APA FORMAT
-2 pages written letter taking a stand for abortion rights, support the decision
-1 page of statistics and evidence to support the topic
Author: admin
-
“Taking a Stand for Abortion Rights: Supporting the Decision with Evidence and Statistics” Introduction: Abortion has been a controversial topic for decades, sparking heated debates and dividing opinions. However, as a firm believer in women’s rights, I stand
-
Weekly Log 1: Current Developments in Artificial Intelligence Citation: Gershgorn, D. (2021, February 2). Google’s AI can now identify food in the supermarket, in a move that could dramatically change
templete attached, will need a total of 6 logs before the final paper
Final Project Part 3: Current Developments
In this part of the project, you need to submit your first weekly log summarizing the main points from a journal or newspaper article. For additional details on grading, please refer to the Course Syllabus which has a link to the Final Project Rubric which contains rubrics for Parts 1-4 of the Final Project and the Logs. Your log should adhere to the following guidelines:
Please use provided template to submit your weekly log (download the file below)
Your entry should be at least 300 words
It should include a complete citation of the newspaper article or journal
It should summarize the main points of the article
It should include your opinion of the article -
Title: “The Power of Nursing: Personal Reflections on Passion and Patient Care”
Nursing is a good passion.My childhood friend is a very good nurse. U share own opinions with me for a better health beacuse i am a scissor patient.
-
“The Media’s Influence: A Case Study of Ted Kennedy’s Chappaquiddick Incident” “Creating a User-Friendly and Dynamic Course Website: A Step-by-Step Guide”
you must follow apa format perfectly, this teacher is very hard on that. if you have any questions let me know. also i have attached sample papers on what its supposed to look like as well as the rubric they use to grade it and the apa 7th templete. Please read over everything and look at the links he is very strict.
1st Paper ~ Student will research and write on the Media’s influence ~ Ted Kennedy Chappaquiddick Incident
Ted Kennedy’s Chappaquiddick Incident: What Really Happened | HISTORYLinks to an external site.
Must read and follow requirements in this link for Paper #1: /courses/279856/modules/items/5758672
SOURCES/CONTENT
You must use your textbook as a source, and you must also use five other additional outside sources for your paper (a total of at least 6), and three of these should be scholarly in nature. For example, you may use the internet, academic journal databases, books, encyclopedias, videos, newspapers, etc. So, a minimum of six (6) sources are required.
* Use the subheadings listed below in your paper for organization, consistency, and coherency of the overall paper:
Both Research papers must consist of the following – No Abstract
– Must Use in 1st Paragraph ~ Title of The Paper as the heading, the first paragraph
*** This is the introduction that contains the thesis in the last sentence but does not have Introduction as a heading, but the Title of the Paper
* Must Use the subheadings (do not include hint underneath) listed in order below in your paper for organization, consistency, and coherency of the overall paper:
Description of the research subject(hint ~ Write an overview of the subject you are researching for that paper)
Analysis of the crime event or events(hint ~ your decision on what crime or crime events you want to write on for that paper based on your research)
Description of media involvement and coverage(hint ~ write to the media coverage, how much, what venue, what did they cover, did it change over time, i.e., during the event, trial, etc.)
Perspective concerning the media influence on; (1st paper) and (2nd paper).(hint: What is your perspective (not your Opinion) based on your research backed up with citations and sources on how the media influenced this matter? It could be what impact it had while it was going on, afterwards, trials, currently, etc.).
Conclusion (hint ~ The paper’s conclusion wraps it all up for the reader who is your grade)
** (Overall, the last hint ~ Review the APA Module Again before submitting the papers ~ I structured this paper format approach so that one segment flows nicely into the next one. Again, sentences should not be more than 25-30 words. Paragraphs approx. 5-6 sentences, with proper indent. Use APA 7 citations and references.)
———————————————————————————————–
Format
Each paper must be in APA 7 format (NO ABSTRACT) and include a title page, body *Thesis is last sentence in first paragraph of body* (include subheadings above), and references/work cited page. Intext citations are required when citing your sources and must be in correct APA format. The length of the body of each paper is to be 1500 words, written in 12-point font and double-spaced, papers should be a minimum of 1500 words, not counting the title page, and reference page. Papers are to be submitted through the course website.
Due to time constraints, late submissions cannot be accepted and will forfeit feedback.
ASSIGNMENT SUBMISSION POLICIES
Submissions are to be submitted in MS Word or Adobe PDF.
When submitting an assignment, you are responsible for saving a copy before submitting it, in the event the Course website computer system malfunctions. Save the assignment on your computer hard drive or a removable medium then submit the assignment.
