Category: Law

There are some essential feedback and input regarding this research that needs to be fixed/changed, and they’re as follows:
1. The research paragraphs need to be fully formatted.
2. The conclusion and results have to be after the discussion, and you can add your own comments on the literature review without dividing it into findings and results.
3. The survey was distributed to 15 consumers, but only 10 returned completed questionnaires. It’s important to note that the number of participants in the survey is relatively small, which may limit the generalizability of the results.
4. The research recommendations need to be expanded, as I only found two recommendations.
These changes are very very essential and important.

Please write a 300-word discussion reply to the post attached in APA 7 format. NO TITLE PAGE. 2 Sources within the last 5 years required.

Research Project Part Two: Advocacy
The second half of your quarter-long research project, the AP asks that you 1) introduce and
evaluate one or more significant efforts to address the problem you described in your CP;
and then 2) develop an argument about which of the efforts to address the problem work
best, explain why, and offer possible next steps; OR make the case that none of the efforts
to address the problem works, explain why, and offer possible next steps. Unlike the CP, an
expository essay that asks you to use your research to describe the problem, the AP requires you
to stake out a clear position in a thesis statement that you must defend through deeply engaged
research.
An advocate takes a position in a debate or conflict and works to solve problems. Social justice
advocates, for example, aim to give voice to the marginalized and defend the vulnerable from
harm by forging resolutions among stakeholders where intractable problems persist. To advance
their aims, advocates must be strategic: they must con sider
whether or not various modes of redress will effectively
mitigate or resolve the problem at hand. And to be strategic,
they must also be informed. You, too, must be deeply
informed about the advocacy landscape and ongoing
conversations concerning your topic and the problems
associated with it.
Your initial research for the AP should explore the various
efforts to shape public opinion through the media; to change
policies; to institute new laws or amend existing ones; or to
pursue litigation. As you examine these efforts, you should
assess their short- and long-term outcomes; their costs (in a
variety of senses: cultural, economic, personal, moral,
institutional, to name a few) and benefits; their relative
fitness in comparison to one another; their ability to produce
equitable outcomes; and the obstacles that stand in their
way.
Thinking about obstacles necessitates thinking about
rhetorical context. The role of public opinion, for example,
has always been instrumental (for better and worse) in
shaping advocacy efforts. Advocates must consider the
values expressed through social affiliations—political,
institutional, religious, cultural, and regional. Sometimes these considerations involve
compromise (advocates have terms for these compromises: “respectability politics” is one;
“matters of expediency,” another). Where there is compromise that bends to corporate interests
or public opinion, there may exist other kinds of compromise, such as short term solutions that
satisfy demands in the present but fail to address damaging consequences in the long term. You
should account for similar dynamics in the representation of advocacy efforts you examine.
Some questions that might
help to direct your research
include:
Is the problem you addressed
in your CP well-known to the
public? If so, has public
opinion influenced efforts to
address it? If not, how are
advocates working to raise
awareness?
How do scholars in various
disciplines study and write
about efforts to address the
problem?
Who or what informs the
positions and proposals of
reports on the problem from
government agencies, think
tanks, or other organizations?
Indeed, you will learn that few advocacy efforts enjoy universal support, and accounting for the
range of attitudes toward and characterizations of your chosen efforts—some you may agree
with, others you may strongly contest—will strengthen your advocacy analysis.
By the time you complete the AP, you should be able to:
• Write a developed thesis statement that clearly and concisely articulates the central claims of
your argument.
• Strengthen your argument by analyzing the positions of academics and other experts,
including those who offer perspectives that differ from your own
You should continue to practice the major skills from the CP:
• Develop effective research note-taking habits through source annotations.
• Practice information literacy in the research process by locating and critically evaluating
relevant and credible evidence from a variety of sources and genres.
• Understand research as a part of the larger composition process of prewriting, drafting, and
revision.
• Collaborate with fellow researchers to give and receive constructive feedback on the work in
progress.
• Plan, draft and revise an essay with organization and style appropriate for addressing a
general academic audience.
• Arrange and integrate evidence—primary-source, secondary-source, and multimodal—
intentionally, with particular attention to its argumentative purpose and rhetorical effect.
• Integrate and cite evidence in a transparent and ethical manner, using a standard citation
system. Learn how and why to avoid plagiarism and patch-writing.
Assignment Requirements
Process work is required to be eligible to submit a final draft for a grade. This may include but
is not limited to a proposal or prospectus and multiple essay drafts. Late or incomplete process
work may result in a grade penalty on the final draft.
At a minimum the argument in your AP should integrate evidence from 6-8 new sources, at
least two of which should involve complex, comprehensive arguments that substantively
consider the obstacles at work in solving the problem you addressed in your CP. You may
continue to use relevant sources that you found while researching for the Contexts Project. Keep
in mind that the total number of sources for the entire project’s bibliography is 12-20 sources.
Your final submission for Part Two should be an approximately 2000-word multimodal
composition. It should be formatted in MLA style , with parenthetical citations, a Works Cited
page, and a descriptive academic title.

Explain the relationship between law enforcement and the administration of justice and the impact of this on reducing the crime rate Not less than 3 pages

Develop a hypothetical scenario, beginning with a crime being committed, and proceeding through the legal system ending with incarceration. In your scenario, be sure to incorporate information from every step in the process, explaining what rights they have and what your defendant is experiencing In your reply posts: Reply posts are due no later than Sunday, 11:59 p.m. CT. Critically examine the postings of your peers and provide substantive replies to at least two (2) different individual initial posts. Compare and contrast your scenario to that of your peers. Provide additional insights, including any legal concerns that you may have.

