Category: Nursing

At a minimum, be sure to address each point. In addition, you are encouraged to review the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.
Describe the health care problem or issue you selected for use in Assessment 2 and provide details about it.
As you describe the topic you explored in Assessment 2, use the first four steps of the Socratic Problem-Solving Approach to aid your critical thinking. This approach was introduced in Assessment 2.
Identify possible causes for the problem or issue.
Use scholarly information to describe and explain the health care problem or issue and identify possible causes for it.
Identify at least three scholarly or academic peer-reviewed journal articles about the topic.
You may find the How Do I Find Peer-Reviewed Articles? library guide helpful in locating appropriate references.
You may use articles you found while working on Assessment 2 or you may search the Capella library for other articles.
You may find the applicable Undergraduate Library Research Guide helpful in your search.
Review the Think Critically About Source Quality to help you complete the following:
Assess the credibility of the information sources.
Assess the relevance of the information sources.
Analyze the health care problem or issue.
Describe the setting or context for the problem or issue.
Describe why the problem or issue is important to you.
Identify groups of people affected by the problem or issue.
Provide examples that support your analysis of the problem or issue.
Discuss potential solutions for the health care problem or issue.
Describe what would be required to implement a solution.
Describe potential consequences of ignoring the problem or issue.
Provide the pros and cons for one of the solutions you are proposing.
Explain the ethical principles (Beneficence, Nonmaleficence, Autonomy, and Justice) if potential solution was implemented.
Describe what would be necessary to implement the proposed solution.
Explain the ethical principles that need to be considered (Beneficence, Nonmaleficence, Autonomy, and Justice) if the potential solution was implemented.
Provide examples from the literature to support the points you are making.
Your assessment should also meet the following requirements:
Length: 4–6 typed, double-spaced pages, not including the title page and reference page.
Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.
APA tutorial: Use the APA Style Paper Tutorial [DOCX] for guidance.
Written communication: Write clearly and logically, with correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and mechanics.
Using outside sources: Integrate information from outside sources into academic writing by appropriately quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing, following APA style.
References: Integrate information from outside sources to include at least three scholarly or academic peer-reviewed journal articles and three in-text citations within the paper.
APA format: Follow current APA guidelines for in-text citations of outside sources in the body of your paper and also on the reference page.
Organize your paper using the following structure and headings:
Title page. A separate page.
Introduction. A brief one-paragraph statement about the purpose of the paper.
Elements of the problem/issue. Identify the elements of the problem or issue or question.
Analysis. Analyze, define, and frame the problem or issue.
Considering options. Consider solutions, responses, or answers.
Solution. Choose a solution, response, or answer.
Ethical implications. Ethical implications of implementing the solution.
Implementation. Implementation of the potential solution.
Conclusion. One paragraph.
Must use previous paper to complete this — it is the document attached called “NHS4000 Applying Research Skills.docx” 

Case 1: A 42-year-old female complains of progressive weight gain of 20 pounds over the last year, fatigue, postural dizziness, loss of memory, slow speech, deepening of her voice, dry skin, constipation, and cold intolerance. She claims her menses have been irregular x 1 year. She has an 18-year-old daughter, and has been attempting to have another child with her new partner. She has been unsuccessful.
Case Study Rubric
Case Study Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnswers items completely. Develops adequate responses to questions. The plan shows depth and application of course concepts.
10 to >7.5 pts
Exemplary
The case study meets or exceeds expectations with creative, innovative strategies for the case study.
7.5 to >5.0 pts
Proficient
The case study meets expectations by including good depth for all elements of plan but does not demonstrate good application of course content.
5 to >2.5 pts
Satisfactory
The case study meets minimal expectations with minimal development of portions of case study.
2.5 to >0 pts
Emerging
The case study does not meet expectations; the plan has no depth or has included inaccurate elements. No points awarded if not completed.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentifies and describes pathophysiologic concepts and care as needed
10 to >7.5 pts
Exemplary
The study meets or exceeds expectations with well-developed resources (e.g., textbook, peer-reviewed articles).
7.5 to >5.0 pts
Proficient
The case study meets expectations; resources included are well developed in all but a few areas.
5 to >2.5 pts
Satisfactory
The study meets the minimal expectations with few resources included.
2.5 to >0 pts
Emerging
The case study does not meet expectations; no resources are included. No points awarded if not completed.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics
Writing has good flow throughout, responses have good transitions, and no spelling or grammar errors. APA Style is used,
5 to >4.0 pts
Exemplary
Written in a clear, concise, formal, and organized manner. Responses are mostly error free. Information from sources is paraphrased appropriately and accurately referenced and cited in current APA style when applicable.
4 to >3.0 pts
Proficient
Writing is generally clear and organized but is not concise or formal in language. Multiple errors exist in spelling and grammar with minor interference with readability or comprehension. Most information from sources is paraphrased, referenced, and cited correctly in current APA style.
3 to >2.0 pts
Satisfactory
Writing is generally unclear and unorganized. Several errors in spelling and grammar. Information from sources is missing or improperly cited.
2 to >0 pts
Emerging
Errors in spelling and grammar detract from readability and comprehension, AND/OR writing includes slang or is inappropriate for academic discourse.
5 pts
Total Points: 25
PreviousNext

