Category: Ethics

I have some background on airport security, but the introduction needs to include how it interacts with the economy of time and the image of objectivity through an STS (science technology and society) framework .
I will attach what I have. Please include it!

I will apply a PDF File of rules and questions. PLEASE 
FOLLOW INSTRUCTIONS. ESPECIALLY IF YOU SEE THE
LETTER R AT THE END OF THE QUESTIONS THAT MEANS 
TO PROVIDE A RATIONLE. You do NOT need to answer questions, 1,2,3,4,5,6,6,8,10,13,15,16,20,22,27,32,35.

I’d like an research paper on the history and orgins of the concept of race and how it led to the  concept of racism. I’d like the part of essay explaing the orgins of racisms and how it evolved over time into today’s more modern concept of racism. I’d like to end the essay providing ways we can contribute to end racism. 

Each student will hand in a 2-3-page writing on Nancy’s “Justice.” The writing should have a summary of approximately one page followed by one to two pages of reflection/reaction. The bulk of the essay should be dedicated to responding to the thinker and the given text. Both the brief summary and reflection/reaction should exhibit careful reading, attention, and thoughtfulness; and essays will be graded according to the following rubric:
Writing must be virtually free of spelling and grammatical errors. Writing with more than three spelling or grammatical errors will be penalized 2 points. Writing with more than six spelling or grammatical errors will be penalized 3 points. Writing with more than ten spelling or grammatical errors will be penalized 6 points. Writing that does not meet the length requirement will be penalized 3 points. Writing that does not follow the prescribed formatting will be penalized 4 points.* Writing that does not exhibit thoughtful attention will be penalized 3 points. And, any originality report (TurnItIn, etc.) that returns a score of 20% or higher or an AI report over 30% will be an automatic zero.*
*All writing should be in 12pt, “Times New Roman” font and double-spaced with 1” margins.

1.Choose an environmental disaster that was caused, at least in part, by human agency, and that occurred in the past five years. This disaster will be the one you focus on for your final paper.
Find an article that describes the event. In this discussion, post a link to the article, and present a brief summary of the event. The ethical dimensions of an environmental disaster cannot be analyzed until the basic information about what actually happened is understood, so being able to explain the event and its consequences is a crucial first step to performing an ethical analysis.
2.The second asssignment for this class is attached

Hi! This paper is for my global ethics class, and the paper is a project proposal. The focus of the paper is Social Justice/Human Rights and the theme chosen is gender equality. Below I have added the project guide and rubric for this assignment, and a pdf of the chapter of the textbook that supports this theme. You don’t need to add any sources but if would be helpful if there was sources included. 
This is a link to help with question three of the assignment:
https://aese.psu.edu/teachag/curriculum/modules/bioethics/modules/copy2_of_introductory/4-scenarios/what-are-ethical-frameworks
This is a link of a video my professor added that relates to this theme as well:

Thank you so much!

Book: https://cloudflare-ipfs.com/ipfs/bafykbzaceap77jw3oovxq7szwk3i4cr625zxbb2n6mdvi3l5opukhl7agi2aw?filename=James%20S.%20Bowman%2C%20Jonathan%20P.%20West%20-%20Public%20Service%20Ethics_%20Individual%20and%20Institutional%20Responsibilities-Routledge%20%282021%29.pdf     Include the “Word Count” after each of your answers. Not doing so will keep you from 
earning the points assigned in the grading rubric for including the word count. 
Part A:
• You need to answer the following questions/prompts (in no less than 150 words per answer) 
focusing on expressing accurate knowledge as presented in the course, without expressing your 
opinion or ideas not covered during class discussions or in the required readings/materials
assigned in the course —please do not copy others’ answers (I will give you F in the course if 
you do). You need to independently develop your own answers.
PUB – Public Sector Ethics Spring 2024
© 2024 Dr. Hugo D. Asencio Page 3 of 5
1. Explain the myths about ethics (Key: review book chapter assigned for Week 2 Chapter 1).
2. Discuss the reasons for studying ethics (Key: review book chapter assigned for Week 2 chapter 1).
3. Explain the levels of analysis in ethics (Key: review book chapter assigned for Week 3 chapter 2).
4. (a) Define values and ethics and (b) explain their relationship (Key: review book chapter 
assigned for Week 4 chapter 3).
5. Compare Lawrence Kohlberg’s moral development theory and Jonathan Haidt social 
intuitionalist approach (Key: review book chapter assigned for Week 5 chapter 4).
6. Explain the takeaways from the Milgram and Zimbardo experiments (Key: review book 
chapter assigned for Week 5 chapter 4).
7. Compare cognitive (result and rule problem-solving) and virtue ethics (Key: review book 
chapter assigned for Weeks 6 and 7 chapter 5/6).
8. Explain how the psychological tendencies discussed by James Bowman and Jonathan 
West influence the thinking and actions of people when they are faced with ethical 
dilemmas (Key: review book chapter assigned for Week 8 chapter 7 ).
• You need to include the full question (in bold) before your answer (not in bold). 
• After each answer, please include (in bold) the word count under the heading “Word Count.”
Part B:
• You need to answer the following questions/prompts (in no less than 250 words per answer) 
focusing on expressing what is in your mind/your moral character —Please reflect, reflect, and 
reflect as you develop your answers. Do not copy others’ answers (I will give you F in the 
course if you do).
1. (a) Identify the values of your personal moral code (i.e., your individual attitudes 
with respect to what is moral) and (b) illustrate with examples from your own 
experience how the values of your personal moral code actually guide your thinking 
and actions.
2. Based on the ethical decision-making models that you learned about/applied in the 
course, explain the mental steps that you will take in your life when faced with 
ethical dilemmas (i.e., “… when competing or conflicting ethical principles or values 
are embedded in a particular problem” (Cooper, 2012, p. 32):
a. When you do not have the luxury of time to make a decision; and
b. When you do have the luxury of time to make a decision.
• You need to include the full question (in bold) before your answer (not in bold). 
• After each answer, please include (in bold) the word count under the heading “Word Count.”
Developing an answer that avoids quoting directly from the instructional materials provided in 
the course.
5. Including the question/prompt (in bold font) before the answer.
Including after the answer (in bold font) the word count under the heading “Word Count”. 
8. Formatting an answer in line with APA style (7th edition) guidelines. 

