Category: Nursing

Using the PICO question, write a 4 page paper about nurse burnout. % cited sources and a turn it in score below 15%.

Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to this question from any other website since I am already well aware of this. I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure that the answer comes up with way less than 18% on Studypool’s internal plagiarism checker since anything above this is not acceptable according to Studypool’s standards. I will not accept answers that are above this standard.
No AI or Chatbot! I will be sure to check this.
**I will provide the paper, matrix, and my previous discussion post on the John Hopkins Evidence Based Practice Model once you are selected to work on the question**
**After the revisions are made the paper, the final draft should be between 10-12 Full Pages Times New Roman Size 12 Font Double-Spaced APA Format Excluding the Abstract, Title, Reference, and Appendix Pages**
Title Page
2. Abstract (written in past tense)
3. Introduction (Include a mini-outline and a purpose statement)
4. Background/problem statement
A) Describe the practice problem in your practice setting. Be as specific as possible.
B) Present the background and magnitude of the problem and contributing factors using evidence.
C) Describe the population most affected by this issue and any population health, diversity, and equity issues this project will impact.
D) Examine the significance of the phenomenon to the discipline of nursing.
E) Select a theoretical framework and propose how it relates to your scholarly project.
5. Purpose
A) State the purpose and objectives of the scholarly project.
B) Propose the PICOT question and discuss each part of the question. Make sure to select ONE intervention that is evidence-based.
C) Identify and define the independent and dependent variables for your project based on your PICOT question. These relate to the I and O parts of the PICOT question.
D) Identify the search strategy, key words used, and engines searched.
6. Literature Synthesis
A) Independent variable (intervention). Using literature from the matrix, discuss the insights gained and evidence supporting the use of the selected intervention.
B) Dependent variable (outcome). Using literature from the matrix, discuss the insights gained and evidence supporting the outcomes that will be measured to analyze the effectiveness of the practice change project.
C) Summary. Present a summary of the literature review.
7. Implementation Model
A) Propose which intervention model would best guide the implementation of the project in your organization. Provide a rationale for your selection.
B) Identify what you will need to do at each step to implement the project using this model.
8. Stakeholders
A) Identify the specific stakeholders that will need to be considered to aid the success of your project.
B) Propose their potential impact.
C) Propose the actions you will need to take to secure their support.
9. Conclusion
10. References
11. Appendix A-Literature Matrix (At least 20 articles)
MESSAGE FROM INSTRUCTOR OF CORRECTIONS THAT NEED TO BE MADE ON THE FINAL DRAFT
You need to make substantial changes to this paper. You have the discussions for the Literature Synthesis section switched. The result should be discussed as the DV (Dependent variable) and the content and intervention, access, acceptance should be discussed as the IV (Independent Variable). Review the content in each section and title appropriately. PDSA is not an implementation model for EBP per the authors, select a model from Chapter 14 and review the author’s explanations and see page 156 why PDSA is not considered an EBP implementation model by the authors. PDSA is used primarily for QI projects and is not generalizable. Attach Part B to the matrix as part of the paper. Therefore, the PDSA part of the paper needs to be changed. Please use the John Hopkins Evidence Based Practice Model in it’s place. The matrix should also be updated to include Part B (Narrative Summary) of the additional references. Please be sure to copy and paste the information from the matrix_2.0_outline and include it at the bottom of the final revised version of the paper.
Requirements: Revise the Paper and Matrix Based on the Feedback Provided Times New Roman Size 12 Font Double-Spaced APA Format Excluding the Title and Reference Pages
Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to this question from any other website since I am already well aware of this. I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure that the answer comes up with way less than 18% on Studypool’s internal plagiarism checker since anything above this is not acceptable according to Studypool’s standards. I will not accept answers that are above this standard.
No AI or Chatbot! I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure to include an introduction paragraph with a clear thesis statement in the last sentence of the introduction paragraph and a conclusion paragraph.
Please be sure to carefully follow the instructions.
No plagiarism & No Course Hero & No Chegg. The assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
Please be sure to include at least one in-text citation in each body paragraph.

