Author: admin

  • Title: Exploring Social Stratification: Systems and Marx’s Perspective

    Instructions
    Social stratification is the structured inequality between different groups of people. Karl Marx provided one of the earliest explanations of the conditions of social stratification within societies. His explanations focused on an economic analysis of capitalism as a primary reason for social stratification. Marx identified the conflict between social classes as one of the major reasons for social stratification.
    The class system is one of the four systems of stratification that have existed in societies around the world. Think about the other systems of stratification that sociologists have identified.
    Write an essay in which you identify and define the remaining systems of stratification. Next, discuss the major components of Karl Marx’s view of social stratification.

  • “Exploring Conflicts in Society: A Comparison of No Face and Trifles” “Exploring Self-Conflict and Societal Influences in Trifles by Susan Glaspell and “No Face” by Junot Diaz”

    Written Assignment 2: Based on any of the four stories read in class, write a APA five
    paragraph compare and contrast essay based on three types or one type of conflict, man vs.
    man, man vs. self, and man vs. society. There are two options for this assignment:
    “Hunger Artist” by Franz Kafka
    “The Accident” by Dave Eggers
    “No Face” by Junot Diaz
    Trifles by Susan Glaspell
    *Times New Roman, 12 Font, Double Spaced
    Option 1: Focus on one type of conflict
    No Face and Trifles (Man vs. Society)
    1.) Judgment
    2.) Hierarchy
    3.) Culture
    Outline
    Paragraph 1 Introduction (4-5 sentences): Thesis Statement
    -Supporting points (three ways the specified conflict is present)
    Paragraph 2 Supporting Point 1 (5-6 sentences): man vs. society
    -examples, details, two in-text citations one from each story,
    Paragraph 3 Supporting point 2 (5-6 sentences): man vs. society
    -examples, details, two in-text citations one from each story,
    Paragraph 4 Supporting point 3 (5-6 sentences): man vs. society
    -examples, details, two in-text citations one from each story,
    Paragraph 5 Conclusion (4-5 sentences): Closing thoughts/Mention titles and authors one more
    time. How are both of these stories relevant to present society?
    ntroduction
    In the play Trifles by Susan Glaspell and the short story “No Face” by Junot Diaz, there
    are similarities in conflict between the protagonists and society. Both No Face and Mrs. Wright
    are harshly judged for circumstances that they have no control over. Knowingly or unknowingly,
    one character from each story is willing to stand up to the hierarchy of society. Nevertheless,
    there is clearly a focus on the culture which sparks an intriguing societal perception of feminism
    versus masculinity.
    Judgment
    The judgment laid down by society is strong enough to keep No Face and Mrs. Wright in
    isolation. No Face cannot go out without being judged for how he looks, and Mrs. Wright cannot
    leave her home without people questioning the unhappiness that exists within her marriage.
    While their circumstances are out of their control, they still attempt to live their daily lives. No
    Face’s name is in fact a major part of his identity which he unfortunately acquires after being
    attacked by a pig. Diaz (1996) says, “He knows he should go but the morning fog covers
    everything…No Face! A few of them yell out but he has no time for them” (p.577). No Face
    leaves home before he can be ridiculed by his family, and he rushes past shopkeepers before they
    can mistreat him. Their judgment is based on his facial disfiguration. Likewise, Mrs. Wright is
    judged by her peers who suspects she murdered her husband. Mrs. Hale says, “I’d hate to have
    men coming into my kitchen, snooping around and criticizing” (Glaspell, 1919, 1.1.56).
    Ironically, in their attempt to identify a motive, they make mention of the type of woman she was
    prior to being married. She was happier before she was married, and it appears to be common
    knowledge that her husband made her life difficult. While he is not being judged for what he did
    to her, she is in fact judged by what she might have done to him. Both characters are suspects
    based on the supposed threat they pose to society.
    Padre Lu and Mrs. Hale stand up against hierarchy in society.
    Masculinity vs. Feminism
    Conclusion
    Option 2: Focus on three types of conflict:
    No Face and Trifles
    1.) Personal choice (man vs. self)
    2.) Voices debating their rightful places (man vs. man)
