Attaching paper already written, received feedback from the Professor and there are some things missing- The paper needs to be pursavive- convincing leaders that this change needs to happen. The paper needs to start off with addressing the CEO or CNO of the hospital. The paper also has to include 2 internal competencys which are resources from the book. I will add those, and then it need to wrap up with something of the nature as I emplor you to consider this proposal as its in the best interest of…….
Here are two resources that need to be used somewhere in the paper:
Marshall, E. S., & Broome, M. E. (2017). Understanding contexts for transformational leadership: Complexity, change, and strategic planning. In E. S. Marshall, & M. E. Broome (Eds.), Transformational leadership in nursing: From expert clinician to influential leader (2nd ed.) (pp. 37–62). Springer.
Chapter 3, “Current Challenges in Complex Health Care Organizations: The Triple Aim” (pp. 63–86)
Pereira, K. C., & Bowers, M. T. (2017). Current challenges in complex health care organizations: The triple aim. In E. S. Marshall, & M. E. Broome (Eds.), Transformational leadership in nursing: From expert clinician to influential leader (2nd ed.) (pp. 63–86). Springer.
Feedback from the Professor as well regarding the rubric which is attached:
Well written you are missing the requirement of 2.1. Response adequately synthesizes and integrates outside resources. Does not adequately synthesizes and integrates competency-specific resources that support the responses provided.
You did not identify the audience, your voice is not persuasive for the audience to make a change.
Category: Healthcare
-
Title: “Persuading Healthcare Leaders: A Proposal for Transformational Change”
-
Title: Application of Systems Thinking in Transition of Care for the IHI Quadruple Aim: An Annotated Bibliography and PowerPoint Presentation.
Part 1:
To complete Part 1:
For this Performance Task, you will develop a PowerPoint presentation explaining how you would apply systems thinking when providing a transition of care that is aligned to the IHI Quadruple Aim.
Submission Length: A minimum of 2-3 pages in an annotated bibliography.
Select a transition of care (hospital, specialty care, rehabilitation, nursing home, homebound, etc.).
Use the Walden Library and other reputable academic resources to locate 5 scholarly resources on nurse leadership during this transition of care. Identify what constitutes effectiveness (i.e., cost, care management, best/effective providers, best setting, sustaining outcomes) for this transition of care. What evidence supports this transition of care or transition of care intervention?
Create an annotated bibliography of the 5 scholarly resources you located on your selected transition of care.
https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/assignments/annotatedbibliographies
Part 2
Based on the research you conducted in Part 1, develop a 5- to 6-slide PowerPoint presentation for a staff meeting that addresses the following:
Identity your selected transition of care.
Explain how you, as a nurse leader, along with your healthcare team, would apply systems thinking when providing a transition of care aligned with the IHI Quadruple Aim framework in order to improve it. Explain what the fourth aim in your strategy would be and why.
Describe the key stakeholders that might be involved in this transition of care and how you would engage and influence them to improve transition of care processes.
Explain how systems thinking would inform your improvement plan for your transition of care.
Can do just 5 powerpoint slides and then 2 pages on Part 1 for a total of 7 pages. -
Title: Enhancing Patient Interviews through Culturally Competent Communication: The 4 Cs Approach The 4 Cs of communication, also known as the four principles of effective communication, are clarity, conciseness, coherence, and courtesy. These
Discuss ways to enhance a successful patient interview process.
• Discussion Topic: What are the 4 Cs of communication?
Please elaborate on how can the Family Nurse Practitioner meet the 4 Cs of communication based on culturally competent care. -
“Health Informatics in Anesthesia Practice: Addressing Standards, Legal and Ethical Issues, Patient Safety, and Workflow Processes”
The purpose of this assignment is to a. Identify and evaluate issues affecting and concerning health informatic in anesthesia practice in the current clinical setting, b. Provide empirical evidence to support issue affecting anesthesia and c. Present Ideas in a clear, succinct and scholarly manner.
The student is to write a 8 page paper exclude title and reference page on health informatics. This topic must be focus on a healthcare informatics concern affecting nurse anesthesia in your current setting. Paper are to be double spaced, use times toman 12 point font and AMA format
Format
Title page
Header for content
The paper narrative for discussion related to the impact of health care informatics for anesthesia practice
Conclusion
References
Content header
1. standards and regulations
2. Legal and ethical issue
3. Patient safety
4. Security and privacy
5 workflow processes and benefits and implications -
Title: A Critical Exploration of the Implementation and Evaluation of the Affordable Care Act in the United States
This assignment is worth 100% of the total marks for this course unit.
This essay aims to introduce, contextualise, and critically explore a health policy of your choice. This includes how this policy might be evaluated, and the implications of a particular evaluation approach for assessing the policy. Please refer to the Assignment Brief for any further information regarding this assignment.
