Category: Law

It is a Legal Analysis of a fact pattern. I have attached the instructions/fact pattern  and examples. 

To review the assignment information, click on the document name to view or download the document. Scroll to view or download the embedded rubric.
Proposal Classical Argument Thesis/Outline Assignment Instructions
Proposal Classical Argument Thesis/Outline Resources
Antecedents of Cybersecurity Implementation: A Study of the Cyber-Preparedness of U.K. Social Enterprises
Artificial Intelligence Implementation to Counteract Cybercrimes Against Children in Pakistan 
Artificial Intelligence and Human Psychology in Online Transaction Fraud 
Cyber Victimisation, Restorative Justice and Victim-Offender Panels 
An Integrated Cybernetic Awareness Strategy to Assess Cybersecurity Attitudes and Behaviours in School Context
Cybersecurity Awareness and Training (CAT) Framework for Remote Working Employees
Exploring the social implications of buying and selling cyber security
Generational Inclusion: Getting Older Adults Ready to Own Safe Online Identities
Impact, Vulnerabilities, and Mitigation Strategies for Cyber-Secure Critical Infrastructure
Is there a cybercriminal personality? Comparing cyber offenders and offline offenders on HEXACO personality domains and their underlying facets
Mapping Cyber-Enabled Crime: Understanding Police Investigations and Prosecutions of Cyberstalking
Thwarting Instant Messaging Phishing Attacks: The Role of Self-Efficacy and the Mediating Effect of Attitude towards Online Sharing of Personal Information
Unpacking the political-criminal nexus in state-cybercrimes: a macro-level typology
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool. For more information about Turnitin, click here.
Chapter 13 is in attachments

Please post your outline here if you would like to do the term paper. Check the syllabus for the more details about the term paper. Here is some information from the syllabus:
To be eligible [to write a term paper], a student must first submit an outline by Tuesday, May 28 (you can turn it in earlier!). That outline must be approximately 150 to 250 words long, with an indication of at least three sources (e.g., Internet sites, books, court cases, newspaper stories) you have found and may use. The outline is not graded, but we usually acknowledge its receipt and often also write to the submitting student with advice on how to approach his/her paper and/or with a request that he/she revise his/her outline. One approach – BUT NOT THE ONLY APPROACH – is have your paper arise from, relate to, delve deeper into, or otherwise concern a real case or actual example discussed in the LSB text, in the Barron’s book, or in one or more of the class-related YouTube videos. Generally, it would be much better to choose a case or example that was not discussed at great length (e.g., for more than one or two paragraphs), because that gives more opportunity for you to do your own research and develop your own insights.
This is not the only approach. Generally, any law topic that is business related (very broadly defined) is acceptable. Do not write about any subject that is more pertinent to another course than to a law course, about a matter where you are focusing on a case or an event from earlier than 2012, or about a criminal law matter not related to business.
PLEASE DO NOT WRITE focusing on OLD FAMOUS CASES – E.G., ROE v. WADE, BROWN v. BOARD OF EDUC.

Full topic:Addressing deep socio-economic inequality in a HRBAD: a bilateral governmental donor seeks to address structural socio-economic inequality within a least developed country (90 % of the wealth is
held by 10 % of the people), and wonders whether and how it can help to address deep inequality in
the partner country (with a particular focus on the HRBAD principle of non-discrimination).
1. Group 5 argues that the equality norm needs reinvigoration to address structural socio-
economic inequality, and suggests how such reinvigoration could take place in the context of
a HRBAD. 
In the written assignment you have to develop an argument in favour or against a certain approach to an HRBAD, based on the briefing that you have received (same topic and position as for roundtable).
The paper will take the format of an internal policy brief rather than an academic piece.
The policy brief is a document which outlines the rationale for choosing a particular policy alternative or course of action in a current policy debate. It is commonly produced in response to a request directly from a decision-maker or within an organisation that intends to advocate for the position detailed in the brief. … Nevertheless for any case, as any policy debate is a market-place of competing ideas, the purpose of the policy brief is to convince the target audience of the urgency of the current problem and the need to adopt the preferred alternative or course of action outlined and therefore, serve as an impetus for action.
Source: http://www.policy.hu/ipf/fel-pubs/samples/PolicyBrief-described.pdf 
add an executive summary of between 300 and 500 words
After a short introduction of the topic, develop the argument that has been assigned to you. Decide which focus you want to take; it is impossible to engage with all arguments.
Grab and keep the attention of the decision-maker; framing is important (normative versus effectiveness/impact arguments: ‘it is the right thing to do’ versus ‘it works’)
The argumentative analysis must engage with the key elements mentioned above (human rights principles; human rights law; power, change and context analysis; human rights law and global justice).
Stick to the position assigned to you (in favour or against), and be consistent in your arguments. Structure your text clearly.
Do not copy paste text from websites, articles, policy documents. Your submission is automatically submitted to a plagiarism check. Severe penalties for plagiarism apply.
Length: minimum 1500 words, maximum 2500 words (exclusive of cover page, executive summary and bibliography)
References: use APA (name, date, page number) in the text, and add a short bibliography;the bibliography is not included in the word count 
Substantive orientation
attention must be paid to:
human rights principles
human rights law as it is and as it ought to be
aspects of power, change and context analysis
a combination of legal technical human rights analysis with global justice considerations
Keep the target audience (as mentioned in the themes section) in mind.

