Category: Law

1) The Internet has resulted in new ways to guarantee payments, such as digital cash, a virtual currency or digital wallets. Discuss security issues.
2) Your thoughts on the issue of qualification for credit. Discuss whether there could be racial patterns with legitimate qualifying processes.

The desired search title is:
Research – Time-sharing system in Saudi tourist real estate units What is required is a scientific research of no less than thirty pages
References must be documented in the margins of each page
All conditions for scientific research must be applied and the template in which you will place the work must be attached as required
You must provide a comprehensive explanation of all research questions and communicate findings and recommendations
Attached is the system for you to use in your research
https://laws.boe.gov.sa/BoeLaws/Laws/LawDetails/3a…
You can translate it to understand its content

I have attached a draft of the paper. The feedback on this draft is that: “This paper relies heavily on the position of the OCPP, which is not much of a scholarly resource in any event, without reflecting sustained effort to find & address counterarguments.” Can you please update the paper to do this?
The additional writing will go into the section on page 15 that says, “Oregon Should Repeal its Individual Taxpayer Kicker Law to Ensure its Economy is Protected During Times of Recession.” The additional writing should flow with this argument.
The number of sources used is insignificant, but if you can find more sources, that is good.

Essay Question
Answer ONE of the following questions:
1. ‘Neoliberalism undermines democracy’. Critically discuss.
2. Is the notion of human rights a Western Concept? 
3. With respect to gender and/or race, are rights a tool for social control or for liberation?
Word count
For PSI Advanced  – 2,000 words (excluding footnotes and bibliography)
Please ensure you read the essay guidance set out in the Week 10 Revision Lecture (recording and lecture notes), especially in relation to the key requirement that your essay makes a substantive engagement with the module readings.
Look also at the supporting information attached.
Please use OSCOLA refrencing and in text citations.
The marking criteria can be found below . 
I have attached two sample essay below for guidance. 
i will also attach the supporting materials for the module and the essay when hiring is processed. 

The Supreme Justice of my choice to research is Samuel A. Alito Jr., Associate Justice.
Please read attached documents for instructions on this assignment 

Law 101 Case Study
Action ItemsIn Brazil, the export industry always finds ways to cut costs. The international community expressed its dismay at the manufacturers’ latest cost-cutting decision to replace flouride with diethylene glycol in toothpaste. Flouride is designed to strengthen teeth enamel. Diethylene glycol is a poisonous substance used to make chemicals that are widely used by the automobile industry.The end product exported from Brazil was poisonous toothpaste that was not labeled to indicate that it contained diethylene glycol. When the poisonous chemical was found in the toothpaste, Costa Rican government officials issued a warning telling consumers to discard the toothpaste. In 2019, a study found that toothpaste containing diethylene glycol was harmless if the chemical concentration was below 15.6 percent. The contaminated toothpaste found in Costa Rica contained levels as high as 5 percent. Costa Rican government officials warned that it was unsafe in any concentration. It is especially harmful for children, as well as those suffering from weakened kidneys.
In July 2020, due to growing concern about the safety of the imported toothpaste, the Costa Rican government banned all manufacturers from using diethylene glycol in toothpaste. Investigators believed that the toothpaste originated from two small manufacturers in the Brazil but the manufacturers denied any wrongdoing.
The contaminated toothpaste was found in five shipping containers but there have not been any confirmed illnesses or deaths from using the contaminated toothpaste. If you were manufacturing toothpaste and decided to substitute diethylene glycol for glycerin, would you consider it your ethical obligation to tell the consumer?
Submission InstructionsComplete and submit this assignment per your professor’s instructions.

