Category: Ethics

Ive written a 2000 word essay and need someone to clear it of any ai detection as ive used a lot of ai and it will definitely be detected. I also need someone to double check my sources, grammar etc… this person needs to very detailed and not actually ruin the quality of the paper when humanizing the text because that tends to happen. Add more sources if you needs to . I dont want someone who will give me a lazy paper it needs to be done really well and i need a turn it in report after of the ai content detection.

Textbook: Chapter 5, 6
Lesson
Minimum of 1 scholarly source (in addition to the textbook) 
Initial Post Instructions 
Rather than living in chaos, danger, and the hostility of our neighbors, we find ways to live together. It isn’t easy, but can we avoid doing so?
If everybody has self-interest in their own welfare and safety, then everybody also has self-interest in the welfare and safety of others. Self-interest involves community interest, and we must think about what we are willing to give up in order to get that safety and stability for ourselves, our families, our community, our nation, and even the world.
Thomas Hobbes and John Locke are just two examples of social contract moralists. Locke’s philosophy helped Thomas Jefferson formulate the United States Declaration of Independence. We are interested in what it means to live together in an orderly way under a social contract.
For the initial post, address one of the following sets of questions:
What is a time when you or someone you know of experienced a conflict between duty to self and loyalty to the community? What would logical reasoning say should be done in that case? Why that? What would an Ethical Egoist say to do? Why would they say to do that? Note what you feel is the best course of action.
What is a time when you or someone you know experienced a clash between professional duties and familial duties? Reference a professional code such as that of the American Nurses Association or American Bar Association in explaining the clash. What moral values should have been used in that case? Why those values? What would social contract ethics have said to have done? Why would social contract ethics say that? Note what you feel is the best course of action.
Articulate and evaluate a time when you or someone you know saw personal obligations collide with national obligations. How did that tension involve differing positions on a moral debate? Did those positions rely on any key moral theories? If so, how so? If not, why not? Note what you feel is the best course of action.
Follow-Up Post Instructions
Respond to at least one peer. Further the dialogue by providing more information and clarification.
Writing Requirements
Minimum of 2 posts (1 initial & 1 follow-up)
Minimum of 2 sources cited (assigned readings/online lessons and an outside scholarly source)
APA format for in-text citations and list of references

First, select a topic of moral controversy, debate, disagreement, and dispute, Examples of such topics are euthanasia, the death penalty, abortion, cloning, etc. You can pick any such topic. It need not be listed here.
My TOPIC :euthanasia, I am a pro euthanasia when poor quality of live is the other option 
What would an Ethical Egoist say about this topic? What side would the Ethical Egoist take? What would the Ethical Egoist say to justify their moral position? Is there a conflict between loyalty to self and to community relevant to your topic? If so, how so? Note what you feel is the best course of action.
What would a Social Contract Ethicist say about this topic? What side would the Social Contract Ethicist take? What would the Social Contract Ethicist say to justify their moral position? Does your topic involve a collision between personal obligations and national ones? If so, how so? Note what you feel is the best course of action.
Finally, reference and discuss any professional code of ethics relevant to your topic such as the AMA code for doctors, the ANA code for nurses, or any other pertinent professional code. State whether and how your chosen topic involves any conflicts between professional and familial duties.
Cite the textbook and incorporate outside sources, including citations.
Requirements
Length: 3-4pages (not including title page or references page)
1-inch margins
Double spaced
12-point Times New Roman font
Title page
References page (minimum of 3 scholarly sources in addition to the course textbook)
References 
Title: The Elements of Moral Philosophy
Authors: James Rachels, Stuart Rachels
Publisher: Mcgraw-Hill Education
Publication Date: 2022-05-04
Edition: 10th
APA Citation
Rachels, S., & Rachels, J. (2022). The elements of moral philosophy (10th ed.). Mcgraw-Hill Education.

*i will provide the topic for you* This task is designed to focuse on crafting a well-structured, argumentative paper.
Topic Selection: Choose a topic from the course that interests you. This should be a
concept, theory, or debate we have covered in our discussions or readings.
Writing for an Informed Audience: Imagine explaining this topic to a smart undergraduate, like a roommate, who hasn’t taken this course. Your paper should start by introducing the topic in a way that makes it accessible to someone unfamiliar with the specific content of our class.
Developing an Argument: Once the topic is introduced, present your own claim or thesis about it. This should be an original argument, reflecting your critical thinking and analysis of the course material. MAKE SURE TO INCORPORATE AT LEAST SOME OF THE ATTACHED READING
Addressing Counterarguments: Anticipate objections and counterarguments. Present these potential challenges to your thesis as if they were coming from someone knowledgeable in the field who holds an opposing viewpoint. Respond to these objections thoughtfully, demonstrating your ability to engage with different perspectives and defend your position.
No Al Assistance: For this assignment, the use of ChatGPT or similar Al tools is strictly prohibited.
This assignment is a test of your ability to independently articulate and defend a sophisticated idea in ethics.

