Trusted Essay Writer

Author: admin

  • “Exploring the Impact of Social Media on Society: A Critical Analysis”

    I attached a file of an example of what my teacher gave us . that is how she wants it .
    I also attached a file to give you what my paper is going to be about . if you have any questions please don’t hesitate to ask

  • Title: The Impact of Social Media on Mental Health: Exploring the Connection and Promoting Positive Usage

    Instructions will be uploaded later.
    Important Info
    The order was placed through a short procedure (customer skipped some order details).
    Please clarify some paper details before starting to work on the order.
    Type of paper and subject
    Number of sources and formatting style
    Type of service (writing, rewriting, etc)

  • “Assist Clients with Medication Online Exam Assistance Request”

    Below are
    the login details: for online exam, I have been doing it and I couldn’t finish
    it as questions continued to be tougher for me. It is currently sitting on 64.8
    % and it is a multiple choice.
    If you
    could work on it, I will appreciate.
    Course
    HLTHPS006 – Assist clients with medication (3Hrs) Face-to-Face Training &
    Assessment + online e-Learning
    Commences: Tue, 4 Jun 2024
    Status: IN PROGRESS
    You have 80 days to complete this
    course.
    open course 
    Competency Assessment
    Online Exam

  • “Fine Start with Room for Improvement: Revising and Rebutting in Utilitarianism and the Case Study”

    Feedback from week 3 assignment. Your work is off to a fine start with some opportunities for improvement as you work on your final draft. Your thesis and opening paragraph are very well done and you apply most course material effectively to the case study. One revision needed is to replace your discussion of consequentialism with utilitarianism–you have mislabeled the theory. In addition to making the revision noted above, please be sure to also consider and rebut an objection to your thesis as you work on the final draft of your paper due in week five.

  • Title: Reflection on Health Literacy Universal Precautions Toolkit Tool #4: Communication Observation Form

    please check grammar, spelling and APA citation .
    Instructions
    Explore the AHRQ’s Health Literacy Universal Precautions Toolkit, 3rd EditionLinks to an external site..
    Choose ONE of the many tools to discuss in your reflection. Do not select the Communication Observation Form or the Communication Self-Assessment, as these are parts of one of the tools but not a tool itself.
    From Communicate Clearly: Tool #4, complete either the Communication Observation Form. OR the Communication Self-Assessment.
    Submit a double-spaced two- to three-page, a title page, and a reference page. Write the APA-formatted paper discussing the tool you selected for #2 and your choice of form for #3. Be sure to address the following:
    What tool did you choose to review? Provide a brief summary of what the tool suggests should be done and how this relates to patient education and engagement. Please note that you must include a reference for the tool you choose in your reference list and at least one in-text citation referring to the tool you reviewed.
    Have you seen the recommended actions taken in clinical settings? Provide at least 2 examples that support your answer. What would you recommend to improve the area you explored? Keep in mind that there is always room for improvement.
    Include the completed assessment form you selected, the “Communication Observation Form” or “Communication Self-Assessment,” including comments about what went well and areas for improvement. (Note: this must include a separate citation in the reference list and in the text separate from part a).
    Was the assessment form you completed accurately representing how a patient encounter went? Why or why not? Should these be used regularly in our practice? Be sure to provide support for your ideas.

  • Ethical Dilemmas in Counseling Scenario 1: Confidentiality in Groups Question 1: What ethical codes from ASCA or ACA apply to confidentiality in group counseling? Answer: The ethical codes from ASCA and ACA that apply to confidentiality

    In this assignment you will be apply the skills and knowledge you have been developing throughout this course to answer questions related to four scenarios. Apply related ASCA or ACA Codes of Ethics in your responses regarding confidentiality in groups, working with couples, obstacles of private practice, and issues related to telehealth.
    Access the “Scenario Analysis” document. Complete the document according to the assignment guidelines.

  • Title: The Three Laws of Motion and Their Real-World Applications

    Describe the 3 laws of Newton motion and their applications , requirement to be 8 pages. I will block you if you use AI. I am very strict.

  • “Interdisciplinary Collaboration in Healthcare: Addressing Challenges and Improving Patient Outcomes”

    For this assessment, you will create a 2-4 page report on an interview you have conducted with a health care professional. You will identify an issue from the interview that could be improved with an interdisciplinary approach, and review best practices and evidence to address the issue.

