Category: Nursing

  • “Exploring the John Hopkins Nursing Evidence Based Practice Model and Its Role in Guiding an Evidence-Based Quality Improvement Project” #MSNproject

    Assignment Overview
    In this assignment the student will be exploring and describing the John Hopkins model along with identifying how the model will guide, inform, and support the evidence-based practice quality improvement project. This paper is part of your MSN project. Reminder: When you save this assignment in your document files save with the hashtag #MSNproject. This assignment can be placed in the MSN project template to complete Section IV of your final manuscript.
    Assignment Instructions
    Describe area of interest and focus of the evidence-based practice quality improvement project
    Describe the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence Based Practice Model
    Describe each component of the model
    Restate the clinical/practice question developed in NR520 (Note clinical/practice question might need to be revised)
    Identify how the model will guide, inform, and support the evidence-based practice quality improvement project.
    Abide by the Chamberlain College of Nursing Academic Integrity Policy.
    Sources older than five years may not be used without the permission of the class professor.
    Title page, pagination, subheadings, body of paper, citation of sources, and reference page must follow APA guidelines as found in the most current edition of the manual.
    Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, sentence and paragraph structure are followed and consistent with formal, scholarly writing as noted in the most current edition of the APA Manual.

  • “Advocating for Nursing Practice: Analyzing a Current Policy” Response to Initial Questions: The policy I have chosen to review is the Affordable Care Act (ACA), also known as Obamacare. This policy was signed into law in 2010

    Your participation in the discussion forum, including the following:
    A response to the initial questions in the discussion descriiption. Your initial post should be 200-250 words in length, and include references and citations.
    Responses to at least two other students’ posts. Each response should be a minimum of 100 words in length.
    A statement of agreement or disagreement is insufficient for the purposes of scholarly discussion. You must include references and citations in your responses to other student discussions. Your responses must be courteous, and should include specific scholarly information about the topic.
    The level of evidence you use to support your statements in the initial and subsequent posts is important and must be evident in each part of the discussion. Your textbook and any article you are asked to locate/read should always be used as evidence. The next level of evidence would be peer reviewed articles, and after that, well known web sites for example: CDC or the AHA. The use of blogs or obscure or non-healthcare related web sites is/are unacceptable in this course and program. Never utilize Wikipedia for scholarly work. Step 1 Choose a current policy or pending legislation to review.
    Visit the ANA website or the website for your state board of nursing, and investigate what policies are being addressed and the position the organization has on the policy.
    Step 2 Post your response to the discussion board.
    Respond to the following question and, if relevant, include your own personal experience:
    In your own words, describe the policy you chose and how it impacts your nursing practice.
    Explain whether you agree or disagree with the policy and the organization’s position on it.
    Is there something you can do to advocate your position?

  • Title: Annotated Bibliography for a Quality Improvement Project in Nursing

    Annotated Bibliography
    The annotated bibliography will assist in advancing your quality improvement project by facilitating critical understanding of the relevant literature. Students will be required to submit an annotated bibliography assignment due at the end of week 2. Each submission should provide annotations for 4 references. 
    The annotated bibliography will be a review of the relevant literature pertaining to the proposed problem/project. Carefully select the articles you review to inform and/or support the need for your project, for example:
    Does the literature provide supporting documentation of the existence of the problem you have identified? Your project should not be based solely on your own subjective perceptions, intuition, or opinion.
    Does the literature support the methodology or “solution” you have selected to address the problem? It can be helpful to have a template/model to follow.
    Does the literature point to major gaps that your project can fill? Maybe no one else has done what you propose to do. That’s great! Your study will definitely “add to our (collective) fund of knowledge.”
    Are there published reports by others who have already done what you propose to do? If so, critique this literature, and discuss how your project can improve / expand / build on it.
    The document must include a minimum 250 word one-paragraph introduction on your topic on page 1 before you begin filling in the annotations. This introduction will be developed with your first submission and then will be used again for your final paper.
    Annotated references should include the following four key components:
    Introduction – clearly defining a quality improvement initiative related to the nursing profession.
    Full and accurate APA citation of reference.
    Brief summary and assessment of the reference (type of research, major findings, quality and rigor of the reference, etc.)
    Brief reflection of how the reference relates to other references included in the bibliography (How does this reference challenge, or agree with other references cited)

  • Title: The Importance of Health Assessment in the Nursing Profession: Key Contributions and Impact on Healthcare

    Describe why is health assessment so important in the nursing profession? Identify key contributions to nursing and explain its importance in healthcare.
    Guidelines: 
    ◦    APA Format 
    ◦    MUST utilize credible data sources such as CINAHL, MEDLINE, Embase, ClinicalKey, The Cochrane Library. Library resources can be accessed from the Library page at the FNU.edu website. FNU Librarians are available to assist each student with retrieving the required scholarly content.
    ◦    Research paper must be 300 – 500 words.     
    ◦    3 or more scholarly sources must be utilized
    ◦    Sources must be within the last 5 years 
    ◦    Must have a minimum of 3 Sources 
    ◦    All article sources must be cited by including them in reference sheet (separate).