PDF attached with two topic options.
attaching all photos and info I have. I am so over school and almost at the finish line so I’m paying to get these last 3 classes I have done. pertaining to rubric I need…..
Policies that create ethical dilemmas or consequences related to care coordination and the American Heart Association could still be Medicaid/Medicare coverages versus the specific/unique needs of a patient. Access to care could also be an ethical issue for specific patient populations. Costs of care is another ethical dilemma. While the dilemmas may not apply directly to the
AHA, they still impact patients requiring cardiovascular care.
1. Discuss 2-3 governmental policies that impact the care coordination of your selected organization.
Examples could be: Affordable Care Act, HIPAA, Nursing Home Reform Act, CMS, Hospital
Readmission Reduction Act, etc. Provide specific examples of how each policy impacts the care coordination for your audience.
2. Discuss ethical dilemmas or consequences of specific policies as it relates to the care coordination of your target audience. (as noted above)
3. Assess the impact of the Code of Ethics for nurses and coordinating care. What are some social determinants of health, and how do they contribute to health disparities or access to care for the patients of your audience? Examples: Age, race, education level, income, geographical location, etc.
Resources for this assessment could include your selected policies, CMS, AHRQ, Healthy People 2020, American Nurses Association Code of Ethics, etc.
you do have to do American Heart Association but it’s an example. I need speaker notes under each slide, and a SEPARATE word document with all the speaker notes in APA format (headings for different sections and reference page). I will of course complete the audio portion. I also attached an example speaker notes paper. my classmate sent just to give an example. it’s not on the same subject.
please hit all competency (rubric) requirements

Hello. This assignment is a response to my peers post. I have attached the instructions to
the original post, my peers response, and my readings for this week for you to reference.
Please use APA 7th edition professional format and if you use additional references please
only uses APA, peer-reviewed, evidence-based, scholarly medical journals, that are no 
more than 5 years old. Please read and respond thoroughly and precisely to her post. If 
you have any questions please contact me. Thank you!

My professor is very strict about APA citation. This essay is only about evaluating the quality of the research article. Please message if you have any questions or need clarification.

The paper is ready. It only requires revision per professor’s feedback
1st assignment:
written component (3000 words):
Oral component (10 minutes)
2nd assignment:
End of Life Care (5000 words)

In this week’s assignment, you will analyze the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Quality Indicators.
Select and share the indicator that resonates with you and impacts your clinical practice.
Discuss the background of the problem as it relates to your selected indicator.
Explain why this indicator is worthy of focusing on and describe why this is a problem in your practice.
Address how this indicator plays a role in the National Quality Strategy.
Ensure references are within the last 5 years

