Category: Healthcare

Hello, I need to answer this question. Review the question with responses already, check it     , and rewrite as needed. Please 

Major Term Essay
This is an analytical assignment that requires you to write a well-developed critical
paper related to the concept Race and Health. The essay must be at least 10 pages
including bibliographic information, 1.5 spaced and size 12 font. Be sure to include
the following main features in your essay:
1. A title page including a title that reflects the argument or question being
explored.
2. A table of contents
3. An abstract not exceeding 150 words.
4. Introduction/Background (Page 1 starts here)
5. Literature Review or Theoretical Framework (which theory, theories or
theorist(s) inform yourwork?)
6. Discussion and Analysis (link back to theoretical framework)
7. Recommendation(s) (if necessary)
8. Summary/Conclusion
9. A list of references or works cited, a minimum of 10 scholarly journals and/or
books.
(I was thinking of focusing on racism and mistreatment in labour for women)

Please  Read each direction under each picture . Here are 6 peer post and 1 discussion initial post,  that has to be responded to for 3 different classes . Please read directions carefully. 
225 words minimum for the inital post
Peer post for the last two classes can be short and simple! 
125 words minimum 

See Ethics case study below.  Answer questions 1-3 in an initial post by Wednesday, May 29, 2024 at 2359 CST. Respond to at least one other student by sharing insight on their post, (not just a good job comment) by Sunday, June 2, 2024 at 2359 CST. See Grading rubric for requirements. Rubric is loaded in General tab. 
Andy is assigned to care for a 14-year-old girl, Amanda, admitted with a large tumor located in the left groin area.  During an assessment, Amanda shares her personal feelings with Andy.  She tells him that she “feels different” from her friends.  She is ashamed of her physical development because all of her girlfriends have “breasts” and boyfriends.  She is very flat-chested and embarrassed.  Andy listens attentively to Amanda and helps her focus on some of her positive attributes and talents.
A computerized tomography (CT) scan is ordered and reveals that the tumor extends to what appears to be the ovary.  A gynecological surgeon is called in to evaluate the situation.  An ultrasonic-guided biopsy is performed.  It is discovered that the tumor is actually an enlarged lymph node, and the “ovary” is actually a testis.  Amanda has both male and female gonads.
When the information is given to Amanda’s parents, they do not want her to know.  They feel that she was raised as “their daughter”.  They ask the surgeon to remove the male gonads and leave only the female gonads.  That way, “Amanda will never need to know.”  The surgeon refuses to do this.  Andy believes the parents should discuss the situation with Amanda as they are denying her choices.  The parents are adamant about Amanda not knowing anything.  Andy returns to Amanda’s room and Amanda begins asking all types of questions regarding the tests and the treatments.  Andy hesitates before answering, and Amanda picks up on this, demanding he tell her the truth.
1.       How should Andy respond?
2.       What ethical principles are in conflict?
3.       What are the long-term effects of Andy’s decision?

