Category: Case Studies

Hi, the answer has already been completed and just needs to be revised based on the following feedback: **hello you did a great job but please go in more detail the summaries are not specific enough and you use abbreviations for describing the groups and I am confused point is for you to do the research for me and provide in detail summary so that I would know the research and can explain it myself please go in more detail on all aspects of summary and limitations and future direction as well please!**
I will provide the answer along with the articles used for the assignment once you are selected to work on the question. Please ignore the ppt part since the only part that needs revising based on the feedback given is the ppt script answer part which is what I will provide to you once you are selected to work on the question.
I have provided the instructions for you below so that you know what the assignment is all about:
“Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to this question from any other website since I am already well aware of this. I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure that the answer comes up with way less than 18% on Studypool’s internal plagiarism checker since anything above this is not acceptable according to Studypool’s standards. I will not accept answers that are above this standard.
No AI or Chatbot! I will be sure to check this.
This is for a graduate school in school psychology student for Trauma and Neurobiology course.
The instructions:
1. find 3 different scholarly source articles of studies of neurofeedback and to summarize them 2 of the sources must be of children and 1 of adults.
I want you to include all of the following components of all 3 articles based on the articles:
– a. Summary of the entire research of EACH OF THE 3 articles and explain it and write it as if you had to teach the article information in the studies to me. so be very detailed and get all information of article very specifcially and in detail mentioning all variables they looked at, all scales, all measures, wha specifically was done, how it was done, who did it, who was involved, how it happened, where it took place.
– b. purpose of studies and research questions – SPECIFICALLY. include all variables researched in each and what they were researching
– c. participants- who they were, how many- was there control group? what was the control? how many groups? randomized control group or not?
d. diversity of participants ? gender difference if any? diversity in studies? where it has been studied? on which population? which disorder was it looking at? RESEARCH THIS FOR THE 3 STUDIES AND IN GENERAL
e. methods of study / what were measures used, scales used, tests used, and procedures – very specific as if you had to explain and teach it to me
f. results of study – specifically what were the variables they wre researching in study and what was the effect for each variable
g. Discuss the limitations of the research about neurofeedback in each of the studies and specifically what the research says about it and then the future directions of research
h. make a powerpoint presentation for it. as if to present it to my class with no more than 4 slides and include talking points as well as information to include into the powerpoint for it. this is for graduate school so make it professional. include all 3 article information into it. write the number of studies showed its effectiveness and cite them and the numbers that showed its ineffectiveness and cite them. include the limitations and future directions into powerpoint as well
THEN, IN ADDITION TO THE 3 ARTICLES DO THE FOLLOWING:
YOU MUST LOOK AT OTHER ARTICLE AND RESEARCH AS WELL TO FIND WHAT RESEARCH SAYS IS LIMITATIONS OF NEUROFEEDBACK AND WHY. MUST DISCUSS HOW MANY PARTICIPANTS IN STUDIES WHERE IT SHOWS LARGE EFFECT SIZE AND HOW MANY WHEN IT DOES NOT SHOW EFFECT SIZE. DISCUSS WHAT RESEARCH DISCUSSES FUTURE RESEARCH SHOULD ENTAIL AS WELL.
RESEARCH NEUROFEEDBACK IN GENERAL AND DISCUSS NUMBER OF STUDIES THAT SHOWED ITS EFFECTIVENESS AND SHOW NUMBER OF STUDIES SHOWED ITS INEFFECTVENESS AND DISCUSS SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES FOUND BETWEEN THEM AND WHY IT EVEN SHOWS THERE IS EFFECT SIZE AT ALL. BASICALLY GOAL IS TO INVESTIGATE WHETHER NEUROFEEDBACK HAS ENOUGH RESEARCH TO SAY IT IS AN EBI. IT HAS BEEN VERY POPULAR AMONG MANY DESPITE RESEARCH SHOWING THAT IT IS NOT AS EFFECTIVE. HOWEVER, THERE ARE RESEARCH SHOWING AN INCREASE IN PERFORMANCE WITH NEUROFEEDBACK USE, DISCUSS WHY THAT IS AND IF IT CAN BE CONCLUDED TO BE EFFECTIVE WHY OR WHY NOT. BACK UP WITH LIABLE RESEARCH ONLY!
DO APA 7TH EDITION WORK CITED
NO PLAGIARISM!!!!
