Category: English

Commotion Contamination and Wellbeing: A Disturbing Association
In our undeniably urbanized world, commotion contamination has arisen as a critical natural issue that influences a large number of individuals. Characterized as undesirable or unsafe sound that disturbs the typical acoustic climate, clamor contamination is a frequently ignored danger to general wellbeing. From the steady murmur of traffic to the tireless buzz of modern hardware, commotion contamination pervades our day to day routines, forcing a scope of unfriendly wellbeing impacts. This paper investigates the complex connection between clamor contamination and wellbeing, featuring its sources, effects, and potential alleviation systems.
Wellsprings of Commotion Contamination
Clamor contamination comes from various sources, both regular and human-made. In metropolitan regions, the essential supporters incorporate transportation frameworks (street traffic, rail routes, and air terminals), modern exercises, development work, and diversion settings. Street traffic clamor is especially unavoidable, with a large number of vehicles adding to a steady noise that is hard to escape. Rail routes and air terminals add to this bedlam, particularly in regions near significant vehicle center points. Modern clamor radiates from manufacturing plants, studios, and different offices, while building locales create critical commotion using large equipment and gear.
Notwithstanding these man-made sources, normal sounds, like rainstorms or high breezes, can likewise add to clamor contamination, in spite of the fact that their effect is for the most part less constant and less unsafe contrasted with human exercises. By and by, in specific conditions, regular sounds can intensify the general clamor levels, compounding their impacts on wellbeing.
Wellbeing Effects of Commotion Contamination
The wellbeing effects of commotion contamination are significant and boundless, influencing both physical and mental prosperity. Delayed openness to elevated degrees of commotion can prompt serious medical conditions, a large number of which are frequently underrated or neglected.
Hearing Misfortune: One of the most immediate impacts of commotion contamination is clamor incited hearing misfortune (NIHL). Constant openness to boisterous commotion can harm the hair cells in the inward ear, prompting super durable hearing weakness. This is a typical word related danger for laborers in businesses like development, assembling, and music.
Cardiovascular Issues: Various investigations have connected commotion contamination to cardiovascular sicknesses. Constant openness to high commotion levels can cause raised pulse, expanded pulses, and a higher gamble of cardiovascular failures and strokes. The pressure prompted by tireless commotion goes about as an impetus for these circumstances, disturbing ordinary cardiovascular capabilities.
Rest Unsettling influence: Clamor contamination is a significant disruptor of rest, which is urgent for generally speaking wellbeing and prosperity. Rest unsettling influences can prompt a scope of medical problems, including exhaustion, mental impedance, and debilitated resistant reaction. Unfortunate rest quality, brought about by ecological commotion, can intensify other medical issues, making an endless loop of weakening wellbeing.
Emotional wellness: The mental effects of clamor contamination are similarly huge. Ceaseless openness to undesirable clamor can prompt pressure, uneasiness, and sorrow. The consistent siege of commotion makes a feeling of powerlessness and absence of control, which can seriously influence emotional well-being. For youngsters, commotion contamination can disrupt learning and mental turn of events, prompting long haul instructive and formative difficulties.
Personal satisfaction: Past the immediate wellbeing impacts, commotion contamination additionally influences the general personal satisfaction. It can disrupt day to day exercises, lessen efficiency, and reduce the happiness regarding one’s current circumstance. In metropolitan regions, where space is restricted and populace thickness is high, the failure to escape from clamor can prompt expanded disappointment and a feeling of mistreatment.
Relief Systems
Tending to clamor contamination requires a multi-layered approach, including strategy measures, mechanical developments, and local area commitment. Powerful commotion the board procedures can essentially lessen the wellbeing influences related with clamor contamination.
Guideline and Regulation: Legislatures assume a urgent part in controlling commotion contamination through the execution of tough guidelines and principles. This incorporates setting passable commotion levels for different sources, implementing clamor control regulations, and laying out commotion reduction strategies. Metropolitan arranging approaches can likewise consolidate commotion contemplations, like drafting guidelines that different local locations from uproarious modern zones.
Mechanical Arrangements: Propels in innovation offer promising answers for relieve commotion contamination. Developments like commotion obstructions, soundproofing materials, and calmer apparatus can essentially diminish clamor emanations. In the transportation area, the advancement of electric vehicles, which are calmer than conventional burning motors, can add to bring down commotion levels in metropolitan conditions.
Metropolitan Preparation: Smart metropolitan preparation and configuration can assist with making calmer living spaces. This incorporates the production of green spaces and cradle zones, which can go about as normal sound walls. Also, planning structures in view of sound decrease, like utilizing twofold coated windows and sound-retaining materials, can relieve the effect of outside clamor on occupants.
Public Mindfulness and Commitment: Bringing issues to light about the wellbeing effects of clamor contamination and advancing local area contribution are fundamental for viable commotion the board. State funded schooling efforts can illuminate people about the dangers related with clamor contamination and urge them to go to preventive lengths, like utilizing ear assurance and upholding for calmer conditions.
Individual Measures: On a singular level, individuals can do whatever it takes to safeguard themselves from commotion contamination. This incorporates utilizing earplugs or outside sound blocking earphones, keeping a calm home climate, and looking for calmer neighborhoods if conceivable. Pushing for nearby sound decrease drives can likewise add to more extensive local area endeavors.
End
Commotion contamination is an inescapable and frequently misjudged natural danger that presents critical dangers to general wellbeing. Its effects on hearing, cardiovascular wellbeing, rest, mental prosperity, and generally speaking personal satisfaction are significant and broad. Resolving this issue requires complete systems that include administrative measures, innovative progressions, metropolitan preparation, and public mindfulness. By making a purposeful move to diminish commotion contamination, we can safeguard general wellbeing and upgrade the personal satisfaction for a huge number of individuals around the world.