At the glamorous Met Gala in May 2023, Christopher Hall, a New York business mogul and
fixture in the New York art and fashion scene, told pop star Billie Eilish that a recently
discovered painting by Andy Warhol could be purchased for just $10 million. Between sips of
Veuve, Hall assured Eilish that she could sell it at Schindler Auctions at the end of the month for
$60 million. Having won countless awards and lucrative endorsement deals, Eilish is flush with
cash and indicates she will purchase the work as long as Hall procures an expert opinion
confirming the work’s value.
Jonathan Miller is a Warhol expert. Ten days after the Met Gala, Miller writes the following
letter to Hall’s friend, Henry Frick:
May 17, 2023
Dear Henry,
You have asked my opinion about the painting “Bananas,” the recently discovered work
by Andy Warhol. It was painted by the artist in 1987, right before his death. In my view,
the painting could easily fetch $60 million at auction. Please feel free to call on me
should you have any other questions.
Sincerely,
Jonathan Miller
Miller has an ownership interest in the Warhol painting, a fact that is not disclosed in his letter.
The May 17 letter was given by Henry to his friend Christopher Hall who in turn delivered it to
Eilish on May 23rd. The day after receiving the letter, Eilish purchased the painting for $10
million and posted a photo of her newest acquisition on her Instagram.
After showing off the work on social media, Eilish consigned the work to Schindler Auctions to
put in the May Contemporary Art auction with a low estimate of $60 million, a high estimate of
$80 million, and a reserve of $50 million. After much pre-auction publicity, the work was bought
in (went unsold).
QUESTION: On June 30, 2023, Eilish sues Miller. Analyze all available claims that might be
brought against Miller and any defenses Miller might raise.

I have attached the file with the question, please answer with the best work
These are the criterias I need met: 
Shows clear evidence of wide and relevant
reading and an engagement with the conceptual
issues.
Develops a sophisticated and intelligent
argument.
Shows rigorous use and a confident
understanding of relevant source materials
Achieves an appropriate balance between factual
detail and key theoretical issues. 
Provides evidence of original thinking. 
·    In essay questions, marks are awarded for your
ability to critically analyse an essay statement. The essay will provide you
with a statement. You should identify arguments in support of, and counter to,
that statement. Marks are awarded for development of an argument, including
understanding of the question and context of the question, a thesis and
structured testing of that thesis.  The
question must always be answered but this need not be as a yes/no.   Critical
analysis is key. Legal reasoning involves breaking down a practical or theoretical
problem.
· you are excpeted to be able to
critically evaluate legal arguments, assumptions and concepts. You should be able to evaluate
arguments in academic articles and explain your evaluation. 
You should be able to evaluate legal judgments
and draw upon distinctions in judgments in your evaluation
After you have written it please send me a turnit
in’ report to check for any plagarism.
NO
plagarism please 
P.S can you try your best to give me the highest
possible mark and i will give a good review and
possibly tip.
use the following books and articles
– Women and the law Book by Sandra Fredman; Oxford Scholarship Online Law, 1997 chapter 10
– Feminist judgments: rewritten employment discrimination opinions Book edited by Ann C. McGinley; Nicole Buonocore Porter 2020
– Domestic Workers, the ‘Family Worker’ Exemption from Minimum Wage, and Gendered Devaluation of Women’s Work in Industrial Law Journal Article by Natalie Sedacca
-Shared Parental Leave: Can Transferable Maternity Leave Ever Encourage Fathers to Care? in Industrial Law Journal Article by Gemma Mitchell 07/06/2022

No intro 
No conclusion 
No citation needed 
No direct quotes 
In one paragraph summarize the article and main arguments 
In a second paragraph provide a critical analysis of the author’s position, agreeing or disagreeing, and providing its strengths and weaknesses 

