Category: English

https://www.gutenberg.org/files/23/23-h/23-h.htm
Link for the story attached if not familiar with it. Please don’t let it sound AI. Don’t use extraordinary vocabulary.

Please I am looking for High school  level writing not a college level writing. Please do not accept if you can’t do the assignment on a high school level. No AI if you don’t have time to be original please pass.
•Write a letter to your school principal persuading him or her concerning one of these controversial issues:
—adding an elective class (which one?) or an extracurricular program, such as agriculture
—starting a school community garden that could be the joint effort of students, faculty, parents, and volunteers
—allowing students to have cell phones in school
—as a school, taking on a community service or outreach project, such as providing meals for needy families, painting over graffiti in the community, or helping at a local nursing home or senior center
—starting a school-wide campaign to promote healthy eating and exercise among students, their families, and school faculty
In particular, think about your audience’s familiarity and experience with the topic, as well as any preconceived notions or prejudices the audience might have toward the topic. Is your audience neutral about the topic, or is it already strongly opposed to your proposition? For instance, perhaps you are writing a letter to your fellow students convincing them to take a stand against bullying and school violence. Some of your classmates probably already agree with you, while others may be apathetic (unconcerned; indifferent) about the topic. You will have to work harder to convince the apathetic readers than the agreeable readers. As another example, perhaps you are writing a letter to your principal to convince him or her to allow students to use cell phones during the school day. If your principal is already opposed to your proposition, you will need to present a strong and convincing argument to sway his or her opinion.
Your audience likely has some objection to your ideas. You should begin to  
Answer the following questions.
1) Writing Tasks
Complete the following tasks to plan your argumentative letter.
What is the topic of your argumentative letter?
2) Writing Tasks
Complete the following tasks to plan your argumentative letter.
Who is your audience?
3) Writing Tasks
Complete the following tasks to plan your argumentative letter.
Briefly describe your audience’s basic characteristics. Consider factors such as age, education, personality, likes and dislikes, work experience, etc.
4) Writing Tasks
Complete the following tasks to plan your argumentative letter.
In general, how does your audience feel about your topic? Is the audience neutral, uninformed, or prejudiced against your ideas? Explain.
5) Writing Tasks
Complete the following tasks to plan your argumentative letter.
State your purpose in writing your argumentative letter.

Write me a scriipt please and follow all of the directions in the attachments
PART ONE: Ethical Dilemma
Read the ethical dilemma below; after reading, write a scriipt for your presentation and then VIDEO RECORD yourself explaining how Bentham or Kant from our course would inform Macbeth’s or Lady Macbeth’s predicament as he/she struggles with his/her desire and ambition for the throne, even if the cost is murder of the King. Use terminology specific to the theory of your chosen philosopher that will demonstrate both understanding of the philosopher and a solution to the moral question.
Upload your scriipt and video to complete the assignment.
Dilemma: How would the philosopher advise Macbeth (or Lady Macbeth) regarding what they ought to do (the concise definition of ethics) as they plot murder to gain the throne. Here is a quick reminder of each of their thoughts as they wrestle with the desire to murder Duncan. The citation is included so that you can read the full soliloquies if you choose to read further:

Your task is to rewrite an existing fairytale by turning it into dystopian fiction. Your writing piece should include the 5 elements of dystopian fiction we learned about. ( Government control, enviormental decstruciton, technological control, survival, and loss of individualism)
For this essay, the fairytale is Shrek. Listed below are examples thay may be used for each element of dystopian fiction
1) Government control: The government has banished all fairytale creatures to a lawless land, the swamp, and won’t allow them back 
2) Enviormental Destruction: There are frequent and violent storms in the swamp that cause mass destruction. Causing several deaths each time.
3 & 4) Technological Control and Survival: Lord Fawrquad sends killer robots into the swamp to hunt the fairytale creatures
5) Loss of Individualism: All fairytale creatures have lost their powers 

It has to have Introduction, 3 reason, and 3 evidence for each reasoning, and a counteragruement, and Conclusion. I will put the 3 resoure in the file, because some will not be able to see if you are login.  3 resource 