For your draft submission, please complete Part A of the assignment. The essay should concentrate on a health-focused policy implemented in your country or a context that you are familiar with. Part A of the assignment is due on April 9th.
You must include as much critical appraisal as you can throughout the assignment to critically appraise the evidence (within the word limit). You must apply your critical thinking skills by going beyond just describing what the authors did and focusing on the interpretation and evaluation of what they did within the context of the study, as shown in the ”CRITICAL APPRAISAL FILE”.
Consider the word count and the marks in the brackets when you respond to each question (See Assignment Brief file).
3,000 maximum word limit. It is preferable to include the references at the end of the paper.
References should be consistently laid out in Harvard format.
Submit word-processed work as 1.5 or double spacing and number the pages
Please carefully review all of the assessment task questions in the assignment brief file. In addition, refer to the assignment brief for information on the learning outcomes that will be reviewed in this assessment.
There are also other materials provided that include important information about this task. Please read through all of the materials as some provide Course Material for this module, the Assignment Brief, and the Critical Appraisal. You can use these as a reference to help you organise your assignment response. Utilise the CASP checklist to appraise the study critically as well.
A marking rubric file is provided as well to consider while composing the assignment to check if the requirements for this task are met. -
Title: The Importance of Evaluation in Evidence-Based Research Projects: Methods, Plans, and Adjustments
The purpose of this section is to understand the importance of evaluation in an EBR project. In a 500-750-word paper, include the following as they relate to evidence-based research:
Analyze a minimum of three different methods of project evaluation.
Determine which project evaluation method would be most appropriate for your project and explain why.
Create an evaluation plan for your project.
Develop an adjustment plan that identifies points when a change in direction may be needed. Determine what actions may be needed to ensure a successful implementation.
This assignment requires a minimum of two scholarly articles. -
“Securing Funding for Nanotechnology-based Surgical Procedure in Australia: A Strategic Approach for Head of Surgery at a Public Hospital”
Instructions:
In
no more than 1200 words, please reflect on the learning materials and
required readings for this week, and discuss the following
questions/prompts with other students by responding to the
following task:
As
the head of surgery at a public hospital, you’re keen to introduce a
new nanotechnology-based procedure that’s already approved by the
Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA). Your task is to determine the
funding pathway for this innovation.
Start
by discerning whether funding falls under state, federal, or both
jurisdictions. Next, assess whether the procedure’s cost will be
integrated into the Australian Refined Diagnosis Related Groups
(AR-DRG), Medical Benefits Schedule (MBS), Pharmaceutical Benefits
Scheme (PBS), or any other relevant scheme.
Once
these elements are clear, identify the top five key stakeholders
crucial for securing funding for the new technology.
Your
response should cover:
Understanding
the technology and addressing any data gaps.
Establishing
relationships with key stakeholders and fostering collaboration.
Implementing
a strategy to monitor funding progress.
Word
count 1200 words
Style:
Vancouver -
Title: Critical Evaluation of Patient Data, Validity of Measurements, and Reflective Analysis of Clinical Assessment Skills for Critically Ill Patients.
Please use recent referencing and guidlines from UK.
Part 1 -Instructions 1. Critically evaluate the data below, link it
with appropriate pathophysiology, discuss the current ICU management, and
specifically consider the patient’s experience. (60%)
Part 2.- Critically discuss the validity and potential sources of
error in the measurement or assessment of any of the items of data below and
discuss further information that would be useful to plan care. (30%)
Part 3 I have started but needs
re-writing Utilising a
reflective model, reflect on how you could develop your knowledge and skills
for clinical assessment of critically ill patients. (10%.
Reflection – What, So What, Now
What. Rolfe et al.’s (2001) I was
allocated to look after a patient who needed a new Arterial line and Central
Venous Catheter (CVC). As I was busy, I drew the sample and placed it in the
Blood Gas Machine; while speaking to another staff member about items I needed
during the night, I selected Venous without focusing. The sample was analysed
as an arterial sample but was a venous sample that had been processed. The
reading of Svo2 was very high, indicating that the artery is rich in oxygenated
blood. This meant that there was a possibility of the CVC line being in an
artery instead of a vein. This was a cause for concern as the results were
transferred to the flowsheet, so when the medical doctor saw that Svo2 was
<60% for a venous site, that meant the sample was inaccurate, or the catheter was placed in the wrong site as the expected level should be 60-80%. I then retook both samples separately, analysed the results, and transduced the CVC line with tracing and reading; CXR was requested by the medical doctor for NG placement and CVC position check to be more confident. Because of this learning curve, I am now much more focused when performing tasks by minimising the amounts spoken and distractions so that samples and labelling of items are done correctly, thereby reducing stress levels that are already high and reducing delays in treatment time for patients. -
“Policy Development for Patient Safety: Translating Evidence into Practice” Policy Implementation for Patient Safety: A Step-by-Step Guide
Create a new policy for the medical center based on evidence using the attached Hospital Policy template.