I PUT 4 PAGES FOR IT BUT THERE ISNT A PAGE COUNT BECAUSE IT IS NOT AN ESSAY BUT MUST ANSWER ALL COMPONENTS IN DETAIL AND EXPLAIN IT IN MANNER THAT I HAVE ALLL ASPECTS OF THE INFORMATION SUFFICIENTLY ENOUGH TO UNDERSTAND THE RESEARCH AND EXPLAIN IT. ALSO DO POWERPOINT PRESENTATION AS WELL.
Look into these aspects when doing research and discss it in addition to other aspects: Individual variability in response
Lack of standardization
Ethical and safety concerns
Integration with AI and machine learning
Potential for personalized neurofeedback
Please discuss all aspects and discuss the research in detail including variables measured and how they were measured using what and all the information
Basically need to cover all aspects and in addition to the 3 articles say what he research is saying about neurofeedback, is it effective? is it really actually effective or do studies have small sample size showing small increase in effect? give that input and limitations of research of neurofeedback and future direction of research
Its not a research paper. It is basically for a presentation I am asking you to do all the research for a presentation for me to know and understand all research so you need to fully do the research and explain all aspects and then also do a powerpoint presentation.
When you are looking at generally the research and limitations and how many effective studies and how many did not show effectiveness in improvement with neurofeedback, discuss ones from back then as well to show evolution in though if any, including when it was first researched. Also, discuss all variables of all studies like for example if it researched neurofeedback effectiveness for ADHD kids but improved processing speed and attention but not impulsivity do so that way. be very specific.
That it is all aspects a-h for the 3 articles and then separately in addition how many effectiveness studies how many not effectiveness studies and go into it and discuss why it showed effectiveness – (smaller study showing smaller effect size but large rigorous studies not showing any at all) be a skeptic and discuss whether it should be an EBI or not, is it actually scientifically proven to be effective or not? does it really work? or is it placebo effect as well? discuss what research says about that. and then future directions of the research as well.
in what setting are they studied? are they only in hospitals and that is why they cannot be applied to clinical setting or can they? do the studies show effctiveness because of that or would it work in clinical setting?
Look at if it helps those with trauma and ptsd if there is any research on that
Requirements: Minimum 4 Full Page PPT Script + PPT Slides Times New Roman Size 12 Font Double-Spaced APA Format Excluding the Title and References
Be sure to include an introduction with a clear thesis statement along with a conclusion
Please be sure to carefully follow the instructions
Please be sure to include at least one in-text citation on each slide
Please be sure to include title, conclusion, and reference slides in the ppt
Please be sure to include a background and at least one image on each ppt slide whether its a photograph, statistic, graph, document etc.
Please use the 5×5 rule for the ppt slides
No plagiarism & No Course Hero & No Chegg. The assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool”
Requirements: Revise Answer Based on Feedback Given Times New Roman Size 12 Font Double-Spaced APA Format Excluding the Title and Reference Pages

Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to this question from any other website since I am already well aware of this. I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure that the answer comes up with way less than 18% on Studypool’s internal plagiarism checker since anything above this is not acceptable according to Studypool’s standards. I will not accept answers that are above this standard.
No AI or Chatbot! I will be sure to check this.
This is for a graduate school in school psychology student for Trauma and Neurobiology course.
The instructions:
1. find 3 different scholarly source articles of studies of neurofeedback and to summarize them 2 of the sources must be of children and 1 of adults.
I want you to include all of the following components of all 3 articles based on the articles:
– a. Summary of the entire research of EACH OF THE 3 articles and explain it and write it as if you had to teach the article information in the studies to me. so be very detailed and get all information of article very specifcially and in detail mentioning all variables they looked at, all scales, all measures, wha specifically was done, how it was done, who did it, who was involved, how it happened, where it took place.
– b. purpose of studies and research questions – SPECIFICALLY. include all variables researched in each and what they were researching
– c. participants- who they were, how many- was there control group? what was the control? how many groups? randomized control group or not?