After you have completed your research on private and government prisons, prepare a written summary of your findings. It is expected that, based on the nature of this project, a concise yet thorough analysis will take approximately 8-10 pages of text, in addition to your cover page, abstract, and reference page. Your paper must include a minimum of four (4) scholarly sources to support your findings. The paper will be written using all APA guidelines and will be double-spaced, using 1-inch margins, 12-point font. see attached for complete assignment

Essay question: “The Trustee Act 2000 introduced welcome reforms to the area of trustee investment. It is clear that a trustee can now account for any kind of environmental and ethical considerations when making investments on behalf of beneficiaries. The societal benefits of these reforms outweigh any negative consequences for beneficiaries.”
Critically analyse the legitimacy of the above statement. ______________________________
STRUCTURE: Introduction(150 Words)
Pathway to The Trustee Act 2000 Pathway to the reforms Trustee Act 2000 to the area of trustee investment
2. Environmental Considerations(350 Words)
Write about the relationship between the Environmental Considerations and The Trustee Act 2000 + in which part you can find it in the Act 2.1 IN Positive consequences for beneficiaries (100 Words)
2.2 IN Negative consequences for beneficiaries (100 Words)
2.3 Analysis paragraph (150 Words)
3. Ethical Considerations (350 Words)
Write about the relationship between the Environmental Considerations and The Trustee Act 2000 + in which part you can find it in the Act 3.1 Positive consequences for beneficiaries(100 Words) 3.2 Negative consequences for beneficiaries(100 Words) 3.3 Analysis paragraph (150 Words)
4. Conclusion (150 Words)
NOTES: (1000 words) For the whole essay OSCOLA referencing in the footnote Only Use: Cases, Regulation, Acts, Directives and Prereview Articles from google scholar
Websites might be useful : https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/the-trustee-act-2000-a-major-change-the-trustee-act-200-brings-in-the-biggest-change-to-trust-law-in-england-and-wales-for-75-years-/21559.article
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2000/29/part/III

NO AI, NO CHATGPT, NO Plagiarism, AND PLEASE USE CITATIONS IF NEEDED.
There are three parts to the final assignment: 1 case brief and 2 essay questions.  
Please do case brief for the case Tennessee v. Lane, 541 U.S. 509 (2004). Use the same format as for past case briefs. Attached and here:  https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=6561706852611120473&q=Tennessee+v.+Lane&hl=en&as_sdt=4,60
CASE STUDY(400 WORDS)
In addition, please answer the following two questions. Each answer should be 400-500 words (about 1 page single spaced) This part of the exam is “open book” and you can review and refer to the text of the laws and cases we studied, class materials, and discussion posts if you would like. But the most important part of this is your own words and opinions – I want to hear what you think!
Questions
1. (400 WORDS) A person with a disability is considering moving to the United States. However, they are concerned about encountering discrimination and other barriers due to their disability. They write to you for advice about what their rights would be under American disability laws. Write back to them  about what the major American disability rights laws require, protect, and prohibit. Note that I am not looking for a list of every disability rights law. I want to hear, in your own words, what you think are a few major issues a person with a disability might face, and what the law says about them. For example, “you might have a problem finding an accessible home. Here’s what the Fair Housing Act and the ADA say about housing . . .].
2. (400 WORDS)  You have been asked to become President Biden’s disability policy advisor. 1) explain why the Biden administration should prioritize protecting and promoting the rights of people with disabilities; and 2) identify a few major gaps in the current laws or problems people with disabilities currently face, and what the Biden Administration should do to fix them.

1. Part a is compulsory. you are required to complete all question in it
2. answer two question from part b.

For each of the following prompts, determine whether Officer Keller’s conduct constitutes a search for purposes of the Fourth Amendment:
Officer Keller is walking down Main St. when he overhears two voices yelling inside a house. He steps onto the sidewalk leading up to the front porch to try to see if he can make out what they are saying. When he gets a few feet away from the porch, he hears a male voice from inside the home shout “That’s it! I’m going to kill you! I am tired of your constant nagging.” Is the man’s statement subject to Fourth Amendment protection?
Next, Officer Keller walks onto the porch and looks through an opening in the curtains to see a woman seated in a chair. The woman appears to be crying. Standing opposite the woman is a man angrily holding a knife. Are these observations subject to Fourth Amendment protection?
Officer Keller knocks on the door and the man answers. Officer Keller can now clearly see that the man has a knife in his hand. He tells the man that he is under arrest for assault. The man drops the knife and runs past Officer Keller. Officer Keller yells for the man to stop, but he keeps running. Officer Keller does not chase him. Instead, he calls for backup. Has the man been seized for purposes of the Fourth Amendment?
For each thread, you must support your assertions with at least 3 scholarly citations in current
Bluebook format. 
Book: CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND THE CONSTITUTION 
LEADING SUPREME COURT CASES AND INTRODUCTORY TEXT
2023 Edition 
Jerold H. Israel
Yale Kamisar
Wayne R. LaFave
Nancy J. King
Eve Brensike Primus
Orin S. Ker