Write an essay of 500 to 750 words to address the following: Define what it means to be a police officer and determine some of the duties of a police officer. Explain the legal use of nondeadly force and deadly force by the police. Determine based on research and statistical analysis whether American police officers use too little, enough or too much force. Describe the limits placed on police power by the U.S. Constitution and the federal courts. Are these limits appropriate given the current state of police use of force? Explain. Utilize the GCU library to locate a minimum of three to five scholarly, relevant sources to support your content.

Attatched is the ruberick for the paper.   i need it re written into a college level paper. I am willing to activly stay on standby to chat with you to get this paper to a bachelor level style. 

You must research and discuss an issue a case pending before the Supreme Court. You may present Your research and discussion in a final paper (minimum five pages)
Here are some guidelines to help you get started: 
Step 1: Pick an area of interest based on the syllabus.  Example: Freedom of Speech
Step 2: What question are you interested in exploring. Example: The right to carry a gun at a protest 
Step 3: Consider whether there are real life examples of this issue: Example: Individuals carrying guns at a Black Lives Matter Protest
Step 4: What has the Supreme Court decided in prior cases?: Example: Look at the seminal gun rights case: Heller v. D.C. or Chaplinsky and the fighting words doctrine. 
Step 5: Research the history of this issue! Example: Why do we even have the 2nd amendment. What is the basis for fighting words. 
Step 6: If the issue were before the Supreme Court, how do you think the court would decide based on these past cases? 
Step 7: Conclusion: What would you decide? Example: I think the individuals should have the right to carry guns at a protest 
because. . . 

I have put the assignment breif and my rough essay below – I am trying to compare how regulatory bodies in the UK handle complaint, I have to cite sources, make points and argue them.

Please find below (1) dissertation guidelines, a reminder of the deadline, and an example of a good dissertation. You’ll also find (2) some notes from the session as well as key sources.
1 – Dissertation guidelines
Re criteria of a good dissertation, the dissertation must be a substantial scholarly work of a quality and length akin to a law review article (at least 8 pages), that follows the below guidance:
Re the Introduction
· Please identify the dissertation subject and include a hook that captures the reader’s interest and articulates the scope of the dissertation.
· Please describe the overall argument.
· Please clarify fundamental concepts to the extent necessary.
· Please summarizes the paper’s structure in a roadmap.
Re the content, the student’s dissertation is evaluated on the basis of the following elements:
· Issue Statement : please identify a problem and provide a constructive analysis of it.
· Legal Significance : please present a subject that is novel, not obvious, and useful to the audience.
· Persuasive Argument: The argument in support of the thesis is clear, logical, and sustained throughout the document. Please make connections to broader related issues, without tangents or distractions (e.g., comparative law for instance between the UAE and EU where relevant).
· Balance : please offer a proposition and give sufficient weight to opposing views and countervailing considerations, by: taking problems and turning them to your advantage; addressing implications such as resources and policy matters; acknowledging tradeoffs as necessary.
· Structure: please structure the parts of your dissertation in a logical order; coherently connect sections and use transitions to effect good flow throughout.
Re the conclusion,
· Please re-state the thesis; provide insightful observations and conclusions (for example, by discussing the future implications of the dissertation or by providing forward looking recommendations); avoid introducing new, confusing information or propositions.
Re the format, I would appreciate you to follow this structure:
· Word-formatted
· Times New Roman (12 pt.)
· Double-spaced text
· 1.5 inches left margins
· 1 inch margins on the top, bottom, and right
· Footnotes with endnotes
· No blank pages
· Page numbering
Example of a good dissertation
Please find attached an example of a very good dissertation from the 2019 promotion. Deepa agreed for me to share her dissertation with the group.
2 – Key notes of the lecture are attached to this email as well.
3 – Some of you had difficulties to find the GDPR and Draft AI Regulation:
EU GDPR: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32016R0679
Leaked final version of the EU AI Act: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1xfN5T8VChK8fSh3wUiYtRVOKIi9oIcAF/view
US Biden AI Executive Orders: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2023/10/30/executive-order-on-the-safe-secure-and-trustworthy-development-and-use-of-artificial-intelligence/
US OMB Guidance on AI: https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/briefing-room/2023/11/01/omb-releases-implementation-guidance-following-president-bidens-executive-order-on-artificial-intelligence/
I remain available should you have any question.
Many thanks in advance

This is the assignment with 2 legislations. The topic needs to be on domestic abuse. The previous writer added domestic violence. I will attach the comments from
The previous assignment too