Provide three websites that assist or address ethics in government. Also, list two federal government ethics policies and an analysis as to how those policies have shaped ethics in government

Reflect on the Case Study: Mr. Martinez media piece. Should Mr. Martinez be transferred to intensive care, where his respiratory failure can be treated by a ventilator, and by CPR if necessary, and his oxygen level can be monitored? Assume that doctors cannot contact Mrs. Martinez and must make this choice on their own. To help you reach an objective, ethically sound decision, draw upon concepts and arguments from your textbook and independent research. Support your decision with clear, concise, and correct examples, weaving and citing the readings and media throughout your answer.
Address the following:
The patient’s directives.
The patient’s quality of life.
The family’s stated preferences.
The cause of the patient’s current respiratory distress.
The moral issues associated with limiting life support.
The ethical principles most relevant to reaching an ethically sound decision.
Important considerations such as implications, justifications, and any conflicts of interest that might arise because of the patient’s respiratory failure.
You will be evaluated as to how well you:
Articulate the moral issues associated with limiting life support.
Demonstrate sound ethical thinking and relevant ethical principles when considering limiting life support.
Explain important considerations that arise when contemplating limiting life support.
Exhibit proficiency in clear and effective academic writing skills.
Assignment Requirements
Your paper should meet the following requirements:
Written communication: Written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message.
APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style and formatting guidelines. See the Evidence and APA Citation section of the Writing Center for guidance.
Length: 3–4 typed, double-spaced pages.
Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.

Read/review the following resources for this activity:
Textbook: Chapters 3, 4
Lesson
Minimum of 2 scholarly sources (in addition to the textbook)
Instructions
Review the following ethical dilemmas:
John Doe has decided to clone himself. He is sterile. He cannot find anyone to marry him. He wishes to have children. He knows that he will not be able to love a child that is adopted or not connected directly to him biologically. He will be making use of a new procedure that involves taking his skin cells to produce a twin. The twin starts out as an embryo and grows into a child. The child in this case will have the same genetic information as John Doe. John Doe and his child will be twins.
Jane Doe is eighteen. For as long as she can remember she has been sexually attracted to other females. Her parents belong to a religion that has a religious text stating that God forbids one to be a lesbian. This religion goes on further to say that lesbians will be punished in the afterlife. Jane Doe is debating whether she should tell her parents about her sexual attraction. She has not yet decided if she should come out to her parents and live as a lesbian now that she is a legal adult.
Joe and Mary are a couple. Before becoming sterile, they had a child. This child died of a rare disease. Joe and Mary miss their child terribly. They have heard that there is a new IVF procedure that can ensure that they can have another child. However, their religion forbids using IVF.
Use the resources assigned for this week and additional research,
Select two of the situations above and then address 2 of the following:
What is the relation between ethics and religion? Formulate and investigate the relation.
For each case, determine the ethical path of conduct. Then, determine what paths of conduct would be unethical
For each case, what would an emotivism say to appraise what you determine is the ethical form of conduct?
For each case, would a natural law ethicist agree with what you say is the ethical form of conduct? Why or why not?
Articulate, explain, and evaluate in each case an approach that makes use of divine command ethics.
Requirements
Length: 2-3 pages (not including title page or references page)
1-inch margins
Double spaced
12-point Times New Roman font
Title page
References page (minimum of 2 scholarly sources)