Essay explaining your post-secondary goals, the reason(s) you are requesting the scholarship, and how, if awarded, the scholarship will help you achieve your goals. Please be sure to include one fun fact about yourself. 

Assignment
In this assignment, you will write two paragraphs which explore what “’Never Trust a Snake’: WWF Wrestling as Masculine Melodrama” is saying, and how it’s saying it. Your first paragraph will summarize the article, using your skills in summary, paraphrase, and quotation to explain the main claims to an audience who is unfamiliar with the text. The language of your summary should be independent of the original, and contain few, if any, quotations. The summary must be accurate and complete, establishing your understanding of the essay’s central argument and claims.
Your second paragraph will explore the implicit arguments being made in “’Never Trust a Snake’: WWF Wrestling as Masculine Melodrama” using close reading and rhetorical analysis strategies. You will begin by selecting one or two moments in the source text in which how the text is arguing impacts what the text is arguing. You might consider focusing on organization, tone, diction, syntax, audience appeals, repetitions and contrasts, unstated assumptions, etc. After selecting a passage, explain in 5-6 sentences how the strategy the author took in your example impacts the overall meaning of the piece. Your goal is to draw clear connections between what the author is saying, how the author is saying it, and the overall effects these have on the argument of the essay. You are not trying to “decode” the text or show that it “really” means something different than what you see, so make sure that all of your claims are based in evidence that appears on the page and which you can clearly explain to your audience.
Strategy
Read the essay carefully, identifying the author’s main claim and the key ideas that support that claim. Remember that the claim may be implicit rather than explicit—it’s your job to locate it and reframe it for your audience. Once you have a clear sense of the author’s argument, paraphrase it by substituting your own words for the original. Using transitions, attributive tags, and strong verbs (e.g. “Jenkins claims”; “the author argues”), arrange your sentences so that they read logically and smoothly. Be sure to frequently check the draft of your summary against the original for accuracy, objectivity, and completeness. Review Wilhoit, “Summary,” particularly his discussion of informative summaries, as well as “Paraphrase X3” in Writing Analytically.
In your analysis, use WA’s sections on “The Method” (25-32) and “Uncovering Assumptions” (56-58) to help you focus on the details in the essay, instead of your reaction to it. Connect these details to the author’s message to show your reader how [Author’s] choices in the passage you chose help communicate their claim to the reader. Based on the evidence that you analyze, craft a claim that shows how you see a connection forming between how the text is arguing and what the text argues.
Criteria for Evaluation
Does the Skill Focus completely and accurately summarize the essay’s central claim and its most important supporting details? Would the Skill Focus be understandable to someone unfamiliar with the author’s essay?
Does the Skill Focus explore at least one significant passage from the text and the ways in which the author’s choices in that passage impact the overall meaning and argument of the text as a whole?
Does the Skill Focus present and evaluate details from the article in a logical, clear, and accurate way such that a reader unfamiliar with “’Never Trust a Snake’: WWF Wrestling as Masculine Melodrama”
Actions
might understand the impact those choices have on the text as a whole?
Does the Skill Focus remain independent and objective by paraphrasing the author’s words, using a minimum of quotations, and avoiding judgment or personal association?
Does the writing use style and voice to demonstrate rhetorical awareness of the assignment’s audience and purpose? Does the writing make use of the expectations for academic writing, including transition phrases, attributive tags, strong verbs, appropriate word choice, and MLA citation format?