Hide Assignment Information
Turnitin™
This assignment will be submitted to Turnitin™.
Instructions
Recall the memo you submitted in week 4 for Part I of the Training Project. Assume that the CEO of FEF, Inc has approved your suggested training. 
Create a PowerPoint that you will present to the employees of FEF, Inc. to address the discrimination issue you detailed in the memo. Your PPT should be no fewer than 10 content slides. You must include a cover slide and a references slide with at least 3 references (governmental, legal, scholarly, or academic sources) in APA format. The cover and references slides are IN ADDITION to the (minimum of) 10 required slides.  
The PowerPoint presentation must:
1. Explain the applicable law to the intended audience
2. Provide thorough treatment of the topic(s) selected, including actionable steps the company should take to avoid issues around discrimination
3. Adhere to general standards for good use of PowerPoints. Note that your creative use of technology will be assessed in this project. Some useful tips can be found in the following articles:
https://www.businesstrainingworks.com/training-resources/presentation-slide-tips
https://support.office.com/en-us/article/Tips-for-creating-and-delivering-an-effective-presentation-f43156b0-20d2-4c51-8345-0c337cefb88b
3. Include Speaker Notes for each slide. Notes should expand on the content of the slide to explain the key points.
Optional:Expand on the content on the slides by using recorded narration (if you’ve never used this awesome feature in PowerPoint, you can learn more about it here https://support.office.com/en-us/article/Record-a-slide-show-with-narration-and-slide-timings-0b9502c6-5f6c-40ae-b1e7-e47d8741161c) If you include narration, you MUST INDICATE THIS IN THE SUBMISSIONS COMMENTS. 
To receive full credit for this submission, you must attach two separate files for my assessment:
The PowerPoint presentation (remember to note in the submission comments if you have included recorded audio or video narration)
A SEPARATE Word or PDF document with all slides AND Speaker Notes. If you are unsure how to create this file, please review the step-by-step directions here: https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/edit-or-print-powerpoint-handouts-in-word-09256fc0-3b3e-4a43-9c83-3cfde594fed4
Due on May 19, 2024 11:55 PM

The following excerpt is from the nisi Shawls novel Ever Fair, published 2016 in this passage, The narrator describes the experience of a young woman lisette as she rides her bicycle through the French countryside in July 1889. Read the passes carefully, then in a well written essay. Analyze how Shaw uses literary elements and techniques lisette to portray complex response to her experience of riding her bike.

We need to write one and a half for our essay theme is pros and cons when it comes to shooping online 

