Category: Nursing

This is a service improvement assessment, students is proposing to design a poster encourage elderly patients to comply with using anti embolism stocking known as TED or COMPRESSION sock and her topic is ENCOURAGING THROMBOEMBOLIC DETERRENT STOCKING COMPLIANCE WITH THE USE OF EDUCATIONAL POSTER INTERVENTION’ so the learning outcome is as follows critically analysed, compare and contrast each paper then recommendations and conclusions

This is a TWO PART assignment. 
Part 1: Reply to the instructor’s comment to my post based on the attached case study
Part 2: Reply to a peer 

This eassy have two part A & B
will provide the rubirc and instruction please follow the rubric one by one 

Your Introduction must include:
Your PICOT question.
Purpose of or rationale for the scholarly project:
Provide an evidence-based explanation of why it is necessary to complete your scholarly project and what benefit will be gained (health promotion, fiscal, and efficiency).
Background on the problem or population of interest:
Using primary sources, provide data on your topic.
Providing the background will demonstrate the focused need for your project.
Significance of the problem to nursing and health care:
State how your problem or population of interest aligns with the larger interest of health care in the community.
Create a context to why your topic is important.
Benefit of the project to nursing practice:
State what will be gained from your project.
Describe the expected outcomes of your project to practice within your population and setting.
Relate the outcomes to evidence-based guidelines and outcomes.
Describe how your project may influence other populations or settings.
Submission Instructions:
The paper must be submitted via Turnitin and meet the maximum criteria of 20%. To avoid any possibility of AI being captured in your paper, please use resources such as Grammarly ONLY to check your grammar. Do not let it make changes, it is AI generated and will be detected on your paper. As an option, this paper can also be done as a Voiceover/Video powerpoint. Please note that a penalty will be applied if your paper has more than 20%.
The introduction is original work and logically organized.
The paper is 2-3 pages in length and follows current APA format 

Step 1: Comparison of Nursing Specialties
write 2-3 paragraphs comparing the nursing specialty you have selected – or the one you prefer if your choice is still under consideration –  to your second preference. Identify each specialty and describe the focus and the role that graduates are prepared for. Identify any other differentiators you feel are significant, especially those that helped or may help you reach a decision.
Compare Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practioner vs. Family Nurse Practitioner. 
Step 2: Justification of Nursing Specialty
Use the space below to write a paragraph identifying and justifying your reasons for choosing your MSN specialization. Be sure to incorporate any feedback you received from colleagues in this week’s Discussion Forum.
Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practioner- justifications for choosing this specialty: I have personal experiences that allow me to contribute to this field in a manner that will continue to move in a new direction 
Step 3: Professional Organizations
Use the space below to identify and examine one professional organization related to your selected or preferred specialty. Explain how you can become a member of this organization.
Organization: American Psychiatric Nursing Association 

Please review instructors’ comments. Needs speaker notes for each slide, there is several grammar errors. I have included the rubric, to help.

The selected problem for this assessment is domestic violence.
Develop a 3-4 page preliminary care coordination plan for a selected health care problem. Include physical, psychosocial, and cultural considerations for this health care problem. Identify and list available community resources for a safe and effective continuum of care.
Complete the following:
Select one of the health concerns in the Assessment 01 Supplement: Preliminary Care Coordination Plan [PDF] Download Assessment 01 Supplement: Preliminary Care Coordination Plan [PDF]resource as the focus of your care coordination plan. In your plan, please include physical, psychosocial, and cultural needs.
Identify available community resources for a safe and effective continuum of care.
Document Format and Length
Your preliminary plan should be an APA scholarly paper, 3–4 pages in length.
Remember to use active voice, this means being direct and writing concisely; as opposed to passive voice, which means writing with a tendency to wordiness.
In your paper include possible community resources that can be used.
Be sure to review the scoring guide to make sure all criteria are addressed in your paper.
Study the subtle differences between basic, proficient, and distinguished.
Supporting Evidence
Cite at least two credible sources from peer-reviewed journals or professional industry publications that support your preliminary plan.
Grading Requirements
The requirements, outlined below, correspond to the grading criteria in the Preliminary Care Coordination Plan Scoring Guide, so be sure to address each point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.
Analyze your selected health concern and the associated best practices for health improvement.
Cite supporting evidence for best practices.
Consider underlying assumptions and points of uncertainty in your analysis.
Describe specific goals that should be established to address the health care problem.
Identify available community resources for a safe and effective continuum of care.
Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.
Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.
Write with a specific purpose with your patient in mind.
Adhere to scholarly and disciplinary writing standards and current APA formatting requirements.
Before submitting your assessment, proofread your preliminary care coordination plan and community resources list to minimize errors that could distract readers and make it more difficult for them to focus on the substance of your plan. Be sure to submit both documents.
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:
Competency 1: Adapt care based on patient-centered and person-focused factors.
Analyze a health concern and the associated best practices for health improvement.
Competency 2: Collaborate with patients and family to achieve desired outcomes.
Describe specific goals that should be established to address a selected health care problem.
Competency 3: Create a satisfying patient experience.
Identify available community resources for a safe and effective continuum of care.
Competency 6: Apply professional, scholarly communication strategies to lead patient-centered care.
Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.
Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.

