Category: Criminology

The structure should be the following: 
Introduction/methodology
Chapter
1 (2200 words approx.)
·      
Overview of the Ukraine-Russia conflict and its impact on
both countries.           
·      
Definition and types of cyberwarfare in the context of the
conflict.
·      
You’re looking at cyberwarfare as an extension of the conflict,
with both sides using computer technology as a weapon.
·      
‘What does a cyberattack hope to achieve?’ Damage to
critical infrastructure? Damage to supply lines? Damage to utilities etc.
Chapter
2 (2200 words approx.)
·      
Motives behind cyberattacks in the Ukraine-Russia conflict.
·      
Psychological effects of cyberattacks on individuals and
society.
·      
How the combatants have used cyberattacks against their
opponent.
·       The possible effects of a successful
cyberattack on the population: What would happen if gas, electric, food supplies were
disrupted? What would the effect be on the populations?
Chapter
3 (2200 words approx.)
·      
Strategies for combating cyberattacks in the context of the
conflict.         
·      
Main arguments
o   Cyberattacks have become a
significant aspect of modern warfare with state and non-state actors using them
to achieve political and military objectives.
o   The Ukraine-Russia conflict has seen
a rise in cyberattacks targeting critical infrastructure government
institutions and individuals leading to widespread disruption and fear.
o   Understanding the psychological
motivations behind cybercrimes in this conflict is crucial for developing
effective countermeasures and promoting peace and stability in the region.
·      
How other countries prevent cyberattacks
·      
A successful cyberattack: Stuxnet
·      
A successfully prevented cyberattack.
Summary
References

Instructions
Unlike the Reflection Papers, for your Analyst’s Paper
choose a topic that relates to the materials covered during your studies of the
Homeland Security world. This topic cannot be one that you wrote about in any
of your courses at APUS or any other institute of higher learning. This is your
opportunity to explore in-depth a topic that you have a greater interest in
than what you covered during the other courses at APUS. Feel free to explore
the world of Homeland Security and write about something that really interests
you. Be brave and write about something that others are not going to write
about, not just a typical paper on a common Homeland Security theme. Explore
and enjoy. 
Topic: Artificial Intelligence’s Role in Homeland Security
Possible references:
https://www.rand.org/hsrd/topics/dhs-and-ai.html
https://www.gao.gov/blog/how-artificial-intelligence-transforming-national-security
https://www.dhs.gov/science-and-technology/artificial-intelligence
https://www.reuters.com/technology/us-homeland-security-names-ai-safety-security-advisory-board-2024-04-26/
Please add and use additional references as necessary to
meet the technical requirements.
Components of the Analyst’s Paper
·      
Cover Page (does not count towards your minimum
or maximum page count).
·      
Abstract and Keywords (does not count towards
your minimum or maximum page count).
·      
Introduction, Body, and Conclusion.
·      
Reference Page (does not count towards your
minimum or maximum page count). 
Technical Requirements:
·      
Your
paper must be at a minimum of 8 pages and a maximum of 9 pages (the Title,
Abstract, and Reference pages do not count towards the minimum limit).
·      
No direct quotations, paraphrases are
acceptable.
·      
Do not include a methodology section or a
literature review.
·      
You must have at least eight unique sources in
the paper. Each requires both a citation and a reference.
·      
Type in double-spaced Times New Roman 12-point
font. One-inch margins left, right, top, and bottom.
·      
No direct quotations.
·      
All paraphrases require a reference. All
references require a paraphrase.
·      
Follow APA 7 as the sole citation and reference
style used in written work submitted as part of coursework.
·      
Points will be deducted for the use of Wikipedia
or encyclopedic-type sources. It is highly advised to utilize books,
peer-reviewed journals, articles, archived documents, etc.
·      
All submissions will be graded using the
assignment rubric.

