Category: Nursing

talk about nursing process. be sure to address each step of the process the assessment diagnosis planning implementation and evaluation
my experience is a nurse asked me to change a wound dressing which is outside of my practice

For this assessment, you will create a 5-10 minute video reflection that addresses either an interprofessional collaboration you experienced or a collaboration case study scenario that you imagine you experienced.  I WILL DO THE AUDIO JUST WRITE THE SCRIPT. WRITE SOMETHING ON A dialysis NURSE BECAUSE THAT IS WHAT I AM. I WORK IN A PLACE NAMED DAVITA dialysis CENTER. THANK YOU
As part of an initiative to build effective collaboration at a site where you work as a nurse, you have been asked to:
Reflect on an interprofessional collaborative project.
Examine what happened during the collaboration.
Identify positive aspects and areas for improvement.
Research best practice for interprofessional collaboration.
Use lessons learned from your research and experience to create a video reflection (5-10 minutes) that share suggestions for improving interprofessional collaboration that can be shared with leadership and colleagues.
Be sure that your assessment addresses the following criteria. Please study the scoring guide carefully so you will know what is needed for a distinguished score:
Reflect on an interdisciplinary collaboration experience, noting ways in which it was successful and unsuccessful in achieving desired outcomes.
Explain aspects of the collaboration that helped the team make progress toward relevant goals or outcomes.
Explain aspects of the collaboration that could have been improved.
Identify how poor collaboration can result in inefficient management of human and financial resources, citing supporting evidence from the literature.
Discuss the ways in which the interdisciplinary team did not collaborate effectively.
Discuss the negative implications for the human and financial resources of the interdisciplinary team and the organization as a whole.
Cite the literature for support.
Identify best-practice leadership strategies from the literature that would improve an interdisciplinary team’s ability to achieve its goals, citing at least one author from the literature.
Identify at least one leadership best practice or strategy that you believe would improve the team’s ability to achieve their goals.
Identify the strategy and its source or author and provide a brief rationale for your choice of strategy.
Cite the literature for support.
Identify best-practice interdisciplinary collaboration strategies to help a team achieve its goals and work together, citing the work of at least one author.
Identify at least one best practice or strategy for interdisciplinary collaboration to help the team achieve its goals and work more effectively together.
Identify the strategy, its source, and reasons why you think it will be effective.

Week
10 Neurocognitive and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Training
Title 48
Name:
Sarah Higgins
Gender:
female
Age:
11 years old
T- 97.4 P- 58 R 14 98/62 Ht 4’5 Wt 65lbs
Background:
no history of treatment, developmental milestones met on time, vaccinations up
to date. Sleeps 9-10hrs/night, meals are difficult as she has hard time sitting
for meals, she does get proper nutrition per PCP. she has a younger brother.
lives with her parents in Washington, D.C. No hx of head trauma.
Symptom
Media. (Producer). (2017). Training title 48 [Video].
https://go.openathens.net/redirector/waldenu.edu?url=https://video.alexanderstreet.com/watch/training-title-48
TO PREPARE:
Review this week’s Learning Resources and consider the insights they provide. Consider how neurocognitive impairments may have similar presentations to other psychological disorders.
Review the Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation template, which you will use to complete this Assignment.
By Day 1 of this week, select a specific video case study to use for this Assignment from the Video Case Selections choices in the Learning Resources. View your assigned video case and review the additional data for the case in the “Case History Reports” document, keeping the requirements of the evaluation template in mind.
Consider what history would be necessary to collect from this patient.
Consider what interview questions you would need to ask this patient.
Identify at least three possible differential diagnoses for the patient.
Complete and submit your Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation, including your differential diagnosis and critical-thinking process to formulate primary diagnosis.
Incorporate the following into your responses in the template:
Subjective: What details did the patient provide regarding their chief complaint and symptomology to derive your differential diagnosis? What is the duration and severity of their symptoms? How are their symptoms impacting their functioning in life? 
Objective: What observations did you make during the psychiatric assessment?  
Assessment: Discuss the patient’s mental status examination results. What were your differential diagnoses? Provide a minimum of three possible diagnoses with supporting evidence, listed in order from highest priority to lowest priority. Compare the DSM-5-TR diagnostic criteria for each differential diagnosis and explain what DSM-5-TR criteria rules out the differential diagnosis to find an accurate diagnosis. Explain the critical-thinking process that led you to the primary diagnosis you selected. Include pertinent positives and pertinent negatives for the specific patient case.
Reflection notes: What would you do differently with this client if you could conduct the session over? Also include in your reflection a discussion related to legal/ethical considerations (demonstrate critical thinking beyond confidentiality and consent for treatment!), health promotion and disease prevention taking into consideration patient factors (such as age, ethnic group, etc.), PMH, and other risk factors (e.g., socioeconomic, cultural background, etc.).

