Category: Nursing

2 Critiques of articles related to your proposal. Identifies 2 articles related to the research topic for critique. Here are the 2 articles -1. Qualitative Article – Benda NC, Fairbanks RJ, Higginbotham DJ, et alObservational study to understand interpreter service use in emergency medicine: why the key may lie outside of the initial provider assessmentEmergency Medicine Journal 2019;36:582-588.2. Systematic Review Article – Diamond, L., Izquierdo, K., Canfield, D. et al. A Systematic Review of the Impact of Patient–Physician Non-English Language Concordance on Quality of Care and Outcomes. J GEN INTERN MED 34, 1591–1606 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-04847-5The review of the literature should include an analysis/critique of the 2 research studies related to the proposed research study. Filled out each one of the attached documents.

For this assessment, research best practices related to a current health care problem. Your selected problem or issue will be utilized again in Assessment 3. To explore your chosen topic, you should use the first two steps of the Socratic Problem-Solving Approach to aid your critical thinking.View the Assessment Topic Areas media piece and select one of the health care problems or issues in the media piece to research. Write a brief overview of the selected topic. In your overview:
Summarize the health care problem or issue.
Describe your interest in the topic.
Describe any professional experience you have with this topic.
Identify peer-reviewed articles relevant to health care issue or problem.
Conduct a search for scholarly or academic peer-reviewed literature related to the topic and describe the criteria you used to search for articles, including the names of the databases you used. You will select four current scholarly or academic peer-reviewed journal articles drafted during the past 3–5 years that relate to your topic.
Refer to the NHS-FPX4000: Developing a Health Care Perspective Library Guide to help you locate appropriate references.
Use keywords related to the health care problem or issue you are researching to select relevant articles.
Assess the credibility and explain relevance of the information sources you find.
Determine if the source is from an academic peer-reviewed journal.
Determine if the publication is current.
Determine if information in the academic peer-reviewed journal article is still relevant.
Analyze academic peer-reviewed journal articles using the annotated bibliography organizational format. Provide rationale for inclusion of each selected article. The purpose of an annotated bibliography is to document a list of references along with key information about each one. The detail about the reference is the annotation. Developing this annotated bibliography will create a foundation of knowledge about the selected topic. In your annotated bibliography:
Identify the purpose of the article.
Summarize the information.
Provide rationale for inclusion of each article.
Include the conclusions and findings of the article.
Write your annotated bibliography in a paragraph form. The annotated bibliography should be approximately 150 words (1–3 paragraphs) in length.
List the full reference for the source in APA format (author, date, title, drafter, et cetera) and use APA format for the annotated bibliography.
Make sure the references are listed in alphabetical order, are double-spaced, and use hanging indents.
Summarize what you have learned from developing an annotated bibliography.
Summarize what you learned from your research in a separate paragraph or two at the end of the paper.
List the main points you learned from your research.
Summarize the main contributions of the sources you chose and how they enhanced your knowledge about the topic.

Read the NYTimes article You Can Help Break the
Chain of Transmission. Think about Dr.
Hanage’s comment, ” Every time you cut a link, you
don’t just take out that link, you also take out all the
potential cases and links descending from it.” This
statement sums up much of the science of
isolation/quarantine. In your opinion, how much of this
is understood by the public? How well has the public
health message been delivered?

Present an overview of each paper in a summary table drawing on critical appraisal skills of the studies. Followed by a thematic synthesis where you write the findings from the papers using themes which have been identified. Present then a summary of what these papers tell you about the topic chosen.

Instructions for Analysis of the Editorial Essay (NPR article)In this folder you will find the editorial opinion written by Linda Poon from NPR.Before you begin writing,
1. Refer to the LuiselliLinks to an external site. book from N402L (click on the link to have free online access from the Pollak Library)
2. Watch video El Hielo (Ice El Hielo by La Santa Cecilia. You can find it on Youtbe.it is a 4 minutes 30 seconds clip)
3. Study the rubric carefully; listen to the PPT explaining the rubric- it has audio
4. Use the articles in Canvas and look for your own- There are 3 folders
5. This assignment is automatically submitted to Turnitin, a plagiarism software. Review your Turnitin report prior to the assignment’s due date and time and make any needed changes. There will be no re-submissions for this assignment

You should research your answer and cite at least one scholarly source when appropriate, and always use quality writing. The discussion board is never a place to use text language or emoticons. You will also be asked to respond to your classmates. This is designed to enhance the academic discussion around the topic. It is all right to disagree with something posted by another, however your responses should always be thoughtful and respectful and reflect your opinions professionally.
Discussion Question:
Choose one research article that includes either physiological or psychological knowledge and discuss how the knowledge would be used to influence the healthcare paradigm.

Hi, you should answer some questions about diabet 2, metformin medication and side effects and…, you can use my textbook I have uploaded here some pictures about metformin and…. Please read carefully and answer carefully related to questions and text book.

You are required to write a 6000-word (+/- 10%) dissertation in the format of an extended CAT. In
addition to the elements described under Formative assessment (i.e., formulating a precise clinical
question and developing a search strategy to identify relevant evidence) you will need to critique and
synthesise the data and make recommendations.
The purpose of this assessment is to provide the opportunity to demonstrate that you can critically
use evidence to make recommendations for practice.

Discussion Criteria
Application of Course Knowledge: The student’s initial post contributes unique perspectives or insights gleaned from personal experience or examples from the healthcare field. The student must accurately and fully discuss the topic for the week in addition to providing personal or professional examples. The student must completely answer the entire initial question. Initial post must be posted by Wednesday at 11:59pm MT. Two resources must be used in your initial post. One from the weekly reading or lesson and one outside source.
Engagement in Meaningful Dialogue: The student responds to a student peer and course faculty to further dialogue.
Peer Response: The student responds substantively to at least one topic-related post by a student peer. A substantive post adds content or insights or asks a question that will add to the learning experience and/or generate discussion.
A post of “I agree” with a repeat of the other student’s post does not count as a substantive post. A collection of shallow posts does not equal a substantive post.
The peer response must occur on a separate day from the initial posting.
The peer response must occur before Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT.
The peer response does not require a scholarly citation and reference unless the information is paraphrased and/or direct quotes are used, in which APA style standards then apply.
Faculty Response: The student responds substantively to at least one question by course faculty. The faculty question may be directed to the student, to another student, or to the entire class.
A post of “I agree” with a repeat of the faculty’s post does not count as a substantive post. A collection of shallow posts does not equal a substantive post.
The faculty response must occur on a separate day from the initial posting.
Responses to the faculty member must occur by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT.
This response does not require a scholarly citation and reference unless the information is paraphrased and/or direct quotes are used, in which APA style standards then apply.
Integration of Evidence: The student post provides support from a minimum of one scholarly in-text citation with a matching reference AND assigned readings OR online lessons, per discussion topic per week. Two resources total and to count must be an in-text citation in your initial post.
What is a scholarly resource? A scholarly resource is one that comes from a professional, peer-reviewed publication (e.g., journals and government reports such as those from the FDA or CDC).
Contains references for sources cited
Written by a professional or scholar in the field and indicates credentials of the author(s)
Is no more than 5 years old for clinical or research article

Assignment instructions and media videos are attached. PDF’s must be available for the resources used. Please send links to PDF’s of references. Please include an introduction and concluding statement. This is a blackboard discussion post. It needs to be brief.