Category: Ethics

Note: different format:
What are the four basic steps of nonviolent action that Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. highlights? How has he and his supporters followed these steps? Clarify his argument of just and unjust laws. How does his argument impact you? Submit two paragraphs answering these prompts by 6/12/24.
Use your own words unless quoting. Include two quotes with quotation marks.
PLEASE USE FILE AND LINK ONLY QUOTES FROK THE TEXT ONLY

The instuctions are attached to the files including the short story choosen “How It Feels to be Colored Me”by Zora Hurston.

Human Services majors, please use the link above to submit your signature assignment.
Read the attached case and answer the questions at the end of the case. Also, remember to include the eight steps in making ethical decisions outlined in chapter one of your text.
Instead of a “traditional flow” APA paper, use the following subheadings to ensure you cover all parts of the case. See rubric guidelines. The only APA format will be the title page and all sources (both in-text citations and reference list). 
Title Page
Full Title of Paper  -This will be page 2. All pages should have a header and page numbers. 
Start with an introduction paragraph. Give a brief overview of the case. 
Case Questions 
Type your first question. -Then fully answer the question. Do this for all questions associated with your assigned case.  For example: 
What Are the Primary Issues That Are Raised for You by the Scenario? 
Answer the question from your perspective as the counselor, not the client. Remember to support all sections of your work. 
After answering all questions assigned to your case include the following: 
Eight Steps 
1. Identify the problem – Then discuss how this step applies to the case. What is the identified ethical dilemma(s) in your assigned case?
Do this for each of the 8 steps, not just the first step. 
Remember to cite all sources using APA 7.0 both in-text and in the references. 

The Geneva Conventions are an attempt at creating a separate, rules-based global ethical framework. In this discussion, you will explain the purpose of the Geneva Conventions and examine a part of the conventions that resonates with your personal ethics. Discussing the Geneva Conventions with your peers can help you learn more about how ethical frameworks aid in understanding human actions. 
Discussing challenges that face our world often means investigating opinions and ideas different from your own. Remember to remain thoughtful and respectful toward your peers and instructor in your initial and response discussion posts. 
Create one initial post and respond to at least two of your classmates. 
For your initial post, address the following:
How would you explain the purpose of the Geneva Conventions to someone who has never heard of them?
Describe a part of the conventions that resonates with your personal ethics and build an argument for why this should apply to all people and nation-states. 
For your response posts, address the following:
What do you think of your peer’s explanation of the Geneva Conventions?
Consider your peer’s argument and argue the opposite. Why should your peer’s chosen part of the conventions not apply to all people and nation-states? 
50 words each reply
1. Cody EDELMAN posted Jun 11, 2024 1:29 AM
The Geneva Conventions, a series of international treaties, establish rules and protections to ensure humane treatment during wartime, particularly for those not directly involved in the conflict, such as civilians, wounded soldiers, and medical personnel. Their primary aim is to mitigate the horrors of war by setting ethical standards that all participating nations must adhere to, thereby safeguarding human dignity even amidst hostilities. The consequences of not adhering to these conventions are dire, leading to the erosion of trust between nations, the escalation of violence, and the disregard for human life and dignity.
A specific aspect of the Geneva Conventions that resonates deeply with me is the protection of medical personnel. This principle asserts that those providing medical care to the wounded and sick should be safeguarded from attack and allowed to perform their duties without interference. This aligns with my belief in the sanctity of life and the importance of humanitarian aid. Ensuring the safety and neutrality of medical workers not only saves lives but also upholds a fundamental aspect of human compassion and decency, which is crucial during the chaos of war. Imagine the potential if all nations universally adhere to this principle-a more humane and respectful approach to conflict, acknowledging the invaluable role of those who work to alleviate suffering and save lives.
2. James Cannon posted Jun 10, 2024 2:00 PM
If I had to describe the Geneva Conventions to someone unfamiliar with them, I’d say they are guidelines for nations involved in war for how to act ethically without causing unnecessary harm or death recklessly. Ultimately, they are there to protect only the most vulnerable and those who aren’t directly in the fight (like civilians, medical workers). The part of the Geneva Conventions that resonate with my personal values is the Fourth Convention, which aims to protect civilians even in occupied territory. Even in the military, you’d be hard pressed to find those who want war, but still they took an oath to defend their country willingly so they fully understand what they’re getting into and the risks involved. But, with an example like Ukraine, they did not ask to be invaded and want no part in armed conflict that’s been placed on them. It would be extremely depressing if civilians living peacefully in their homes could be brutally slaughtered because of political disputes, and unfortunately it still happens constantly, but there’s at least things in place to try to mitigate this, which is a good start.