Module 2Change Process
Collaboration Café
Think of a time in which you encountered a challenging change process (personal or professional) and answer the following questions/prompts.
Was the change planned or unplanned?
List the elements that made this change difficult.
Who were the people involved, and what were their attitudes toward the change?
What were some lessons learned by you during this change process?

Health Promotion Data Collection and Analysis
Practicum Project Assignment
Purpose
The purpose of this assignment is to collect and analyze data for the Practicum Project. The aim of the Practicum Project is to advocate for community health through collaboration with licensed healthcare professionals and the provision of educational resources.
Course Outcomes
This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:
CO 1: Apply principles of nursing to the public health system. (POs 1, 6)
CO 2: Assess the health of populations, aggregates, and communities. (POs 3, 4)
CO 3: Apply the nursing process to vulnerable populations with professional clinical judgment and evidence-based practice. (POs 4, 8)
Due Date
Students must complete the Week 2 Practicum Project: Health Promotion Data Collection and Analysis template and submit it to the Dropbox by Sunday at 11:59 p.m. MT.
Late Assignment Policy 
Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction as noted in the rubric below.
Total Points Possible
This assignment is worth a total of 155 points.
Preparing the Assignment
Follow these guidelines when completing each component of the assignment. Contact your course faculty if you have questions.
Directions
Use the selected topic from Week 1 to complete the Practicum Project: Health Promotion Data Collection and Analysis template, following the steps below. 
Download the Week 2 Practicum Project: Health Promotion Data Collection and Analysis templateLinks to an external site.. Use of the template is required. If the template is not used, a 10% deduction will be applied. See the rubric. Save the template and include your name in the file name.  
Download the Week 2 Practicum Project: Sources of Data documentLinks to an external site.. 
Use the links provided in the Practicum Project: Sources of Data document and other professional sources to collect data on your practicum topic.  
Use the data collected from the Practicum Project: Sources of Data document and other professional sources to complete the Practicum Project: Health Promotion Data Collection and Analysis template. 
Correctly cite and reference ideas and information that come from scholarly literature.  Sources should be no more than five years old unless they are historical references. 
Follow rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation consistent with formal, professional writing.   
Abide by Chamberlain University’s academic integrity policy.
Include the following sections (detailed criteria listed below and in the grading rubric).
Demographic Data 
Collect county data for all sections 
Collect state data for all sections 
Collect U.S. data for all sections 
Epidemiological Data Collection: Prevalence  
Collect county data for two years, including number, and source 
Collect state data for two years, including number, and source 
Collect U.S. data for two years, including number, and source 
Collect world data for two years, including number, and source 
Epidemiological Data Collection: Mortality 
Collect county data for two years, including number, and source 
Collect state data for two years, including number, and source 
Collect U.S. data for two years, including number, and source 
Collect world data for two years, including number, and source 
Demographic Data Analysis  
Compare county, state, and national data 
Explain how data are similar 
Explain how data are different 
Epidemiological Data Analysis: Prevalence 
Compare county, state, national, and world data 
Explain how data are similar 
Explain how data are different 
Provide a citation for at least one scholarly source
Epidemiological Data Analysis: Mortality 
Compare county, state, national, and world data 
Explain how data are similar 
Explain how data are different 
Provide a citation for at least one scholarly source 
Epidemiological Data Analysis: Prevalence & Mortality 
Compare prevalence and mortality data across two years. 
Explain if the public health concern is improving or worsening. 
Provide a citation for at least one scholarly source. 
Data Analysis
Identify which data is most important to share with other healthcare professionals. 
Provide a rationale.  
Provide a citation for at least one scholarly source. 

Discuss the interrelationship among theory, practice, and research.
Submission Instructions:
Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources.  Your initial post is worth 8 points.