Assignment Description:
1500-word APA essay please include a summary of what the essay is on and a conclusion. Please answer each prompt. 
Select a corporate leader in the news who acted legally but immorally and one who acted illegally but morally. Explain the differences of the actions and behaviors in each of the two examples. What lessons do you take from your examples?
Using Internet search tools, select a case example of an organization that has made what it considered to be an ethical decision. Describe the decision it faced and the decisions and actions that it took subsequently. Critique that decision using the five ethical decision-making principles discussed in Chapter 2. Which of the principles were emphasized? Which were less emphasized? Do you agree with their decision? Why or why not?
Briefly explain your ethical decision-making style as presented in the module.
I was employed as a certified public accountant (CPA) for a regional accounting firm that specialized in audits of financial institutions and had many local clients. My responsibilities included supervising staff, collecting evidence to support financial statement assertions, and compiling work papers for managers and partners to review. During the audit of a publicly traded bank, I discovered that senior bank executives were under investigation by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) for removing funds from the bank.
They were also believed to be using bank funds to pay corporate credit card bills for gas and spouses’ expenses. The last allegation noted that the executives were issuing loans to relatives without proper collateral. After reviewing the work papers, I found two checks made payable to one executive of the bank that were selected during a cash count from two tellers. There was no indication based on our sampling that expenses were being paid for spouses. My audit manager and the chief financial officer (CFO) of my firm were aware of these problems.
After the fieldwork for the audit was completed, I was called into the CEO’s office. The CEO and the chief operating officer (COO) stated that the FDIC examiners wanted to interview the audit manager, two staff accountants, and me. The CEO then asked the following question: “If you were asked by the FDIC about a check or checks made payable to bank executives, how would you answer?” I told them that I would answer the FDIC examiners by stating that, during our audit, we made copies of two checks made payable to an executive of the bank for $8,000 each.
The COO stated that during his review of the audit work papers he had not found any copies of checks made payable to executives. He also stated that a better response to the question regarding the checks would be, “I was not aware of reviewing any checks specifically made payable to the executive in question.” The COO then said that the examiners would be in the following day to speak with the audit staff. I was dismissed from the meeting. Neither the CEO nor the COO asked me if the suggested “better” response was the response I would give, and I did not volunteer the information. During the interview, the FDIC investigators never asked me whether I knew about the checks. Should I have volunteered this information?
What would you have done? Volunteered the information or stayed silent? Explain your decision.
Was anything unethical going on in this case? Explain.
Describe the “ethics” of the officers of the firm in this case.
What, if anything, should the officers have done, and why?
What lessons, if any, can you take from this case, as an employee working under company officials who have more power than you do?

Theory and research inform evidence-based practice (EBP) in nursing. In this discussion, you will address the relationships among theory, research, and EBP.
Use the questions to guide an original response:
Why is theory important to research design and evidence-based nursing practice?
How can the findings in quantitative research impact nursing practice and patient outcomes?
Respond to the posts of at least two classmates. APA citations are required only in the original response.

Case study about a person with the clinical
condition (hand arthritis). Use a narrative style. HOWEVER, you need to use ICF
components in the case study to identify impairments, activity limitations,
etc., so they can assess our understanding of these. in the document below I have explained everything about the assignment.

I am writing a research proposal for my master’s dissertation; a critical literatur review on how the movement of animals during war and armed conflict contribute to the spread of zoonosis, and I am struggling to make my literature review of the scientific background strong and cohesive. The review is max 500 words, and I need help in rewriting mine. I also have to place it in a One Health context and I am worried this doesn’t come through enough. 
this is the list of references I have looked into:
Bajer, A., Alsarraf, M., Topolnytska, M., Tołkacz, K., Dwużnik-Szarek,
D., & Rodo, A. (2023). Vector-borne parasites in dogs from Ukraine translocated to
Poland following Russian invasion in 2022. Parasites & Vectors, 16(1), 430–430. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-023-06042-2
Braam,
D. H., Jephcott, F. L., & Wood, J. L. N. (2021). Identifying the research
gap of zoonotic disease in displacement: a systematic review. Global Health Research and Policy, 6(1), 25–25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41256-021-00205-3
Braam,
D. H. (2022). Excluding Livestock Livelihoods in Refugee Responses: A Risk to
Public Health. Journal of Refugee Studies, 35(2), 910–928. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/feac006
Cobby,
T. R., & Eisler, M. C. (2024). Risk of rabies reintroduction into the
European Union as a result of the Russo-Ukrainian war: A quantitative disease
risk analysis. Zoonoses and Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1111/zph.13135
Ducrotoy,
M. J., Majekodunmi, A. O., Shaw, A. P. M., Bagulo, H., Bertu, W. J., Gusi, A.
M., Ocholi, R., & Welburn, S. C. (2018). Patterns of passage into protected
areas: Drivers and outcomes of Fulani immigration, settlement and integration
into the Kachia Grazing Reserve, northwest Nigeria. Pastoralism : Research, Policy and Practice, 8(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13570-017-0105-1
Fèvre,
E. M., Bronsvoort, B. M. de C., Hamilton, K. A., & Cleaveland, S. (2006).
Animal movements and the spread of infectious diseases. Trends in Microbiology (Regular Ed.), 14(3), 125–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2006.01.004
Goniewicz,
K., Burkle, F. M., Horne, S., Borowska‐stefańska, M., Wiśniewski, S., & Khorram‐manesh, A. (2021). The influence of war and
conflict on infectious disease: A rapid review of historical lessons we have
yet to learn. Sustainability, 13(19), 10783-. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910783
Horefti,
E. (2023). The Importance of the One Health Concept in Combating Zoonoses. Pathogens (Basel), 12(8), 977-. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12080977
Kaneda, Y., Sakeshima, K., Takahashi, K., Ozaki, A.,
& Tanimoto, T. (2022). Public health risks for relaxing quarantine for pet dogs
entering with Ukrainian refugees. QJM : Monthly Journal of the Association of Physicians, 115(7), 495–496. https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcac135
Mohammed, A. A. A., & Ahmed, M. (2023). Veterinary services under siege: how the armed
conflict in Sudan threatens animal and human health and how to respond. Infection Ecology & Epidemiology, 13(1), 2281054–2281054. https://doi.org/10.1080/20008686.2023.2281054
Sandvik,
K. B. (2023). The Ukrainian refugee crisis: Unpacking the politics of pet
exceptionalism. International Migration, 61(4), 292–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.13100
Tasker, A., & Braam, D. (2021). Positioning zoonotic disease research in forced
migration: A systematic literature review of theoretical frameworks and
approaches. PloS One, 16(7), e0254746–e0254746. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254746
Topluoglu,
S., Taylan-Ozkan, A., & Alp, E. (2023). Impact of wars and natural
disasters on emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases. Frontiers in Public Health, 11, 1215929–1215929. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.121592