Touchstone 2.1: Evaluate a Source
ASSIGNMENT: For this essay, you will select one of the sources that you intend to support your argument. Which source you choose is up to you; however, it should be substantial enough that you will be able to talk about it at length, and intricate enough that it will keep you (and your reader) interested. 
The introduction of this paper will involve introducing the source: After you recap your research paper’s central argument argument, provide the author, the title, and the context (where you found the source, where it was originally published, who sponsored it, etc.) 
You will then go on to evaluate the source on two levels:
Credibility (at least one full paragraph): Using the information in this unit as a guide, evaluate the source’s authenticity and reliability. Look at all the information that you can find about the source to establish the author’s (or sponsor’s) trustworthiness.
Usefulness (at least one full paragraph): Using a combination of summary and analysis, examine the source on a critical level. Determine what the source’s purpose (thesis) is, and how it arrives at that goal. Examine its value to you and the project you are working on. How will it help you prove your own points? How might it come in handy to back up a claim (or address a counter-claim)?
Finally, you will include a conclusion which shows your final assessments on both counts.  
Sample Touchstone 
In order to foster learning and growth, all work you submit must be newly written specifically for this course. Any plagiarized or recycled work will result in a Plagiarism Detected alert. Review Touchstones: Academic Integrity Guidelines for more about plagiarism and the Plagiarism Detected alert. For guidance on the use of generative AI technology, review Ethical Standards and Appropriate Use of AI.
A. Assignment Guidelines
DIRECTIONS: Refer to the list below throughout the writing process. Do not submit your Touchstone until it meets these guidelines. Refer to the Sample Touchstone for additional guidance on structure, formatting, and citation.
1. Source Identification
The introduction of this paper will be introducing the source:
❒ Have you recapped your research paper’s central argument?
❒ Have you provided the author’s name?
❒ Have you provided the source title?
❒ Have you provided the context (where you found the source, where it was originally published, who sponsored it, etc.)?
❒ Have you ended the introduction with a thesis statement that sums up your evaluation of the source’s credibility and usefulness?
2. Source Evaluation
❒ Have you provided an evaluation on the source’s credibility in at least one full paragraph?
❒ Have you used specific, accurate page/paragraph-numbered examples from the source to illustrate your evaluation on credibility?
❒ Have you provided a judgment on the source’s usefulness in at least one full paragraph?
❒ Have you used at least two specific quotations (cited with accurate page/paragraph-numbers) from the source to illustrate your evaluation of its usefulness?
❒ Did you include a reference list with complete source data such as author(s)’ name(s), date of publication, title, publication outlet or journal, an URL address (if available)?
3. Reflection
❒ Have you answered all reflection questions including specific and concrete examples that provide thoughtful insight in all responses? 
❒ Are your answers included on a separate page below the main assignment?
B. Reflection Questions
DIRECTIONS: Below your assignment, include answers to all of the following reflection questions. 
What types of questions did you ask yourself when evaluating the credibility and usefulness of your source? (2-3 sentences)
How do you feel this evaluation practice will help you as you continue to move through the research process? (2-3 sentences)
C. Rubric
Advanced (100%) Proficient (85%) Acceptable (75%) Needs Improvement (50%) Non-Performance (0%)
Thesis Statement (10 points)
Provide a clear thesis statement with sufficient support.
The thesis statement consists of an original observation that is clear, focused, and well-supported.  The thesis statement consists of an original observation that is adequately supported.  The thesis statement consists of an identifiable main idea that is generally supported.  The thesis statement consists of an identifiable main idea, but it is not well supported or does not match most of essay’s content.  The thesis statement is missing or completely unsupported.
Evidence and Analysis (20 points)
Evaluate a single source based on the characteristics of credibility and usefulness. 
The analysis includes specific and accurate examples from a correctly identified source as support; claims for credibility and usefulness are fully developed. The analysis includes accurate examples from the a correctly identified source as support; claims for credibility and usefulness are adequately developed. The analysis includes some accurate examples from a correctly identified source, though they are potentially vague or abstract; claims for credibility and usefulness are established but need further development. The analysis includes one or two accurate examples from a correctly identified source, but they are of a vague, abstract nature; claims for either credibility or usefulness are missing. The analysis includes no examples or inaccurate examples for support, the source is not correctly identified, and/or there are no established claims for either credibility or usefulness.
Organization (5 points)
Exhibit competent organizational writing techniques.
Presents all of the required components of a source evaluation essay, including an engaging introduction with background information and a clear thesis, a body paragraph or paragraphs addressing the source’s credibility, a body paragraph or paragraphs addressing the source’s usefulness, and a conclusion with a concluding statement. Presents all of the required components of a source evaluation essay, including an introduction with background information and a clear thesis, a body paragraph or paragraphs addressing the source’s credibility, a body paragraph or paragraphs addressing the source’s usefulness, and a conclusion with a concluding statement. Presents nearly all of the required components of a source evaluation essay; however, one component is missing. Presents most of the required components of a source evaluation essay, but is lacking two components; sequences ideas and paragraphs such that the connections between ideas (within and between paragraphs) are sometimes unclear and the reader may have difficulty following the progression of the essay. Lacks several or all of the components of a source evaluation essay; sequences ideas and paragraphs such that the connections between ideas (within and between paragraphs) are often unclear and the reader has difficulty following the progression of the essay.
Style (5 points)
Establish a consistent, informative tone and make thoughtful stylistic choices.
Demonstrates thoughtful and effective word choices, avoids redundancy and imprecise language, and uses a wide variety of sentence structures. Demonstrates effective word choices, primarily avoids redundancy and imprecise language, and uses a variety of sentence structures. Demonstrates generally effective style choices, but may include occasional redundancies, imprecise language, poor word choice, and/or repetitive sentence structures. Frequently includes poor word choices, redundancies, imprecise language, and/or repetitive sentence structures. Consistently demonstrates poor word choices, redundancies, imprecise language, and/or repetitive sentence structures.
Conventions (5 points)
Follow conventions for standard written English. 
There are only a few, if any, negligible errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage. There are occasional minor errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage. There are some significant errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage. There are frequent significant errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage. There are consistent significant errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage.
Reflection (5 points)
Answer reflection questions thoroughly and thoughtfully.
Demonstrates thoughtful reflection; consistently includes specific and concrete examples that provide thoughtful insight, following or exceeding response length guidelines. Demonstrates thoughtful reflection; includes multiple specific and concrete examples that provide thoughtful insight, following response length guidelines. Primarily demonstrates thoughtful reflection, but some responses are lacking in detail or insight; primarily follows response length guidelines. Shows limited reflection; the majority of responses are lacking in detail or insight, with some questions left unanswered or falling short of response length guidelines. No reflection responses are present.
D. Requirements
The following requirements must be met for your submission to be graded: 
Composition must be 2-3 pages (approximately 500-750 words).
Double-space the composition and use one-inch margins.
Use a readable 12-point font.
All writing must be appropriate for an academic context. 
Composition must be original and written for this assignment.
Use of generative chatbot artificial intelligence tools (ChatGPT, Bing Chat, Bard) in place of original writing is strictly prohibited for this assignment.
Plagiarism of any kind is strictly prohibited.
Submission must include your name, the name of the course, the date, and the title of your composition. 
Include all of the assignment components in a single file.
Acceptable file formats include .doc and .docx.
E. Additional Resources
The following resources will be helpful to you as you work on this assignment:
Purdue Online Writing Lab’s APA Formatting and Style Guide
This site includes a comprehensive overview of APA style, as well as individual pages with guidelines for specific citation types.
Frequently Asked Questions About APA Style
This page on the official APA website addresses common questions related to APA formatting. The “References,” “Punctuation,” and “Grammar and Writing Style” sections will be the most useful to your work in this course.
APA Style: Quick Answers—References
This page on the official APA Style website provides numerous examples of reference list formatting for various source types.

Topic Sentence [1 sentence]:
Connect to the prompt by stating the title, novel, first character, and the defense mechanism projection
Body Sentences [7-12 sentences]:
Provide a brief description of your defense mechanism (**a good place to quote your nonfiction source**) [1-2 sentences]
Provide an explanation of a scene where the character uses the defense mechanism [1-2 sentences]
Embed a quotation that highlights the character using that defense mechanism (include speaker) [1 sentence]
Explain HOW this quotation shows the character using the defense mechanism [1-2 sentences]
Provide an explanation of a second time the character uses the defense mechanism [1-2 sentences]
Embed a quotation that highlights the character using that defense mechanism (include speaker) [1 sentence]
Explain HOW this quotation shows the character using the defense mechanism [1-2 sentences]