Save the file in the format “LASTNAME_FIRSTNAME-FINALPAPER” and do not use the # symbol in the file name.
All writing assignments will be submitted to turnitin.com through the course link in Course website. All work must be original to you and done for the first time this semester for this class.
Email submissions and hard copies are not accepted.
If you miss the deadline for submitting the draft copy, you will have voluntarily forfeited feedback and will have to submit a final paper with no revisions allowed. -
“Exploring Geology Through Inquiry: Investigating the Formation of Layers at the Grand Canyon” “Exploring the Ocean: Using Inquiry Strategies to Foster Critical Thinking in the Classroom”
In your notebook on a clean sheet of paper, answer this question. I’m going to give you about five minutes to write independently. We see layers of rock in the earth. At the Grand Canyon we see different layers of rock, they have different names. What do you think caused these layers to form.
>> In teaching this geology unit the inquiry approach is I think invaluable for these students. Because geology can be very difficult I think — a very difficult concept for the students to really get a grasp on. Especially what they’re learning in this unit. My students are learning about the Grand Canyon.
>> If sandstone is made from sand, okay, and this may sound like a silly question, but I want you think about it, talk about it for one minute, that’s all you need at your table, which came first. It’s like the old joke, which came first the chicken or the egg. Which came first, the sand or the sandstone.
>> Well, maybe the rock came first and then the ocean came and rubbed off it. Created a whole bunch of —
>> [Inaudible] that’s what I said.
>> They have to use the tools at their disposal, physical tools and what’s inside their brains, and put them together and try to find the answer. And that’s what my kids are learning to do.
>> For the people that think that sand came first, then I’m going to ask you another question. If sand came first, where did the sand come from? Okay, where would sand come from. Even if you don’t agree with those people, I still want you think about this question. If sand came first, was it always sand? Did it start off as sand, or did sand come from something else?
>> If you want to dig in there, keep on digging, you’ll find different colors — different kinds of rocks.
>> [Inaudible] how did you think sand was made.
>> [Inaudible] did come first before sand, so how do you think sand was made?
>> I don’t know.
>> I think it’s different.
>> — rocks, powder, and different pieces of rocks put together.
>> Yeah. Because there’s different color sands.
>> Yeah.
>> There’s little cracks in them.
>> Some sand have rocks in them. Little, little pieces of rocks.
>> I actually have some rocks here. It is called — okay, granite.
>> Through the inquiry approach, by having them actually hold rocks that are from that region of the United States, for them to actually do the experiments and tests that real geologists would use, it gets them excited about it. They’re doing the science, they’re not just reading about it. They’re not memorizing science. They’re learning to think like scientists do and to act like scientists do. It also hooks them into it. It really engaged them. I think it kept them, got their attention and helped keep their attention throughout the unit.
>> And I will give — each group will have available to use five of them, five rocks, a jar, and your old friend the magnifying glass. And lastly, a piece of white paper. Here’s what I’d like you to do. I’d like you to come up with a plan, each group to come up with a plan. How can we test which hypothesis of rocks are what makes sand.
>> Take two of the same type of rock and rub them together to see what comes out, if powder comes out or something comes out.
>> Good. Tamethia [Phonetic]?
>> We was going to rub the rocks together on the paper to see, like, what would happen. How would it come out.
>> Why would you say on the paper. You’re the first group I’ve heard say that. Why would —
>> Because it’s better to see on the paper than in the jar.
>> Yeah, everyone hear what Tamethia said? She suggested that her group is going to rub the rocks onto the white paper so they’re easier to see. Because remember, I’m going to give you magnifying glasses. And she said that might make it easier. Because originally I know you were talking about putting the sand in the jar, right? And then holding it up. But the paper —
>> It’s better to do it on the paper, because the paper is much lighter than the jar.
>> Yeah. So you might have a better chance of seeing the sand if it’s on the paper. Good idea.
>> We was going, like, act like the ocean, by, like, taking a bucket of water and just, like, splashing to see if, like, stuff comes out.
>> Could use this like the bucket?
>> Yeah.
>> Okay, we have a lid on it so it doesn’t spill. That’s the only thing I could suggest, so you don’t get water all over the room.
>> One of the challenges of using the inquiry strategy in the classroom is it can be more intensive, in terms of time, in terms of my own mental energy. The preparation needed to get ready for this type of class. All of that requires preparation beforehand. So my homework is to, you know, the day before, the week before, start getting the lab ready. I need to think long term.
>> This one — this one has all these nice shiny minerals. You look at this one, this one looks rough.
[ Background noise and comments ]
>> Have you been shaking it?
>> Yeah.
>> And we did it on the paper too. Look.
