In this longer paper assignment (10-15 pages or so) and worth 25% of your grade, which will be due by Midnight on Sunday, June 23rd, I would like you to pick a particular conspiracy theory you are interested in. You will develop it and try to determine to the best of your ability its possibilities to be true through careful analysis of messages, sources, and other persuasive devices we have studied over the semester.
Author: admin
-
Title: Operating System Vulnerabilities and Remediation Tactics
Throughout the course, you have explored how operating systems and hardware integrate and the issues that arise from that integration. Conduct some research and provide an example of a specific operating system vulnerability disclosed in the last 12 months. Operating systems can include Windows, Mac OS, Linux/Unix, or other relevant platforms. Your example should focus on one of the following topics:
Privileged and nonprivileged states
Application processes and threads
Memory (real, virtual, and management)
File systems
In your response posts, describe a remediation tactic to address the vulnerability identified by each of your peers. The tactic you select should be guided by one of the Fundamental Security Design Principles. -
“Exploring the Relationship between Service Quality, Perceived Value, Corporate Image, Complaint Behavior, and the Role of Agents on Customer Satisfaction: A Study of Malaysian Regions”
1) I DONE MY CHAPTER 1
2) I AM REQURED TO USE ACSI MODEL
3) I WILL USE MY CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK WHERE CUSTOMER SATISFACTION IS DEPENDENT VARIABLE, SERVICE QUALITY, PERCEIVED VALUE, CORPORAGE IMAGE COMPLAINT BEHAVIOUR AND ROLE OF AGENT AS INDPENDENT VARIABLE
4) 200 SAMPLE WILL BE DISTRIBUTE TO THEIR NORTHERN REGION, SOUTHERN, CENTRE REGION, EAST COST AND EAST MALAYSIA
5) CONVENIENCE SAMPLING -
“Revealing Society Through Sound: A Comparative Analysis of Popular Music in Jamaica and Egypt” Exploring Themes and Connections in the Assigned Materials: An Analysis of a Single Database
Requirements:
Write a fully original and titled 5 plus page essay (meaning do not kill your discussion exactly at the bottom of page 5— fully introduce, fully discuss your ideas and evidence, and fully develop your conclusions), in which you: compare and contrast at least three features of how our source materials dealing with Jamaica and Egypt have shown us how the consumption and production of popular music is useful historical evidence. Do not simply retell similar and different details related to Umm K. and Ivan M. as characters/figures/lives, rather, use ideas and examples from these case studies as evidence of the production and consumption of popular music, evidence that will allow you to make/support/clarify larger claims about society, culture and historical experiences within both Jamaica and Egypt.
Your carefully designed discussion must include some coverage of gender expectations/identities and power relations, and at least two additional relevant themes/topics of your choice.
You should only use the required sources that we have worked with in our course for your essay, plus the specific required usage of supporting primary source articles from one database— New York Times Historical File.
Be certain to make use of at least 4 relevant New York Times articles from this database in developing your work. All of these articles should be accessed and assessed through keyword searches in which you hunt for matches/corroboration among the ideas and supporting examples developed in your essay and the issues and events described in the articles of the NYT.
No other additional materials beyond our assigned course materials may be used.
Suggestions:
There are many rich themes/topics of historical evidence to consider in this organizational and problem-solving task. Prepare your essay by gathering your examples and ideas to be able to outline, draft and write. You could think of this as gathering and coding your data.
*You might consider ways in which shifting power relationships, expectations and identities (ex. class, social geography (ex. rural/urban) functioned in these contexts.
*And/or you might consider how the sacred spaces (Koranic School/Evangelical Church) and secular (Cabaret/Dance Hall/Radio) spaces operate these contexts.
*And/or you may want to consider the transnational (ex. how music travels beyond national borders).