Include a definition of success in your own words. Please include strong reasons and carefully chosen evidence to support your definition of success

Your final paper will focus on two of the stories that we have read in the second half of the semester (the excerpts from The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks, the excerpts from “Hiroshima,” and “Atonement”). In it, you will analyze an aspect of the two readings your paper is about. You will choose one of the four topics below to focus your paper on.  Discuss how the authors collected the information for their stories and how they presented it. Then, discuss whether you think the two stories show bias from the author, making an argument for why or why not in each case. Finally, discuss what someone who disagrees with your position might say and your response to them. 
Over the course of your paper, you will also be expected to demonstrate many of the writing techniques we have practiced this semester. 
Successful papers will include the following: 
·      An introduction with a thesis 
·      Relevant summaries of both stories under discussion in your own words 
·      Body paragraphs, with topic sentences, thoughtfully discussing and analyzing your paper’s topic 
·      Evidence from both readings in the form of properly integrated quotes and specific details supporting your analysis 
·      A conclusion reviewing your key ideas and final thoughts on the readings and the topic 
·      Overall writing that is logically organized, grammatically correct, relevant, specific, and detailed 
Overall, your paper will be about seven paragraphs long. It should follow standard college formatting. It should also include a Works Cited page for the two readings you are discussing.you should not use any outside resources for research or writing.

DUE TONIGHT AT 11:59PM
https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/le/content/1630084/viewContent/33294269/View
After watching the welcome video, indicate one thing you are looking forward to learning in this class. include 1 to 3 sentences in your response in the text box provided.
RAPPORT RELATIONSHIP BUILDING
https://search-alexanderstreet-com.ezproxy.snhu.edu/view/work/bibliographic_entity%7Cvideo_work%7C2790525/clip/138267#/embed/object/clips/138267
INFORMED VERBAL CONSENT https://search-alexanderstreet-com.ezproxy.snhu.edu/view/work/bibliographic_entity%7Cvideo_work%7C3918511/clip/144747#/embed/object/clips/144747
INEFFECTIVE LISTENING &POSITIVE ATTENDING https://search-alexanderstreet-com.ezproxy.snhu.edu/view/work/bibliographic_entity%7Cvideo_work%7C3918511/clip/144209#/embed/object/clips/144209
ENCOURAGING
https://search-alexanderstreet-com.ezproxy.snhu.edu/view/work/bibliographic_entity%7Cvideo_work%7C3918511/clip/144210#/embed/object/clips/144210
https://www.counseling.org/docs/default-source/default-document-library/ethics/2014-aca-code-of-ethics.pdf?sfvrsn=55ab73d0_1
https://www.amhca.org/events/publications/ethics
QUESTIONS
This discussion will allow you to introduce yourself to your peers, discuss the course, and review the first two microskills. These skills are essential for you as a counselor, as they will be integrated into the other skills and assist you in helping your client(s). For the discussion this week, complete the following:
View the Basic Attending Skills videos on nonverbal skills and encouragers:Video: Ineffective Listening & Positive Attending (3:40–13:00)
Video: Encouraging (43:54–59:25)
Review the following rubric documents:Final Project I Guidelines and Rubric
Final Project II Guidelines and Rubric
Use the following as guidelines for your initial post:
a. What are your thoughts and feelings as you prepare for this course and the residency?
b. What are your expectations for your peers, instructor, and yourself?
c. If these class meetings and the residency are successful, what do you hope to learn? What do you hope to offer?
d. Identify one thing about yourself that you would like your peers to know.
e. Discuss your thoughts and feelings on learning and demonstrating nonverbal skills and encouragers.

