around this time – but did not pursue this. She has no other health history or complaints today related to medical health, no military history. She currently takes no medications and has no allergies. She considers herself healthy as she eats a vegan diet and does walk 2 times a week around the local lake.
On examination Jill says she has always been a very ‘nervy’ person who finds dealing with everyday stresses difficult. She worries a lot about herself and her family and easily gets “in a state” and assumes “the worst” – for example, if family members are unwell or if they are late coming home. Sometimes things get so bad that she needs someone around her constantly to reassure her and feels that she can’t be left on her own. The intensity of these problems has varied over the years, but has become worse again during the past eight months following her husband’s diagnosis of heart problems. She has been drinking wine most evenings to try to calm herself down. More recently things have become so bad that she has sometimes felt that if she were left on her own she might harm herself. Her family has been very supportive and stayed with her during these periods until she calmed down, but is now finding this difficult to manage. Last night she had an extended period of feeling like everyone would be better off without her. She describes a plan “to drink alcohol, take some of her husband’s pain medications, start her car in the garage and pass out.” She states the only thing that every helps her is to walk and hum to herself and in the winter she sometimes knits.
Vitals:
BP: 122/68
HR: 74
R: 18
T: 97
O2: 99%
Pain: 2 on 0–10 scale
Wt.: 147
Ht.: 66” -
“Concept Mapping: Applying the Nursing Process to a Disease Process” “Implementing and Evaluating Nursing Interventions: A Nursing Process Template”
The Nursing Process Template & Concept Map Template are located within this Concept Mapping Assignment Worksheet. Concept Map Assignment WorksheetDownload Concept Map Assignment Worksheet
Rubric
Concept Mapping Spring 23 edits
Concept Mapping Spring 23 edits
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDisease Process and Pathophysiology Risk Factors
5 pts
Satisfactory
Learner performs a thorough review of the disease process pathophysiology; identifies risk factors.
3.5 pts
Beginning
There are critical aspects of pathophysiology missing. This entry is incomplete.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
The pathophysiology information is missing.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRecognizing Cues
What matters most?
5 pts
Satisfactory
Based on available patient data, the learner identifies at least four (4) critical cues that are significant and could impact the patient condition. The learner may consider both subjective and objective patient data.
3.5 pts
Beginning
Based on available patient data, the learner identifies two (2) or three (3) critical cue(s) that are significant and could impact the patient condition. The learner may consider both subjective and objective patient data.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Based on available patient data, the learner identifies zero (0) or one (1) critical cue(s) that are significant and could impact the patient condition. The learner may consider both subjective and objective patient data.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalyzing Cues
What could it mean?
5 pts
Satisfactory
Based on the identified cues, the learner is able to create three (3) – four (4) supporting connections between the relevant cues and client conditions/problems.
3.5 pts
Beginning
Based on the identified cues, the learner is able to create two (2) supporting connections between the cues and patient condition/problems.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Based on the identified cues, the learner is able to create one (1) or zero (0) supporting connection(s) between the cues and patient condition/problems.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePrioritizing Hypotheses
Where do I start?
5 pts
Satisfactory
Based on the identified connections between cues and patient conditions/problems, learner is able to identify and rank three (3) client conditions/problems critical to positive patient outcomes. These should be listed with most urgent problems first.
3.5 pts
Beginning
Based on the identified connections between cues and patient conditions/problems, learner is able to identify and rank two (2) client conditions/problems critical to positive patient outcomes. These should be listed with most urgent problems first. This point value is also chosen if client/problems are not listed with the priority concern(s) first.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Based on the identified connections between cues and patient conditions/problems, learner identifies zero (0) or one (1) client conditions/problems critical to positive patient outcomes.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGenerating Solutions
What can I do?
5 pts
Satisfactory
List five (5) solutions/outcomes with appropriate interventions that will positively impact client outcomes and are appropriate to the care of the client. Outcomes/goals are listed in the SMART format.
3.5 pts
Beginning
List three (3) to four (4) solutions/outcomes with appropriate interventions that will positively impact client outcomes and are appropriate to the care of the client. Outcomes/goals are listed in the SMART format.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
List zero (0) to two (2) solutions/outcomes with appropriate interventions that will positively impact client outcomes and are appropriate to the care of the client. This point value is also chosen if outcomes/goals are not listed in the SMART format.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTaking Actions
What will I do?
5 pts
Satisfactory
Describe how each of the five (5) identified nursing interventions will be performed, implemented, administered, communicated, or taught.
3.5 pts
Beginning
Describe how three (3) to four (4) of the identified nursing interventions will be performed, implemented, administered, communicated, or taught.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Describe zero (0) to two (2) of the identified nursing interventions will be performed, implemented, administered, communicated, or taught.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvaluating Outcomes
Did it help?
2.5 pts
Satisfactory
Describe how you will determine the effectiveness of the five (5) priority nursing interventions you implemented. How will you know if your interventions are effective or not?
1.5 pts
Beginning
Describe how you will determine the effectiveness of three (3) to four (4) priority nursing interventions you implemented. How will you know if your interventions are effective or not?
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Describe how you will determine the effectiveness of zero (0) to two (2) priority nursing interventions you implemented.
2.5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeNursing Process template
2.5 pts
Satisfactory
Recognizing the completion of this template will assist the learner with the concept map assignment, all six (6) boxes are thoroughly completed. The SBAR information is thoroughly identified, and the chosen concept for the assignment is clearly identified.
1.5 pts
Beginning
Information is missing from one (1) to three (3) box(es). The SBAR information is thoroughly identified, and the chosen concept for the assignment is clearly identified.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Information is missing from four (4) to six (6) boxes. This point value is also chosen if the SBAR information is missing and/or the chosen concept for the assignment is not identified.
2.5 pts -
“Analyzing Ethical Dilemmas: A Case Study Approach” Chapter 1 – Case Study: Case Study Title: “The Dilemma of Dual Loyalties” In this case study, a therapist named Sarah is faced with a
Instructions:
Click and choose ONE (1) Case Study below and post answers.
Chapter 1 – Case Study
Chapter 3 – Case Study
Answers must:
Be 100 words or more
Use the standard English grammar and spelling
References are cited (if necessary) -
“Comparing the Efficacy of Psychotherapy and Pharmacological Intervention in Reducing PTSD Symptoms among Veterans: A 6-Month Analysis”
In Veterans diagnosed with PTSD, what is the
difference between psychotherapy and pharmalogical intervention on reduction of
symptoms across 6 months? -
“Improving Patient Safety: Implementing Organizational Systems to Reduce Medication Errors in a Hospital Setting”
Topic: Reducing medication errors in a hospital
setting
Discuss
a description of the organizational systems needed to implement the program
above,(Topic)
including QI
committee structure and functions, health care information technology,
descriptions of accountability including protection of
patient information (HIPAA) -
Title: “Community-Based Support Interventions for Improving Breastfeeding Success Rates among First-Time Mothers from Lower Socioeconomic Backgrounds: A Comprehensive Review and Analysis”
The research question is:
How effective are community-based support interventions in improving breastfeeding success rates among first- time mothers aged 15 to 32 years from lower socioeconomic backgrounds? Needs to include: the purpose, research question, objective, rhetorical framework, synthesis of literature, methodology, project description, ethical principal in research, project evaluation results, plans for dissemination, implications for nursing the profession . minimum of 30 references. thank you! -
Title: Exploring the Experiences of Women in Male-Dominated Industries: A Qualitative Study
1. Please follow the instructions attached, also attaching the main research article to use.
2. Please use three peer reviewed article to supplement the paper.
3. The reserach article is a requred single -study qualitative reserach