Category: Criminology

Overview
In this assignment, you will create a problem statement based on your scholarly evidence and data review.
Prompt
In Module Two, you learned how a particular problem in criminal justice affects both the general public and the criminal justice system. You also identified a factor that contributes to a criminal justice problem by conducting a review of the literature. You will now apply this knowledge to create a problem statement. This is the first draft of your problem statement. You will have the chance to apply feedback and improve your problem statement to include in your project submission in Module Seven.
Specifically, the following rubric criteria must be addressed in your problem statement:
Identify the nature of a criminal justice problem.
Explain the significance of a criminal justice problem.
Describe the impact of a criminal justice problem. Be sure to address the following questions in your description:
Who is affected by the problem?
How are they affected?
What to Submit
Submit your assignment as a Microsoft Word document. This assignment should be 200 to 300 words in length. Any references must be cited in APA style

This paper will be part of my dissertation 
It has two sections 
Introduction- 800 words – introduce the topic, draw some data to show the significance of study ( why is the topic important? )
Background context – 3200 words
Subsections :
1 Defining and understanding gender based violence (WHO or United Nations definitions) 
2 Overview on GBV in Turkey, Data 
3 Historical Context: Review historical patterns of violence against Turkish women and the evolution of feminist movements in Turkey.
Cultural Context – Religion and Patriarchy – The position of women in today’s Turkish society 
4 Legal and Policy Framework – Evaluate current policies and legal measures aimed at addressing violence against women in Turkey.
5 Theoretical framework- Intersectionality Theory 

Scenario
Your department has been involved in several high-profile use of force incidents that have resulted in community unrest. You have been tasked with improving your department’s use of force policy.
Preparation
The Police Executive Research Forum (PERF) has researched and recommended 30 Guiding PrinciplesLinks to an external site. for use of force policies. From this list, identify the five principles that you believe are most vital to restore the community’s faith in its police department. Review Chapters 10 and 14 from your Community Policing Today: Issues, Controversies, and Innovations text for additional information.
Instructions
Complete a 5-7 page report in which you:
Identify five guiding principles that will most effectively update your use of force policy.
Detail the steps necessary to incorporate each selected principle into current organizational operations.
Include details of what would be needed for each principle, such as training, equipment, or policy oversight.
Explain how you will communicate these changes to the community.
Suggest 2-3 specific methods to communicate results of these changes to the community.
Use five credible, relevant, and appropriate sources to support your writing. Cite each source listed on your source page at least once within your assignment. For help with research, writing, and citation, access the library or review library guides.
You may use 30 Guiding PrinciplesLinks to an external site. and your Community Policing Today text for two of your sources, but you must provide at least three additional sources to support your selected initiatives.

Overview
For this activity, you will critically analyze how those within your chosen population engage with your topic. You will identify what is already working well and opportunities for change. Completing this activity will result in a draft of the critical analysis section of your project. It also provides an opportunity to obtain valuable feedback from your instructor that you can incorporate into your project submission.
Directions
In this activity, you will consider the elements of your topic you can develop to encourage, promote, and transform conversations about diversity. Include diverse perspectives from varied sources to support your points. You should continue to gather the sources you will integrate into your final project, which include two resources from course materials and two resources from the library. Look to the SNHU Shapiro Library for assistance in finding evidence and resources from outside the course. For this activity, you will discuss how to collaborate constructively with your chosen population group. You will then describe at least one positive element related to your topic and, finally, one element that could benefit from change.
You are not required to answer each question below the rubric criteria but may use them to better understand the criteria and guide your thinking.
Specifically, you must address the following rubric criteria:
Integrate reliable evidence from varied sources throughout your paper to support your analysis.
It is important to draw from a more diverse pool of perspectives from varied sources to support the analysis. This is different from the Citations and Attributions rubric criterion.
Reliable evidence from varied sources should be interwoven throughout the paper itself, while citing and attributing sources will be represented as APA in-text citations and a reference list at the end of your work.
You will be evaluated on both criteria.
Discuss how you would constructively collaborate with your population to encourage their engagement with your chosen topic.
Consider how you would develop a dialogue with your population about the topic you have chosen. What are your ideas for supporting constructive and inclusive conversation and programs of engagement?
Describe at least one positive element within your topic that supports transformation.
What conversational and collaborative approaches have already been successful? Visualize how this positive element could have a ripple effect towards a transformative conversation about your topic. This is not simply your opinion but should be supported by reliable evidence.
If you do not think your topic has been engaged with positively or successfully, explain why you have come to this conclusion.
Describe at least one specific element within your topic that could benefit from change.
What potential opportunities are there to improve your topic? What could be done differently to encourage, promote, or transform your topic? Build off ways that your topic has been discussed and represented in the past. This is not simply your opinion but should be supported by reliable evidence.
What to Submit
Submit your short paper as a 1- to 2-page Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Sources should be cited according to APA style

