Author: admin

  • “Analyzing a Case Study: Uncovering Key Factors for Student Success in a Challenging Classroom Environment”

    The a-s-s-e-s-s-m-e-n-t will
    Case Study Analysis
    Please see the questions shown in the screenshot. I will send you all the info after being hired, eg PPTs, student access etc. Please send a draft in 12hrs -1 day time, day 2, and day 3 as well. + Will need to draft some questions to ask the teacher and revise base on feedback (Send bk ard in 1 day max)

  • “Addressing the Hidden Harm of Mandatory Minimum Sentencing in Australia: Recommendations for Effective Criminal Justice Reform”

    This task invites you to closely examine a ‘hidden’ harm related to a criminal justice activity, process or policy that exists in Australia. Choose an issue that you consider requires better responses from governments and/or other powerful institutions of ‘justice’ and have a go at identifying what better responses look like.
    This task enables you to build your skills in the area of persuasive policy briefing by providing advice ‘up the chain’ (in an imaginary government organisation) that captures what you see as the best way to enact reform. Synthesising complex evidence is a key skill for future criminologists, criminal justice actors and policy makers who are working towards ‘doing justice’ better in the future.
    The audience for this task should be a senior advisor to a relevant Minister currently in government (can be real or imagined). This means that we expect you to write in a formal and structured manner using the Briefing Note template provided. A Briefing Note provides a description of an issue that draws on research and practice-based evidence to provide options and recommendations to address that particular issue. Briefing Notes inform decision-makers about an issue by succinctly describing key pieces of information.

  • The Interplay between Objectivity and Subjectivity in Cognitive Psychology: A Critical Analysis of the Study “Visualizing Data to Support Judgement, Inference, and Decision Making”

    Topic: How does the interplay between objectivity and subjectivity influence perception and decision-making processes in cognitive psychology?
    Write a 3-page paper that summarizes and critiques on ONE of your primary sources (i.e., experiment, study, etc. conducted by the author and published in a peer-reviewed academic journal). The primary source should relate to the original research question you generated in Discussion 4 (topic question). Your source analysis should demonstrate your ability to identify the key components of a study or experiment as well as your critical thinking and analysis of research.
    Your paper should:
    Introduce your topic;
    Provide a summary of the research method that the authors used by identifying the purpose of the study or experiment and the hypothesis or research question.
    Describe the findings, conclusions, and implications of this study, as well as future directions for research suggested by the author/s.
    Provide a critical analysis of this source. Your writing should be a coherent presentation of your analysis of the authors’ research design, their conclusions about their findings, and the relevance of these findings to your own research question
    Your APA style paper should be three pages, not including a title page or your reference page. Be sure to include an APA style reference page for the article that you reviewed and any other sources that you used.
    Please choose ONE source to discuss from this list: Alhadad, S. S. J. (2018). Visualizing Data to Support Judgement, Inference, and Decision Making in Learning Analytics: Insights from Cognitive Psychology and Visualization Science. Journal of Learning Analytics, 5(2), 60–85.
    Aleksey A. Dyachkov. (2023). Psychological Mechanisms of Cognitive Subjectivity Development. Russian Journal of Education and Psychology, 14(6), 422–442. https://doi-org.proxy.ccis.edu/10.12731/2658-4034-2023-14-6-422-442
    Eva, K. W. (2018). Cognitive Influences on Complex Performance Assessment: Lessons from the Interplay between Medicine and Psychology. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 7(2), 177–188. https://doi-org.proxy.ccis.edu/10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.03.008
    Klempe, S. (2013). Kierkegaard and Psychology as the Science of the “Multifarious Life.” Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 47(3), 367–375. https://doi-org.proxy.ccis.edu/10.1007/s12124-013-9235-1
    Li, L. (2023). The other side of false belief: Constructing the objectivity of reality. Infant & Child Development, 32(3), 1–13. https://doi-org.proxy.ccis.edu/10.1002/icd.2416

  • Exploring Diverse Media: A Reflection on Engaging with Various Forms of Content

    Look through the items here and if something strikes your fancy, read/watch/listen to it (there’s a wide assortment). To earn credit, write a thoughtful response to the item you chose. Briefly summarize the material and show how you engaged with the material. How did the item make you think? How did the material you’ve studied so far help you understand it? How did the item enlarge your understanding of the course material? How did it resonate with your previous experience? Why should someone else engage with the item? (These are questions to get you started. This list is not intended to serve as a checklist.) Note: Some entries include two related items. For full credit, you must discuss both.
    Rubric: 
    Writing counts. Use formal tone, proper grammar, punctuation, spelling, etc. Organize your ideas. Address specific points from the material; the details you include reflect your engagement with the material. The greater your level of engagement, the more points I am likely to award as your bonus. I may award more or fewer points depending on the complexity of the item and/or the depth of your engagement.
    Each topic has its own Prompt
    Please read the attachament.s Text or call if you have any questions 
    347-798-5081