*And/or you might consider debates about top-down versus bottom-up (review Corbett’s discussion of Adorno/Frankfurt School versus the Birmingham School) and assess how these contexts confirm or challenge these theories of how popular music works to reinforce the class system within capitalism or to give important voice to forms of resistance. Concerning this last theme, note that if you choose “both” it only shifts the problem around and then you still should be able to explain how and to what extent is it “both”.
These are conceptual suggestions and approaches, not requirements. While I do expect some coverage of gender expectations/identities and power relations, for the at least two additional relevant themes/topics of your choice, I am fully open to the other themes/topics you propose to be interesting and/or important enough for your comparisons and contrasts within this essay. Again, stay away from retelling the contexts and/or reducing the analysis to individuals. Work towards using popular music as evidence that will allow you to make/support/clarify larger claims about society, culture and historical experiences within both Jamaica and Egypt.
Also, as you prepare your essay, I strongly suggest allowing for multiple sessions of browsing and experimenting with varied keywork searches of our excellent free JJ library database- New York Times Historical File.
Lastly, no need to retell general points from these contexts to me (your audience), or to explain definitions from dictionaries. Rather, organize your own thoughts and carefully selected and cited body of evidence to develop your best possible ideas and examples based solely on your work with our assigned materials and specific single database.
Further Details:
Basic advice for how I will grade these essays (12 possible points):
I will grade based on the use of relevant ideas and examples/evidence/support to build a clear, well-informed discussion and fully developed conclusion(s).
To pass, each paper should use at least two references from each film, and at least a reference from every reading, including required NYT supporting sources. Your work should demonstrate that you understand our materials and that you can work with them in order to build your own original analysis. I highly suggest that you use aspects of the Corbett article that you find helpful for framing your ideas and evidence.
Better than average and excellent work should make strong thematic connections (here understood as comparisons and/or contrasts), strong balanced coverage, and to do so with clarity. A better than average or excellent paper will not magically drop dead at the end of 5 pages. Rather, B and A level writings will fully develop their discussion and conclusions. There are no page limits to worry about. Give me everything you can— with clarity.
Videos:
– https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uLfONsv8BEI
– https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wv1Iy26qlLk
– https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jKJOL8JlpH4 -
“Exploring Dissertation Writing: Sample Analysis and Tips for Success”
Here have 3 folder , i have to do a little bit you can open the dissertation folder
You can have a look sample 1 & 2 -
“Supporting the Child Suicide Prevention and Lethal Means Safety Act: A Letter to Congress”
Midterm Group Project: Letter of Support or Opposition to Proposed Law.
The bill we are supporting is
Support for H.R. 7265 Child Suicide Prevention and Lethal Means Safety Act
https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/7265/all-actions
2.1 The group submission must be written for the group in the third person (e.g., we, us, our group) and not as an individual submission (e.g., I, me, my).
2.2 The letter shall substantively use at least three (3) “External Authoritative Sources” defined below, to support the arguments and position advanced by the group.
2.3 Every paragraph in the letter must contain at least one source substantively cited to support the statements made therein and in every sentence where a number appears.
2.4 SAMPLE LETTER
(Month) (Day) (Year)
The Honorable (First name) (Last name)
(Room Number), State Capitol
(City),(State) (Zip Code)
RE: (state the topic or include the bill number, author and subject and state whether your group is writing to support or oppose a particular legislative bill)
Dear (Assembly Member/Senator) (Last name):
Our names are (state your names). We are (state who you are – for example: students; advocates; community member or other) who resides in your district (if applicable). (no source citation needed)
(State why your group supports or opposes the bill here. Choose up to three of the strongest points that support your position and state them clearly. Remember to include citations to “authoritative external sources”)
(Include a personal story. Tell your representative why the issue is important to your group and how it affects you, your family member and your community.) (no source citation needed)
(Tell your representative how your group wants her or him to vote on this issue and ask for a response. Be sure to include your name and address on both your letter and envelope.) (no source citation needed)
Sincerely, SIGN ALL YOUR NAMES
Print your names
Street address
City, State, Zip code
2.5 Visit the following link for another sample. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Xe4yS3j8zaMDmLtR-uH6zzt2PaB6vrYS/view?usp=sharing (Links to an external site.)