  • Judicial Activism vs. Restraint: Examining the Proper Role of Judges in Constitutional Interpretation

    Write an essay of 1,000 to 1,250 words, discussing the following:
    Explain the concepts of judicial activism and restraint.
    Describe the appropriate lens for judges to examine the Constitution.
    Justify your advocacy for the position of activism or restraint with Peer-Reviewed analysis.
    Utilize the following subheadings: Introduction, Judicial Activism and Restraint, The Proper “Lens” of Judicial Interpretation, Conclusion, and References.
    Be sure to cite three to five relevant peer-reviewed sources in support of your content. Use only sources found at the GCU Library, government websites/legal case sites or those provided in Topic Materials.
    Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
    This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
    You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

  • Module 4 Work Breakdown Structure for Project Charter Assignment “Developing a Comprehensive Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) for Effective Project Management”

    This module’s assignment is a continuation of the event you planned in your Module 3 Project Charter assignment.  You will be working on the same projects; however, now your task is to focus on the scope. 
    Instructions
    Utilizing the project you described in your Module 3 Project Charter assignment, create a Work Breakdown Structure (WBS).
    Step 1: List the highest level requirements/deliverables
    Step 2:  Break up each high level requirement into sub-deliverables. (Hint: deliverables and sub-deliverables will be nouns). Keep breaking down sub-deliverables until you are at the lowest level that still makes sense.
    Step 3: Break down each of the lowest sub-deliverables into work packages or activities.
    Step 4: Review work packages and WBS to make sure the project is complete. Ask yourself, if you “add up” all the work packages, sub-deliverables, and deliverables would your project be complete? If not, then you are missing a deliverable or work package.
    Step 5: Use Intelligent Numbering to mark your WBS entries as demonstrated in our text and the image above.
    The preferred format of the WBS is in chart form as demonstrated in the textbook as well as the “Project Planning with Sticky Notes” video. Most processing programs (Word, Google Docs, etc.)  allow you to insert shapes with text.  If you have trouble with this, it is fine to hand-draw the chart, but it should be neat and legible. 
    How you can plan for success
    Follow the steps above carefully.
    Rubric
    WBS Rubric
    WBS Rubric
    Criteria Ratings Pts
    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDetail
    20 to >17.0 pts
    Outstanding
    Provided a concise and easily actionable list of deliverables/activities and incorporated these into a WBS that will contribute precise project planning.
    17 to >14.0 pts
    Very Good
    Clearly and concisely listed activities and developed a clear WBS that would allow for project planning.
    14 to >11.0 pts
    Satisfactory
    Provided an adequate list of activities reflected through the WBS.
    11 to >0 pts
    Poor or Marginal
    Activity/deliverable list insufficiently detailed
    20 pts
    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCompleteness
    20 to >17.0 pts
    Outstanding
    Provided an exceptionally detailed and complete WBS reflecting excellent research and knowledge of the final project
    17 to >14.0 pts
    Very Good
    Provided a complete WBS that encompassed necessary activities with sufficient details within the three (or more) levels to plan the task.
    14 to >11.0 pts
    Satisfactory
    Included a WBS that identified major activities and some actionable details at the 3 or more levels.
    11 to >0 pts
    Poor or Marginal
    WBS would not logically result in the final product.
    20 pts
    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAccuracy
    20 to >17.0 pts
    Outstanding
    WBS contains all items related to construction, including intangibles and contingency items.
    17 to >14.0 pts
    Very Good
    WBS contains only items related to the project
    14 to >11.0 pts
    Satisfactory
    WBS contains extraneous items or lacks items related to project completion
    11 to >0 pts
    Poor or Marginal
    Activity/deliverable list used for the WBS missing major items
    20 pts
    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClarity
    20 to >17.0 pts
    Outstanding
    WBS is exceptionally clear and easy to comprehend without additional explanation.
    17 to >14.0 pts
    Very Good
    WBS is clear and comprehensible
    14 to >11.0 pts
    Satisfactory
    WBS can be understood with additional text.
    11 to >0 pts
    Poor or Marginal
    WBS is unclear, difficult to comprehend even with additional text
    20 pts
    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntelligent Numbering and Presentation
    20 to >17.0 pts
    Outstanding
    Provided an exceptionally well formatted and attractive WBS. Intelligent Numbering system is properly utilized.
    17 to >14.0 pts
    Very Good
    Provided a competent, professional WBS. Intelligent Numbering system is properly utilized with few mistakes.
    14 to >11.0 pts
    Satisfactory
    Provided a functional and legible WBS. Intelligent Numbering system is present but contains multiple errors.
    11 to >0 pts
    Poor or Marginal
    WBS not understandable, related, or legible. Intelligent Numbering system is not present.
    20 pts
    Total Points: 100
    PreviousNext