Category: Management

# You should not copy from any website
# References must be written
# The assignment must be delivered on time
# The agreed number of words must be adhered to
# Give examples and write a perfect answer

Q – Please read the discussion Attached and prepare a Reply to this discussion post with comments that further and advance the discussion topic.
The reply needs to be substantial and constructive in nature. it should add to the content of the post.
Please provide the references you used.
Word limit: 150 – 200 words.

No plagiarism, no matching please. This is IMPORTANT!!
Word format only.
Answers must be detailed.
Use Time New Roman size 12 – double spaced and no pictures.
Use APA style reference. & In text citation.

This assignment is an individual assignment.
The Assignment must be submitted only in WORD format via the allocated folder.
Assignments submitted through email will not be accepted.
Students are advised to make their work clear and well presented; marks may be reduced for poor presentation. This includes filling in your information on the cover page.
Students must mention question numbers clearly in their answers.
Late submission will NOT be accepted.
Avoid plagiarism, the work should be in your own words, copying from students or other resources without proper referencing will result in ZERO marks. No exceptions. All answered must be typed using Times New Roman (size 12, double-spaced) font. No pictures containing text will be accepted and will be considered plagiarism).
Submissions without this cover page will NOT be accepted.
Assignment Workload:
This Assignment comprises of a short Case.
Assignments are to be submitted by each student individually.
Assignment Purposes/Learning Outcomes:
After completion of Assignment threestudents will be able to understand the following LO’s
LO5: To have the ability to carry out objective and scientific analysis of employees’ performance management.
LO6: To be able to identify and describe the needs of the parties involved in labor relations, and how these needs are balanced.
Read the case given and answer the questions:
Momena was the first of her family to go to college and, after working in a reputed organization for a few years, she got into her first-choice graduate program. During her first semester, Momena was seen as mature, professional, and well-organized. Concerns emerged during the spring semester; she seemed distracted when on campus and was absent from organization more days than she was present. She was working on a paper, but progress was slow, and in March Momena failed to turn in a draft on the date promised. Her advisor Dr. Ali assumed that more structure was needed, so she began to set very explicit expectations for products with specific deadlines attached. During their meetings, Momena was enthusiastic about her projects and eagerly promised to get the work done. However, the pattern of failing to deliver kept repeating itself. Finally, after an extended stretch when Momena was absent from the organization and had missed a deadline for a draft, Dr. Ali called her in to ask if she was serious about her work. Momena teared up and revealed that her mother was seriously ill, and she had been driving the three hours back home every weekend for the last several months to help her family. She had thought it inappropriate to mention her family crisis, not wanting to acknowledge that her personal life was interfering with her graduate studies. She asked Dr. Ali if she should withdraw from the program. Assignment Questions:Marks: 10
Q1. What are the main themes raised in this case?(2Marks)
Q2. What is the best course of action for this student for the immediate future? (2Marks)
Q3. How can an organization develop successful mentoring programs to help its work force? (3Marks)
Q4. What policy changes might the department implement to avoid a repeat of the situation in the future, with another student?(3Marks)
Answers:
1.
2.
3.
4

Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to this question from any other website since I am already well aware of this. I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure that the answer comes up with way less than 18% on Studypool’s internal plagiarism checker since anything above this is not acceptable according to Studypool’s standards. I will not accept answers that are above this standard.
No AI or Chatbot! I will be sure to check this.
Postincident review allows emergency managers, first responders, and allied professionals the opportunity to learn from past mistakes and reinforce positive adaptive behaviors. In the past decade, there have been many disasters where the effects of the hazard impact were exacerbated by either the failure or lack of adequate planning methods.
Select one natural, technological, or human-caused disaster that has occurred in the past 20 years.
Hurricane Harvey is the selected natural disaster
write a 1,000-1,250 word essay that includes the following:
Briefly describe the disaster event.
Discuss the failure of or lack of effective planning measures.
Provide a summary of after-action lessons learned from this event.
In your viewpoint, recommend how specific planning measure would prevent future planning failures to limit losses and ensure continuity of operations. Cite relevant emergency management sources to defend your claims
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
Requirements: 1,000-1,250 Words Times New Roman Size 12 Font Double-Spaced APA Format Excluding the Title and Reference Pages | .doc file
Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to this question from any other website since I am already well aware of this. I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure that the answer comes up with way less than 18% on Studypool’s internal plagiarism checker since anything above this is not acceptable according to Studypool’s standards. I will not accept answers that are above this standard.
No AI or Chatbot! I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure to include an introduction paragraph with a clear thesis statement in the last sentence of the introduction paragraph and a conclusion paragraph.
Please be sure to carefully follow the instructions.
No plagiarism & No Course Hero & No Chegg. The assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
Please be sure to include at least one in-text citation in each body paragraph.

No plagiarism, no AI or matching please. This is IMPORTANT!!
Word format only.
Answers must be detailed.
Use Time New Roman size 12 – double spaced and no pictures.
Use APA style reference. & In text citation.

Match colum a with colum b
Important Info
The order was placed through a short procedure (customer skipped some order details).
Please clarify some paper details before starting to work on the order.
Type of paper and subject
Number of sources and formatting style
Type of service (writing, rewriting, etc)

In this activity, you will review supporting materials and add the project scope, costs, and benefits to your project charter. You will also identify an aspect of the project as being out-of-scope and add it to the charter. Below is word doc with details for the project.

On April 18, 2016, The United States Supreme Court denied a petition for certiorari (refused to review the lower court’s ruling) in the case of Authors Guild v. Google, Inc., 804 F. 3d 202 – Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit 2015. Please look this case up and read it.
That case let stand the ruling of the Court of Appeals which can be found at the following website:
https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=2220742578695593916&q=Authors+Guild+v.+Google+Inc&hl=en&as_sdt=4000006 1) Please write a 500-word summary of fair use as this court decision says it.
2) Tell me what you would do if you were on the Supreme Court.
Rubric for Assignment submission Criterion
Description
Points possible
Content
Student accurately summarizes the effects of this Supreme Court decision
50
Word Count
450-600 words 10
Total Points possible
60

Write a paper starting with an introduction and then for part one, comment on your DISC style and on your top two or three Skills, Driving Forces and Motivators (refer to these sections of the assessment report). Explain what your awareness of these results means for you. What will you do differently? What do you want to improve upon or work on? Describe what you believe to be the two strongest and weakest areas of your personality, with reference to the assessment results? If you have work experience, please use your past professional experience to provide examples of those skills, motivators and driving forces in action. If you do not have work experience, then refer to examples from school or family interactions. In part two, explore how those traits of yours may impact your career and work performance based on your current or aspirational career path. Which traits are likely to be key to your success? Which traits will you have to be careful to work on, improve upon or regulate? How will you do this? Finally, in part three, develop a written action plan (with actual concrete steps you’ll take) to improve in those areas you identified above as needing your attention. At the end of the paper include a short conclusion. Organise your paper with proper APA headings. No abstract nor table of contents is necessary. Support your paper with 6-8 scholarly research sources, with one being your textbook. The paper should be between 1,600 and 1,800 words (not including cover page and references) and written using APA format. Adhering as closely as possible to the word count target is part of the exercise, requiring you to be selective with the information you include and ensuring everything you include adds value. Submit your paper to the Turnitin dropbox on the course Moodle page.
Before you get started, please carefully review the marking rubric below.