Category: English

As part of the requirements for English 206, each student will read a novel and write a paper incorporating research. Like the exam and/or essay grade given for each of the three literary periods that we will study, this assignment is worth 100 pts. (out of 525 pts. total for the class). The following guidelines will be used for this term paper:
1. Select one of the following novels (one per literary period):
A. Romantic Period–Mary Shelley, Frankenstein
2. View study session videos for the book you are reading.
3. Write your paper, using current MLA standards. Your works cited page must contain a minimum of 7 sources with named authors. Use parenthetical citations (not footnotes or endnotes) following MLA guidelines. See me if you have any questions about research paper format; I will also be happy to review a draft of your paper before it is turned in for grading but only if the draft is submitted to me no later than 5/15/2024.
4. Your paper ( 10-12 pages) should cover the following areas (not necessarily in this order, but in these proportions):
A. Biographical information (approx. 2 pages) giving a succinct overview of pertinent events in the life and writing career of the author
B. Discussion of the novel (approx. 5 pages) giving a brief overall summary and followed by in-depth analysis of important themes, characters, techniques, etc.
C. Examination of the novel’s significance and its relationship to the period in which it was written (approx. 3 pages).
DUE DATE: MONDAY, June 3rd, 11:59pm 
Note: Any papers turned in with an incomplete or inaccurate works cited page WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED. 
I will also attach the book 

Minimum of 500 words for the Multigenre Persuasive Campaign; Minimum of 1,000 typed, polished words for the Rhetorical
Rationale)
This assignment asks you to take a stance on the topic or issue that you have identified within your declared,
or prospective, academic major. Drawing from your investigative field research and your analysis of the
rhetorical strategies employed by your discourse community, compose three new texts in different genres to
convince your audiences to take action.
To begin, you will take a stance and develop your argument based on the information you have gleaned from
the first and second projects. Then, you will identify your audiences; that is, you will decide what audiences
would (or should) respond to your argument. For this project, you are required to address at least two unique
audiences. Making your audience more concrete and specific will make your rhetorical task easier and will
result in a more successful project. Once you have identified your audiences, you will want to consider which
three genres will be most effective for reaching your chosen audiences. Your genres are your choice, but this
choice should be informed by your analysis and assessment of your rhetorical situation. Finally, you will
compose your three genres, developing a researched argument that will target the specific audience you
identify.
In addition, you will write a rationale that explains the rhetorical choices you made when composing in each
genre and how you see those choices as effective for your purpose, audience, and context. You should explain
not only what you did but also why you did it. Finally, your rationale should evaluate the effectiveness of
your choices (as indicated by feedback you received on drafts), acknowledging when something didn’t work
as you intended.
Documentation Style: The three compositions should use formatting and citation styles appropriate for the
selected genres; the Rhetorical Rationale may be crafted using the documentation style of your field, but it
must be formatted in Times New Roman, 12 pt. font, double-spaced.
Issue -Why do women do not gain as much respect as men in pre-law majors and genre-glossary 

Use the word document uplaoded to make a PPT. No other info needed. Only use info in the PPT. It should be an easy task. Please make speakers notes relevant to the slides. 
No max slides. The PPT must be 25 minutes talk time. 
TOPIC IS IN THE WORD DOCUMENT UPLOADED. 

Your op-ed must:
– Follow proper APA format.
– Range between 1200-1500 words (about 3 pages).
– Incorporate at least two outside sources with proper in-text citations. – Include a reference page with citations for all sources. 

– Don’t add any citation 
– make it free of plagiarism and AI since the professor checks the papers with Turnitin.
-don’t use big vocabulary
– pick Bubble Gum for the argument
-Follow the rubric.

Was Miller successful in disproving intelligent design and irreducible complexity? Evaluate his argument. Discuss how effective Behe’s counterargument were in responding to Miller’s criticism.

May 8 2024
hi I’m PATRICK JAMES S DIZON
I was born in bagbag nova liches Quezon City and
my sports soccer ball and my exercise is running and I love playing games and I’m grade 8
my dream is just too short my dream is to be doctor to help all people that doesn’t have money to go to hospital and I want to help all people who has sickness and had problems like can’t see anything and can’t walk that’s why I dream to be doctor to help all people for me helping people is so fun even when I had problems they can’t help me well I don’t need it actually because God can give it to me but right now I’m still trying my best even do it’s so hard for me but I will never surrender for my dreams had bully’s I love them even do they don’t they just don’t understand me I wish they understand me they hurt me sometimes but it’s okay to me I’ll stil
l focusing on my dreams that maybe one day they will be my friends again being a grade 8 student for me it’s so hard because I’m not like other’s that so smart and fast learner and I know that but I promise to my parents that I will finish it even do I don’t know if I’m gonna pass but I still believe in my self that one day my dreams will be come true
that’s all
Performance task ESSAY