3. “External Authoritative Sources” for purposes of this course shall mean: articles from published books, peer reviewed journal articles, education and government sites as well as non-partisan national or international organizations (such as WHO, UNICEF, UNAIDS etc) provided, however the article selected must have:
3.1 Authors; and
3.2 In text citations and references to support statements made therein.
3.3 Under no circumstances are newspapers (e.g., the Wall Street Journal), blogs (regardless of source), editorials, panel discussions, definition of terms, the assigned case study, “dot com” sites, and text books from the course or other courses to be used. The foregoing are not considered authoritative for this course. -
Title: Addressing Ethical Dilemmas and Organizational Culture in Patient Care: A Case Study
Assessment Description
Read the scenario and address the discussion question:
Scenario
You are a member of an interdisciplinary team participating in patient rounds at the start of your shift. You notice the physician charting that the patient is alert and oriented x3, but the patient was clearly confused, which the physician acknowledged during rounds.
Discussion Question
How would you approach this scenario? Apply one of the ethical principles discussed in Dynamics of Nursing: Art and Science of Professional Practice to this scenario. Discuss how organizational culture can help manage errors.
Initial discussion question posts should be a minimum of 200 words and include at least two references cited using APA format. Responses to peers or faculty should be 100-150 words and include one reference. Refer to “RN-BSN Discussion Question Rubric” and “RN-BSN Participation Rubric,” located in Class Resources, to understand the expectations for initial discussion question posts and participation posts, respectively.
American Association of Colleges of Nursing Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education
This assignment aligns to AACN Core Competencies 5.2, 6.2, 6.4, 9.1, 9.2, 9 -
“Roadmap to Quality Healthcare: An Analysis of The Joint Commission’s Chapters 1 & 2”
All answers must be addressed and on topic
APA Format for references
Chapter 1&2 of The Joint Comission Roadmap -
Title: “Exploring the Advantages and Drawbacks of Restricting SAAF Grants to Stabilistan-based NGOs and Assessing the Rights- and Needs-Based Approach in Fragiliwest Context”
Stabilistan is one of the largest ODA funders in the world. It channels its funding through StabilAid. StabilAid funds multilateral operations as well as work done by Stabilistani NGOs. Many Stabilistani NGOs are global leaders in their respective fields. One of StabilAid’s flagship funding mechanisms is the Small Agency Action Fund (SAAF). In January 2018, StabilAid issued Guidelines for Applicants, for a new round of grants to NGOs.
Fragilisave (a diaspora organisation in Stabilistan) and DEF (an organisation in Fragiliwest) have jointly prepared a Concept Note. If this Concept Note gets accepted, Fragilisave and DEF will have to produce a more detailed proposal.
Please read the Guidelines for Applicants and the Concept Note, and answer the following questions.
Section 6.1 of the Guidelines for Applicants and Section 1.2 of the Concept Note template stipulate that only Stabilistan-based NGOs are eligible for SAAF grants. Please describe, in no more than 500 words, the advantages and drawbacks of such a restriction. [For context: Stabilistan is a rich donor country, much like the UK.]
Is this concept note based on a rights-based or a needs-based approach? In not more than 500 words, please explain your answer, and assess whether or not this is an appropriate approach to take in the particular context of Fragiliwest. If you are not yet familiar with the rights- and the needs-based approaches, this will require some background reading.
Please strengthen this Concept Note, using Track Changes. You can insert questions, comments, suggestions and additional useful information, if available. Ideally, you go beyond a bit of text editing, and point out inconsistencies and weaknesses, and perhaps fill a few gaps. Do not exceed the length of the Concept Note by more than 1000 words.