d. diversity of participants ? gender difference if any? diversity in studies? where it has been studied? on which population? which disorder was it looking at? RESEARCH THIS FOR THE 3 STUDIES AND IN GENERAL
e. methods of study / what were measures used, scales used, tests used, and procedures – very specific as if you had to explain and teach it to me
f. results of study – specifically what were the variables they wre researching in study and what was the effect for each variable
g. Discuss the limitations of the research about neurofeedback in each of the studies and specifically what the research says about it and then the future directions of research
h. make a powerpoint presentation for it. as if to present it to my class with no more than 4 slides and include talking points as well as information to include into the powerpoint for it. this is for graduate school so make it professional. include all 3 article information into it. write the number of studies showed its effectiveness and cite them and the numbers that showed its ineffectiveness and cite them. include the limitations and future directions into powerpoint as well
THEN, IN ADDITION TO THE 3 ARTICLES DO THE FOLLOWING:
YOU MUST LOOK AT OTHER ARTICLE AND RESEARCH AS WELL TO FIND WHAT RESEARCH SAYS IS LIMITATIONS OF NEUROFEEDBACK AND WHY. MUST DISCUSS HOW MANY PARTICIPANTS IN STUDIES WHERE IT SHOWS LARGE EFFECT SIZE AND HOW MANY WHEN IT DOES NOT SHOW EFFECT SIZE. DISCUSS WHAT RESEARCH DISCUSSES FUTURE RESEARCH SHOULD ENTAIL AS WELL.
RESEARCH NEUROFEEDBACK IN GENERAL AND DISCUSS NUMBER OF STUDIES THAT SHOWED ITS EFFECTIVENESS AND SHOW NUMBER OF STUDIES SHOWED ITS INEFFECTVENESS AND DISCUSS SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES FOUND BETWEEN THEM AND WHY IT EVEN SHOWS THERE IS EFFECT SIZE AT ALL. BASICALLY GOAL IS TO INVESTIGATE WHETHER NEUROFEEDBACK HAS ENOUGH RESEARCH TO SAY IT IS AN EBI. IT HAS BEEN VERY POPULAR AMONG MANY DESPITE RESEARCH SHOWING THAT IT IS NOT AS EFFECTIVE. HOWEVER, THERE ARE RESEARCH SHOWING AN INCREASE IN PERFORMANCE WITH NEUROFEEDBACK USE, DISCUSS WHY THAT IS AND IF IT CAN BE CONCLUDED TO BE EFFECTIVE WHY OR WHY NOT. BACK UP WITH LIABLE RESEARCH ONLY!
DO APA 7TH EDITION WORK CITED
NO PLAGIARISM!!!!
I PUT 4 PAGES FOR IT BUT THERE ISNT A PAGE COUNT BECAUSE IT IS NOT AN ESSAY BUT MUST ANSWER ALL COMPONENTS IN DETAIL AND EXPLAIN IT IN MANNER THAT I HAVE ALLL ASPECTS OF THE INFORMATION SUFFICIENTLY ENOUGH TO UNDERSTAND THE RESEARCH AND EXPLAIN IT. ALSO DO POWERPOINT PRESENTATION AS WELL.
Look into these aspects when doing research and discss it in addition to other aspects: Individual variability in response
Lack of standardization
Ethical and safety concerns
Integration with AI and machine learning
Potential for personalized neurofeedback
Please discuss all aspects and discuss the research in detail including variables measured and how they were measured using what and all the information
Basically need to cover all aspects and in addition to the 3 articles say what he research is saying about neurofeedback, is it effective? is it really actually effective or do studies have small sample size showing small increase in effect? give that input and limitations of research of neurofeedback and future direction of research
Its not a research paper. It is basically for a presentation I am asking you to do all the research for a presentation for me to know and understand all research so you need to fully do the research and explain all aspects and then also do a powerpoint presentation.
When you are looking at generally the research and limitations and how many effective studies and how many did not show effectiveness in improvement with neurofeedback, discuss ones from back then as well to show evolution in though if any, including when it was first researched. Also, discuss all variables of all studies like for example if it researched neurofeedback effectiveness for ADHD kids but improved processing speed and attention but not impulsivity do so that way. be very specific.
That it is all aspects a-h for the 3 articles and then separately in addition how many effectiveness studies how many not effectiveness studies and go into it and discuss why it showed effectiveness – (smaller study showing smaller effect size but large rigorous studies not showing any at all) be a skeptic and discuss whether it should be an EBI or not, is it actually scientifically proven to be effective or not? does it really work? or is it placebo effect as well? discuss what research says about that. and then future directions of the research as well.
in what setting are they studied? are they only in hospitals and that is why they cannot be applied to clinical setting or can they? do the studies show effctiveness because of that or would it work in clinical setting?
Look at if it helps those with trauma and ptsd if there is any research on that
Requirements: Minimum 4 Full Page PPT Script + PPT Slides Times New Roman Size 12 Font Double-Spaced APA Format Excluding the Title and References
Be sure to include an introduction with a clear thesis statement along with a conclusion
Please be sure to carefully follow the instructions
Please be sure to include at least one in-text citation on each slide
Please be sure to include title, conclusion, and reference slides in the ppt
Please be sure to include a background and at least one image on each ppt slide whether its a photograph, statistic, graph, document etc.