Concept map which needs to include a case study. The topic is intracranial regulation. I have attached the template for the concept map and a sample. I have also uploaded the rubric. The grading is tough. Smart goals are very critical and the pathophysiology must be done following the disease process of the patient the topic is done on.

Instructions for each section and rubric are attached below. Please only use peer reviewed journal articles that are from 5 years ago or more recent. No Chat GBT allowed.

You are currently employed as a healthcare provider in a community 
hospital in your local community. The local high school is designing a 
learning unit for sophomores who have expressed an interest in computers and other technology as a potential future career. The teacher, who has 
designed this unit, has asked you to attend one of the classes as a guest 
speaker discussing how computer-related technology is used in healthcare. 
Given the above scenario, please answer the following questions:
1. What are the 3 to 5 key points you would want to include in this 
presentation?
Your response must be at minimum 250 words.
Please remember that you must include one citation from a scholarly 
source that is within the last 5 years using APA guidelines.

Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to this question from any other website since I am already well aware of this. I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure that the answer comes up with way less than 18% on Studypool’s internal plagiarism checker since anything above this is not acceptable according to Studypool’s standards. I will not accept answers that are above this standard.
No AI or Chatbot! I will be sure to check this.
**I will provide the paper, matrix, and my previous discussion post on the John Hopkins Evidence Based Practice Model once you are selected to work on the question**
**After the revisions are made the paper, the final draft should be between 10-12 Full Pages Times New Roman Size 12 Font Double-Spaced APA Format Excluding the Abstract, Title, Reference, and Appendix Pages**
Title Page
2. Abstract (written in past tense)
3. Introduction (Include a mini-outline and a purpose statement)
4. Background/problem statement
A) Describe the practice problem in your practice setting. Be as specific as possible.
B) Present the background and magnitude of the problem and contributing factors using evidence.
C) Describe the population most affected by this issue and any population health, diversity, and equity issues this project will impact.
D) Examine the significance of the phenomenon to the discipline of nursing.
E) Select a theoretical framework and propose how it relates to your scholarly project.
5. Purpose
A) State the purpose and objectives of the scholarly project.
B) Propose the PICOT question and discuss each part of the question. Make sure to select ONE intervention that is evidence-based.
C) Identify and define the independent and dependent variables for your project based on your PICOT question. These relate to the I and O parts of the PICOT question.
D) Identify the search strategy, key words used, and engines searched.
6. Literature Synthesis
A) Independent variable (intervention). Using literature from the matrix, discuss the insights gained and evidence supporting the use of the selected intervention.
B) Dependent variable (outcome). Using literature from the matrix, discuss the insights gained and evidence supporting the outcomes that will be measured to analyze the effectiveness of the practice change project.
C) Summary. Present a summary of the literature review.
7. Implementation Model
A) Propose which intervention model would best guide the implementation of the project in your organization. Provide a rationale for your selection.
B) Identify what you will need to do at each step to implement the project using this model.
8. Stakeholders
A) Identify the specific stakeholders that will need to be considered to aid the success of your project.
B) Propose their potential impact.
C) Propose the actions you will need to take to secure their support.
9. Conclusion
10. References
11. Appendix A-Literature Matrix (At least 20 articles)
MESSAGE FROM INSTRUCTOR OF CORRECTIONS THAT NEED TO BE MADE ON THE FINAL DRAFT
You need to make substantial changes to this paper. You have the discussions for the Literature Synthesis section switched. The result should be discussed as the DV (Dependent variable) and the content and intervention, access, acceptance should be discussed as the IV (Independent Variable). Review the content in each section and title appropriately. PDSA is not an implementation model for EBP per the authors, select a model from Chapter 14 and review the author’s explanations and see page 156 why PDSA is not considered an EBP implementation model by the authors. PDSA is used primarily for QI projects and is not generalizable. Attach Part B to the matrix as part of the paper. Therefore, the PDSA part of the paper needs to be changed. Please use the John Hopkins Evidence Based Practice Model in it’s place. The matrix should also be updated to include Part B (Narrative Summary) of the additional references. Please be sure to copy and paste the information from the matrix_2.0_outline and include it at the bottom of the final revised version of the paper.
Requirements: Revise the Paper and Matrix Based on the Feedback Provided Times New Roman Size 12 Font Double-Spaced APA Format Excluding the Title and Reference Pages
Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to this question from any other website since I am already well aware of this. I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure that the answer comes up with way less than 18% on Studypool’s internal plagiarism checker since anything above this is not acceptable according to Studypool’s standards. I will not accept answers that are above this standard.
No AI or Chatbot! I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure to carefully follow the instructions.
No plagiarism & No Course Hero & No Chegg. The assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