  • “Effective Internal Control and Audit Procedures for Financial Investments and Accounts Receivable”

    Week 3 – Discussions 1
    Prior to beginning work on this discussion forum, read
    Chapters 10 and 11 in the course textbook.
    Since financial investments are assets with a high degree
    of inherent risk, companies must establish effective internal control over
    their investments. Address the following in your discussion post:
    ·       
    Describe segregation of
    duties and dual control.
    ·       
    Describe the functions
    that should be segregated to provide good internal control over cash, the
    receipt of cash, and financial investments.
    ·       
    Describe two other
    internal control policies that should be established for financial investments.
    ·       
    List three audit tasks
    related to the audit of financial investments that may require specialized
    skill or knowledge.
    Write: Make sure your response is more than
    200 words and that you include an in-text citation or a brief quote from the
    reading material where appropriate. You may find the Writing Center’s APA: Citing Within Your PaperLinks to an external site. resource helpful in
    citing your sources.
    Week 3 – Discussions 2
    Prior to beginning work on this discussion forum, read
    Chapters 10 and 11 in the course textbook.
    Confirmation of accounts receivable is presumptively a
    mandatory audit procedure. In performing this procedure, auditors use positive
    confirmation requests or negative confirmation requests or a combination of
    both. Address the following in your discussion post:
    ·       
    Explain the difference
    between negative and positive confirmations.
    ·       
    Describe conditions
    which should exist for the auditors to use the negative form of request.
    ·       
    Describe conditions
    which should exist for the auditors to use the positive form of request.
    ·       
    If a response is not
    received to an initial positive or negative confirmation request, describe the
    action that should be taken by the auditors, including a discussion of
    alternative auditing procedures.
    Write: Make sure your response is more than
    200 words and that you include an in-text citation or a brief quote from the
    reading material where appropriate. You may find the Writing Center’s APA: Citing Within Your PaperLinks to an external site. resource helpful in
    citing your sources.

  • “Exploring the Human Condition through Naturalism and Realism in Edith Wharton’s Ethan Frome”

    this is an essay using naturalist and realist literary works, such as Ethan Frome by Edith Wharton.
    source: https://www.gutenberg.org/files/4517/4517-h/4517-h.htm

  • “Gun Control in America: Exploring the Controversial Debate and Analyzing its Sources and Effects” “The Gun Control Debate: Examining the Pros and Cons of Stricter Regulations on Second Amendment Rights”