For this assignment, your mission is to explore and demonstrate active allyship towards individuals experiencing oppression based on their gender and/or sexual identities. 
Your task:
Choose a Case Study: Select one case study from the options provided. Each case involves individuals with diverse gender and sexual identities encountering various forms of oppression. 
Create a Public Service Announcement (PSA): Develop a PSA addressing the unique challenges the individual in your chosen case study encounters and promote the principles of allyship within the community. 
Step 1: Choose a Case Study
Click here to view the case studies to choose from.
Step 2: Create a Public Service Announcement (PSA)
Your PSA can take various formats: 
A radio or podcast recording  2-3 minutes long, delivering a concise, comprehensive and persuasive message. 
A video presentation  2-3 minutes long, offering visuals and engaging content. 
A print piece for a newspaper or magazine  500 words in the style of a newspaper advertisement or article 
Online post for social media or website  An infographic that you create with 300 words of supporting text. Content should be designed to promote shares and interactions. 
Poster for public spaces  A visual that you create with 300 words of supporting text. Content should be designed to grab attention and convey message quickly. 
Any other creative method for delivering information  For other creative methods, students should provide an estimated equivalent effort to the above options, which should be pre-approved by the instructor. For instance, if a student opts to create a series of photographs or an art piece they plan to share with others, they might also submit an artist’s statement of at least 500 words that explains their work and how it addresses the assignment.
Submission Details:
Identifying Information: Include your name and date on your PSA. 
Citations: If you use any external sources, make sure to cite them directly on your creation following the appropriate APA citation and references format. 
Submission Format: Depending on your chosen PSA format, submit your assignment in a format that can be easily reviewed (a link, a document, an image file, etc.) 
Upload completed assignment by the assigned due date.
Be sure to correct any spelling, grammar, or punctuation errors before you post.
Remember, the goal of this assignment is to foster understanding, dismantle harmful stereotypes, and inspire active allyship within the community. Be creative, be factual, and most importantly, be an ally. 

Term Paper– at least 2000 word paper 8 pages (not including citations) on a topic covering a chemical or biology innovation with a focus on the discussion of the course. The student would then be required to research the innovation, the chemistry or biology behind it, and the commercial impact. 
The marks breakdown for the term paper is as follows: 
40 % on the discussion of the science (How does this work?)
40 % on the discussion of the business case and:
20 % on how you put the two together