AlexaModule 4 Discussion: Technology in Clinical Practice – Section B Alexa
Module 4 Discussion:  Technology in Clinical Practice
Instructions
Please post your initial and response postings below by the due dates posted in the NGR 7820 Course Schedule.  
Initial Posting:   For this module, everyone will respond to the same question and prompts outlined below.  Please refer to NGR 7820 Expectations: Discussion Postings/Written Work
Response Posting:  Respond to one of your classmate’s postings following the above guidelines.
Formatting:  All references are to be formatted using APA 7th ed. style.Links to an external site.
Grading:  Total discussion points = 100 (initial and response) – see grading rubric
Discussion Question
All students:  Please address each of the following prompts for your initial discussion post:
Provide a brief overview of a clinical practice technology of your choice.
How is this technology being used to improve clinical practice or care delivery?
Briefly discuss any relevant advantages/disadvantages of the use of the selected technology.
Discuss any legal, ethical, and/or privacy issues relevant to the use of the selected technology.
Reflect on complexity leadership (Uhl-Bien, M., & Arena, M. (2017). Complexity leadership: Enabling people and organizations for adaptabilityLinks to an external site.. Organizational Dynamics, 46(1), 9–20). Discuss an enabling leadership
Discussion Postings / Written Work
General Information
Assignments in this course are intended to strengthen your skills in written communication. Effective communication skills, including scholarly writing, is an element of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing’s (AACN) Essentials of Master’s Education in Nursing:
“Assume a leadership role in effectively implementing patient safety and quality improvement initiatives within the context of the interprofessional team using effective communication (scholarly writing, speaking, and group interaction)” (AACN, 2011, p.12).
Additionally, the American Organization of Nurse Leader’s (AONL) Nurse Executive Competencies include having the ability to “demonstrate written and oral presentation skills” (AONL, 2015, p.5) as a component of core competencies representing the science of managing the business.
All written assignments submitted by students, including both discussion postings and written papers, should provide evidence of growth in both written communication and scholarly writing over the course of the semester.
General Guidelines
To facilitate your success, please follow these general guidelines:
Discussion Postings
Initial post: Please restate the question you are answering to guide the discussion thread.
All postings (initial and response): Should be a minimum of three paragraphs in length, (approximately 350-500 words), enough content to convey understanding of key concepts.  
The first paragraph should be 2-3 sentences in length.
Middle paragraph(s) – should be 5-20 sentences and represent the substance of what you are conveying to the reader. Content should be supported by appropriate citations to assure you have gone beyond opinion.
The final paragraph should be 3-6 sentences and not contain new information but summarize what you have said.
Formatting: For all discussions, I recommend that you do all initial writing in Word or another document that can be saved. This provides you with a back-up in case there are any issues with your posting and/or Canvas glitches (rare but occur). Then copy and paste the content from that document into the discussion text box. I do understand that there are formatting issues with APA once the document is copied and pasted. Do your best to correct the formatting.
Use of Quotations: The use of quotations in discussions and written assignments is strictly limited for use in citing definitions ( See Section 8.25 of APA Manual:  Principles of Direct Quotation – p. 270)
Scoring Rubric: A detailed grading rubric is provided to guide your responses.
Written Papers
All written papers are to follow the APA 7th (2020) for structure and content (please note, not all elements are components of course assignments).
Please refer to paper instructions and grading rubric for further details.
Additional Resources
Additional resources available to you to support your growth and success include:
American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th). Washington DC: APA [ISBN: 1433832151]
Chapter 2:  Paper Elements and Format
Chapter 4: Writing Style and Grammar
Chapter 6: Mechanics of Style
Chapter 9:  Reference List
Chapter 10:  Reference Examples
UCF Libraries APA Style Guide
The University of Central Florida Writing Center.
The purpose of the writing center is not to fix papers but to teach writers strategies to understand and navigate writing situations.
Consultations are available both in-person/face-to-face or online. Students are allotted up to one consultation per day and up to three consultations every seven days.
American Psychological Organization:  APA Style WebsiteLinks to an external site.
References