    Each student will submit a research paper on a topic in American Government.  Students may choose any topic they wish with the exception of abortion.  Any student writing their research paper on abortion will receive No Credit for the assignment.  Students will choose a controversial topic in American Government, present the pros and cons of the chosen topic (supported by cites), and provide an analysis of the subject with an opinion/conclusion.  The analysis must present a critical review of the topic as well as a critical analysis of the sources used.  Options for critical topic analysis include, but are not limited to, liberal/conservative ideology, media coverage, political parties, institutions, political participants, and details of the actual topic (refer to SLO’s for areas of analysis).  Source analysis is based on a critical review of the articles/citations used for the paper.  
    Papers must be a minimum of five (5) pages of text in length (7 pages max.) plus a standard bibliography of no fewer than 5 reputable sources.  Any paper submitted without a complete bibliography will receive no credit for the assignment. 
    Students MUST use the following publications as sources (minimum 1 article from each source: 3 of the 5 required citations) for their papers:  Mother Jones, the National Review, One Government Publication (US or state) or One Interest Group Publication; additional cite choices are at the discretion of the student.  All of these publications can be found via LBCC Library online resources, specifically the search engine ProQuest.  If a website is used as a required cite, it must be from a reputable publication, institution or association.  Non-reputable websites will not be counted toward required sources.  The required textbooks, dictionaries, Wikipedia, or any encyclopedia or standard reference volume may not be used as a required cite (reference material may be used as additional citations, and must be included in the bibliography). 
    Papers must be written in the following format:  ½  page introduction and facts, 1 page pros of topic (properly cited from research), 1 page cons of topic (properly cited from research), 1 page source analysis (a discussion of the positives and weaknesses of your sources), 1 page subject/topic analysis (choose 2 from the list below) and ½ page conclusion (including author’s position on the topic). 
    The Analysis section of the paper should include a one (1) page source analysis where the student critically analyzes 2 – 3 of the sources used in writing the paper; AND a (1) page topic analysis using two of the following:  1. ideology (liberal and conservative), 2. media/source treatment of topic, 3.  institutions, or 4. political participants, to further analyze the topic beyond pro/con.
    The paper is worth 250 points, 10 points will be deducted each day for a late paper up to one (1) week late.  Papers shorter than the minimum 5 pages, lacking a complete bibliography, or not meeting the requirements of the assignment will receive severe point deductions or no credit. See Semester Schedule for Due Date.  Students needing assistance with writing a complete bibliography, check out the website www.aresearchguide.com.
    The Research paper, including bibliography, Must be typewritten, double-spaced, 1-inch margins, 12-point Times New Roman or CG Times font.  
    Please refer to the Syllabus for additional information and a list of mandatory deductions.
    Something like this 
    Sure, here’s a sample research paper on the topic of gun control in American Government, following the specified structure:
    Gun Control in America: A Controversial Debate
    Introduction and Facts
    Gun control remains one of the most contentious issues in American politics. The debate centers on the extent to which the government should regulate the sale, possession, and use of firearms. Proponents of stricter gun control argue that it is essential for reducing gun violence and enhancing public safety. Opponents, however, believe that such regulations infringe upon the Second Amendment rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution. This paper examines both sides of the gun control debate, analyzing the pros and cons, and providing a critical review of the sources used.
    Pros of Gun Control
    Advocates for stricter gun control measures argue that such regulations are necessary to curb gun violence and reduce the number of mass shootings. According to an article from Mother Jones, countries with stringent gun laws, such as Australia and the United Kingdom, have significantly lower rates of gun-related deaths compared to the United States . Additionally, research from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) indicates that states with stronger gun laws have fewer gun deaths per capita . Proponents also point to studies showing that background checks and restrictions on assault weapons can prevent firearms from falling into the hands of criminals and individuals with mental illnesses, thereby reducing the potential for violence .
    Cons of Gun Control
    Opponents of gun control argue that such measures are unconstitutional and ineffective. The National Review asserts that the Second Amendment explicitly protects an individual’s right to own and bear arms, and that any infringement on this right is a violation of constitutional freedoms . Critics also argue that gun control laws do not deter criminals, who are unlikely to obey such regulations. Instead, they believe that these laws only restrict law-abiding citizens’ ability to protect themselves. Additionally, some studies suggest that areas with strict gun control laws, such as Chicago, continue to experience high rates of gun violence, indicating that other factors, such as socio-economic conditions, play a more significant role in influencing crime rates .

  • Title: Evaluating Vertical and Horizontal Alignment in Music Curriculum for Grades 9-12

    In this task, you will evaluate the vertical alignment of a concept or unit of instruction in the prior, current, and next grade or level (Music 9-12). 
    You will also reflect on how to work with your team to ensure horizontal alignment of a curriculum for a specific grade or level.
    music (9-12 is the subject) 
    Vertical Alignment
    A. Gather the curriculum map or curriculum materials for a concept or unit of instruction in the prior, current, and next grade or level in your subject area and then do the following: 
    1. Describe the curriculum, including the following:
    • current grade or level
    • concept or unit of instruction
    • standards that correspond to the prior grade or level
    • standards that correspond to the current grade or level
    • standards that correspond to the next grade or level 
    2. Describe the learning progression across the three grades or levels. 
    3. Discuss a potential gap or redundancy in knowledge or skills across the three grades or levels. 
    4. Suggest two improvements to the current grade or level curriculum to better align vertically with the prior or next grade or level curriculum. 
    Horizontal Alignment 
    B. Discuss how you would work with a team of teachers in your school or district who all teach the same grade or level in a specific subject area to ensure that there is horizontal alignment for the curriculum unit identified in part A1, by doing the following: 
    1. Discuss the steps your team would take to ensure horizontal alignment of the curriculum resources for the unit.
    2
    . Discuss the steps your team would take to ensure horizontal alignment of the instructional strategies for the unit. 
    3. Discuss the steps your team would take to ensure horizontal alignment of the assessments for the unit.
    C. Acknowledge sources, using APA-formatted in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.
    D. Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission.