Write two (seperate on same documanet) of these:
Research: Look through news sites and social media, watch or listen to news programs, and/or read newspapers/magazines to identify a current criminological event. This could range from street crime, to protests, to violence perpetrated by the state, etc.
Summarize: After finding 2 – 3 sources on your chosen current event, summarize what the sources discuss, and how they discuss/describe the event.
Critique: Using Radical Criminology, critique the current event you chose. Critique the event itself, how the news sources discuss/describe the event, and the response to the event by the public, the government, corporations, etc.
Formatting: Your critiques should be 1-2pages, single spaced using 12 pt font, with normal 1-inch margins. CITE ALL SOURCES.
Author: admin
-
Title: Critiquing a Current Criminological Event through Radical Criminology
-
Value Proposition for Disney+ Streaming Service “Applying Value Proposition and Effective Communication Techniques through a Memo: A Case Study Analysis” “Improving Writing Skills: A Memo for Student Feedback on Assignment Submissions”
his assignment will be submitted to Turnitin™.Instructions
Purpose
The purpose of this assignment is to explain value proposition for a product or service. This connects to course learning outcomes of helping you identify the role of marketing in creating, communicating, and delivering value for customers, and applying the concepts of value proposition and positioning to a product or service. This course is focused on consumer marketing and as such, your selection should focus on the business to consumer aspect of marketing rather than business to business or government organizations (which can be addressed in later marketing courses).
Assignment Task Overview
As a marketing consultant, you have been asked by one of the following streaming service companies to provide a one-page memo, casually known in marketing as a “Back of the Napkin” concept. This memo will explain the value proposition from an outsider’s perspective. Consider the internal and external environment as well as the company’s competition to demonstrate your unique selling position.
You will use 150 words or less to create a short memo to management and images to communicate your value proposition. At the bottom of your memo, you will include a “back of the napkin image” to illustrate your value proposition. This original illustration you create can be added as a picture within your document or using the Word document tools to create a visual aid. Your memo and illustration will display how your product or service solves a problem for the consumer. You do not have to be an artist. You will need an idea and the ability to summarize. You will submit a single page Word document with the memo and image along with a second reference page. The illustration must go inside the memo document so that only one file is submitted. Be sure that your proposition is clear and concise. Follow the instructions below.
You will be using this value proposition to develop a message campaign later in the course.
Instructions
Step 1: Choose one of the following products or services in consumer markets. There are three category options from which you can choose. Choose just one from any category that interests you the most.
Streaming Services Category
tubi
Disney+
Paramount+
Sling
HBO
B Corporation Category (Legally acknowledged as having a higher standard of purpose or “greater benefit.”)
allbirds
Stonyfield Farm
Patagonia
Thrive Market
Avocado Green Mattress
Energy & Resource Companies (*Apply in B2C framework)
Hess
Chevron
Green Mountain Energy
Step 2: Determine the value proposition for your chosen product or service. Create a memo and images to communicate the Value Proposition.
· What is the value proposition for your product or service? Focus on offerings for customers in the U.S. market only.
· What makes a good value prop?
·Present your value proposition ideas using 150 words or less and appropriate images of your choice.
·Sample Professional Memo: https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/subject_specific_writing/professional_technical_writing/memos/sample_memo.html
Step 3: Format your submission to comply with these technical requirements.
One page is the maximum length of the value proposition. If you are nearing the length maximum, but have more to convey, work on editing your submission for writing effectiveness.
Your ideas and work must be original. You may not copy a value proposition from any source even if you cite that source. You may not reuse an assignment or example from this course, a prior course, or any other session of this course if you are retaking the course.
Your submission must also include a reference list. The reference list is not part of the 150 words, and the reference list can be placed on a second page of the document.
Cite to the product/service website and the sources for any images used on the reference list.
This assignment does not require a cover page.
See the rubric for grading guidelines. Week 2 – Written Assignment Memo Rubric
Questions?
Questions about this assignment are welcome in the “Ask the Professor” area of the classroom.
