Category: Architecture

Please refer to the course readings and lectures. Please do not “cut and paste” your 
responses from other sources, including AI-driven platforms. 
1.
Write your response in FULL SENTENCES—NO MORE THAN 500 WORDS ALL TOGETHER.
Indicate your word count in your submission at the end of your response. (Total: 35 Points): Be sure to use
the term, Globalism.) 
How would you define “Globalism” in the built environment (5 Points)? What are TWO specific
conditions of “Globalism” that designers must negotiate in their practices considering
standardization and labor issues (10 points)? Based on these two conditions, what would be your
position as a designer in the context of “Globalism” in the built environments (10 points)? Provide
TWO examples to support your claims (10 Points). 
2.
Develop A FULLY STRUCTURED ESSAY—NO MORE THAN 800 WORDS ALL TOGETHER.
Indicate your word count in your submission at the end of your response. Make sure to demonstrate your
thesis and argument in the beginning as an introductory paragraph without any filler general empty
sentences. Be as specific as possible; do not assume readers will understand your claims. Please underline
and indicate your thesis sentence. We suggest starting with outlining the structure of your essay (Total: 60
Points): 
Compare and contrast the following two images. Demonstrate your connection, position, or
argument in a concise and clear sentence in the beginning; make sure you underline and indicate
your thesis sentence (10 points). Identify these two images with the author, the software, and the year
(10 points). Provide the historical and theoretical context, considering how the built environment
designers became consumers of computers (10 Points). In that historical context, demonstrate how
these two images differ (10 Points). How did these two images help you understand computers’ role
in the built environment (10 Points)? Introduce one reading from the assigned reading list to support
your argument and claims. (5 points). We will be keen on your essay’s clarity, transitions, structure,
tone, and narrative (5 Points).   
Use Globalization Today reading and Lecture notes 14 to answer question 1.
Use Progressive architecture, Architecture and the computer and Lecture notes 13 to answer question 2. 

Case Study Analysis for isla dela victoria cebu
– Evaluate the application of Construction Management and Project Management principles in the project that was done
– Assess the project’s success based on the integration of bothdisciplines.

Design a simple, naturally day-lit structure or pavilion that resists solar heat gain & glare and which also incorporates some form of building integrated photovoltaic (BIPV). Sketch a simple floor plan with nearby site context, roof plan and a building section to illustrate the active solar design methods being employed. As applicable, identify any nearby vegetation (trees?), and pay attention to aesthetics (this is a design exercise, not merely an engineering activity). Consider using color and line-weight differentiation as a way to clearly communicate your design intent and to distinguish between physical elements and graphic notation (such as a north arrow). PLEASE INCLUDE NORTH ARROW
Your structure/pavilion can be located either at the area where you performed a Site Analysis or, for students in the 200B class, at the project site for that class.
I will provide student examples here:

Please follow all instructions on the assingment brief 
i have attatched how the presentation portfolio should look like
i have attatched some ortho drawings too please do all you can 
involves autocad 
hand drawings 
but i need only 40% to pass so i am asking for the minimal as this is last minute 

All of the instructions are in the attached images as well as the photos that are to be referenced thank you so much 

My teacher asked me to rewrite the essay based on these instructions in Chicago Style.
Instructions
Your script offers a good descriptive summary of street markets in London (not sure
all those you mention can be called “flea markets” though) and points at some of
the challenges for keeping them alive within the complexity of urban change. The
problem of the script is that it is excessively descriptive and does not provide
enough evidence as to how the references that you list at the end have been used
in the text. Those references should appear in the form of footnotes at relevant
points in the text; at the same time, it is not only a matter of scattering some
footnotes around but to summarise and comment on specific points that are made
in the texts. For example: what do we learn from Jan Gehl and how can that be
applied to what you can observe in a London street market?
It is important to reflect on the relation between the text and the film and how one
builds on the other – and which one builds on which, something that is not wholly
clear in your submission. Usually, a written script is turned into a film; yet you could
also do the opposite: you have some footage (the one you have produced) and you
extract a text/narrative from it. This would imply close readings of things that
happen in the film and that would also allow you to go beyond the overall feeling of
praise of every single aspect of a street market that emerges from your text: aren’t
markets also difficult places? Isn’t there any criticality to be considered? While not
having to aim for a negative viewpoint, your analysis would definitely benefit from a
more critical observation of what is in front of your camera.
You should re-work and re-submit the text (without re-working the film), which you
can do in a few different ways. One is a simple revisiting of it by means of adding
references where necessary in the text. This should be done as suggested above,
that is, not merely adding a few footnotes that provide the title of a text but
articulating some thoughts about the specific sources you are using. So, this would
imply re-writing some sections of your text to embed the sources clearly. The result
would be still within the realm of a somewhat canonical essay in terms of writing
format and style. A second way of re-working the text is to re-write it (almost)
completely by following the suggestion given above of starting from the film and
extracting observations from it (no problem if the market shown in the film is
different from the ones you are writing about: you can still find in it examples of
social practices that apply to many different locations). This would imply taking
decisions as to who is writing/speaking (a vendor, a visitor, some specific objects in
the market, etc.? You should choose one and keep it consistent) as well as trying to
write a bit differently from a canonical essay (which in part you are already doing by
using the first person).
Overall, your text is not on the edge of a low pass and for this reason, as long as
you revisit it along the lines suggested above and aim for clearer reference to the
bibliography and some more critical analysis.

Instructions will be uploaded later.
Important Info
The order was placed through a short procedure (customer skipped some order details).
Please clarify some paper details before starting to work on the order.
Type of paper and subject
Number of sources and formatting style
Type of service (writing, rewriting, etc)