Please read the attached instructions!!
I just need 1000 more words added to what i have and 1 more source
Source must be from my college library
database, i will provide links and login for
that!
Please read the comments from my instructor and see what could be tweaked if needed… dont need to be fancy just a 101 class… see how i wrote plz try to keep it simple like that without crazy bigger words… he does not expect that 
From me… 
Another thing, my instructor hates the typical 5 paragraph writing so dont do that please

Assignment Prompt
For this assignment, you will be writing an argumentative essay–a piece of writing that requires you to take a position, what rhetoricians call a claim, on a debatable topic (that is, a topic with more than one side). Specifically, you will present a policy claim where you argue for or against a change of some kind. This claim should be supported by reliable, credible evidence (i.e. scholarly sources) backed by research.  In addition to presenting your claim, you will also need to acknowledge the other side, which is called the counterargument. For this assignment, you may choose your own topic. Hint: browse topics that interest you in “Opposing Viewpoints” our article database accessed through the banner.
Assignment-Specific Requirements:
Length: This assignment should be at least 750 words. 
Thesis: Underline your thesis statement or the main claim of your letter.
Supporting Points: Plan to develop at least three strong supporting points to accompany your thesis and at least one counter. Each supporting point should equate to at least one body paragraph. 
Sources Needed: The essay should integrate at least 4 reliable and credible sources, to help prove the argument for or against a policy change.  Be sure to use MLA guidelines for all in-text and Works Cited citations. 
While we encourage you to acquire sources from Gale’s Opposing Viewpoints, you may access credible, scholarly sources from other resources.  Tertiary sources, such as online encyclopedias, dictionaries and Wikipedia, are not scholarly sources, and should not be cited within your work; however, they may offer helpful foundational information as you develop your understanding of an issue. (For more information, please review Berkley University’s resource on scholarly and popular sources: “Evaluating Resources.”)
Page Formatting: See Appendix C – Formatting and Submitting Your Work. Please underline your thesis statement.
MLA Requirements: See Formatting your Essay: MLA 8th Edition
Rhetorical Mode
When we talk about argument writing, we are not talking about an emotional and heated argument, but one that is neutral in tone and uses evidence/facts to convince your readers of a claim. Your argument is your claim, or the point that you want to convince readers of–in this instance, you will be making a claim for or against a policy change. Because everything depends on the strength of this claim (and the supporting points that you use to scaffold it), the organizational structure of an argumentative essay is incredibly important to its success. Every idea, topic sentence, paragraph, and page should always align with your argumentative claim. Be sure that you use scholarly evidence purposefully to support the claim you are making and do not veer too much into exploratory or informative writing, which is trickier than it sounds. You’ll also need to think carefully about how to integrate researched evidence with your own ideas, to build a fully developed and supported stance throughout. Finally, you will want to acknowledge the counterargument in the body paragraphs, even if you cannot refute it entirely. 
Rhetorical Considerations
Purpose:
Remember that this is an argumentative essay: that means your goal is to prove your claim for or against a policy change to readers. This piece of writing should be aimed at convincing readers through the inclusion of a strong argumentative thesis, specific supporting points, acknowledgement of the counter, and carefully chosen scholarly evidence. 
Audience:
The argumentative essay is written for someone else–a community of readers that is most impacted by the policy you are proposing to change (or keep the same). In this instance, you are writing to argue for or against a change (and thus convince readers that a change should or should not occur). Keep this audience in mind by angling everything in your essay towards a strong argument that can appeal to a more general population. 
Form:
This is a formal writing project, written in third-person, relying on strong organizational strategies, integrating researched evidence (the academic sources you choose), and following MLA formatting guidelines. 
Topics to avoid, as they are either too complex to argue in a single essay, or not considered appropriate for an academic or scholarly essay, are as follows:
The death penalty
Euthanasia or self-assisted death
Abortion 
The (il)legalization of drugs (e.g. marijuana) 
Religion or religious readings (e.g. existence of a higher order/being, or life after death)
Gun rights/rules
Global warming 

I used this app and hired someone you write my essay which is about the effects of cybercrime on national security and he did a horrible job and my unfortunately I got a zero on it but my professor is giving me a chance to fix it but will still take 20 points off. can anyone help me fix it please. use 2 peer reviewed article to you in either evidence or counter argument or rebuttal. the quote needs to be in a sandwich method in writing format . I’m going to attach a link to show examples. and the conclusion needs to be a solution instead of repeating what was said in the previous paragraphs. I will attach the original essay so you just need to add what’s missing. keep the visual aid as is and I’ve also made some changes to it to fix it . I just need two peer reviewed article to use quotes from and have a paragraph of counter argument and a rebuttal. https://docs.google.com/file/d/1_wM8gunGAMSVccsXY6OATYp-o8Sm9Trm/edit?usp=docslist_api&filetype=msword