>> This, this, this, and this. Which one do you call sand, when do you start calling it sand?
>> That.
>> Because I think what happened was that when you keep on rubbing it, it gets smaller and smaller and smaller.
>> So what would you call this one?
>> [Inaudible] like a rock.
>> It’s like, a multicultural rock, because there’s a whole bunch of different type of what looks like — and I know some parts are shiny like a crystal.
>> Obviously in nature there aren’t these plastic jars out rolling around in the Grand Canyon. So what do you think is causing — just like you did in the class, whether you’re rubbing the rocks together or shaking them together, what’s happening in nature that’s making the sand. Because it’s not the jars, you know that. That’s your homework tonight. Write in your notebook, tell me what is it in nature that’s causing the same thing that you’re doing with your hand or with the jars. But — so that’s what you did today —
>> It’s teaching them habits of mind that I think are invaluable. Whether or not they stay in science or go into a different career field, I’m hoping that all of my students will walk out of my classroom at the end of the year stronger critical thinkers, and they will approach a problem and not immediately feel like they need to turn to someone else or turn to a book for an answer. That they’ll realize that within themselves they have the ability to — and the tools to start the discovery process to try to find the answers on their own. And I think that’s an invaluable gift we can give the students that they can use anywhere from this point on. -
Navigating the Overlap: Challenges Faced as a Safety Professional As a safety professional, it is my responsibility to ensure the safety and well-being of employees in the workplace. This includes complying with various regulations and standards set by different governing bodies
Reflect on how, as a safety professional, you would respond to the overlap in Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) standards and state or local building, electrical, and life safety regulations. In your opinion, what might be the most significant challenges?
Your journal entry must be at least 400 words in length. No references or citations are necessary. -
“Reflection on a Client Session: Integrating Legal/Ethical Considerations, Health Promotion, and Risk Factors”
Reflection notes: What would you do differently with this client if you could conduct the session over? Also include in your reflection a discussion related to legal/ethical considerations (demonstrate critical thinking beyond confidentiality and consent for treatment!), health promotion and disease prevention taking into consideration patient factors (such as age, ethnic group, etc.), PMH, and other risk factors (e.g., socioeconomic, cultural background, etc.).
I will add / upload the trancript of the patient video /interview psych assessment. -
Title: The Theatre of the Absurd in Beckett’s “Waiting for Godot”
In a 2-3 page essay, using one other critical source in addition to the text of the play itself, Discuss how the conventions of the theatre of the absurd are used by Beckett and why this helps him develop a theme of nothingness and futility? Don’t forget a Works Cited page.
Please when using citations make sure you are using ” ” and citing where you got it from any page numbers, and the time stamp from the youtube video.
Under no circumtances can AI be in this paper -
“The Intersection of Science and Art: Exploring Theory Development and Evaluation” Introduction The process of theory development and evaluation is a critical aspect of scientific inquiry that involves the exploration, refinement, and testing of hypotheses to explain phenomena. It is a dynamic
Examine the science and art of theory development and evaluation.
Submission Instructions:
Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points. -
“Exploring the Evolution of Anthropological Study in Europe through Three Book-Length Ethnographies”
Due: Wednesday, Week 4, 11:59 p.m. Points: 100 Word count: 5 pages/1,250 words (not counting the references cited list). The purpose of this assignment is to examine three book-length ethnographies of Europe, chosen from a pre-approved list, one from each of three eras: • Classic; • Post-Cold War; • 21st century. You will not need to read the books (although you can, if you can squeeze in the time), but you will need to ready about them and write about a 250 word description of each, plus a synopsis of about 500 words discussing what the three books tell you about the foci of anthropological study in those three eras. Requirements • At least three book-length, ethnographic works by anthropologists. A pre-approved list is provided. Note that new books in the “21st century” category are coming out all the time, so if you find something interesting that isn’t on that list, run it by me for approval. • For each of these sources, you should prepare to describe them in about a page. • You will not have to read each, but you will need to read about them in book reviews published in the academic press. If they are very new, reviews may not be available yet, but you can determine a fair amount about the subject from the publisher description. Some of the older books are so classic, that you can read about them in places other than the academic journals. • Discuss what the collection of three tells you about the study of Europe as an anthropological subject and how that study has changed over time. Important parameters • Be sure that you have properly formatted your bibliography. You must use the Chicago, MLA, or APA formatting and you must provide both a references cited list and in-text citations that show where you are using those listed works. • Cite in-text and provide bibliographic information about any reviews you use. • Write concisely and clearly, but with enough detail that readers can get a good idea of what the book is about. • Submit as a Word or Pages or other word-processing document, not a pdf.