Category: Law

Action ItemsAn e-mail is sent to Party B, in order to form a contract. Party A is the sender of the email. Party A’s identification is located at the top of the e-mail and is sufficient to show authentication. Will use of the individual’s initials or name at the end of the message satisfy the signature requirement, under Article 2B of the Uniform Commercial Code (the UCC)? Submission InstructionsIt It must be 150 words

Critically examine the postings of your peers and provide substantive replies to at least two (2) different individual initial posts. Do you agree with your peers? Why or why not? Offer one additional advantage not listed in your peer’s initial post. Offer one additional disadvantage not listed in your peer’s initial post.

Randi Nicole Gordon but I know me as Nikki just turned 45 and is still living in the shadows of her teenage days.  After successfully raising two boys, Nikki has been focusing on making a better life for herself.  Randi “Nikki”  received her  GED 2 weeks ago. She is now trying to clear her criminal records to be able to get a better job for herself.  After knowing Nikki for 16+ years, I have at least two new things about her, her government name and that she has criminal fractions on her background check.  I agreed to have a letter written requesting a pardon on her behave. 

1. The word limit for the research essay is 6,000 words.
a. Footnotes are included in the word limit. You may prefer to include more
footnotes but hope that they would be excluded from the word limit. If that
is the case, please highlight them in red to show that those would be extra
footnotes that are not included in the word limit.
b. Feel free to use any citation format as you see fit.
2. Your essay should have two sections. Each section should have a title indicating
your research topic.
a. They should deal with two specific issues chosen out of the three research
areas: personal data protection, legal regulation of algorithms, and
artificial intelligence and copyright.
b. For example, if your first session deals with a specific issue concerning
personal data protection, your section should deal with a specific issue
concerning legal regulation of algorithms OR artificial intelligence and
intellectual property.
c. We have discussed a range of specific research issues in our class. You
may write about one for each research area.
d. But you should feel free to write about any specific issue that we did not
discuss in class.
3. Please provide a word count at the end of your essay.

Hello I need help with a 3 page law task.Please I only need an expert please. Will tip extra for great work. Will attach everything once attached.

• Originality, Similarity and Plagiarism Check: Your work must be original. All papers will be submitted through SafeAssign software to check for similarity and plagiarism. Any instance of academic dishonesty will result in a grade of zero for the assignment. No exceptions and no second chances!
• All references must be cited using APA format. This includes both in-text citations and the reference list at the end of the document.

You need to write two essays of 1250 words each using osccola reference.
This the first essay: 
1. Critically reflect on the influence of policy regarding the development of duty of care within the tort of negligence.
100 Marks
The second essay:
2. Pennington Village Hall, in south Wales, was hosting a choir based music recital one lunchtime. There was a sudden cracking noise which came from the roof – a concrete support fell onto the stage, physically injuring a number of people. The builders of the Village Hall have admitted liability in negligence because of mistakes made in the design of the concrete support. James Smith was in the direct path of the falling concrete support; he managed to roll out of the way just in time but was very shaken by the experience. Mark Jones was standing next to him but was not so lucky, he was trapped, unconscious, under a great deal of debris. Mark’s sister Elaine witnessed the accident and was convinced, for the next two hours, that Mark had died. Mark was then pulled out of the debris alive, but with no memory of what happened to him that day. The concert was being audio live streamed on FaceBit. Mark’s wife Tracy was listening to the concert from her home in Scotland. Tracy was convinced she had heard Mark’s screaming and believed he was fatally injured. Tracy managed to catch a plane to Cardiff and arrived at the hall before Mark was rescued. The choir’s conductor Rachel was not physically injured but was distraught at these events – two choir members were killed right in front of her. Jane, a paramedic worked tirelessly to assist the casualties but became overwhelmed by what she had witnessed, and subsequently took three months off work.
James, Tracy, Rachel and Jane have all been diagnosed with PTSD. Advise them how the law would approach a claim for psychiatric injury using the tort of negligence.
100 Marks

5. Nigel wants to rob a security van. He phones his friend Omar, asking if he ‘wants in on the job for half of the money’. Omar is shocked at the suggestion and puts the phone down. Nigel then turns to his wife Pauline, who agrees to be part of the plan. Pauline is however scared of her husband and only intends to drive him to the chosen location, and then play no further part in the robbery. Later that day, Pauline drops Nigel off opposite a shop where the security firm makes deliveries. Nigel watches the van arrive from a safe distance and then starts to cross the road towards the van. As he does so the police arrive and arrest him. Unknown to Nigel, Omar had reported the planned robbery after receiving his call. Discuss the criminal liability, if any, of the parties involved in this scenario
This piece of assessment will be assessed by reference to the following criteria: 1. The ability to identify the legal issues central to the question. 2. The ability to define the law clearly and concisely. 3. The ability to explain the relevant legal provisions in the context of the question. 4. The ability to apply the relevant law to the factual situation 5. The ability to provide a clear, reasoned and supported argument in relation to the set question. 6. The use of appropriate further reading and research. 7. The ability to write grammatically correct English and to spell and punctuate accurately. 8. The ability to structure the answer appropriately. 9. The ability to present and reference your work appropriately. Reference Style: Oscola UK Law only. UK cases as well as any articles or law journals are required.

In a three-page, double-spaced reflection essay, respond to any/all of the following prompts:
Drawing from the course materials and the conversation with our guest speakers, describe how mass incarceration affects families of incarcerated people.
Drawing from the course materials and the conversation with our guest speakers, describe how policies and/or practices exacerbate or mitigate harms to the families of incarcerated people.
Are there specific policies and/or practices that you believe would help support the families of incarcerated people?
Your essay should include an appropriate header with student information (at the top of the first page), 3 pages of text, double-spaced, standard font (such as Times New Roman), size 12 font, 1-inch margins, in-text citations, and a reference list. Please reference this template for more guidance.
See the below grading rubric for guidance on grading criteria.
**As with all submitted work, please reference our class policy on the use of ChatGPT/foundation models and our policy on academic honesty (in the syllabus). Reflection essays will be scanned in the Turnitin repository.

You work as a junior researcher for the Government Research Institute (fictitious) and have been asked to investigate and evaluate methods of executive accountability in the UK. Instructions are as follows:
1. Based on your research, identify case study examples of where the executive has been held accountable.
2. Examine the methods of accountability used in these examples and provide an evaluation of their effectiveness.
3. Consider proposals for reform or to enhance the effectiveness of existing methods.
To begin your research, you have been provided with some materials (below). 
Please extend your research with additional sources based on the examples you have chosen.
In order to assist you, you have been given the following indicative template: 
Title: Provide a suitable title for the paper 
Executive Summary: This should be written once the paper is complete and should briefly summarise the ideas developed in the paper. 
Introduction: This should provide general context and elaborate on the importance of the problem. You may want to draft a few questions (research questions) which need answering. 
It should contain: 
An explanation of your task 
Questions you have decided to address. 
Discussion: 
This section should be divided into subsections – each with a title. Each subsection should discuss one issue based on your questions – discussing the evidence and the pros and cons of each potential solution. 
Conclusions and Recommendations: 
What are your findings and what do you recommend considering your findings? 
Referencing: submissions should be referenced in OSCOLA format, i.e. footnoted with a bibliography.