Category: Criminology

Pick one important, frequently used concept such as crime, juries, community policin
Would like the paper wrote on community policing. I have attatched instructions for the paper,thank you.

1. I have attached documents with all the information required. 
2. Please refer first to the Document labelled “QUESTION PAPER” as it has the requirements of the essay.
3. Thereafter, please refer to the Word document labelled “STRUCTURE TO FOLLOW…” as it has all the headings and subheadings, as well as the student’s case study and theory chosen to be used.  It also has information about referencing and font style and size, please refer to that
4. I added documents with all the information for each of the points in the essay: feminist pathways; CJS responses; processing and sentencing; supervision, etc. 
5. I added information about the case study, but additional research must be included on everything
6. Lastly, I added an example of an essay I wrote. Please follow a similar style of writing including the way I in-text references in the paragraphs. The example essay includes some of the information that can be used for the feminist approach point.
7. Reference list required

In this assignment, you will start doing the research to identify relevant and recent facts and figures related to the type of victimization you chose for your fact sheet.  Area 2 (Facts & Fictures) Fact Sheet requirements are:
Include incidence and/or prevalence estimates of the type of victimization, as well as statistics about important patterns and correlates of the type of victimization
Include at least five (5) relevant and recent facts and figures from at least three (3) original sources
No more than one fact or figure can be from an assigned reading in the course
Facts and figures do not have to be specific to your assigned location
Incidence and prevalence estimates should be the most recent available – preferably in the last two years, but no less than 10 years old
For this assignment, you will submit five relevant and recent facts and figures from at least three original sources, with the original sources being cited in APA Style, on this template. It is perfectly acceptable for the five facts and figures to come from four or five original sources instead of three (in other words, if you can have five facts and figures, each from a different source). The point is to get the most relevant and recent facts and figures, and it is very likely there is no source that gives you more than one relevant fact or figure.
Template is attached below 
Note from the Professor: “I would suggest trying to focus on either cybercrime in general, or a specific type of cyber crime- such as stalking and identify theft. I would also like to see more information on rates, and demographics, and resources for victims to cyber crime.”