Assignment Content
You decide to prepare a set of report documents that will be completed concurrently and after the implementation of your evaluation. You decide to add these forms to the memo you drafted in Wk 3 – Design Evaluation. Your intention is to receive feedback on reporting expectations so that the task force can participate in steering the evaluation.
Given the definition and design of your evaluation, prepare a 525- to 700-word report template that will objectively communicate data, interpretations, conclusions, and recommendations.
Develop your hypothesis statement for presentation.
What information from the textbook, assignments, and discussions are relevant to the problems you are addressing in your evaluation?
What theory and calipers provided background information about the problem(s)?
What actors and variables are you including in your evaluation?
Which will change?
Which will remain the same?
What is your hypothesis?
What areas are vulnerable to bias and risk misinterpretation?
Cite at least 3 peer-reviewed or similar references to support your assignment.
Format your assignment according to APA guidelines.
Order 7715355 Week 3 Design Evaluation

his week, you are continuing your study of the Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments. Respond to 1 of the following questions. Support your answer with at least 1 published court case, such as a case from the U.S. Supreme Court, lower federal courts, or appellate state courts.
What is a search incident to arrest, and what circumstances must exist in order for this exception to the warrant requirement to apply? Next, locate and summarize a published case in which the court discusses a search incident to an arrest. Finally, provide the citation to the case as your reference.
Or
What are exigent circumstances, and what are the various circumstances where exigent circumstances exist?  Next, locate and summarize a published case in which the court discusses exigent circumstances. Finally, provide the citation to the case as your reference.
Discussion Board Reminders:

write a 1500 words essay about the Edward Brooke papers- What is the document? Who wrote it? When is it from? – What does it say about the definition and role of conservatism? – Why was it compelling or interesting to you? – What was the context in which it was written? – How does it relate to course themes – ideas, media, social movements, or other themes? include info on Sen. Tom Scott and his views on conservatiism

provide a brief summary and critical analysis of the book The Enigma of a Violent Woman – A Critical Examination of the Case of Karla Homolka by Jennifer Kilty and Sylvie Frigon.  The minimum length for your review is 4 full pages of text – not including your reference page and title page. Note that subtitles, running heads, referencing and spacing between paragraphs does not count as written text. There is no maximum length for your review. If you do not meet the minimum page requirement for your review, you will receive a mark of 0. If you have errors within the first two sentences of your review, you will receive a mark of 0.
Grading for book review: 20% (15% for content and 5% for style). When writing your book review, you might want to take into consideration the following tips:
It should present what Kilty and Frigon wanted to accomplish by writing The Enigma of a Violent Woman.  Why did they write the book?  Why should we care about this book?
– It should give a summary of the main themes/content/ideas presented in the book.
– It should outline the strengths/weaknesses of the book.  Did anything stand out while you read the book?  
– Remember to provide support/evidence for all of the claims made in your review from The Enigma of a Violent Woman book.
– Perhaps you might want to think about how this book potentially contributes to the body of knowledge about serial killers, women who kill and/or the cultural/media fascination with murder/violence.
– Discuss what you have learned/describe what your take away was from reading this book.
– Discuss whether Kilty and Frigon accomplished their goal/purpose with writing this book.
*Note that these tips are not meant to be exhaustive.  You may want to add other key elements to aid in your overall assessment of Kilty and Frigon’s book.*