  • Title: “Integrating the Clinical Reasoning Cycle in Planning Person-Centred Care: A Guide for Healthcare Practitioners”

    Examine the clinical reasoning process in planning person cantered evidenced based care. Question 2 – Clinical Reasoning Cycle
    Clinical reasoning cycle guides clinical decision making that leads to accurate, informed decision making (Levitt-Jones, 2012). Person cantered care ‘is care that is respectful of, and responsive to, the preferences, needs and values of the individual patient.’ Discuss how you would incorporate Clinical Reasoning Cycle into planning person centred care for your patients. incorporate the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency 

  • “Addressing Inconsistencies in APRN Certification and Licensure: The Need for Full Practice Authority and the APRN Compact”

    Response needed to this post:
    An important concern about APRN certification and licensure is the inconsistency in state rules and the absence of complete practice authority (FPA) for APRNs throughout the United States. Full Practice Authority refers to the unrestricted authority of Advanced Practice Registered Nurses to independently practice according to their level of education and training, without requiring supervision or assistance from physicians. This problem impedes Advanced Practice Registered Nurses’ capacity to fulfill the increasing need for primary care services, especially in impoverished regions, and limits patients’ ability to obtain prompt and effective healthcare. Obstacles and difficulties that have impeded the advancement of APRN practice encompass resistance from medical associations, apprehensions about patient safety and care quality, and the impact of antiquated regulatory structures. Physician groups frequently contend that Advanced Practice Registered Nurses possess insufficient training and skill compared to physicians, resulting in opposition to providing them complete independence in their practice. Nevertheless, studies have demonstrated that Advanced Practice Registered Nurses deliver secure and efficient healthcare that is on par with physicians, particularly in primary care environments. To overcome these obstacles, it is required to make legislative and regulatory amendments to update the licensure of Advanced Practice Registered Nurses and eliminate unjustified limitations on their professional responsibilities. The APRN Compact is a legislative policy that currently affects APRN practice. The APRN Compact is a reciprocal recognition framework that enables APRNs to work in many states without the requirement of acquiring extra licenses in each state. The objective is to enhance the availability of healthcare services by enabling the movement of Advanced Practice Registered Nurses while upholding regulatory supervision and ensuring patient safety requirements. According to my latest information, a number of states have proposed or implemented laws to become part of the APRN Compact, indicating an increasing acknowledgement of the necessity to simplify the licensing procedures for APRNs. Ortiz et al. (2018) propose that enhancing the independence of nurse practitioners can enhance patient outcomes. Competent and accomplished Advanced Registered Nurse Practitioners have the ability to improve the availability and usage of primary healthcare services in rural regions. Increasing the level of independence for nurse practitioners could have positive effects in communities with limited access to healthcare.

  • Cultural Interview with a Haitian Individual: Insights for Culturally Competent Healthcare “End-of-Life Care: Cultural Practices and Considerations for Providing Better Healthcare”


    Contact an individual from the cultural group selected in module two (with their consent) and conduct a cultural interview.  
    This interview can be in person, over the phone, or through a video call. 
    The individual can be a patient, neighbor, grandparent, in-law, or friend. Do not use your parent, brother, sister, spouse, or significant other. 
    Respect the interviewee’s privacy and cultural beliefs. 
    Use the interview questions developed in Module 2 based on Module 1’s mind map and the textbook’s FIG. 1.1 and FIG. 1.2 in Chapter 1 as the blueprint and guide for your interview.
    Take notes during the interview to capture the key points discussed. 
    Use voiceover PowerPoint, Canvas Studio Screen Capture, Teams, or Zoom to narrate the PowerPoint presentation you will create to share the results of the interview. 
    Be sure to answer the following questions in the presentation: 
    Did your preconceptions or stereotypes influence the interview process? 
    What cultural factors emerged during the interview that could impact healthcare decisions?
    How might you adapt your nursing practice to provide culturally competent care for individuals from this cultural group based on the interview insights? 
    Submission Instructions:
    The presentation is to be original work and logically organized, formatted, and cited in the current APA style, including citations and references.
    The PowerPoint presentation should consist of 10-15 slides and be 10-15 minutes in length. Use voiceover PowerPoint, Canvas Studio Screen Capture, Teams, or Zoom to narrate the PowerPoint presentation. 
    How do I record a Canvas Studio video using a webcam?
    How to submit Canvas Studio media as a File Upload
    Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work. Journal articles should be referenced according to the current APA style (the online library has an abbreviated version of the APA Manual).
    The  Questions asked are 
    Introduction
    and General Questions
    Can you tell
    me a little about your background and your experience living in the United
    States, that’s different from living in Haiti
    What are some
    important aspects of Haitian culture that you think are important for
    healthcare providers to understand?
    Health
    Beliefs and Practices
    How do you
    and your family typically approach healthcare and wellness?
    Are there any
    traditional Haitian health practices or remedies that you or your family use?
    How do you
    view the role of traditional healers or herbal medicine in your culture?
    Family and
    Social Structure
    Can you
    describe the role of family in healthcare decisions in your culture?
    How do you
    typically support a family member who is ill?
    Religious and
    Spiritual Beliefs
    How do your
    religious or spiritual beliefs influence your views on health and illness?
    Are there any
    specific rituals or practices related to health and healing that are important
    in your culture?
    Communication
    and Interaction with Healthcare Providers
    How do you
    prefer to communicate with healthcare providers?
    Are there any
    cultural norms or practices that I should be aware of when interacting with you
    or your family in a healthcare setting?
    Perspectives
    on Western Medicine
    What has been
    your experience with Western medicine and healthcare providers in the United
    States?
    Are there any
    aspects of Western medicine that you find particularly helpful or unhelpful?
    Barriers to
    Healthcare
    Have you
    encountered any barriers to accessing healthcare services? If so, what were
    they?
    How do you
    think healthcare providers can better support the Haitian community?
    Health
    Education and Prevention
    What do you
    think are the most important health issues facing the Haitian community?
    How do you
    typically receive information about health and wellness?
    Dietary
    Practices
    Can you tell
    me about any specific dietary practices or restrictions that are important in
    your culture?
    How do you
    feel these dietary practices impact your health?
    End-of-Life
    Care
    What are some
    cultural practices or beliefs related to end-of-life care and decisions?
    Additional
    Insights
    Is there
    anything else you think I should know about your culture to provide better
    healthcare?