this is the rubric Total Possible Score: 35.00
A. Explains the Basic Elements of Decision-Making and Public Finance in Law Enforcement or Correctional Organizations in General
Total: 1.00
Distinguished – Thoroughly explains basic elements of decision-making and public finance in law enforcement or correctional organizations in general.
Proficient – Explains the basic elements of decision-making and public finance in law enforcement or correctional organizations in general. Minor details are missing.
Basic – Partially explains the basic elements of decision-making and public finance in law enforcement or correctional organizations in general. Relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations – Attempts to explain the basic elements of decision-making and public finance in law enforcement or correctional organizations in general; however, significant details are missing.
Non-Performance – The explanation of the basic elements of decision-making and public finance in law enforcement or correctional organizations in general is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
B. Defines and Describes what is Meant By the Following Terms: Strategic Management, Quality Management, Operations Management, and Project Management
Total: 1.00
Distinguished – Thoroughly defines and comprehensively describes what is meant by the following terms: strategic management, quality management, operations management, and project management.
Proficient – Defines and describes what is meant by the following terms: strategic management, quality management, operations management, and project management. Minor details are missing.
Basic – Partially defines and minimally describes what is meant by the following terms: strategic management, quality management, operations management, and project management. Relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations – Attempts to define and describe what is meant by the following terms: strategic management, quality management, operations management, and project management; however, significant details are missing.
Non-Performance – The definition and description of what is meant by the following terms: strategic management, quality management, operations management, and project management are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.
C. Explains the Distinctions between Qualitative Versus Quantitative Decision-Making and Describes Various Ways Both Styles of Decision-Making are Important for a Criminal Justice Organization
Total: 1.00
Distinguished – Comprehensively explains the distinctions between qualitative versus quantitative decision-making and thoroughly describe various ways both styles of decision-making are important for a criminal justice organization.
Proficient – Explains the distinctions between qualitative versus quantitative decision-making and describes various ways both styles of decision-making are important for a criminal justice organization. Minor details are missing.
Basic – Minimally explains the distinctions between qualitative versus quantitative decision-making and partially describes various ways both styles of decision-making are important for a criminal justice organization. Relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations – Attempts to explain the distinctions between qualitative versus quantitative decision-making and describe various ways both styles of decision-making are important for a criminal justice organization; however, significant details are missing.
Non-Performance – The explanation of the distinctions between qualitative versus quantitative decision-making and the description of various ways both styles of decision-making are important for a criminal justice organization are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.
Examines the Management Philosophy of Henri Fayol (1917) and Describes the Ways Planning, Organizing, Leading, Controlling, and Coordinating Impact an Agency’s Budgetary Considerations
Total: 1.00
Distinguished – Thoroughly examines the management philosophy of Henri Fayol (1917) and comprehensively describes the ways planning, organizing, leading, controlling, and coordinating impact an agency’s budgetary considerations.
Proficient – Examines the management philosophy of Henri Fayol (1917) and describes the ways planning, organizing, leading, controlling, and coordinating impact an agency’s budgetary considerations. Minor details are missing.
Basic – Partially examines the management philosophy of Henri Fayol (1917) and minimally describes the ways planning, organizing, leading, controlling, and coordinating impact an agency’s budgetary considerations. Relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations – Attempts to examine the management philosophy of Henri Fayol (1917), and describe the ways planning, organizing, leading, controlling, and coordinating impact an agency’s budgetary considerations; however, significant details are missing.
Non-Performance – The examination of the management philosophy of Henri Fayol (1917) and description of the ways planning, organizing, leading, controlling, and coordinating impact an agency’s budgetary considerations are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.
Applies Theoretical Concepts of Management and Leadership to the Chosen Agency’s Budgetary Reduction and Explains How These Considerations Reflect Strategic Management Practices
Total: 2.00
Distinguished – Thoroughly applies theoretical concepts of management and leadership to the chosen agency’s budgetary reduction and fully explains how these considerations reflect strategic management practices.
Proficient – Applies theoretical concepts of management and leadership to the chosen agency’s budgetary reduction and explains how these considerations reflect strategic management practices. Minor details are missing.
Basic – Minimally applies theoretical concepts of management and leadership to the chosen agency’s budgetary reduction and partially explains how these considerations reflect strategic management practices. Relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations – Attempts to apply theoretical concepts of management and leadership to the chosen agency’s budgetary reduction and explain how these considerations reflect strategic management practices; however, significant details are missing.
Non-Performance – The application of theoretical concepts of management and leadership to the chosen agency’s budgetary reduction and explanation of how these considerations reflect strategic management practices are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.
Explains the Basic Premises of Budget Management and Preparation as they Pertain to the Type of the Chosen Agency (Either Law Enforcement or Corrections)
Total: 1.00
Distinguished – Thoroughly explains the basic premises of budget management and preparation as they pertain to the type of the chosen agency (either law enforcement or corrections).
Proficient – Explains the basic premises of budget management and preparation as they pertain to the type of the chosen agency (either law enforcement or corrections). Minor details are missing.
Basic – Partially explains the basic premises of budget management and preparation as they pertain to the type of the chosen agency (either law enforcement or corrections). Relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations – Attempts to explain the basic premises of budget management and preparation as they pertain to the type of agency you chose (either law enforcement or corrections); however, significant details are missing.
Non-Performance – The explanation of the basic premises of budget management and preparation as they pertain to the type of agency you chose (either law enforcement or corrections) is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Provides a Detailed Explanation of the Nuances of Budget Management and Preparation that are Unique to the Chosen Agency
Total: 2.00
Distinguished – Provides a detailed explanation of the nuances of budget management and preparation that are unique to the chosen agency.
Proficient – Provides an explanation of the nuances of budget management and preparation that are unique to the chosen agency. Minor details are missing.
Basic – Provide a limited explanation of the nuances of budget management and preparation that are unique to the chosen agency. Relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations – Attempts to provide a detailed explanation of the nuances of budget management and preparation that are unique to the chosen agency; however, significant details are missing.
Non-Performance – The explanation of the nuances of budget management and preparation that are unique to the chosen agency is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Reviews Researched Literature and Analyzes the Technical Aspects of Program Budgeting and Finance as they Pertain to the Type of Chosen Agency
Total: 2.00
Distinguished – Thoroughly reviews researched literature and comprehensively analyzes the technical aspects of program budgeting and finance as they pertain to the type of agency chosen.
Proficient – Reviews researched literature and analyzes the technical aspects of program budgeting and finance as they pertain to the type of agency chosen. Minor details are missing.
Basic – Partially reviews researched literature and minimally analyzes the technical aspects of program budgeting and finance as they pertain to the type of agency chosen. Relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations – Attempts to review researched literature and analyze the technical aspects of program budgeting and finance as they pertain to the type of agency chosen; however, significant details are missing.
Non-Performance – The review of researched literature and analysis of the technical aspects of program budgeting and finance as they pertain to the type of agency chosen are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.
Explains how Strategic, Quality, and Operations Management Impact These Institutions and Defends any Budget Cuts that are Included in the Budgetary Plan Based on Research
Total: 2.00
Distinguished – Thoroughly explains how strategic, quality, and operations management impact these institutions and fully defends any budget cuts that are included in the budgetary plan based on research.
Proficient – Explains how strategic, quality, and operations management impact these institutions and defends any budget cuts that are included in the budgetary plan based on research. Minor details are missing.
Basic – Minimally explains how strategic, quality, and operations management impact these institutions and partially defends any budget cuts that are included in the budgetary plan based on research. Relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations – Attempts to explain how strategic, quality, and operations management impact these institutions; however, does not defend any budget cuts that are included in the budgetary plan with research, and significant details are missing.
Non-Performance – The explanation of how strategic, quality, and operations management impact these institutions and defense of any budget cuts that are included in the budgetary plan based on research are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.
Evaluates Financial Constraints Facing the Selected Organization, Taking into Consideration the Concepts of Demand and Supply as they Pertain to the Type of the Chosen Agency and Identifies Relevant Stakeholders, Potential Sources of Competition, Economies of Scale, and Financial Constraints Facing the Agency
Total: 4.00
Distinguished – Thoroughly evaluates financial constraints facing the selected organization, taking into consideration the concepts of demand and supply as they pertain to the type of agency chosen and identifies relevant stakeholders, potential sources of competition, economies of scale, and financial constraints facing the agency.
Proficient – Evaluates financial constraints facing the selected organization, taking into consideration the concepts of demand and supply as they pertain to the type of agency chosen, and identifies mostly relevant stakeholders, potential sources of competition, economies of scale, and financial constraints facing the agency. Minor details are missing.
Basic – Partially evaluates financial constraints facing the selected organization, taking into consideration the concepts of demand and supply as they pertain to the type of agency chosen, and identifies somewhat relevant stakeholders, potential sources of competition, economies of scale, and financial constraints facing the agency. Relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations – Attempts to evaluate financial constraints facing the selected organization, taking into consideration the concepts of demand and supply as they pertain to the type of agency chosen; however, does not identify relevant stakeholders, potential sources of competition, economies of scale, and financial constraints facing the agency, and significant details are missing.
Non-Performance – The evaluation of financial constraints facing the selected organization, taking into consideration the concepts of demand and supply as they pertain to the type of agency and identification of relevant stakeholders, potential sources of competition, economies of scale, and financial constraints facing the agency chosen are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.
Creates a Budget for Chosen Agency that Reduces the Overall Spending by 25% and Reallocates Funds as Necessary
Total: 4.00
Distinguished – Creates a thorough budget for the selected agency that reduces the overall spending by 25% and reallocates funds as necessary.
Proficient – Creates a budget for the selected agency that reduces the overall spending by 25% and reallocates funds as necessary. Minor details are missing.
Basic – Creates a partial budget for your agency that reduces the overall spending by 25% and reallocates funds as necessary. Relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations – Attempts to create a budget for the selected agency that reduces the overall spending by 25% and reallocates funds as necessary; however, significant details are missing.
Non-Performance – The creation of a budget for the selected agency that reduces the overall spending by 25% and reallocates funds as necessary is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Assesses the Impact of Proposed Budget Changes on the Fiscal Health and Human Resources Management of the Agency and Provides a Rationale for the Changes Made to the Organization’s Operating Budget
Total: 5.00
Distinguished – Thoroughly assesses the impact of the proposed budget changes on the fiscal health and human resources management of the agency and provides a comprehensive rationale for the changes made to the organization’s operating budget.
Proficient – Assesses the impact of the proposed budget changes on the fiscal health and human resources management of the agency and provides a rationale for the changes made to the organization’s operating budget. Minor details are missing.
Basic – Partially assesses the impact of the proposed budget changes on the fiscal health and human resources management of the agency and provides a limited rationale for the changes made to the organization’s operating budget. Relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations – Attempts to assess the impact of the proposed budget changes on the fiscal health and human resources management of the agency; however, does not provide a rationale for the changes made to the organization’s operating budget, and significant details are missing.
Non-Performance – The assessment of the impact of the proposed budget changes on the fiscal health and human resources management of the agency and rationale for the changes made to the organization’s operating budget are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.
Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics
Total: 3.00
Distinguished – Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors and is very easy to understand.
Proficient – Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors and is mostly easy to understand.
Basic – Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors which may slightly distract the reader.
Below Expectations – Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors which distract the reader.
Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Written Communication: APA Formatting
Total: 2.00
Distinguished – Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.
Proficient – Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors. 
Basic – Exhibits limited knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all APA requirements. 
Below Expectations – Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA.
Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Written Communication: Page Requirement
Total: 2.00
Distinguished – The length of the paper is equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages. 
Proficient – The length of the paper is nearly equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages. 
Basic – The length of the paper is equivalent to at least three quarters of the required number of correctly formatted pages.
Below Expectations – The length of the paper is equivalent to at least one half of the required number of correctly formatted pages.   
Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Written Communication: Resource Requirement
Total: 2.00
Distinguished – Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.
Proficient – Uses the required number of scholarly sources to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.
Basic – Uses less than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are used within the body of the assignment. Citations may not be formatted correctly.
Below Expectations – Uses an inadequate number of sources that provide little or no support for ideas. Sources used may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are not used within the body of the assignment. Citations are not formatted correctly.
Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Write a 6 page paper concerning the different consequences associated with different levels of crime.