Please use the 5×5 rule for the ppt slides
No plagiarism & No Course Hero & No Chegg. The assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool

Chapter 2: Mini-Case Insight into Consumer Decision Making for TVs
Writing Requirements
1-2 pages in length (excluding cover page, abstract, and reference list)
APA format
Please use the Case Study Guide as a reference point for writing your case study.
Grading Criteria:
PURPOSE & AUDIENCE 25%Addresses purpose effectively, uses assignment to explore topic’s intrinsic interest, shows full understanding of issues, engages audience, establishes credibility, uses headings, format and citation in APA style (where relevant) effectively25points
Adheres to purpose, Fulfills assignment, shows adequate understanding of key issues, style is appropriate to intended audience, presentation is readable, format is correct.
21 points
Waivers in purpose, incompletely addresses assigned topics or directions, shows more need to examine issues, style varies, and visual presentation is ragged.
19 points
Purpose unclear, failure to address topic or directions, weak group of issues, inappropriate style, careless or messy visual presentation
15 points
Purpose unclear, does not address topic or directions, does not address issues, inappropriate style, careless or messy visual presentation
0 points
ORGANIZATION 25%Focuses consistently on clearly expresses central idea, uses paragraph structure and transition guide reader effectively
25points
Central idea is clear, paragraph structure is adequate, some problems with consistency, logic or transitions
21 points
Loose focus on central idea, contains some repetition and digression, structure needs work
19 points
Does not focus on central idea, contains many repetitions and digression, very weak structure.
15 points
No central idea, no clear logic or focus, many repetitions or digressions, lack of structure
0 points
DEVELOPMENT 25%Explores ideas vigorously, supports points fully using a balance of subjectivity and objective evidence, reasons effectively making useful distinctions.
25points
Supports most ideas with effective examples and details, finds suitable balance between references to personal and external evidence, makes key distinctions.
21 points
Presents ideas in general terms support for ideas is inconsistent or unsuitably personal or distant, some distinctions need clarifications, reasoning unclear.
19 points
Most ideas unsupported, confusion between personal and external evidence, unclear use of distinctions or levels of generality
15 points
Ideas are unsupported, confusion between personal and external evidence, no distinctions between levels of generality,
0 points
LANGUAGE 25%Employs words with fluency, develops concise standard English sentences, balances a variety of sentence structures effectively
25points
Word forms are correct, sentence structure is effective, applies standard English grammar and mechanics
21 points
Word forms and sentence structures are adequate to convey basic meaning, errors cause noticeable distraction
19 points
Word use is weak, sentence structures are uneven, errors are very distracting
15 points
Word use is unclear, sentence structures inadequate for clarity, errors seriously distracting
0 points

APA FORMAT TITLE & REFERENCE PAGE DOUBLE SPACED 12pt. FONT 6 PAGES For Part 1 of this project you will watch the documentary, Kind Hearted Woman (5 hrs), taking as many notes as you deem necessary to highlight the facts, key problems, and strengths of the all identified family members. https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/documentary/kind-hearted-woman/? You will be working to identify strengths and challenges for each individual from a biopsychosocial perspective as well has unique strengths and challenges they have as a family. Your notes should be organized in a way the makes sense to you and are understandable to anyone who may need to review your work. Examples may include organizing by individual and family, organizing by identified issue (physical, psychological, medical, educational, work, criminal, etc.) Your notes are the foundation of any case management service you provide so it is important to be as thorough as possible. There may be items that seem small but could prove essential to the overall services being provided to the family so be as detailed as possible. Using your notes and the attached case management assessment tools, we will: PART 2: 1. Identify key problems, why they exist, and how they impact the individual or family. 2. Explore possible solutions or changes that are needed for each individual. Students can use course readings, discussions, their knowledge of local service resources, or conduct an internet search of services that have been used for the identified problems. Live sessions will be held during the week for students to ask questions, get some direction, and share ideas with each other on how they would identify resources. Case management is not meant to be a solo activity, use your classmates! 