Category: Architecture

You have to do one and two point perspective rendering due to kitchen plan smth like in the photo i uploaded
Important Info
The order was placed through a short procedure (customer skipped some order details).
Please clarify some paper details before starting to work on the order.
Type of paper and subject
Number of sources and formatting style
Type of service (writing, rewriting, etc)

I just need u to make me a project with these pictures and then to label em “Detailed and thorough definition for each picture” is what the rubric says and it needs to be in your own words or you get a 0

by comparing and contrasting your selected building, interior, or designed landscape with a second building, interior, or designed landscape (2500-3000 words for the complete essay, but excluding the works cited list).
The second building, interior, or designed landscape may be in any global location, and from any time period. But it must have at least one area of historical commonality. with your first selection, and this aspect should be the focus of your analysis. This might include any of one the following themes:
The historical development of a relevant design typology (e.g. museum, public park, housing )
You will also need to provide a physical description of your first and secondary selected place as part of your comparative analysis. 

The art of materialization and dematerialization of buildings,
intricately woven with the poetics of construction, captures Frampton’s concept
of tectonics in architecture—a fundamental practice of shaping forms,
structures, and light. When
assessing a building’s exterior, we identify the prominent features that
characterize its overall shape and appearance. This idea goes
back to Frampton, citing that the concept of tectonics used in contemporary
buildings have been technically categorized in three solid manifestations: technological,
scenographic, and tectonic (Frampton & Cava, 2001). Technological elements
serve practical functions with design, while scenographic ones suggest hidden
aspects. Tectonic elements are further divided into ontological (relating to
essence or being) and representational forms, adding layers of meaning to
architectural design. As much as how it is defined, this framework provides
architects with a comprehensive approach to designing buildings, be it both
functional and rich in meaning, ensuring that tectonics are not just
structures but also narratives (why is it added there?).
However, it is within this investigation that the reinterpreting
how of the concept of tectonics should be discerned.  To breakdown my research into key points that will
be addressed under the umbrella of re-interpreting tectonics in contemporary
spacious buildings, I will have breakdown a quote stated by Charlotte Bundgaard,
an Associate Professor at Aarhus School of Architecture (AAA). Bundgaard
emphasizes that architects today design within specific contemporary
parameters, including production methods, materials, ethics, and cultural
values. Tectonic thinking, therefore, goes beyond mere constructional logic; it
encompasses how these constructions contribute to a building’s narrative and
material significance (). For instance, the Pompidou Centre in Paris (Figure 1.1),
designed by Renzo Piano and Richard Rogers, showcases exposed steel structures
and colourful pipes, serving both structural and aesthetic purposes. Its
transparent facade offers insight into the building’s inner workings,
challenging architectural norms with its avant-garde hint. Similarly, the
National Museum of African American History and Culture in Washington (Figure 1.2),
by architects David Adjaye, Philip Freelon, and Max Bond, features a bronze-coloured
lattice facade inspired by traditional African American craftsmanship. This
three-tiered design symbolizes the journey from slavery to freedom, celebrating
African American history and resilience. These examples illustrate how
tectonics in architecture are influenced by cultural references and the
surrounding context. In other words, a symbiotic relationship between
tectonics, cultural references, and contemporary architectural initiatives. Eventually,
architects draw inspiration from local culture, history, and environment to
create unique design elements that reflect the identity of the building. This
paper seeks to delve further into this symbiosis, clarifying how these three
elements shape the built environment of today and tomorrow.
Additionally,
these examples often illustrate that architects either employ building
materials, systems, and construction methods in an aesthetically expressive
manner, or they seek to integrate and adapt building technology into the
architecture (). So, when a building seeks to use technology on the exterior of
a building it highlights the fact that in an expressive way with a possibility
of complexities since systems of structural, mechanical, and electrical, façade,
along with details and materials play a role on the architectural qualities of
a building. On the other hand, if it is concealed, it results in the
possibility of seeking simplicity instead. Thus, the distinction in
representation determines whether buildings are classified as tectonic or
stereotomic, high-tech or low-tech, with their approaches being either
representational or ontological.
Eventually, Kenneth
Frampton succeeded in repositioning tectonic theory as a medium of
architectural criticism in the 1980s and early 90s, recognizing the assigned
reading Rappel a L’Ordre, The Case for the Tectonic. Frampton explores
tectonics in a contemporary view and expands on the fact that it is used in both
construction technology as well as in design. I have used the case studies of Masdar City Abudhabi and Sidi Hrazem 

Hello, Below is the instructions and information given to complete the homework. Please follow the criteria. On the last one I did score a 50/100. i atatched what the professor wanted. ill also attach it here ”
The off-shoot branches should be detailed statements providing a rationale for why you chose your key ideas”. I think the teachers means on the shoot off bracnhes you would need to add the explanation on there. let me knwo if you have any question. 

2 more pages of addition to this paper using the power point  readings mentioned in the power point.