It is your responsibility to check your document and make sure you have submitted the correct one for this assignment. The last document you submit prior to the deadline is the one that will be graded.
References
Roam, D. (2008). The back of the napkin: Solving problems and selling ideas with pictures.
Due on Jun 25, 2024 11:59 PMHide Rubrics
Rubric Name: Week 2 – Written Assignment Memo Rubric
Learning Outcome AssessmentLevel 545 pointsLevel 437.35 pointsLevel 332.85 pointsLevel 228.35 pointsLevel 10 pointsCriterion ScoreAssessment of Learning Outcome – Value Proposition
This assignment demonstrates a high level of understanding of the learning outcome in this writing assignment precisely applies the concept to a real offering via a memo.
This assignment demonstrates a good level of understanding of the learning outcome in this writing assignment and generally applies the concept to a real offering via a memo.
This assignment demonstrates understanding of the learning outcome in this writing assignment, but the application of the concept to a real offering could have been more effective via a memo.
This assignment demonstrates a poor understanding of the concept and does not demonstrate the concept’s applicability to a real offering via a memo.
This effort was off track for the assignment.
Score of Assessment of Learning Outcome – Value Proposition,/ 45Assessment of Learning Outcome – Value Proposition Visual Component
This assignment exhibits a high level of understanding of the value proposition through effective “Back of the Napkin” concepts including clarity and simplicity that reflect the value proposition for the chosen offering.
This assignment exhibits a good level of understanding of the value proposition through effective “Back of the Napkin” concepts including clarity and simplicity that reflect the value proposition for the chosen offering.
This assignment exhibits understanding of the value proposition through effective “Back of the Napkin” concepts including clarity and simplicity that reflect the value proposition for the chosen offering.
This assignment demonstrates a poor understanding of the value proposition through effective “Back of the Napkin” concepts including clarity and simplicity that reflect the value proposition for the chosen offering.
This effort did not attempt a visual “Back of the Napkin” illustration or effort was off track.
Score of Assessment of Learning Outcome – Value Proposition Visual Component,/ 45Assessment of Communication TechniqueLevel 537.5 pointsLevel 431.5 pointsLevel 327 pointsLevel 224 pointsLevel 10 pointsCriterion ScoreAssessment of effective memo communication
This assignment demonstrates a high level of understanding of communication efficiency following appropriate memo structure, organization, and support to communicate ideas.
This assignment demonstrates a good level of understanding of communication efficiency following appropriate memo structure, organization, and support to communicate ideas.
This assignment demonstrates understanding of communication efficiency following appropriate memo structure, organization, and support to communicate ideas.
This assignment demonstrates a poor level of communication efficiency following appropriate memo structure, organization, and support to communicate ideas.
This effort was off track for the assignment.
Score of Assessment of effective memo communication,/ 37.5Assignment Adherence and WritingLevel 522.5 pointsLevel 415.075 pointsLevel 311.925 pointsLevel 29 pointsLevel 10 pointsCriterion ScoreGrammar, composition, adherence to submission requirements, effective use of referencing skills
Writing assignment submission is a professionally formatted document containing no typos or grammatical errors. Assignment adheres all all submission requirements. Submission demonstrates superior research and referencing skills.
Writing assignment submission is a professionally formatted document; it may have a few typos or grammatical errors. Assignment adheres to all submission requirements. Submission demonstrates adequate research and referencing skills, but may have some issues with attribution of statements of facts or others’ opinions; there may be minor issues.
Writing assignment submission is an acceptably presented document; it may have an unacceptable number of distracting typos or grammatical errors. Assignment does not adhere to all submission requirements outlined in the syllabus. Student demonstrated poor research and referencing skills leaving most statements of facts and others’ opinions unattributed
Writing assignment is a document containing typos and grammatical errors that are very distracting to the reader. Assignment does not comply with most submission requirements. Student does not demonstrate any research and referencing skills. Writing style needs significant help. Suggest student seek the services of UMGC’s Effective Writing Program before submitting further assignments.
Writing assignment is not in an acceptable format.
Score of Grammar, composition, adherence to submission requirements, effective use of referencing skills,/ 22.5TotalScore of Week 2 – Written Assignment Memo Rubric, -
“Taking a Stand for Abortion Rights: Supporting the Decision with Evidence and Statistics” Introduction: Abortion has been a controversial topic for decades, sparking heated debates and dividing opinions. However, as a firm believer in women’s rights, I stand
APA FORMAT
-2 pages written letter taking a stand for abortion rights, support the decision
-1 page of statistics and evidence to support the topic -
Weekly Log 1: Current Developments in Artificial Intelligence Citation: Gershgorn, D. (2021, February 2). Google’s AI can now identify food in the supermarket, in a move that could dramatically change
templete attached, will need a total of 6 logs before the final paper
Final Project Part 3: Current Developments
In this part of the project, you need to submit your first weekly log summarizing the main points from a journal or newspaper article. For additional details on grading, please refer to the Course Syllabus which has a link to the Final Project Rubric which contains rubrics for Parts 1-4 of the Final Project and the Logs. Your log should adhere to the following guidelines:
Please use provided template to submit your weekly log (download the file below)
Your entry should be at least 300 words
It should include a complete citation of the newspaper article or journal
It should summarize the main points of the article
It should include your opinion of the article -
Title: “The Power of Nursing: Personal Reflections on Passion and Patient Care”
Nursing is a good passion.My childhood friend is a very good nurse. U share own opinions with me for a better health beacuse i am a scissor patient.
-
“The Media’s Influence: A Case Study of Ted Kennedy’s Chappaquiddick Incident” “Creating a User-Friendly and Dynamic Course Website: A Step-by-Step Guide”
you must follow apa format perfectly, this teacher is very hard on that. if you have any questions let me know. also i have attached sample papers on what its supposed to look like as well as the rubric they use to grade it and the apa 7th templete. Please read over everything and look at the links he is very strict.
1st Paper ~ Student will research and write on the Media’s influence ~ Ted Kennedy Chappaquiddick Incident
Ted Kennedy’s Chappaquiddick Incident: What Really Happened | HISTORYLinks to an external site.
Must read and follow requirements in this link for Paper #1: /courses/279856/modules/items/5758672
SOURCES/CONTENT
You must use your textbook as a source, and you must also use five other additional outside sources for your paper (a total of at least 6), and three of these should be scholarly in nature. For example, you may use the internet, academic journal databases, books, encyclopedias, videos, newspapers, etc. So, a minimum of six (6) sources are required.
* Use the subheadings listed below in your paper for organization, consistency, and coherency of the overall paper:
Both Research papers must consist of the following – No Abstract
– Must Use in 1st Paragraph ~ Title of The Paper as the heading, the first paragraph
*** This is the introduction that contains the thesis in the last sentence but does not have Introduction as a heading, but the Title of the Paper
* Must Use the subheadings (do not include hint underneath) listed in order below in your paper for organization, consistency, and coherency of the overall paper:
Description of the research subject(hint ~ Write an overview of the subject you are researching for that paper)
Analysis of the crime event or events(hint ~ your decision on what crime or crime events you want to write on for that paper based on your research)
Description of media involvement and coverage(hint ~ write to the media coverage, how much, what venue, what did they cover, did it change over time, i.e., during the event, trial, etc.)
Perspective concerning the media influence on; (1st paper) and (2nd paper).(hint: What is your perspective (not your Opinion) based on your research backed up with citations and sources on how the media influenced this matter? It could be what impact it had while it was going on, afterwards, trials, currently, etc.).
Conclusion (hint ~ The paper’s conclusion wraps it all up for the reader who is your grade)
** (Overall, the last hint ~ Review the APA Module Again before submitting the papers ~ I structured this paper format approach so that one segment flows nicely into the next one. Again, sentences should not be more than 25-30 words. Paragraphs approx. 5-6 sentences, with proper indent. Use APA 7 citations and references.)