    3.) Cultural and traditional rules in society (man vs. society)
    Outline
    Paragraph 1 Introduction (4-5 sentences): Thesis Statement
    -Supporting points (inner, personal, extra personal)
    Paragraph 2 Supporting Point 1 (5-6 sentences): man vs. self
    -examples, details, two in-text citations one from each story,
    Paragraph 3 Supporting point 2 (5-6 sentences): man vs. man
    -examples, details, two in-text citations one from each story,
    Paragraph 4 Supporting point 3 (5-6 sentences): man vs. society
    -examples, details, two in-text citations one from each story,
    Paragraph 5 Conclusion (4-5 sentences): Closing thoughts. How are both of these stories
    relevant to present society?
    Option 2
    Introduction
    In the play Trifles by Susan Glaspell and the short story “No Face” by Junot Diaz, there
    are similarities and differences among self, interpersonal, and societal conflicts. No Face and
    Mrs. Wright struggle with the choices they must make to survive. Other voices in each story
    debate the rightful place of the protagonists. Finally, cultural and traditional rules are reflected in
    each story ultimately illuminating the core issues that establish the foundation for such conflicts.
    Man vs. Self
    No Face and Mrs. Wright encounter self-conflicts after being confronted with choices of
    survival. No Face is viewed as both mysterious and monstrous because his face is disfigured. He
    seeks acceptance but knows this is not an option. When confronted by a group of young boys
    who have intentions of turning him into a girl, he has a choice to make. He knows that he is
    strong and can more than likely kill each of them. However, he knows this is not the answer as it
    would confirm his crucifixion. Nevertheless, “he says strength and the fat boy flies off him and
    he’s running down the street and the others are following” (Diaz, 1996, p.578). His conscious
    decision to use his strength to run opposed to fight highlights his ability to overcome self-
    conflict. Similarly, Mrs. Wright grapples with self-conflict on a daily basis when she attempts to
    avoid the wrath of her husband. She steps into her role as a housewife and performs her duties.
    Nonetheless, when confronted by his sour attitude, she attempts to protect the one thing that
    keeps her sane. The murder of her bird throws her into a self-conflict that results in the death of
    her husband. Mrs. Hale says, “I wonder how it would seem to never have had any children
    around. No, Wright wouldn’t like the bird-a thing that sang. She used to sing. He killed that, too”
    (Glaspell, 1916, 1.1.123-125). Her choice to end his life was in many ways her ability to begin a
    new life even if it meant being branded as a murderer. Self-conflict within both characters arise
    making them question everything within themselves.
    Voices of other characters> Padre Lou and Mrs. Peters represents the fundamental pillars that
    influence the decisions of men and women.
    Padre Lou represents religion
    Mrs. Peters represents the law
    APA Format
    Cover Page >Header left hand corner, page numbers right hand corner, title, your name,
    school’s name, class time (centered)
    References> List of stories in alphabetical order (references will be provided)
    Short Citations
    Diaz (1996) says, “Their mission was to accomplish the goals that would keep them alive” (p.1)
    “Their mission was to accomplish the goals that would keep them alive” (Diaz, 1996, p.1).
    Paraphrase Citations
    They completed the goals that helped them accomplish their mission (Diaz, 1996).
    Trifles Play APA Format
    The County Attorney says, “Well, Mr. Hale, tell just what happened when you came here
    yesterday morning” (Glaspell, 1916, 1.1.56)
    (Act. Scene. Line #).
    References
    Carver, R. (1981). Cathedral. Kirsner & Mandell Compact Literature: Reading, Reacting,
    Writing, 9th Edition. Cengage. Boston, M.A.
    Diaz, J. (1996). No Face. Kirsner & Mandell Compact Literature: Reading, Reacting, Writing,
    9th Edition. Cengage. Boston, M.A.
    Eggers, D. (1929). The Accident. Kirsner & Mandell Compact Literature: Reading, Reacting,
    Writing, 9th Edition. Cengage. Boston, M.A.
    Glaspell, S. (1916). Trifles. Kirsner & Mandell Compact Literature: Reading, Reacting, Writing,Glaspell, S. (1916). Trifles. Kirsner & Mandell Compact Literature: Reading, Reacting, Writing,
    9th Edition. Cengage. Boston, M.A.
    Kafka, F. (1924). Hunger Artist. Kirsner & Mandell Compact Literature: Reading, Reacting,
    Writing, 9th Edition. Cengage. Boston, M.A.