Collapse All
Introduction
Quality improvement begins with the end in mind. Up until now, you have researched the practice problem and developed a focused, evidence-based intervention to address a patient safety problem. The next step would be to implement the practice change and evaluate the change to determine the effect it had on the population. Now, developing a policy will help sustain the change.
Along the way, you will learn that as a leader in a health care organization, you will not only facilitate the steps of evidence-based practice, but you will apply evidence-based leadership strategies to serve as a role model for decision making in your organization. Your skills and ability to promote and encourage evidence-based behavior and decision making among staff, providers, and other leaders will be invaluable to creating and sustaining an evidence-based organization and a culture of evidence. Your own leadership style will influence how you support and model evidence-based processes at your organization.
The purpose of this assessment is to complete the stages in the EBP process, translating the research into practice. You will be developing a policy or procedure to address a patient safety issue in a healthcare setting. Incorporate information from prior assessment where appropriate.
Scenario
As the Director of Clinical Operations and Nursing Excellence, it is your responsibility to ensure that the best practices and protocols are implemented and sustained at the medical center. The next step is to translate the evidence into practice. Policy development is an important final step. Without a formal policy or guideline, it is likely the change will not become permanent. Policies and procedures standardize care which in turn, improves patient safety.
Instructions
Create a new policy for the medical center based on evidence, using the Hospital Policy Template [DOCX] Download Hospital Policy Template [DOCX].
Review the template before you begin filling in each section, and gather any materials or documentation you will need.
In the Subject/Title of Policy section of the Hospital Policy Template [DOCX] Download Hospital Policy Template [DOCX], type the name of the policy.
In the Purpose section, explain the purpose of the policy in 1-2 short paragraphs. Include the following:
Summarize the patient safety issue.
Explain the gap or a problem in a health care or public health situation that caused the issue.
Use supporting evidence from the literature to show how it determined the need.
Explain how the evidence was gathered.
Include your revised PICO(T) question.
Explain why it was necessary to take action with the development of this policy.
In the Population Affected by the Policy section, identify and describe the populations affected by the change and how the scope of the problem was determined.
Scope is the extent of the problem, or how wide-sweeping the issue is for the target population and the community.
Describe the target population to be addressed by an intervention in enough detail that it is clear what population is included or excluded.
In the Definitions section, create definitions that explain the industry specific terms used throughout the document needed for the understanding of the policy.
Explain the terms in a manner that is descriptive to non-industry personnel.
In the Policy Statement section, create a policy statement in a 3-5 sentence paragraph that includes the following:
State the organization’s declaration of the plans giving a timeframe and scope of the policy implementation.
Explain the organization’s intentions or goal regarding the patient safety issue.
Clearly describe the policy plans, explaining that this is a quality improvement project based on evidence-based practices to address a specific patient safety issue.
In the Procedure section, elaborate on the step-by-step procedure that was outlined in the policy statement above in enough detail that one could replicate the process based on your description alone.
Information needs to be clear and easy to read. Avoid using wordy paragraphs.
Describe all the processes involved. This section could be in a numbered list or a detailed flowchart. Include the following:
All participants with their specific responsibilities listed.
Step-by-step description of the logistical flow of how the policy is to be implemented.
Instructions for completing each step.
Any supplies that may be needed.
If a protocol or guideline already exists for your patient safety issue, use additional guidelines and literature to revise and create a procedure using your own words.
In the Resources section, include a complete reference list of all sources used in the development of the protocol as part of the policy template. Use APA format for the citations.
Additional Resources
Use the Hospital Policy Template [DOCX] Download Hospital Policy Template [DOCX]provided.
No smaller than 11 point font, Times New Roman.
Single spaced format within the template.
Minimum of 12 resources.
APA formatting for citations and reference list.
Competencies Measured
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:
Competency 1: Apply the steps of the evidence based practice process to a health care challenge.
Explain the population affected by the need and the scope of the problem.
Elaborate on the plan that was outlined in the policy statement to include all participants and their responsibilities, logistical flow of procedures, and step-by-step instructions.
Competency 4: Describe the theory and conceptual framework that informs an investigation and/or methodology.
Explain the purpose of the policy in an introduction paragraph including a summary of the patient safety issue, supporting evidence, the revised PICOT question, and why it was necessary to take action.
Create a definition section that explains all industry specific roles, terms, and abbreviations used throughout the document.
Competency 5: Interpret the results and practical significance of health care data analyses in the evidence based practice process.
Create a policy statement including the organization’s declaration of the plans and intentions or goal regarding the patient safety issue.
Competency 6: Produce original written work, in compliance with the Capella Writing Standards, which is a creative synthesis of information from credible sources.
Support main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant and credible evidence.
Apply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing. -
“Breaking the Silence: Addressing Mental Health Stigma and Improving Access to Services in Society”
Topic: How can society better address the stigma surrounding mental health and improve access to mental health services?