Week 2 Narrative Essay
Attached Files:
ENC 1101 Narrative Essay Grading Rubric.pdf (114.853 KB)
Narrative Student Example Essay.pdf (28.474 KB)
Revision Checklist ENC1101R.docx (16.986 KB)
To submit your assignment, click on the title “Week 2 Narrative Essay” above.
In week one, you completed a discovery (prewriting) activity,  created a narrative outline, and drafted the introductory paragraph of your essay.  This week you will draft and revise your narrative essay and submit it for assessment.  The essay should show planning, revision, a  clear thesis statement or main idea, paragraph organization, purpose and direction, and effectiveness of conclusion. It should reflect the feedback you received from your instructor on your outline and demonstrate an understanding of the writing process. There are several resources to assist you including the graphic below, a revision worksheet you should review after drafting your paper, to help revise/edit/proofread for final submission. 
Watch Video
The Writing Process: Drafting
Duration: 2:46
User: n/a – Added: 8/26/20
Watch Video
How to write a body paragraph
Duration: 3:20
User: n/a – Added: 5/13/13
Watch Video
How to Organize Your Writing
Duration: 11:27
User: n/a – Added: 8/4/13
Watch Video
How to Write an Argumentative Essay – Introduction and Conclusion
Duration: 4:13
User: n/a – Added: 5/12/15
Narrative Essay Instructions:
The following criteria reflect the areas needed for a successful narrative essay.
The essay should have a clear purpose and a main idea/thesis statement within the first paragraph.
The narrative should share a larger lesson with the audience than simply retelling an event. 
A strong narrative centers on a conflict building from introduction to the body to a thought-provoking resolution. 
It should use descriptive language to bring the reader into the experience. 
Please see pages 67-70 for more details about the qualities of an effective narrative essay.
Choose one of the following topics:
What personal goal or achievement are you most proud of?  Share the story of the moment you reached that goal.
What one event brought you closer to your family?  Describe that day.
Was there an event in your life where you made a mistake or misjudged a situation?  Describe how the event occurred and what you learned from it.
Requirements: 
600-word narrative essay
Microsoft Word document formatted in APA (see below)
Submit to Submission Area
HOW TO REVISE YOUR PAPER (Print Revision Worksheet linked above)
Paragraph or Essay Structure:
Appropriate title indicates the essay’s topic.
Paper addresses all the requirements. (see rubrics)
Paper is logically organized and flows well
Introduction includes relevant background information and a clear thesis statement.
Body paragraphs discuss the main purpose and move the story forward
Each paragraph has a clear topic sentence and moves the essay forward
Effective conclusion does more than simply repeat the introduction
Sentence Structure:
Review sentence variety and construction as well as word choice and conciseness.
Correct all comma splices, run-ons, and fragments.
All sentences include complete thoughts, containing a subject and a verb.
Sentences have variety.
Vary lengths and structure using different beginnings, such as prepositional phrases, transition words, or dependent clauses.
Transition words (therefore, however, in addition, etc.) ensure writing flows smoothly, connecting related thoughts or signaling shifts in ideas?
Sentences are concise
Avoid being wordy.
Language and Tone:
Language is appropriate for the audience (formal writing)
Point of view is consistent (first person/narrative essay; third person/persuasive essay)
No “announcing” what essay will do. Do not refer to the essay itself.
The essay does not talk down to the reader, or make assumptions (avoid expressions like: Obviously, as you know, it is clear)
Grammar & Mechanics:
Sentences correctly punctuated.
Words are properly capitalized (including  “I”)
No words inadvertently omitted.
The subject and verb of each sentence agree.
Verbs are consistent in the correct tense (past, present, future)
Pronouns properly refer to their antecedents.
Spelling errors corrected including words spell check does not catch (their/there/they’re; its/it’s)
APA:
The Paper needs to be properly formatted in APA.
HOW TO FORMAT YOUR PAPER
Please review the attached document for the proper format for your papers.
Please note the following:
All papers must be Microsoft Word documents.
The paper has a running head that is the title of your paper in ALL CAPS. It is accompanied by a page number. Use your header function to create this line. Do not type it as text in the actual text area for your writing. (See your help function for information on creating headers and section breaks.)
The paper is double-spaced in Times New Roman, size 12, and has no extra spaces between the paragraphs.
The paper uses one-inch margins and half-inch indentions for the beginning of paragraphs. You can set this up in Microsoft Word to automatically default to these settings for your paper.
NO RESEARCH IS TO BE CONDUCTED FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT, so you will not need to provide a references page.
HOW TO SUBMIT THIS ASSIGNMENT
Title the Word document JonesA_ NARRATION DRAFT(change JonesA to your last name and first initial). If you have a title for the essay, center it as a double-spaced half-line just above the text.
At the top of this page click on the title Week 2 Narrative Essay
A new page will open where you can submit your document as an ATTACHMENT. 
Do not paste your essay into the comment box.
Make sure that you have actually attached the document.
HOW YOUR ESSAY WILL BE ASSESSED
Review the Narrative Essay Rubric linked above.