Write a five (5) page minimum, DOUBLE SPACED, 12-FONT TIMES ROMAN paper with references and sources cited in APA format
. cover sheet, abstract and your source citing/references are NOT included in the five page minimum.

Discuss the demographics of the NYPD police department (Although you do not have to use where you live because the data may not be available, you are required to use a real police department/area, not a hypothetical area. Choose a city or county that can be researched and show your sources). 
Discuss the characteristics of the population in which the department serves. 
Identify and discuss a specific problem that is faced by the community (e.g., high rate of property crime, high rate of gang violence)  
Discuss the key features of two prominent leadership styles discussed in the lecture and readings.  
Of those two styles, recommend which style should be instituted within the department.  
Include a justification (backed by scholarly works) regarding why this is the preferred leadership style. 
Provide a discussion on how the leadership style implemented can effectively address the problem that you have identified.  

Topic: Child Imprisonment in australia 
– minimum age of criminal responsbility should be increased to 18 in australia because currently kids at age of 10 are imprisoned 

Overview
In this assignment, you will reflect on the importance of using data and research to inform potential solutions to a problem in criminal justice.
Prompt
In this module, you have learned about analyzing data and research to inform potential solutions. How are potential solutions derived, and why is it important to analyze data and research when searching for solutions to problems in criminal justice? For this 350- to 500-word journal activity, specifically, the following rubric criteria must be addressed:
Describe an approach that can be used to derive a potential solution.
In your description, discuss if the process order (the steps you use to derive a solution) is critical. Why or why not?
Define a fact-based solution.
Describe the importance of analyzing data and research when searching for solutions to problems in criminal justice.
What to Submit
This assignment must be 350 to 500 words in length. Any references must be cited in APA style. Consult the Shapiro Library APA Style Guide for more information on citations.

Our Research topic: How much does media influence community dynamics and perceptions of safety?
Information Sources: Find information through research journals and books, interviews and surveys with research participants, longitudinal studies possibly
Sub-questions/Objectives: 
-Investigating media representation of safety and community dynamics
– Examine the effects of media exposure on perceptions
– To assess media framing and agenda setting
– To explore the role of social identity in Media Influence
– To propose strategies for promoting responsible media practices and media literacy
The above is our research question for our project. Based on the above information, identify and critique the academic research paper that discusses an issue similar to or applicable to your research topic.
The link to the academic research paper that needs to critiqued: https://csesjournal.columbiasouthern.edu/social-media-and-the-police/
Describe how it relates to or informs your draft (work-in-progress) of your team’s research project and report.
Procedure & Details
You must review & critique a chosen academic research paper. 
Topics that you should include in your essay are:
What is the paper and issue you chose, and why did you choose it?
Why is the paper and issue important?
What are the main questions, theories, methods, results, and interpretations identified in the paper?
Provide a critique – both positive and negative – of the main questions, theories, methods, results, and interpretations identified in the paper. Use the Checklist in pp. 390-391 of Leedy & Ormrod (2019) as a guide.
Ensure that you provide examples to illustrate your points.
Discuss the findings and your critique of that paper and how they relate to the research project your team is conducting?
Discuss how the critique has affected your perspective on the issue and provide recommendations for future action/research.
Don’t forget to include a clear introduction and purpose statement!
Your essay will be a minimum of 4 pages in length (5 pages max), double spaced. It must also include an additional cover page.
Your essay will be formatted according to APA style, including in-text citations and a References page.