I am a mental health nursing student so I can not use that field of practice. I have chosen, adult, childrens and learning disability.
Throughout your programme, you are expected to gain experience
in the philosophy of the different fields of practice and engage in
meaningful experiences in theoretical learning or practice learning
(simulation or placement). Based on these experiences, you must
write a series of reflective commentaries in your “Salford Nursing –
Personal Development Record (PDR)”, considering the NMC
platforms of proficiency standards (NMC, 2018) and the differences
between each field.  
For your summative academic assessment in the ‘Leading &
Empowering in Integrated Nursing Practice’ module, you will submit
via Turnitin a Reflective Log critically evaluating the exposures to
three separate fields of practice based on this work within your PDR.
You will write three separate entries within the Word Document
template provided, and these will vary depending on your own
chosen field of practice. Throughout your Critical Reflective Log,
confidentiality must be maintained to ensure places, people and
specific events are not identifiable, therefore any names and
identifiable information must be anonymised.  
You are expected to provide underpinning evidence within your
critical reflective log, following APA 7th guidelines for in-text citations
and a final reference list at the end of the document. In text
citations should be included when considering underpinning
evidence-based research, guidance, publications; however a
reflective log also includes your reflection upon learning which does
not require detailed referencing.
Within each of the three exposure entries in your Critical Reflective
Log, they must be at least 500 words in length, and must include the
following to meet the assessment criteria:
1. Brief description of the exposure in theoretical learning or
practice learning in simulation or placement.
2. Critical evaluation of the similarities and differences between
your exposure and your own field of practice supported by
evidence.
3. Discussion of your learning and how it will benefit your
practice as a future registered nurse supported by evidence.
4. Mapping to the NMC platforms of proficiency standards
(NMC, 2018) e.g. 1.7, 5.1.
Q. Is there an estimated word count for each area within the table?
A. There is not a word count for each column it is 500 for each exposure. The final column
(numbers only) is not included and the main wording will be in the middle two columns, see
below for further guidance
Column 1- one sentence e.g attended a spoke placement on a Child and Adolescent Mental
Health (CAMHs) inpatient ward.
Column 2- similarity /difference (Must link to literature)
Students identify one difference e.g during my exposure to CAMHs the approach to care
utilised attachment theory as part of care which is an element of care I have not observed
within my own adult/ CYP/ MH field of practice. Attachment theory is….. (support with
theory). This was utilised by….. (link to theory). There have been criticisms of this approach/
theory made by….. (theory reference). The benefit observed in practice was…..
Column 3- relating to impact on future practice (Must link to literature)
Students need to link to how this one area of difference will impact on their practice in their
own field e.g. having observed the use of and now having gained an understanding of
attachment theory and its impact on care I will consider this in my future practice by
considering how relationships may be impacted upon due to challenges with early life
attachment….. (link to theory)
Column 4- NMC standards (numbers only no words)
1, 2, 5 & 6 (Not included in word count because it is numbers only no words)
End reference list is not included in the word count.

The purpose of this library assignment is to help nursing students to develop their research skills and to become familiar with different credible data sources available through the Library page at the FNU.edu
Topic Selection: Select a topic that interests you and that is relevant to nursing Pediatric practice. Your topic should be broad enough to allow for an in-depth exploration but narrow enough to be manageable within the scope of a 500-650 word research paper. You may select a topic related to patient care, nursing education, health promotion, or any other area of nursing practice that interests you.
Searching for Literature: After choosing a topic, use the Library page at the FNU.edu website to search for scholarly sources related to your topic. You must utilize at least 3 scholarly sources that have been published within the last 5 years. You may use databases such as CINAHL, MEDLINE, Embase, ClinicalKey, The Cochrane Library.
Evaluating Sources: Once you have identified potential sources, be sure to identify if they are relevant to your topic, written by credible authors, and based on rigorous research methods.
Writing the Paper: Your research paper should follow APA 7 guidelines and include an introduction and a conclusion. Be sure references are cited throughout the paper and included in a reference list at the end of your paper.
Please keep in mind that the paper will be checked for plagiarism, and similarity above 25% that is not cited will no be accepted for submission.
Please refer to the evaluation rubric for evaluation criteria

Levels of Evidence
Instructions
Watch the video Levels of Evidence – Why You Shouldn’t Always Trust the Experts! (2:18).
Read the following article:
“Choosing the Best Evidence to Guide Clinical Practice: Application of AACN Levels of Evidence”
Complete the Learning Activity for Identifying Levels of Evidence based upon the knowledge gained from the video and article assigned in this activity. Then, return to this page and answer the following questions in a Microsoft Word document.
What are the most important characteristics of an information source for you to consider before using the source to help you with your practice?
How important do you think your information-management skills will be to your success as a professional nurse? Why or why not?
What are key challenges you have faced in finding authentic sources of information?
Note: This activity is for practice only.
Citations:
Gray Matters. (2021, October 25). Levels of evidence – Why you shouldn’t always trust the experts! [Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/yyDxJf39iCA
Peterson, M. H., Barnason, S., Donnelly, B., Hill, K., Miley, H., Riggs, L., & Whiteman, K. (2014). Choosing the best evidence to guide clinical practice: Application of AACN levels of evidence. Critical Care Nurse 34(2), 58–68. https://doi.org/10.4037/ccn2014411