Category: Law

For each of the following prompts, determine whether Officer Keller’s conduct constitutes a search for purposes of the Fourth Amendment:
Officer Keller is walking down Main St. when he overhears two voices yelling inside a house. He steps onto the sidewalk leading up to the front porch to try to see if he can make out what they are saying. When he gets a few feet away from the porch, he hears a male voice from inside the home shout “That’s it! I’m going to kill you! I am tired of your constant nagging.” Is the man’s statement subject to Fourth Amendment protection?
Next, Officer Keller walks onto the porch and looks through an opening in the curtains to see a woman seated in a chair. The woman appears to be crying. Standing opposite the woman is a man angrily holding a knife. Are these observations subject to Fourth Amendment protection?
Officer Keller knocks on the door and the man answers. Officer Keller can now clearly see that the man has a knife in his hand. He tells the man that he is under arrest for assault. The man drops the knife and runs past Officer Keller. Officer Keller yells for the man to stop, but he keeps running. Officer Keller does not chase him. Instead, he calls for backup. Has the man been seized for purposes of the Fourth Amendment?
For each thread, you must support your assertions with at least 3 scholarly citations in current
Bluebook format. 
Book: CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND THE CONSTITUTION 
LEADING SUPREME COURT CASES AND INTRODUCTORY TEXT
2023 Edition 
Jerold H. Israel
Yale Kamisar
Wayne R. LaFave
Nancy J. King
Eve Brensike Primus
Orin S. Ker

Please use both primary authorities, such as case law, statutes and official reports, and secondary sources/academic opinion (journal articles; authored books; textbooks) in your answers. The approach we will take to referencing is as follows:
• You are not required to provide footnote citations
• You must, of course, provide authority for your arguments, e.g. case law, legislation and academic opinion where applicable Eg:
• CJA 2003 s 114(1)(d)
it, Hogan and Deed for 201) when referring to a
secondary source, e.g. a textbook]

part1: Choose an arbitration law case discussed in class this semester and analyze it (choose a case of interest from the PowerPoint given below).The cases I give below are all cases discussed in class this semester.
part2: find an arbitration case in a country of your interest and analyze it, it could be (USA, Japan, Australia, France, China.) etc.) 
Finally, compare the two cases and make a conclusion.(Total word count is 8-10 pages) double space.

The police see James standing at a bus stop on a downtown street, in an area
where there is extensive drug dealing. The officers ask James if they can look in his bag
and he says yes. They open the bag and find drugs. Is this a legal search? Why?
What if James says no? Are the cops allowed to open his bag and search it? Why?
What constitutional amendments should you rely on to answer?

Assuming that capital punishment is allowed by law, what would be the most humane way of carrying out a death sentence? Explain. Should the way a prisoner is executed vary based on case factors? If so, what are those factors? In your reply posts: Reply posts are due no later than Sunday, 11:59 p.m. CT. Critically examine the postings of your peers and provide at least two (2) substantive replies. Do you agree with your peer’s manner of execution? Why or why not? This is a discussion post

AS Level Global Perspectives format.
You will need to devise a question that sets up a debate between two contrasting perspectives. Your essay should be informed by varied research using sources that are globally diverse.
Primary sources that are up to date.
Additionally I need a work cited page only mentioning the citations and the citations should be done the same way as the provided PDF. Write it in the format of the PDF i provided

Each student will prepare a term paper, of a minimum of ten (10) pages, on a topic encompassed by jurisprudence.