  • Summary of Three Journal Articles Summary of Three Journal Articles: Exploring Various Health Topics

    Pick 3 Journal articles and write up a summary of the articles. Each article is worth 50 points each. Summary Guidelines: 1 page The summary should be written with enough detail so that a reader would not have to look at the original research to understand all the main points. A well-written summary should cover three main points: why the research was done, what happened in the experiment, and what conclusions the author drew.
    Why was the research done?
    The first section of your summary should include all the important background information and
    context. It should also include the author’s purpose for doing the research and the goal or
    hypothesis. You should typically be able to pull all this information from the introduction.
    What happened in the experiment?
    Next, cover what happened in the methods and results sections of the paper. This is important for
    letting the reader know what happened in the experiment. Do not mix the author’s analysis with
    this section: simply state the facts first. This will keep your summary organized. Also, try not to
    include too many specific numbers or details. Only offer what is necessary or helpful in
    explaining what happened.
    What conclusions did the author draw?
    Lastly, write about the author’s analysis and everything they concluded from the experiment. Go
    over all the main points that the author makes here, including their conclusion, limitations, and
    future directions. Remember that the conclusion is not the same thing as the results. Results are
    the outcomes of the experiment, and conclusions are what the author says the results mean.
    Analysis
    “How is this research relevant or important?”
    Journal Article: Antioxidant Supplements to Prevent Age-Related Macular Degeneration
    Journal Article: Code red: When your postpartum patient won’t stop bleeding
    Journal Article: Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Could Improve Myeloma Treatment
    Journal Article: Nutrition in Older Adults
    Journal Article: Perceived Stress and Surgical Wound Cytokine Patterns
    Journal Article: Comparison of vegetarian versus animal-based low protein diets on estimated glomerular filtration rates in chronic kidney disease patients: a systematic review protocol
    Journal Article: Human Papilloma Virus and the Nurse’s Role in Education and Prevention
    Journal Article: Sickle Cell Disease: Bone, Joint, Muscle, and Motor Complications
    Journal Article: Feasibility and Effects of a Nursing Intervention for Patients with Peripheral Vestibular Disorders

  • Title: Analyzing a Policy Brief on a Healthcare Policy in the United States

    Search professional nursing organizations such as the American Nurses Association, American Association of Nurse Practitioners, American Academy of Nursing, International Council of Nurses or other governing body, health care or governmental sites such as Health Affairs, state boards of nursing, National Council State Boards of Nursing, The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, etc. for a policy brief related to a health care policy in the United States. Identify the following from the Policy Brief:
    What is the topic of the policy brief? Briefly summarize the content outlined.
    Why is this policy brief important? What is the impact?
    What is the topic/healthcare issue’s impact on social, political, ethical, and economic factors on healthcare?
    What interventions are suggested to improve the issue? Are the suggestions for improvement research based? Why is research important in developing health policy?
    How can improving the issue affect delivering of financing and services?
    Post requirements are attached. This is the initial post. Please follow attached rubric

  • Title: Reflecting on My Learning in Skin and Wound Care

    Reflect
    Reflecting
    on your learning is an effective practice that helps you become a better learner. It also helps me see where you might need some additional support. In this activity, your job is to talk about your own
    learning.
    Think of any experiences you have had with wound care and relate that to the new information gained in this module.
    Apply
    this new information to the major concepts related to skin and wound care. What behaviors would you continue? What would you do differently? Answer for yourself as a health care team member aiming to deliver high-quality care with improved patient outcomes, and discuss with your peers, future RN’s.