You will create this assignment following the Assignment Detail instructions below.
Review the tutorial How to Submit an Individual Project.
Assignment Details
As recent events have shown, the rapid pace of technology development has created complicated legal questions that are being litigated before the courts today. Select one of the following topics to analyze, and prepare a three to five page paper addressing the following issues.
DNA from Arrestees
One of the most controversial of technological advances is the relationship between DNA, probable cause, and issues of privacy and the Fourth Amendment. You are provided with two research documents below that analyze the case of Maryland v. King, 569 U.S. 435 (2013), in which the U.S. Supreme Court held that it is constitutional to extract DNA from arrestees. The author of the first article provides an overview of the legal issues associated with compulsory DNA collection from arrestees and argues that the U.S. Supreme Court correctly decided the Maryland v. King case.
The author of the second article raises several concerns about the Maryland v. King opinion and the future of privacy and the Fourth Amendment. Read both documents, and then write an argumentative essay explaining your position on the issue of DNA extraction from arrestees.
Complete the following for this assignment:
Read the following 2 research documents:
Deitrich, L. (2015). Say Aah! Maryland v. King Defines Reasonable Standard for DNA Searches. 49 Val. U.L. Rev. 1095.
Click here to access the article.
Noronha, S. (2014). Maryland v. King: Sacrificing the Fourth Amendment to Build up the DNA Database. 73 Md. L. Rev. 667 (2014)
Click here to access the article.
Summarize the key legal and privacy concerns discussed by Deitrich.
Summarize the key legal and privacy concerns discussed by Noronha.
Write an argumentative essay supporting your position relating to those issues raised by Deitrich and Noronha. Indicate the following: 
Whether you agree with both authors or one author over the other, and why;
Whether you disagree with one or both authors, and why;
Discuss your own ideas on DNA extraction from arrestees;
Explain your position in detail.
For background and additional insight into the Maryland v. King case,
Click here to listen to the oral arguments. 
Click here to read the Maryland v. King case. 
ShotSpotter Technology
Another controversial technological advancement has been police departments’ adoption of ShotSpotter technology across the county. ShotSpotter is a sophisticated surveillance system that detects gunshots and pinpoints the location of the gunshots. Once the system’s microphones detect sounds of gunfire, it sends the audio file to the ShotSpotter Review Center where it will be determined whether the sound was indeed gunfire. If it is determined that the sound is gunfire, ShotSpotter notifies the local police department.
In favor of the use of ShotSpotter, you are provided with a case, United States v. Rickmon, and the oral arguments, in which the majority of the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals held that a ShotSpotter alert could be used to create reasonable suspicion. There also is a dissenting judge in the Rickmon case. You also are provided with an interview with the president of the company that devised ShotSpotter.
Concerns also have been raised about the use of ShotSpotter technology. To support this position, you are provided with an article that questions the use of ShotSpotter and its effectiveness, and Chief Judge Wood’s dissenting opinion in the United States v. Rickmon case. In the article, Mr. Goodman also questions the United States v. Rickmon opinion and raises several concerns about the ShotSpotter technology.
Read these documents and listen to the oral arguments, and then write an argumentative essay explaining your position on the issue of whether ShotSpotter technology is an effective tool that law enforcement should use and whether it should be used to create reasonable suspicion for an investigatory stop, also known as a Terry stop.
Complete the following for this assignment:
Read the following documents and listen to the oral arguments.
Pro ShotSpotter
United States v. Rickmon, 952 F. 3d 876 (7th Cir. 2020).
Click here to access the case. 
United States v. Rickmon Oral Arguments.
Click here to listen to the oral arguments
Williams, C. (2017, May 10). ) How ShotSpotter locates gunfire, helps police catch shooters and works to ‘deformalize’ gun violence. Weblog post. Washington Post – Blogs , Washington: WP Company LLC d/b/a The Washington Post. 
Click here to access the article.
Questions ShotSpotter
Goodman, B. (2021). ShotSpotter – The New Tool to Degrade What is Left of the Fourth Amendment, 54 UIC L. Rev. 797.
Click here to access the article. 
United States v. Rickmon, 952 F. 3d 876 (7th Cir. 2020) (dissenting opinion)
Click here to access the dissenting opinion in the Rickmon case. (Only list the dissenting opinion here, if possible). 
Summarize the key legal points of the Rickmon case and the benefits of ShotSpotter technology.
Summarize the key legal and privacy concerns discussed by the Goodman article and Chief Judge Wood’s dissenting opinion in the Rickmon case.
Write an argumentative essay supporting your position relating to those issues raised by the United States v. Rickmon case and the Goodman article. Indicate
Whether you agree with the majority opinion or the dissenting opinion in the Rickmon case,
Whether you agree or disagree with the Goodman article.
Discuss your own ideas about ShotSpotter technology, how it should be used by police departments, and any constitutional concerns that you may have.
Explain your position in detail.
For additional background and insight into the ShotSpotter technology and constitutional issues, see
Gecas, A.S. (2016). GUNFIRE GAME CHANGER OR BIG BROTHER’S HIDDEN EARS?: FOURTH AMENDMENT AND ADMISSIBILITY QUANDARIES RELATING TO SHOTSPOTTER TECHNOLOGY. 2016 U. Ill. L. Rev. 1073.
Click here to access the article.
Be sure to cite all references in APA format.
Please submit your assignment.
For assistance with your assignment, please use your text, Web resources, and all course materials.
The following grading rubric will be used for this assignment: Grading Rubric.
Assignment Reminders:
Please submit your assignment.
Make sure you submit this assignment by the listed due date. Late deductions will apply for this assignment. Please refer to the Late Submission of Assignment policy.
If you need assistance, please view the Troubleshooting tips.
Resave in the proper format per the Assignment Detail instructions and resubmit.
Submit with a different Web browser.
Submit from a different computer.
Call Technical Support at 877-221-5800, Menu Option 2. They are open 24/7.
If you are still having difficulties after trying steps 1-4, please contact your course instructor.
Instructor’s Comments
There are no instructor comments added at this time.