Research Project: Modern Times
The research project “Modern Times” seeks to challenge the prevailing narrative of modern architecture, predominantly centered on Western perspectives promoted by entities such as CIAM, the Ford Foundation, and MOMA, among others. Through the examination of various architectural and urban projects, the research aims to critically reevaluate modern architecture in the Middle East, Africa, and South Asia regions, often marginalized or overlooked in mainstream discourse. This project offers an opportunity to explore diverse manifestations of modernity and propose alternative frameworks of architectural knowledge that go beyond the traditional paradigms of the Modern movement’s language and formal structures.
Each student will investigate a case study, addressing several key questions: How does the project align with the country’s modernization efforts? What defines the project as modern? What architectural elements characterize the selected piece, and how do they reflect the local culture? The final presentation will consist of three A2 boards:
Opening Page and Introduction:
This board will serve as the introduction to the case study.
It will feature an opening page with the title of the project (“Modern Times”) and the name of the case study.
The introduction will briefly address some key questions, setting the stage for the in-depth exploration.
Images and Text:
This board will primarily focus on visual representation through images and accompanying text.
It will showcase photographs, renderings, or other visual materials related to the case study.
The text will further delve into the case study, addressing specific questions and providing context or analysis as needed.
Two and Three-Dimensional Analytical Drawings:
This board will present analytical drawings of the case study, both two-dimensional and three-dimensional.
These drawings may include floor plans, elevations, sections, diagrams, or models that provide a deeper understanding of the project’s architectural elements and spatial organization.
The analytical drawings will offer insights into the case study’s design principles, functionality, and cultural significance.

*I chose L.A. Confidential, dir. Curtis Hanson, 1997.  I finished but got caught in AI Detector. I need help with editing to avoid AI Detector. Below are the instructions:
Architecture in Film
Watch one of the following films:
24 City, dir. Ziangke Jia, 2008
Barbie, dir. Greta Gerwig, 2023
Blade Runner, dir. Ridley Scott, 1982
The Cabinet of Dr. Caligiari, dir. Robert Weine, 1920
Columbus, dir. Kogonada, 2017
Diamonds Are Forever, dir. Guy Hamilton, 1971
L.A. Confidential, dir. Curtis Hanson, 1997
Metropolis, dir. Fritz Lang, 1947
Triumph of the Will, dir. Leni Reifenstahl, 1935
In a three-page essay (double-spaced, 12-point type, 1″ margins) (750 – 900 words) describe the architecture in the film and the role it plays in furthering the narrative, giving context, and/or developing the characters.
You may do some outside research about the building(s) used in the film, but most of your essay should be devoted to your own original analysis of the role(s) that the building(s) play in the film. To support your argument, be sure to refer to specific scenes, describe the architecture and its physical qualities, and discuss how it shapes and defines the film. You may include screen shots/captures if they help in directly supporting key arguments in your essay.
If you analysis is informed by research, be sure that you identify the sources that you have used using any standard system of citation. Images and citations do not count towards the three-page count.

You don’t have to use fancy words here. I already have the source. Although I have mostly done it, please refer to it. Below are the instructions:
* * * Congratulations! You are one of the lucky winners of the AirBnB Modern Living Competition. Your award is a free, one-year stay in an iconic house or apartment of Modernism. Select you residence by from the list below. * * *
Fallingwater, Bear Run, Penn. (Frank Lloyd Wright, 1939)
Johnson Glass House, New Canaan, Conn. (Philip Johnson, 1949)
Eames House, Los Angeles (Charles and Ray Eames, 1949) 
Farnsworth House, Plano, Ill. (Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, 1951)
apartment at 860-880 Lake Shore Drive, Chicago (Ludwig Mies Van Der Rohe, 1951) apartment at the Unité d’Habitation, Marseille, France (Le Corbusier, 1952)
apartment at Condominium One, The Sea Ranch, Calif. (MLTW, 1965) 
apartment at Nakagin Capsule Tower, Tokyo (Kishō Kurokawa, 1970)
Now imagine that you have spent your year in the residence you selected and that you must write a detailed review that summarizes your stay. Write a description of your architectural experiences, both positive and negative. Experiences might range from your perception of spaces to daily practicalities, such as cleaning, storing possessions, bathing, heating, cooking, receiving guests, studying, and so forth. Include collective space and/or outdoor spaces in your review, if available. Lastly, don’t forget to assign 1-5 stars to your experience! 
You review should include an explanation of why you selected that home and what you were expecting, how your expectations changed and why, at least one architecture-related anecdote from your stay in the home, and a clear statement specifying whether you would recommend the place or not, for whom, and why.
SOURCES & CITATIONS
Your review must draw from lectures and assigned readings. You, if you choose, also draw from additional, outside sources, so long as you cite them properly using any standard system, such as Chicago or MLA.
TITLE
Give your review a specific title that conveys your position (not “Assignment 5”).
FORMAT
Your review should be 2 – 3 double-spaced typed pages (500-900 words) in length, not including any illustrations (optional — not required), and be formatted as a single PDF document.

Please begin by adhering to the structure outlined in my introduction and continue developing the narrative. The initial sections were generated with the assistance of a chatbot and will likely require substantial revision to meet the academic rigor expected at the master’s level. Additionally, I require the incorporation of illustrative figures (around 10) that detail various structural and design elements of pagodas or such. It is imperative that the writing maintains a scholarly tone appropriate for graduate-level research. Ensure all references adhere to the Chicago 17A citation style, drawing from a diverse range of scholarly journals and articles, including both primary and secondary sources, to support the analysis.