———————————————————————————————–
Format
Each paper must be in APA 7 format (NO ABSTRACT) and include a title page, body *Thesis is last sentence in first paragraph of body* (include subheadings above), and references/work cited page. Intext citations are required when citing your sources and must be in correct APA format. The length of the body of each paper is to be 1500 words, written in 12-point font and double-spaced, papers should be a minimum of 1500 words, not counting the title page, and reference page. Papers are to be submitted through the course website.
Due to time constraints, late submissions cannot be accepted and will forfeit feedback.
ASSIGNMENT SUBMISSION POLICIES
Submissions are to be submitted in MS Word or Adobe PDF.
When submitting an assignment, you are responsible for saving a copy before submitting it, in the event the Course website computer system malfunctions. Save the assignment on your computer hard drive or a removable medium then submit the assignment.
Save the file in the format “LASTNAME_FIRSTNAME-FINALPAPER” and do not use the # symbol in the file name.
All writing assignments will be submitted to turnitin.com through the course link in Course website. All work must be original to you and done for the first time this semester for this class.
Email submissions and hard copies are not accepted.
If you miss the deadline for submitting the draft copy, you will have voluntarily forfeited feedback and will have to submit a final paper with no revisions allowed. -
“Exploring Geology Through Inquiry: Investigating the Formation of Layers at the Grand Canyon” “Exploring the Ocean: Using Inquiry Strategies to Foster Critical Thinking in the Classroom”
In your notebook on a clean sheet of paper, answer this question. I’m going to give you about five minutes to write independently. We see layers of rock in the earth. At the Grand Canyon we see different layers of rock, they have different names. What do you think caused these layers to form.
>> In teaching this geology unit the inquiry approach is I think invaluable for these students. Because geology can be very difficult I think — a very difficult concept for the students to really get a grasp on. Especially what they’re learning in this unit. My students are learning about the Grand Canyon.
>> If sandstone is made from sand, okay, and this may sound like a silly question, but I want you think about it, talk about it for one minute, that’s all you need at your table, which came first. It’s like the old joke, which came first the chicken or the egg. Which came first, the sand or the sandstone.
>> Well, maybe the rock came first and then the ocean came and rubbed off it. Created a whole bunch of —
>> [Inaudible] that’s what I said.
>> They have to use the tools at their disposal, physical tools and what’s inside their brains, and put them together and try to find the answer. And that’s what my kids are learning to do.
>> For the people that think that sand came first, then I’m going to ask you another question. If sand came first, where did the sand come from? Okay, where would sand come from. Even if you don’t agree with those people, I still want you think about this question. If sand came first, was it always sand? Did it start off as sand, or did sand come from something else?
>> If you want to dig in there, keep on digging, you’ll find different colors — different kinds of rocks.
>> [Inaudible] how did you think sand was made.
>> [Inaudible] did come first before sand, so how do you think sand was made?
>> I don’t know.
>> I think it’s different.
>> — rocks, powder, and different pieces of rocks put together.
>> Yeah. Because there’s different color sands.
>> Yeah.
>> There’s little cracks in them.
>> Some sand have rocks in them. Little, little pieces of rocks.
>> I actually have some rocks here. It is called — okay, granite.
>> Through the inquiry approach, by having them actually hold rocks that are from that region of the United States, for them to actually do the experiments and tests that real geologists would use, it gets them excited about it. They’re doing the science, they’re not just reading about it. They’re not memorizing science. They’re learning to think like scientists do and to act like scientists do. It also hooks them into it. It really engaged them. I think it kept them, got their attention and helped keep their attention throughout the unit.
>> And I will give — each group will have available to use five of them, five rocks, a jar, and your old friend the magnifying glass. And lastly, a piece of white paper. Here’s what I’d like you to do. I’d like you to come up with a plan, each group to come up with a plan. How can we test which hypothesis of rocks are what makes sand.
>> Take two of the same type of rock and rub them together to see what comes out, if powder comes out or something comes out.
>> Good. Tamethia [Phonetic]?
>> We was going to rub the rocks together on the paper to see, like, what would happen. How would it come out.