Please help me write an email addressing the issue of academic integrity. I was flagged for an exam because my forehead was cut off (and I was not completely within the frame). Please help me write an email to the dean discussing the unfairness of this and why if a sanction must be given, it should be because of noise, cheating detected through noises or constant viewing off to the side, or someone else in the background. 

This assessment you will describe a plan proposal that
includes an analysis of best practices of interprofessional collaboration,
change theory, leadership strategies, and organizational resources with a
financial budget that can be used to solve the problem identified through the
interview you conducted in the prior assessment.
Having reviewed the information gleaned from your
professional interview and identified the issue, you will determine and present
an objective for an interdisciplinary intervention to address the issue.
Note: the plan should be evidence-based and realistic within
the context of the issue and your interviewee’s organization.
For this assessment, use the context of the organization
where you conducted your interview to develop a viable plan for an
interdisciplinary team to address the issue you identified. Define a specific
patient or organizational outcome or objective based on the information
gathered in your interview.
The goal of this assessment is to clearly lay out the
improvement objective for your planned interdisciplinary intervention of the
issue you identified. Additionally, be sure to further build on the leadership,
change, and collaboration research you completed in the previous assessment.
Look for specific, real-world ways in which those strategies and best practices
could be applied to encourage buy-in for the plan or facilitate the
implementation of the plan for the best possible outcome. Use
attached layout for paper
·       
Length
of submission: Use the provided
template. Remember that part of this assessment is to make the plan easy to
understand and use, so it is critical that you are clear and concise. Most
submissions will be 2–4 pages in length. Be sure to include a reference page at
the end of the plan.
·       
Number
of references: Cite a minimum
of 3 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your central
ideas. Resources should be no more than 5 years old.
·       
APA
formatting: Make sure that
in-text citations and reference list follow current APA style.