Task 1 : case study response: 750 Words.
Task 2 and 3 . Produce a SWOT analysis of your own interpersonal skills. Using this SWOT analysis produce a reflective account which identifies how maximise your strengths and considers ways to develop your areas of weakness.
SWOT ANALYSIS: 250 WORDS
REFLECTIVE ACCOUNT: 500 WORDS.

For this assessment, you can use a supplied template to conduct a root-cause analysis. The completed assessment will be a scholarly paper focusing on a quality or safety issue in a health care setting of your choice as well as a safety improvement plan.
Expand All
Introduction
As patient safety concerns continue to be addressed in the health care settings, nurses can play an active role in implementing safety improvement measures and plans. Often root-cause analyses are conducted and safety improvement plans are created to address sentinel or adverse events such as medication errors, patient falls, wrong-site surgery events, and hospital-acquired infections. Performing a root-cause analysis offers a systematic approach for identifying causes of problems, including process and system-check failures. Once the causes of failures have been determined, a safety improvement plan can be developed to prevent recurrences. The baccalaureate nurse’s role as a leader is to create safety improvement plans as well as disseminate vital information to staff nurses and other health care professionals to protect patients and improve outcomes.
As you prepare for this assessment, it would be an excellent choice to complete the Quality and Safety Improvement Plan Knowledge Base activity and to review the various assessment resources, all of which will help you build your knowledge of key concepts and terms related to quality and safety improvement. The terms and concepts will be helpful as you prepare your Root-Cause Analysis and Safety Improvement Plan. Activities are not graded and demonstrate course engagement.
Professional Context
Nursing practice is governed by health care policies and procedures as well as state and national regulations developed to prevent problems. It is critical for nurses to participate in gathering and analyzing data to determine causes of patient safety issues, in solving problems, and in implementing quality improvements.
Scenario
For this assessment, use the specific safety concern identified in your previous assessment as the subject of a root-cause analysis and safety improvement plan.
Instructions
The purpose of this assessment is to demonstrate your understanding of and ability to analyze a root cause of a specific safety concern in a health care setting. You will create a plan to improve the safety of patients related to the safety quality issue presented in your Assessment Supplement PDF in Assessment 1. Based on the results of your analysis, using the literature and professional best practices as well as the existing resources at your chosen health care setting, provide a rationale for your plan.
Use the Root-Cause Analysis and Improvement Plan [DOCX] Download Root-Cause Analysis and Improvement Plan [DOCX]template to help you to stay organized and concise. This will guide you step-by-step through the root cause analysis process.
Additionally, be sure that your plan addresses the following, which corresponds to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Please study the scoring guide carefully so you understand what is needed for a distinguished score.
Analyze the root cause of a specific patient safety issue in an organization.
Apply evidence-based and best-practice strategies to address the safety issue.
Create a feasible, evidence-based safety improvement plan to address a specific patient safety issue.
Identify organizational resources that could be leveraged to improve your plan.
Communicate in writing that is clear, logical, and professional, with correct grammar and spelling, using current APA style.
Example Assessment: You may use the following to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like but keep in mind that your Assessment 2 will focus on the quality issue you selected in Assessment 1.
Assessment 2 Example [PDF] Download Assessment 2 Example [PDF].
Additional Requirements
Length of submission: Use the provided Root-Cause Analysis and Improvement Plan template to create a 4–6 page root cause analysis and safety improvement plan pertaining to a specific patient safety issue.
Number of references: Cite a minimum of 3 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your findings and considerations. Resources should be no more than 5 years old.
APA formatting: Format references and citations according to current APA style.