you will have to ANSWER 2 QUESTIONS Please note that 2000 words is the maximum word count for the completed the paper you   will have around 1000 words to answer each question on the paper. Both questions are equally weighted so please Do not exceed the word count as this may result in a penalty being applied  please use  Use formal, clear language. • Good legal writing is concise and direct • Correct grammar and spelling – proof read! Make sure that your spell checker is set-up for English spelling (colour rather than color etc) and recognises legal terms e.g. tortious not tortuous, statute not statue etc • Presentation – avoid small font sizes and unusual type faces (Arial or Times New Roman, 12 point are the safest) • Case names should be in italics 
Questions-
Compulsory Question
1. 
During a recent football match between Seaside United and Inner City, held at Seaside
United’s stadium, a fire broke out under the stands and spread quickly due to the failure by
the football club to clear litter left from a match a week earlier. Due to the failure of the football
club to maintain the stands, one of the emergency exits failed to open and twenty of the
spectators died from crushing injuries caused in the panic as people tried to escape the fire.
Harry was one of the twenty people killed. Syras who had sustained severe brain injuries
and Luke who was suffering from smoke inhalation were taken to Seaside General Hospital.
Harry’s civil partner, Kurt, who was watching the match on television, saw the televised
images of the fire which he knew was in the part of the ground where Harry was watching the
match. He sustained a recognised psychiatric illness when he discovered that Harry had died.
As Luke only appeared to have minor injuries he had to wait for eight hours before he was
seen by a consultant. By this time the consultant, Dr North, had been on shift for twenty six
hours. He failed to spot signs of lung damage and neglected to administer the standard
treatment to alleviate the smoke damage. After six weeks in hospital, Luke had partially
recovered and was discharged. Had the standard treatment initially been provided by Dr
North, Luke would have had a 45 per cent chance of making a full recovery.
Syras’ wife, Mary, suffered a recognised psychiatric illness as a result of caring for her
husband who is now entirely dependent upon her.
Jameel, one of the stewards at the match who helped some of the affected spectators escape
from the flames on to the pitch, suffered PTSD as a result of his involvement in the horrific
incident.
Advise Syras, Luke, Kurt, Mary and Jameel.  
2. Following the Supreme Court decisions in Mohamud v WM Morrison Supermarkets plc [2016]
UKSC 11 and M Morrison Supermarkets plc v Various Claimants [2020] UKSC 12, critically
evaluate the circumstances under which an employer will be held vicariously liable for the
tortious actions of their employee.
the sources should be only                                                                                        
 Primary sources – cases and statutes (where relevant) but the basis for the argument 
 Quality Secondary sources –academic journal articles (check out
reading suggestions accompanying the seminars. You may also
want to check the electronic library, e.g. the journals search facility
on Westlaw).
 Answer the questions set, not one that you would have liked to be
set. We will never ask you to ‘Write everything you know about…’,
but answers of this type are often produced – this is not a recipe
for a good mark 
 Use your knowledge and skill to interpret what is asked of you to
the best of your ability – as you would do in a traditional exam. 
 Structure your answer thoughtfully. At this level of study there is
usually no single set answer nor expected structure. We will credit
your content and structure on its merits. 
 Members of the Tort team (and other faculty) are not permitted to
advise on the interpretation of the questions, cannot read work
before submission etc.
Writing your Answers 
When answering the essay question 
• What is the question asking? What issue/s raised by the question? 
• Make sure that you do what the question asks – critical evaluate/discuss etc
rather than purely descriptive 
• Scope for interpretations to differ – convince marker regarding the relevance of
your approach 
• Support your response with close analysis of the cases and other relevant
sources. 
• You must go beyond merely naming cases to offer an informed analysis of the
relevant law within them. 
• Do the thinking before the DEX, go broad first (READ KEY JUDGMENTS &
JOURNAL ARTICLES which will develop your understanding and analysis) 
• Ensure that you have a clear introduction, middle and conclusion & proof read
thoroughly 
layout 
◦ Introduction
 Briefly explain your interpretation of the question
 Identify issues and broadly explain arguments 
 Outline of the structure 
◦ Body 
 Present your arguments. Pay attention to how your
argument flows from one paragraph to the next
 Support your arguments with relevant authority (cases,
articles, possibly statutory material) 
◦ Conclusion 
 Draws together the main argument presented in the
body. 
 Your final chance to remind the reader what your essay
set out to do, and how you achieved this, although the
conclusion should not contain new material.
Essay questions 
Problem question
• Accept the facts set down in the factual scenario. Do not go too far ‘off piste’ 
• It is unnecessary to have ‘general’ introduction at the beginning of a problem
question – seek to identify the issues early 
• Presentation – you can make use of headings if you wish 
• Issue, law and application – Identify the legal issue, state the relevant law (case
law/statutory material) and apply the law to the facts 
• You will be given appropriate credit as long as your structure makes
sense and effectively conveys what you intend to say. 
I Identify issues
R Identify the Relevant Law
A Apply the Relevant Law
C Conclude
Problem question
• Focus on the issues raised and what you are asked to do. Don’t write
everything you know about the area(s). 
• Most credit is given for analysis and application of law in relation to the
facts of the problem 
• No need to repeat the facts of the problem in your answer, other than as
necessary to make clear which part of the problem you are addressing. 
• Apply the authorities (cases and/or statutes) to the facts appropriately 
• The more detail in which you know the cases/statutes the more you will
be able to spot and engage with the likelihood that they will be applied or
distinguished. 
• Unlike essay answers, journal articles are usually less important for
problem answers, although feel free to refer to them if they enhance your
arguments or help with your interpretation of points.
Problem question 

Answer all five (5) essay questions and answer every part of the essay problems — labeling each part, a, b, c, etc. 
This is my final exam, please make sure all the answers are correct. 

This is a Criminal law Uk assignment. There are two sections in the main Question. Section A and Section B. You must have to choose at least one Problem Question from Section A and 
At least one Essay Question from Section B. In addition, For the Problem Question you need 
to use IRAC method for solving this Problem Question. IRAC stands for Issue, Rule, Analysis 
and Conclusion. First you need to Identify the issues from each party and then state correct 
rule ( remember you must have to define the rule you are stating) relevant to the Scenario 
using relevant caselaw and Statute from the reading material ( textbooks, caselaws, statutes, journal articles etc.) I have attached for your kind   information. On the other hand, the        Section B Essay Question you need to include Introduction ( background information,             Creating an outline ), Main Body ( by stating correct rule and    creating Clear and Concise  argument,  good level of analysis and Counter argument and   Analysis and finally a               conclusion. Remember the Each Question Problem and Essay question will be 1500 words    and in total 3000 words. I have provided a good level of reading   materials  read them          carefully and use them where relevant to the Each Question. For citation just use the  in-text citation ( Just author name and page number, short form of case law name) but do not provide bibliography. Just in-text citation     will be fine. Do not use any external sources. Essay    Question ten sources required but for   the Problem Question use as many caselaws and            Statutes depending on your approach      but the word count should be 1500 maximum. Read all of the materials and marking criteria   for answering the Questions.  Do not hesitate to contact if any question arises. Remember,   Analysis is very important part for both answers.  Language must be UK simple language throughout the paper. Good luck with your tasks. I’m expecting a High Quality paper but language must be simple and Clear throughout the         paper.    
Also, have a look at the samples but do not copy them at all. Just follow the structure and    
Format.