Assignment Details
In this unit, you are studying the executive branch and the power that the president exercises. The president’s power derives from Article II of the U.S. Constitution, from Acts of Congress and from implied powers. Two of the many ways that a president may choose to exercise their power or authority are through executive orders and administrative agencies. During the 2021–2022 Supreme Court term, the U.S. Supreme Court issued two opinions about vaccine mandates. Both opinions involved the president exercising his power through two different agencies—the Department of Labor (DoL) through the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).
In the first opinion, National Federation of Independent Business v. Department of Labor, OSHA, the Supreme Court held that OSHA exceeded its powers by imposing a vaccine mandate on an estimated 84.2 million employees in the United States and granted the requested stay.
In a second case, Biden v. Missouri, the Supreme Court upheld the vaccine mandate that was imposed upon health care workers.
For this assignment, select 1 of these two cases. Read the case, view the supplemental materials, and respond to the corresponding questions in a 4–5-page paper.
The President Exercises Power Through an Administrative Agency
Case 1
Read National Federation of Independent Business v. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration. ( https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/21a244_hgci.pdf )
View the following supplemental materials that discuss the case:
Karen Harned Discusses U.S. Supreme Court’s Vaccine Mandate Decision ( https://pages.nfib.com/EM-2022-1-NAT-Supreme-Court-Vaccine-Mandate-Victory-ABSB_LP-Video-A.html )
Supreme Court Blocks Biden COVID Vaccine Mandate for Businesses, Allows Health Care Worker Rule ( https://www.cnbc.com/2022/01/13/supreme-court-ruling-biden-covid-vaccine-mandates.html )
After reading the case and viewing the supplemental materials, answer the following questions:
Summarize the facts of the case in your own words.
Summarize the regulation that OSHA passed regarding mandatory vaccinations for employees. To whom did the vaccine mandate apply and were there any exceptions to the vaccine requirement?
Did the Court find that OSHA acted within its powers to pass the vaccine mandate? Discuss the Court’s reasoning or explanation for its ruling.
Finally, discuss whether you agree or not with the per curiam majority opinion, concurring opinion, or the dissenting justices. Explain your answer in detail.
Case 2
Read Biden v. Missouri. ( https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/21a240_d18e.pdf )
Review the following supplemental materials:
2022 Supreme Court Review (watch from 1:03:36 to 1:05:09) ( https://constitutioncenter.org/news-debate/americas-town-hall-programs/2022-annual-supreme-court-review )
Supreme Court Blocks Biden COVID Vaccine Mandate for Businesses, Allows Health Care Worker Rule. ( https://www.cnbc.com/2022/01/13/supreme-court-ruling-biden-covid-vaccine-mandates.html )
After reading the case and viewing the supplemental materials, answer the following questions:
Summarize the facts of the case in your own words.
Summarize the regulation that the HHS Secretary passed regarding mandatory vaccinations for health care workers. To whom did the vaccine requirement apply and were there any exceptions?
Did the Court find that the HHS Secretary acted within their power to pass the vaccine mandate for health care workers? Discuss the Court’s reasoning or explanation for its ruling.
Finally, discuss whether you agree or not with the per curiam majority opinion or dissenting justices. Explain your answer in detail.
APA Formatting of Possible References and In-text Citations
Because you are discussing a case, either Biden v. Missouri or National Federation of Independent Business v. Department of Labor, please make sure that you list one of these case citations in your list of references and in-text citations, which are listed in bold below.
(All references are double-spaced, in alphabetical order, and include a hanging indent.)
References
Case 1 (National Federation of Independent Business v. Department of Labor)
Breuninger, K., & Kimball, S. (2022, January 13). Supreme Court blocks Biden COVID vaccine mandate for businesses, allows health-care worker rule. CNBC. https://www.cnbc.com/2022/01/13/supreme-court-ruling-biden-covid-vaccine-mandates.html
National Federation of Independent Business. (2021). Karen Harned discusses U.S. Supreme Court’s vaccine mandate decision [Video]. https://pages.nfib.com/EM-2022-1-NAT-Supreme-Court-Vaccine-Mandate-Victory-ABSB_LP-Video-A.html
National Federation of Independent Business v. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, 595 U.S. ____ (2022). https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/595/21a244/
In-text citations to go with the above references
(Breuninger & Kimball, 2022).
(National Federation of Independent Business [Video], 2021).
(National Federation of Independent Business v. Department of Labor, 2022).
Case 2 (Biden v. Missouri)
Biden v. Missouri, 595 U.S. ____ (2022). https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/595/21a240/#:~:text=Supreme%20Court%20stays%20an%20injunction,are%20vaccinated%20against%20COVID%E2%80%9319
Breuninger, K., & Kimball, S. (2022, January 13). Supreme Court blocks Biden COVID vaccine mandate for businesses, allows health-care worker rule. CNBC. https://www.cnbc.com/2022/01/13/supreme-court-ruling-biden-covid-vaccine-mandates.html
National Constitution Center. (2022, July 12). 2022 Annual Supreme Court Review. https://constitutioncenter.org/news-debate/americas-town-hall-programs/2022-annual-supreme-court-review
In-text Citations to go with above references
(Biden v. Missouri, 2022).
(Breuninger & Kimball, 2022).
(National Constitution Center, 2022).