The chief of detectives is scheduled to present a lecture to the new class of detectives being held at the police academy, and he has asked you to prepare a memorandum for him to review. In your memorandum, you should include the following:
How to plan for an interview or interrogation
Your discussion of planning should distinguish between planning for an interview from planning for an interrogation, as well as planning for the interview that turns into an interrogation.
Are there aspects of your plan that depend on the subject matter (e.g., a homicide versus a kidnapping)? If so, what are they? If not, what are they?
Prior to conducting an interview or interrogation, what aspects should be anticipated?

Learning Objective
In earlier chapters, we covered the Nature vs, Nurture debate. One one hand it is believed that behavior is determined by genetics (nature), on the other had it is believed that environment, upbringing, and life experiences determine behavior. The purpose of this assignment is to evaluate the nurture aspect of delinquency by assessing the relationship between familial relationships, peer influence, and gang membership on the behavior and social outcomes of the young men in the documentary..
Complete the following steps
Step 1: Watch the “They Click the link below to watch the “They Call Us Monsters” Documentary. Take notes on the documentary to begin making connections to the concepts and factors discussed in chapters 7, 8, and 9. https://tubitv.com/movies/513336/they-call-us-monsters
Step 2: Complete the assignment by using this link They Call Us Monsters Documentary.docx
Please be mindful that a complete assignment will include an analysis of a total of 9 different concepts/theories/terms. Chapters 7, 8, and 9 need to be included in your discussion.

Times New Roman, 12 font size, double-spaced, all responses must be answered using paragraph form. Cover page, reference page, and in-text citations must be in APA writing format.
Points will be deducted if the assignment is not in APA. LATE or EMAILED ASSIGNMENTS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED. Check your grammar and spelling. I strongly suggest using www.grammarly.com before submitting

Introduction
There are hundreds of jurisdictions in the United States on the state and federal level. Each jurisdiction can have its own set of laws, including rules of evidence and procedure that govern how an individual’s rights are protected. A defendant may receive greater protections in one state jurisdiction than in another. During our review of the material, in the book, understand that often you’re learning about federal law or common law. However, Florida law mirrors federal law very closely. For example, the Federal Rules of Evidence and Florida Rules of Evidence are nearly identical substantively and are even numbered similarly. Florida simply adds a “90” in front of its rules of evidence. Federal Rule of Evidence 403 is 90.403 in Florida. As we learn more about the different laws that govern criminal procedure feel comfortable that your knowledge will be easily applied to any Florida scenario. Unless specified, please use Florida law when answering your assignments.
Case
Read the case of Hiibel vs. Sixth Judicial Court of Nevada, in Chapter 4, page 134, of your book; Reference the full Hiibel case for the 5th amendmentLinks to an external site.. Is the “Stop and Identify” Law Reasonable?
Directions
Each FRCP assignment is an opportunity for you to explore and learn more about the rules of procedure for Florida. The rules of procedure are extensive, but once you learn to navigate them they will provide answers to most criminal procedure questions a person may encounter. You will apply the rules of procedure that are relevant to the legal scenario in your book. To complete your FRCP Assignment, you must:
Identify two rules of procedure that apply to the legal issues discussed in the case;
Summarize the meaning of two rules, including the relevant subsections;
Explain why you think the rules apply to the legal issues in the case (support your opinion by citing specific references to the language in the case);
Don’t forget to address both the 4th and 5th amendment.
Format
Please use the following format for the FRCP Assignment:
Use APA format and cite sources, as necessary. If you need a refresher on APA, reference the APA Learning Unit. Do your resources meet the CRAAP test? Review CRAAP Test Reference page for more information.
Your answer must be a minimum of three (3) paragraphs of five (5) to seven (7) sentences.
Use Times New Roman, 12-point font, and double spaced.
All FRCP Assignments should be submitted in PDF format.
Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada, Humboldt County | Oyez