Introduction to the disease and the organ system (history, signs, symptoms, epidemiology etc.)
Discussion of the normal anatomy and physiology of the organ system involved (cell and tissue populations involved, organs, primary functions, connections to other body systems)
Discussion of the changes to the anatomy and physiology as a result of the disease (pathophysiology)
Discussion of treatment/prevention options
3 primary and at least 2 secondary scholarly sources
The disease must be for one of the organ systems covered in this term listed in the syllabus. Select a disease from current events that is an emerging or reemerging concern to you or people in your area. Provide local epidemiological data for the disease.

1B. The
office of the national coordinator (ONC) created the SAFER guides to help
healthcare organizations conduct self-assessments to optimize the safety and
use of electronic health records in specific areas. These SAFER guides are intended
to be used by the interprofessional clinical informatics teams to optimize the
safe use of health information technology.
Choose one
SAFER guide and complete the checklist associated with the chosen guide.
·        
Review
the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) SAFER
Guides (on the Legislation
That Protects Healthcare Information page in the course). website: https://www.healthit.gov/topic/safety/safer-guides
·        
Select
one of the SAFER guides and complete the checklist portion of the guide.
o   
If
you do not currently use an electronic health record, think of one that you
have used in the past (or as a nursing student).
o   
If
unsure whether a recommended practice is implemented, click on the worksheet
link to review “Examples of potentially useful practices.” If you do not
think any of the examples exist in your health information system, then check “not
implemented.”
1C. Using the chosen SAFER guide and checklist, consider activities that should be included in a telehealth project plan Gantt chart to ensure safe use by the interprofessional clinical team.
Identify
one activity inspired from the SAFER guide that could be incorporated
into the Gantt chart for each of the SDLC phases (planning, analysis, design
and development, implementation, maintenance, monitoring and evaluation).
2A. Health information system use, functionality,
and payment are impacted by healthcare policies, legislation, and regulations. These impacts need to be analyzed when considering
activities for your Gantt chart.
·        
Research
one state or federal policy, legislation, or regulation impacting
telehealth.
o   
Use
your textbooks, essential readings from the course, online resources, and other
scholarly sources as needed.
·        
Write
a 3–5 sentence paragraph describing how the policy, legislation, or
regulation impact telehealth.
3A. Evaluating
user experience is done in the ANCC monitoring, maintaining, supporting, and
evaluating phase of the SDLC. User
experience (UX) is an umbrella term that incorporates human factors,
ergonomics, human-computer interaction, and usability. Essentially, ergonomics
is fitting the job to the worker.
·        
Consider the ergonomics within your
home while doing schoolwork or your workplace. Evaluate how you use technology
and whether you achieve a neutral, comfortable working position by completing the
computer
workstation ergonomics self-assessment checklist (on the User Experience (UX) page in the course).
·        
According
to the ergonomics checklist, write a 3–5 sentence paragraph describing the
chosen setting and which element(s) could be addressed to improve the
ergonomics in the chosen setting.

Lifelong learning involves a commitment to remain current within a rapidly changing, increasingly complex, and technologically reliant healthcare world.
Why is it important for nurses to commit to lifelong learning in relation to patients, organizations, and self?
How can organizations such as Sigma Theta Tau International (STTI) assist nurses in their lifelong learning journey?
In order to receive full credit, you will need to clearly respond to both parts of the question using subtitles or bullets AND cite at least one scholarly reference in your response. Y

please answer the worksheet attached. use all the resources provided chapter 24 and chapter 25 please cite those chapters. also include the article attached (cooper) and add only 1 external source

Im trying to receive financial aid for my summer term LPN certificate course. so far for the fall and spring term my grades been good. I received an C for fall and an B AND A for spring term that can be add to the letter i will continue getting good grades. just make this letter sound professional and sincere. thank you