  • Presentation Voiceover Recording

    Need someone to do the presentation voice for me no speaker notes need just need to present it and record audio.Im shy I didn’t mind doing the presentation I just don’t like speaking. No longer than six minutes for video. U may add any edits if you would like not needed

  • Insights and Probing Questions from Discussion Video on Racism and Cultural Competence in Social Work “Empathetic Listening: Understanding Others Through Their Lens”

    Respond to two separately:
    Share an insight gained from reading their post.
    Ask a probing question that will help you gain a deeper understanding of their response.
    Post 1 Erin
    This week’s discussion video was fascinating and informative in bringing to light the awareness that even nowadays with how we have come so far there are still times of racism and discrimination along with unequal viewpoints of individuals. A part of this video that touched me was the moment when Dr. Roberts spoke of it not being the client’s responsibility to justify or clarify their culture. “It is their responsibility to share with you about who they are and how they are seen or impacted by the world. But it’s your responsibility as a practitioner that when you have those questions, you use the resources that you must go out and explore new things. You’re the person who takes the initiative and does not expect to sit in your office or on the phone or camera and everybody brings what they need, or they think they need to you. That you have some responsibility in that encounter”. This resonated with me in the fact of speaking about how in many different environments not just therapeutic the expectation is set that the client with bring all of what they need to you and will do the footwork to clarify to you their needs and background. This is a false picture as the clients are there to share their experience and how they felt at that time and you as the provider are there to figure out why and how to fix it based on the information that you find and what you did for.  I have seen this so many times in my time in the Navy. The expectation is set that the sailor is going to come to the chain of command and give them all the background and information as to why things happened to them and why they feel the way they do however how it should be is the sailor bringing the problem up then the chain of command digging into the background to find an answer as to why to give to the sailor. One strategy or thought that I will take away from this discussion and apply to future self-awareness and or cultural competence is what was said by Dr. Roberts again in the fact of understanding everyone is different. This sentence explains that not every client that you receive or engage with will be the same and or have the same needs. Going back to the prior quote of Dr. Roberts it is our job as clinicians to realize and accept that everyone is different, and the work will be different each time in this field. The social work field is ever-changing, and it is our job to continue to support it.
    Post 2 Jessica
    What idea, experience, or statement resonated with you the most, and why?
    An idea that resonated with me is hard to choose because the whole video offered good insight. However, I will go with the conversation regarding George Floyd. She stated that when his murder happened, there was a call for what WE can do to address and create spaces to have conversations that will lead to more inclusion, awareness, and social justice (Walden, 2021). As well as the ability to view and understand our own strengths and weaknesses so we may be more culturally competent social workers. This resonated with me because I remember when this tragedy happened and I remember thinking, whose job is it to create these changes and offer the world more than where we are right now? The answer was and is social work. We have the ability to create changes on a macro, micro, and mezzo level! We have the ability to offer help and compassion to those that need us and to enlighten and promote social justice and inclusion to others. We as social workers have “power” to help create positive change and combat the injustices.
    What is one strategy described in the video that you will apply toward your self-awareness and/or cultural competence? How might this strategy help when working with a client who is racially or ethnically different from you?
    A strategy discussed in the video would be analyzing ourselves, facing our fears, creating a space for connection to allow for the stories. Asking a person questions about their experience, what lens they are seeing it through and being able to listen.By listening to the person and understanding from that person’s point of view, their lens, will help me better understand them and connect to them. Without that how could I really help them if it’s only on my level of understanding.

  • The Relationship between Psychological Fulfillment and Social Benefit in Gaming In her TED Talk, “Be a Gamer, Save the World,” Jane McGonigal argues that gaming has the potential to not only bring psychological fulfillment to individuals but also create

    Answer and discuss one of the following with your peers this week 
    Jane McGonigal in “Be a Gamer, Save the World,” makes two distinct claims: that gaming is psychologically fulfilling and that gaming is socially beneficial. Is there a relationship between these two claims? How are they connected? Does one have priority over the other? Use 1-2 in-text citations to back your points.

  • “Mastering Neurological Disorders: A Visual Guide for Effective Studying” Infographic/Video Presentation: Title: Understanding Alterations in Cognitive Systems Introduction: – Brief overview of cognitive systems and their importance in daily functioning Body: – Definition

    Week 6: Digital Study Tool
    Points 20
    Submitting a text entry box, a website url, a media recording, or a file upload
    Available until Jun 30 at 11:59pm
    This week, you will have the opportunity to unleash your creativity in order to help you and your classmates study.  
    For this assignment you will be able to create an infographic or video presentation and upload it here for grading.
    Assignment Instructions:
    1. Select one of the topics below.
    Alterations in Cognitive Systems, (Chapter 16, p. 351)
    Alterations in Cerebral Hemodynamics, (Chapter 16, p. 367)
    Alterations in Neuromotor Function (Chapter 16, p. 370)
    Central Nervous System Disorders (Chapter 17, p. 384)
    Peripheral Nervous System Disorders (Chapter 17, p. 405)
    Tumors of the Central Nervous System (Chapter 17, p. 406)
    Alterations of Neurologic Function in Children (Chapter 18, p. 414)
    2. Explore the topic and gather the information needed to teach your fellow learners.
    3. Please create these items using infographics (Canva.com) or video (Powtoon.com). If you would like to use a different media source, please email your Instructor first for permission.