3. Select a ″best″ solution for each individual′s problem. Students will be expected to provide supporting evidence, pros, cons, and determine if the solution is realistic for the individual′s current needs. The solution should also include any additional requirements to implement (referrals to other agencies, transportation, funding availability, etc.) and what the expected outcome is (what does success look like?). This is an opportunity to be really creative and think outside the box (cliché′, I know)! Some of the best case managers are those who can create solutions that maybe haven′t been tried or even thought of before. Don′t be afraid to put forth an idea that could benefit the family. This is also why focusing on a family′s strengths can be really useful. Strengths can become their own solutions if we use them in a beneficial way Part 3: Is combining Part 1 & 2 together (Assessment Part) PART 4: The final step of the case study is to use your notes, assessment, and goals plan to build the case study analysis. The following template will be used to create your final report. I. Introduction (Just a Quick Overview of what I am about to read) – Identify the key individuals in the case and the primary individuals who are the target clients. – Identify the key problems and issues in the case study – This is an opportunity to introduce your family, the issues that you will be addressing in working with them, and proposed outcomes. – This section will be a snapshot of what you will be presenting in the body of the document II. Background – Set the scene: background information, relevant facts, and the most important issues. – Demonstrate that you researched the problems in the case study III. Evaluation of the Case – Outline the various pieces of the case study that you are focusing on. – Evaluate these pieces by discussing what is working and what is not working (strengths and concerns) – State why these parts of the case study are or are not working well. – Is there information missing from the assessment that might impact the work you do with the individuals or family? IV. Proposed Solutions/Changes – Provide specific and realistic solutions(s) or changes needed – Explain why this solution was chosen – Support this solution with solid evidence, research, such as: – Concepts from class (text readings, discussions, lectures) – Outside research – you will need to document your sources to avoid plagiarism. – Personal experience and knowledge V. Recommendations – Determine and discuss specific strategies for accomplishing the proposed solution – If applicable, recommend further action to resolve some of the issues – What should be done and should do it? Your analysis will be written in APA format, double-spaced, 12 pt font. There is an APA template located in Microsoft Word that I will cover in a live session as well as how to properly reference your source material. The analysis will be no less than five pages, not including the title and reference pages.Requirement: 6 pages

Chapter 6: Mini-Case Hotel Flowchart and Blueprint
Writing Requirements
3-4 pages in length (excluding cover page, abstract, and reference list)
APA format
Please use the Case Study Guide as a reference point for writing your case study.
Grading Criteria:
PURPOSE & AUDIENCE 25%Addresses purpose effectively, uses assignment to explore topic’s intrinsic interest, shows full understanding of issues, engages audience, establishes credibility, uses headings, format and citation in APA style (where relevant) effectively25points
Adheres to purpose, Fulfills assignment, shows adequate understanding of key issues, style is appropriate to intended audience, presentation is readable, format is correct.
21 points
Waivers in purpose, incompletely addresses assigned topics or directions, shows more need to examine issues, style varies, and visual presentation is ragged.
19 points
Purpose unclear, failure to address topic or directions, weak group of issues, inappropriate style, careless or messy visual presentation
15 points
Purpose unclear, does not address topic or directions, does not address issues, inappropriate style, careless or messy visual presentation
0 points
ORGANIZATION 25%Focuses consistently on clearly expresses central idea, uses paragraph structure and transition guide reader effectively
25points
Central idea is clear, paragraph structure is adequate, some problems with consistency, logic or transitions
21 points
Loose focus on central idea, contains some repetition and digression, structure needs work
19 points
Does not focus on central idea, contains many repetitions and digression, very weak structure.
15 points
No central idea, no clear logic or focus, many repetitions or digressions, lack of structure
0 points
DEVELOPMENT 25%Explores ideas vigorously, supports points fully using a balance of subjectivity and objective evidence, reasons effectively making useful distinctions.
25points
Supports most ideas with effective examples and details, finds suitable balance between references to personal and external evidence, makes key distinctions.
21 points
Presents ideas in general terms support for ideas is inconsistent or unsuitably personal or distant, some distinctions need clarifications, reasoning unclear.
19 points
Most ideas unsupported, confusion between personal and external evidence, unclear use of distinctions or levels of generality
15 points
Ideas are unsupported, confusion between personal and external evidence, no distinctions between levels of generality,
0 points
LANGUAGE 25%Employs words with fluency, develops concise standard English sentences, balances a variety of sentence structures effectively
25points
Word forms are correct, sentence structure is effective, applies standard English grammar and mechanics
21 points
Word forms and sentence structures are adequate to convey basic meaning, errors cause noticeable distraction
19 points
Word use is weak, sentence structures are uneven, errors are very distracting
15 points
Word use is unclear, sentence structures inadequate for clarity, errors seriously distracting
0 points