What is the most important factor in choosing to run a UC? Speed of the
results or the potential for greater charges from a grand jury
indictment? Explain your answer.
Choosing the UC is a process. Is it based on speed, potential charges, or is it tactical?
View the information  https://www.news-journalonline.com/story/news/local/flagler/2017/07/04/expert-undercover-stings-important-tool-for-police/20376988007/  as a helpful aid…
Why is an UC investigation useful in a child sex case?
Can you determine which if any aspect of the investigation steps below  is most critical?
Method of Conducting Undercover Investigations
Development of a cover story– 
Agent reports–
Communication– 
Shutdown–  
Content, Presentation, and Receipt of Reports
Daily Activity Report (DAR) – 
Statement of Witness Report (SOR) – 
Time Frame for Results
Fitzgerald, D. G. (2015). Informants, cooperating witnesses, and undercover investigations: A practical
guide to law, policy, and procedure (2nd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group.

For this Deep Dive, you will need to watch Episode 10 of Season 2 of “When I was a teenage felon”. Select ONE theory covered in Modules 2-7 and answer the following questions. Make sure to concisely apply all aspects of the theory and provide at least one academic reference to support your arguments.
1.    Explain your chosen theory. Specifically, define the (a) assumptions, (b) level of explanation (micro, macro), and (c) its central concepts (propositions). 
2.    Apply those key concepts to explain Sean’s criminal behavior. Use specific examples described in the show that support the theory. 
3.    Identify at least two limitations of your chosen theory for explaining Sean’s behavior. What other theory (or theories) could address these limitations and why?
4.    According to your chosen theory, what could be done to prevent criminal behavior more broadly? 
You may have free access to this show depending on your streaming services. Otherwise, this is available for $1.99 from YouTube. 
Questions to Answer In This Deep Dive
1. Explain the theory. Specifically, define the (a) assumptions, (b) level of explanation (micro, macro), and (c) its central concepts (propositions). 
2. Apply those key concepts to explain Sean’s criminal behavior. Use specific examples described in the show that support the theory. 
3. Identify at least two limitations of your chosen theory for explaining Sean’s behavior. What other theory (or theories) could address these limitations and why? 
4. According to your chosen theory, what could be done to prevent criminal behavior more broadly?

The assignment Critically reviews current sexual assault response teams on college campuses using scholarly articles and the pdf below. The paper has to be 7 pages long.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0886260514553119?casa_token=-e10L6MuXisAAAAA%3AkCAaMwoAqNO7EuGt5bS4f2l6xsl9TDFLmVqFOxDqt12OBbKjHNW145yXDJyjQArxrGXuYoMOlgXH
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/epdf/10.1177/0886260509334406