Short Answer Prompt Instructions:
After reading the poems, I would like you to respond to the following short answer questions. You have to respond using the sentence types (p.23-24) we learned about in this module. Remember there are three sentence types:
Simple 
Compound
Complex
For each question, respond using the sentence type we learned about in module 3. Your response should only be one sentence long. You are graded on grammar and punctation. 
Each question is worth 20 points. 
Do you want to be remembered in two hundred years? (compound sentence with , fanboys)
How does “Ozymandias” and “I’m Nobody” differ in their attitudes toward memory? Does one poem embrace forgetfulness more than the other? (Complex sentence with a (wwww.sub-a-beauti)
What similarities can we observe between Shakespeare’s  “Sonnet 73” and “To the Virgins to Make Much of Time” (Compound sentence with ; fatcats,)
Do we want to desire the thing, or do we want to have the thing? (compound sentence)
Can you ever truly know somebody? Will there always be mystery when we confront the “other?” (Complex sentence with a wwww.sub-a-beauti)

Your final essay should be 1200 words long and should follow the guidelines for writing a research essay
Craft an essay that addresses a clearly expressed researchable inquiry question that has an effective introduction, a body that makes a convincing case for your answer to the question with appropriate supporting details and evidence, and a satisfying conclusion; an essay that correctly incorporates relevant and credible ideas and information gathered through careful research as support for your own critical perspective on the topic.

Summarizing the speech
Again, note – There is one word used in the video that is not academically appropriate, but Will Smith is using his own vernacular and to take it out would ruin the effect of the video. Please be aware that using that type of language in an academic setting should be avoided. 
Remember to include a topic sentence:
Title + author + strong verb + main idea
The video titled “Fault Vs. Responsibility” by Will Smith + (strong verb) + (main idea)
Choose one of these strong verbs:
Illustrates, explains, analyzes, describes, motivates…
was just having a debate with my friend of mine, and we got stuck on the between fault and responsibility.  She kept talking about how something was “somebody’s fault, somebody’s fault,” and I was like “It don’t matter whose fault it is if something is broken if it is your responsibility to fix it.” 
For example, it’s not somebody’s fault if their father was an abusive alcoholic, but it’s for damn sure their responsibility to figure out how they’re gonna deal with those traumas and try  to make a life out of it. It’s not your fault if your partner cheated and ruined your marriage, but it is for damn sure your responsibility to figure out how to take that pain and how to overcome that and build a happy life for yourself.
Fault and responsibility do not go together.  It sucks, but they don’t.
When something is somebody’s fault, we want them to suffer; we want them punished.  We want them to pay, and we want it to be their responsibility to fix it.  But that’s not how it works, especially when it’s your heart.  Your heart, your life, your happiness-is your responsibility and your responsibility alone. As long as we’re pointing the finger and stuck in whose fault something is, we’re jammed and trapped into victim mode.  When you’re stuck in victim mode, you’re stuck in suffering. 
The road to power is in taking responsibility-your heart, your life, your happiness is your responsibility and your responsibility alone.
Hey I want to thank you all for your response to my IG story- Fault vs. Responsibility.  There have been a lot of comments about that.  There was one thing I wanted to add though. I wanted to say that…
Taking responsibility, accepting responsibility is not an admission of guilt; you’re not admitting that you are at fault.  Taking responsibility is a recognition of the power that you seize when you stop blaming people.  It’s not like you’re letting someone who wronged you off the hook; taking responsibility is an act of emotional self-defense. 
Taking responsibility is taking your power back. 
Smith, Will.  Fault vs. Responsibility.  https://youtu.be/USsqkd-E9ag January 30, 2018.  Date accessed 3/7/2022

why do you admire this person?
Describe three qualities that you admire in this individual
Why  are these qualities important to you
SOMEONE DO IT FREE PLS