Reread Immanuel Kant’s Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysic of Morals, “First Section: Transition from the Common Rational Knowledge of Morality to the Philosophical.” In this section Kant argues against “Aristotle’s claim that the highest good lies in human happiness.” 
With this in mind, respond to the following discussion prompts for this forum:
What does Immanuel Kant mean when he says that “the good will is the only thing that is good without qualification.”  How does this differ from the philosophies we have studied so far–namely, of course, Aristotle, whom Kant cites, but also Aquinas and Mill?
Do you agree with Kant?  Is his vision of the good superior to Aristotle’s?
Responses should be around 400 words. 

Instructions will be uploaded later.
Important Info
The order was placed through a short procedure (customer skipped some order details).
Please clarify some paper details before starting to work on the order.
Type of paper and subject
Number of sources and formatting style
Type of service (writing, rewriting, etc)

What is Hughes’ message? How does his language strike you? Do you agree with him? Do you see America this way? Why or why not?
Submit a detailed paragraph by Friday, 6/14/24 11:59pm and comment on a classmate’s post by Sunday, 6/15 by 11:59pm.
PLEASE ONLY USE LINK BELOW
https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/147907/let-america-be-america-again

For the below data in the pdf I am selecting this topic Ethical Implications of Social Media Algorithms. According to the pdf you need to analyse and fit the methods and models of ethics

Watch the Pinto case and the cost benefit analysis discussed in the first part of this video.
Is it moral to put a price tag on human lives? Why?
How can Utilitarianism help in this Pinto case?

This is the requirement / Nursing student P342: Catholic Principles of Health Care Ethics Read, Reflect, Analyze Paper
The Read, Reflect, and Analyze paper is an assignment where you examine and reflect on your thoughts within text. There is a 2-4 page requirement. I am looking for depth and engagement of thought. Also, make sure to prove that you have read your assigned readings by citing required readings within each section of the rubric. APA format should always be followed when structuring your writing in the nursing profession. The following is what I will use to grade your assignment. Grading will be based on:
Read, Reflect, and Analyze Questions:
1. Questions and Rubric Sections: a. Discuss the four cardinal virtues in your own life and/or in the lives of persons you know/ love. Identify examples of: prudence, justice, temperance and fortitude. Also provide some reflection upon how persons with these virtues have impacted your choice to become a Nurse. How do the Cardinal virtues apply to your readings? (Worth 25%)
b. What is ethics and how do we as human persons learn about ethics? What is the difference between ethics, morals and laws and how do they fit together? (Worth 25%)
c. Choose one of the philosophical frameworks/values perspectives (within the lecture/supplemental videos) and give an example of how this would be utilized in nursing. How does the ANA/ERD fit into these approaches? (Worth 25%) d. Depth, engagement, and clarity of reflection and concepts 10%
e. APA/Grammar 15%
I will add the rubric and the required reading. Please use them as sources.
i will add here some videos
https://youtu.be/2S_XuJTOEJY?si=iCt-X8OS7tsi4LHe https://youtu.be/fvfLU4kY_8A?si=ZNrbKmdt27F6eXJV

If you have any questions or need clarification, please let me know.
Thank you!