Category: Biology homework help

Please  choose a landmark case from the list provided below.  Then, provide a  brief description of the case selected.  Next, provide the historical  context in which the case was argued (e.g., what events were taking  place in society that led the US Supreme Court to hear this particular  case).   Provide the historical evolution of the case, from the time it  was argued in court to the present time. Finally, discuss the impact and  implication the case had in the treatment and management of juveniles  in the criminal or juvenile justice systems and provide a personal  position with respect the Supreme Court’s ruling.  If you agree with the  ruling discuss why there was a need to change the law.  If you disagree  with the position, explain the negative implications of this ruling on  juvenile offenders.
The analysis should be a minimum of 3-5 pages in APA format and 12  point, Times New Roman font.  Use APA style rules and  use outside resources to support positions presented in relation to the  Court’s decision.  If you agree with the ruling discuss why there was a  need to change the law.  If you disagree with the position, explain the  negative implications of this ruling on juvenile offenders.
Landmark US Supreme Court Cases:
Stanford v. Kentucky (1988)

 
For this assignment, identify the ethical issues at play in The Case of Marie, describe their potential consequences, and use the NASW Code of Ethics and other researched resources to apply a principled framework for resolving the dilemma. 
This case involves an ethical dilemma with a diverse family, and the dilemma itself, like most ethical issues in group work, is potentially two-fold:
The dilemma among the family members, as well as the content and manner of their communication with you.
The ethical dilemma within yourself, as you examine your own natural preferences and biases in the context of the family and its needs.
At all levels of social work practice (micro, mezzo, and macro), the diversity of personal preferences and biases always presents the possibility of ethical compromise. Combined with potential ethical issues within the diverse situations, beliefs, and actions of the family members themselves, any given situation can quickly become ethically clouded.
 
Review the NASW resources in the Week 6: Social Work With Family GroupsLinks to an external site. reading list to prepare for this assignment.
In addition, familiarize yourself with the following helpful resources:
Capella University LibraryLinks to an external site..
How Do I Find Peer-Reviewed Articles?Links to an external site.
Social Work Masters Program (MSW) Library Guide.Links to an external site.
Writing CenterLinks to an external site..
Assignment Instructions
Using this week’s readings, The Case of Marie, NASW resources, and scholarly literature, draft a 3–4 page paper that addresses the following:
Describe an ethical dilemma presented in the case study.
Identify areas of ambiguity.
Identify NASW essential steps for ethical problem solving to apply to the case study.
Identify possible consequences if different steps were chosen.
Describe personal values and/or biases that could impact the decision-making process when addressing the ethical dilemma in the case study.
Explain how these values and/or biases could be managed to best maintain an ethical perspective. 
Describe data collection methods necessary to make an ethical decision.
Analyze the data collection methods to demonstrate how they support ethical decision-making.
Assess the strengths, needs, and challenges within the client’s family system related to the identified ethical dilemma.
Make recommendations that might help emphasize the strengths, meet the needs, and overcome the challenges.
Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the social work profession.
Adhere to the rules of grammar, usage, and mechanics.
Support main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant and credible evidence.
Apply current APA style standards, including paper format, in-text citations, and the references list.
Note: You will also work with Marie and her family in the Week 9 assignment, transitioning from identifying potential ethical dilemmas to planning an approach to group work that will benefit all involved.
Additional Requirements
Your assignment should also meet the following requirements:
Written communication: Written communication should be scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the social work profession.
APA formatting: Resources and citations should be formatted according to current APA style and formatting standards. Use Academic WriterLinks to an external site. for guidance in citing sources in proper APA style. See the Writing CenterLinks to an external site. for more APA resources specific to your degree level.
Number of resources: A minimum of five scholarly sources. All literature cited should be current, with publication dates within the past five years.
Length of paper: 3–4 typed, double-spaced pages.
Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.
View Rubric
 Ethics and Diversity in Family PracticeCriteriaRatingsPts
Describe an ethical dilemma presented in the case study. (C1.GP.A)
32 to >27.2 pts
DISTINGUISHED
Assesses an ethical dilemma presented in the case study and identifies areas of ambiguity, including the possible consequences.
27.2 to >22.4 pts
PROFICIENT
Describes an ethical dilemma presented in the case study.
22.4 to >0 pts
BASIC
Identifies an ethical dilemma presented in the case study.
0 pts
NON_PERFORMANCE
Does not identify an ethical dilemma presented in the case study.
/ 32 pts
Identify the NASW Essential Steps for Ethical Problem-Solving relevant to the case study. (C1.GP.A)
32 to >27.2 pts
DISTINGUISHED
Identifies the NASW Essential Steps for Ethical Problem-Solving relevant to the case study and explains potential consequences if different steps were taken.
27.2 to >22.4 pts
PROFICIENT
Identifies the NASW Essential Steps for Ethical Problem-Solving relevant to the case study.
22.4 to >0 pts
BASIC
Incompletely identifies the NASW Essential Steps for Ethical Problem-Solving relevant to the case study.
0 pts
NON_PERFORMANCE
Does not identify the NASW Essential Steps for Ethical Problem-Solving relevant to the case study.
/ 32 pts
Describe personal values and/or biases that could impact the decision-making process when addressing the ethical dilemma in the case study. (C3.GP.A)
32 to >27.2 pts
DISTINGUISHED
Analyzes personal values and/or biases that could impact the decision-making process when addressing the ethical dilemma in the case study, and explains how these values and/or biases could be managed to best maintain an ethical perspective.
27.2 to >22.4 pts
PROFICIENT
Describes personal values and/or biases that could impact the decision-making process when addressing the ethical dilemma in the case study.
22.4 to >0 pts
BASIC
Identifies personal values that come into play in making ethical decisions.
0 pts
NON_PERFORMANCE
Does not identify personal values that come into play in making ethical decisions.
/ 32 pts
Describe data collection methods necessary to make an ethical decision. (C7.GP.A)
32 to >27.2 pts
DISTINGUISHED
Analyzes data collection methods necessary to make an ethical decision.
27.2 to >22.4 pts
PROFICIENT
Describes data collection methods necessary to make an ethical decision.
22.4 to >0 pts
BASIC
Identifies general data collection methods.
0 pts
NON_PERFORMANCE
Does not identify data collection methods necessary to conduct an ethical decision.
/ 32 pts
Describe strengths, needs, and challenges within the client’s family system relevant to the identified ethical dilemma. (C7.GP.B)
32 to >27.2 pts
DISTINGUISHED
Assesses strengths, needs, and challenges within the client’s family system relevant to the identified ethical dilemma, and makes recommendations that might help emphasize the strengths, meet the needs, and overcome the challenges.
27.2 to >22.4 pts
PROFICIENT
Describes strengths, needs, and challenges within the client’s family system relevant to the identified ethical dilemma.
22.4 to >0 pts
BASIC
Identifies strengths, needs, and challenges within the client’s family system relevant to the identified ethical dilemma.
0 pts
NON_PERFORMANCE
Does not identify strengths, needs, and challenges within the client’s family system relevant to the identified ethical dilemma.
/ 32 pts
Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the social work profession.
40 to >34 pts
DISTINGUISHED
Communicates with exceptional clarity in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the social work profession.
34 to >28 pts
PROFICIENT
Communicates in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the social work profession.
28 to >0 pts
BASIC
Communicates in a manner that is professional and consistent with expectations for members of the social work profession.
0 pts
NON_PERFORMANCE
Does not communicate in a manner that is consistent with expectations for members of the social work profession.