Title IX is about the practice of equality and protection from sex discrimination. This federal mandate was put in place to protect students attending educational institutions. Title IX of the Constitution states from the Education Amendments Act of 1972 is a federal law that states: “No person in the United States shall, based on sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program (“14th Amendment and the evolution of Title IX,” n.d.). Title IX is more than about collegiate sports. The received federal Title IX funds granted to a higher educational institution are held to a high standard to provide equality for all students and fair treatment to all genders involved in any athletic activities and educational programs that are enrolled at the institution. Other title IX infractions are unfair treatment and behavior toward an individual based upon gender, sex, gender identity, and stereotyping.
In this assignment, you are asked to put together a case study based on a current Title IX violation or review a past case. Use https://www.justice.gov/crt/educational-opportunities-cases to select a case and answer the following questions.
What Title IX event/case did you select and why?
What was the offense?
What could have been done to prevent this situation?
Case Study Guidelines
Each question should be answered in paragraph form, limited to one paragraph. Be sure to use complete sentences. Include a cover page and reference page, formatting, in-text citations, and references are to be to APA standards.
Two to three pages (excluding cover and reference page)
Use one font only—12-point Times New Roman (unless you need to use something different and larger; make the paper consistent). The title page should be the same font.
Be sure to include an in-text citation for any information that you are mentioning that is not original content and include the full reference on the reference page per APA.

On pg. 58 in your textbook, in chapter 3, the author considers the issue of the diversity of moral views. Different cultures have different attitudes to behaviors such as cannibalism, sexuality, and war. Typically, the diversity of moral views leads to a form of relativism, which reduces moral views to the perspective of a culture or individual. But, the moral objectivist, who believes in universal or absolute moral values, can still believe in universal values, in spite of the diversity of moral views. Explain how, first, (1) a seemingly moral disagreement may actually be a factual disagreement (see the discussion about CO2 emissions). Then, (2) address the point that disagreement about ethical views does not necessarily mean there is no exact and correct answer to ethical questions (see the example about George Washington’s death).

research moral reasoning and ethical theories and apply this knowledge to resolving an ethical
dilemma. This dilemma can be based on a personal experience or from a selection of dilemmas provided. Please check the Word doc added. Includes every piece of information and the rubric.

I need an outline done on utilitariansim theory that has a strong thesis statement.  Please follow the outline that I attached to this request. 

PLEASE READ CAREFULLY 
You are a sales representative for a medical device company that manufactures artificial joints. Your company has developed an artificial knee joint that is less expensive than the competition and will dramatically reduce healing time for patients. However, it is also known to produce a serious and potentially lethal infection in a small percentage of patients. The company refuses to disclose this potential side effect. You feel you have a duty to divulge this issue, but you signed a nondisclosure agreement when you were hired and worry about possible repercussions.Write an essay (suggested length of 6–8 pages) in which you do the following:
A.  Select a nonfictional leader who you feel has exhibited exemplary ethical conduct and do the following:
1.  Discuss two ethical traits your chosen leader has demonstrated.
2.  Explain how your chosen leader has exhibited ethical conduct.
Note: The chosen leader can be someone you know personally or someone famous.
B.  Compare the deontological and consequentialist perspectives and how each perspective would approach the dilemma from the scenario.
C.  Identify and explain which level of cognitive moral development (i.e., preconventional, conventional, or postconventional) is represented in the scenario for each of the following questions:
•  Which action would most likely serve the greater good in society?
•  If I reveal this information, will I get into trouble and possibly even lose my job?
•  Which action best aligns with my long-held belief in the principle of justice?
•  What do the laws say, and what would a law-abiding citizen do?
•  If I keep quiet, will I get some sort of reward?
D.  Reflect on your Ethical Lens Inventory (ELI) by doing the following:
1.  Explain your preferred ethical lens, relevant to the ELI.
a.  Analyze whether you have the same preferred lens in different settings (e.g., work, personal, social).
2.  Explain one of your primary values and one classical virtue from the ELI.
Note: If you are a Center Perspective, choose any primary value.
a.  Compare your primary value from part D2 with one of your own self-identified or personal values. Then compare your classical virtue from part D2 with a different self-identified or personal value.
Note: Examples of personal values can be found in the attached “Clarifying Your Values” chart.
3.  Describe one of the following from your ELI:
•  blind spot
•  risk
•  double standard
•  vice
a.  Discuss two steps you can take to mitigate the blind spot, risk, double standard, or vice described in part D3 in order to make better ethical decisions in the future.
4.  Discuss how the information from your ELI could be applied to an ethical situation in the workplace.
E.  Submit a copy of the PDF file with the results from your ELI as a separate document.
F.  Acknowledge sources, using in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.
G.  Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission.

please look in chapter 1.  In that chapter there are 3 real moral cases from the past.  
“Baby Theresa”
“Jodie and Mary”
“Traci Latimer”
Please pick one of the three above issues and address the following 4 questions in your writing
1. Summarize the story.  During the summarizing, mention relevant factors to make your paper stronger.  Why was this case a critical moral and legal issue?  What were the legal issues or laws involved?  Did this issue get political (e.g., demonstrations, debates for presidential candidates), what were the historical or legal impact of the decision? (You are encouraged to do research outside of the text)
2. Pick two ethical theories we have covered (e.g., utilitarianism and moral absolutism).  After picking the two theories, define what they are and name the strengths and weaknesses for each of the theories
3. Explain how each one of your theory would try to solve this moral issue.  Which theory would you pick and why?
4. Do you agree with the final decision people made (e.g., parents, courts) in the issue that you picked?  Explain your position and what you learned through this exercise
When writing, please remember the following
1. Please expect to spend one to two paragraphs per each of the four questions.
2. Remember to support your point while avoiding personal bias. Use instead logic, longitudinal data, statistics, history, cultural norms based on ethical consensus.  Anecdotal data is powerful too when you can better demonstrate its possible universality.
3. “The chain is only as strong as its weakest link”.  Please use this quote as a guideline to make sure you cover all potential weak spots in your main point. 
https://home.csulb.edu/~cwallis/382/readings/160/EM.pdf