>> Why would you say on the paper. You’re the first group I’ve heard say that. Why would —
>> Because it’s better to see on the paper than in the jar.
>> Yeah, everyone hear what Tamethia said? She suggested that her group is going to rub the rocks onto the white paper so they’re easier to see. Because remember, I’m going to give you magnifying glasses. And she said that might make it easier. Because originally I know you were talking about putting the sand in the jar, right? And then holding it up. But the paper —
>> It’s better to do it on the paper, because the paper is much lighter than the jar.
>> Yeah. So you might have a better chance of seeing the sand if it’s on the paper. Good idea.
>> We was going, like, act like the ocean, by, like, taking a bucket of water and just, like, splashing to see if, like, stuff comes out.
>> Could use this like the bucket?
>> Yeah.
>> Okay, we have a lid on it so it doesn’t spill. That’s the only thing I could suggest, so you don’t get water all over the room.
>> One of the challenges of using the inquiry strategy in the classroom is it can be more intensive, in terms of time, in terms of my own mental energy. The preparation needed to get ready for this type of class. All of that requires preparation beforehand. So my homework is to, you know, the day before, the week before, start getting the lab ready. I need to think long term.
>> This one — this one has all these nice shiny minerals. You look at this one, this one looks rough.
[ Background noise and comments ]
>> Have you been shaking it?
>> Yeah.
>> And we did it on the paper too. Look.
>> This, this, this, and this. Which one do you call sand, when do you start calling it sand?
>> That.
>> Because I think what happened was that when you keep on rubbing it, it gets smaller and smaller and smaller.
>> So what would you call this one?
>> [Inaudible] like a rock.
>> It’s like, a multicultural rock, because there’s a whole bunch of different type of what looks like — and I know some parts are shiny like a crystal.
>> Obviously in nature there aren’t these plastic jars out rolling around in the Grand Canyon. So what do you think is causing — just like you did in the class, whether you’re rubbing the rocks together or shaking them together, what’s happening in nature that’s making the sand. Because it’s not the jars, you know that. That’s your homework tonight. Write in your notebook, tell me what is it in nature that’s causing the same thing that you’re doing with your hand or with the jars. But — so that’s what you did today —
>> It’s teaching them habits of mind that I think are invaluable. Whether or not they stay in science or go into a different career field, I’m hoping that all of my students will walk out of my classroom at the end of the year stronger critical thinkers, and they will approach a problem and not immediately feel like they need to turn to someone else or turn to a book for an answer. That they’ll realize that within themselves they have the ability to — and the tools to start the discovery process to try to find the answers on their own. And I think that’s an invaluable gift we can give the students that they can use anywhere from this point on. -
Navigating the Overlap: Challenges Faced as a Safety Professional As a safety professional, it is my responsibility to ensure the safety and well-being of employees in the workplace. This includes complying with various regulations and standards set by different governing bodies
Reflect on how, as a safety professional, you would respond to the overlap in Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) standards and state or local building, electrical, and life safety regulations. In your opinion, what might be the most significant challenges?
Your journal entry must be at least 400 words in length. No references or citations are necessary. -
“Reflection on a Client Session: Integrating Legal/Ethical Considerations, Health Promotion, and Risk Factors”
Reflection notes: What would you do differently with this client if you could conduct the session over? Also include in your reflection a discussion related to legal/ethical considerations (demonstrate critical thinking beyond confidentiality and consent for treatment!), health promotion and disease prevention taking into consideration patient factors (such as age, ethnic group, etc.), PMH, and other risk factors (e.g., socioeconomic, cultural background, etc.).
I will add / upload the trancript of the patient video /interview psych assessment. -
Title: The Theatre of the Absurd in Beckett’s “Waiting for Godot”
In a 2-3 page essay, using one other critical source in addition to the text of the play itself, Discuss how the conventions of the theatre of the absurd are used by Beckett and why this helps him develop a theme of nothingness and futility? Don’t forget a Works Cited page.
Please when using citations make sure you are using ” ” and citing where you got it from any page numbers, and the time stamp from the youtube video.
Under no circumtances can AI be in this paper