Are  community-based correctional/treatment programs more effective than  incarceration?  Explain your reasoning and provide supporting evidence  for your argument.  Finally, provide an example of an evidence-based  practice in community-based programming or in a correctional institution  that supports your side of the argument.

or this discussion, visit the following Web sites (linked in Resources) and read their “about” pages and other materials pertinent to awareness campaigns:
National Association of Social Workers (NASW).
Council on Social Work Education (CSWE).
American Association of University Women (AAUW).
National Parent Teacher Association (PTA).
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP).
Anti-defamation League (ADL).
National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI).
Describe one of these organizations and evaluate its approach to building an awareness campaign. Explain how the organization’s resources can inform your professional involvement in awareness campaigns.
Posts should reflect your personal and professional experience—and all posts and responses should be supported by recent, scholarly research with proper APA citations and references.

Select a contemporary public policy of interest to you. If asked to evaluate this policy, which evaluation model would you apply? What information would you need for this evaluation? Where would you get it? Who would you turn to for relevant information? If recommendations are part of your evaluation, to whom would you want to report them?
Posts should reflect your personal and professional experience—and all posts and responses should be supported by recent, scholarly research with proper APA citations and references.

How does understanding the level at which policy is developed and the influences on the development of that policy impact the ability to intervene for change of that policy? How do strategies differ, for example, if the policy is a federal-level policy versus a local policy, such as one pertaining to a school district or health care agency at the local level?
(death penalty) 
350 words 

Based on the readings of this week, consider the vulnerable populations in your area. What would their special needs be as a result of a natural disaster in your area? How would you, as a disaster volunteer coordinator, advocate for and respond to their needs? Be specific in both identifying the vulnerable populations and in describing the impact of a crisis or disaster on them.
Discussions should be approximately 350 words long, use scholarly sources to back statements and arguments, and use proper APA formatting for citations and references. 

1.    Explain how childhood trends impact juvenile delinquency? How do you think childhood and delinquency influence behavior?