In the Cyber Fraud Tech Briefing Activity, you identified two Record Management Systems (RMSs) that represent viable alternatives to the system described in the briefing. In this assignment, you use your loss control/prevention and technology skills to take a deeper dive into one of your chosen RMSs. Create a presentation for fellow officers and decision-makers that addresses each of the following, as they relate to your chosen technology (from last week’s activity). The goal is to include details that provide significant insight into areas such as its adoption, use, purpose, et cetera. The presentation should do the following:
Justify 4 important criteria for evaluating a criminal investigation technology for possible adoption.
Recommend an RMS suitable for adoption based upon the application of all identified criteria and the information sought in the Cyber Fraud Tech Briefing scenario.
Cite and describe a real-world example that effectively illustrates the use and outcomes of your chosen technology.
Explain 2 significant limitations or downsides of a chosen technology that could impact decision-making regarding its adoption, including supporting quantifiable metrics or data. You might consider areas such as cost, ethical use, training, maintenance, et cetera.
Presentation Submission Requirements
Use PowerPoint to create the equivalent of a 5-7-minute presentation if delivered orally.
PowerPoint: 8-10 slides. All slides should be supported by detailed speaker notes that address the required criteria without the aid of a voice-over or speaker.
This course requires the use of Strayer Writing Standards (SWS). The library is your home for SWS assistance, including citations and formatting. Please refer to the Library site for all support. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
Examine technology and data tools for use in the criminal justice system that provides Data-informed decision-making.
Analyze the impact of technology on various aspects of the criminal justice system.
Evaluate ethical issues that criminal justice technologies pose to the law enforcement community and society.
One program I found was Kaseware Law Enforcement. If you find another RMS your welome to use it. I must have the minimum of Crime Mapping, Data Analytics, Database Queries with search parameter such as name, address, phone number, Social Media Data Minning, and Police Records Management System. 

Week 5 Discussion: Law Enforcement
Supporting Lectures:
Ethical Systems
Crime Control
Discretion and Law Enforcement
Discretion and Corruption
The discussion assignment provides a forum for discussing relevant topics for this week on the basis of the course competencies covered.
For this assignment, make sure you post your initial response to the Discussion Area by the due date assigned.
To support your work, use your course and text readings and also use the South University Online Library. As in all assignments, cite your sources in your work and provide references for the citations in APA format.
In this final week, we will apply the concepts reviewed in this course to the law enforcement function. For this week’s discussion, consider the following questions, with the ethical systems in mind.
Is it ethical for detectives to deliberately use deception during an interrogation? The Supreme Court has ruled that deceptions are legal, but are they ethical? If so, identify under which ethical system police would be permitted to use deception as an interrogation technique.
All police agencies make use of informants. Larger departments even pay their informants and keep track of their contributions to cases. Discuss the ethical problems of using informants to assist with investigations.
You have read about a concept known as “accepted lies” in police work. Give an example of an “accepted lie” and show how it is ethically permissible.