  • Title: Exploring the Elements: AIR and FIRE Experiences

    1) Describe your experience 1)greeting, 2) feeling, 3) expressing gratitude with the AIR element.  What was this like for you?  Did you have thoughts? Did you experience emotions? Did you have sensory experiences–sight, smell, taste, touch, hearing.  Were you indoors or outdoors? Both? Share any experiences you would like to share and if you have any questions please ask.
    2) Next write about your experience with the FIRE element.  Follow the instructions above.

  • “Perfecting the Essay: A Guide to Winning Essay Contests”

    Please make sure the essay is perfect is essay contest and please follow instruction
    They ask MLA firmat and three sourses

  • “Expanding the Search: Adding Peer-Reviewed Research Articles to Inform a Social Work Topic of Interest”

    Last week, you began searching in the Walden Library for peer-reviewed research articles on your social work topic of interest. What have you found so far? What is missing? Take stock of your search results and consider whether you need to adjust your search terms to expand your results or use limiters or filters to narrow them down.
    The research process involves repeated consultation with the existing literature to understand what is known on the topic—and what is not known. The “not known,” in other words the gap, indicates the need for further investigation in the form of a research study.
    For this Assignment, you continue searching in the Walden Library for three more peer-reviewed research articles. You also refine your use of APA style in your referencing.
    Required Reading:
    Yegidis, B. L., Weinbach, R. W., & Myers, L. L. (2018). Research methods for social workers (8th ed.). Pearson.
    Chapter 2: Ethical Issues in Research (pp. 24–51)
    DeAngelis, T. (2015). In search of cultural competenceLinks to an external site.. American Psychological Association: Monitor on Psychology, 46(3). https://www.apa.org/monitor/2015/03/cultural-competence
    National Association of Social Workers. (n.d.). Code of ethicsLinks to an external site.. https://www.socialworkers.org/About/Ethics/Code-of-Ethics/Code-of-Ethics-English
    Scharff, D. P., Mathews, K. J., Jackson, P., Hoffsuemmer, J., Martin, E., & Edwards, D. (2010). More than Tuskegee: Understanding mistrust about research participationLinks to an external site.. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 21(3), 879–897. https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.0.0323
    Required Media
    NIHRtv. (2020, July 1). An introduction to cultural competence in researchLinks to an external site. [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_VEibZOP01c
    Note: The approximate length of this media piece is 11 minutes.
    Walden University, LLC. (2013). Parker family (Episode 4) [Video]. In Sessions. https://class.waldenu.edu
    Note: The approximate length of this media piece is 1 minute.
    Review any feedback you have received on your Week 2 Library Searching Assignment and revise accordingly.
    Search for at least three additional peer-reviewed research articles on your topic that have been published within the past 5 years.  
    Submit your updated Library Searching document from last week, adding at least three new peer-reviewed research articles for a total of six.
    Ensure that you have referenced the articles in APA Style.
    Include a brief explanation of each article’s appropriateness to your topic.

  • Title: Examining Color-Blindness and Racism: Myths and Realities

    Learning objective: 
    LO 9.1 Contrast the myth and reality of race, race and ethnicity, and minority and dominant groups; discuss ethnic work. (p. 260) LO 9.2 Contrast prejudice and discrimination and individual and institutional discrimination; discuss learning prejudice, internalizing dominant norms, and institutional discrimination. (p. 265)
    Description: 
    After watching the video, answer the following questions. Each question (number) should be answered in 75-150 words. Be sure to cite information/data/arguments taken from external sources. 
    1. What does it mean to be racially color blind? What are the assumptions of color-blindness? Evaluate the validity of these assumptions.
    2. We observe differences from a young age and create categories. Society is structured around many of these categories. What happens if we try to suppress certain categories? Think about your own racial/ethnic identity—or any part of your identity—what if you were told it didn’t matter? How would it impact you? 
    3. Color-blindness is offered as a solution to racism. Can color-blindness solve racism? Why or why not? What other reasons did the video pose as reasons people promote color-blindness? Discuss the validity.
    4. If being color-blind is not the solution to racism, then what is? How can we see color and not ignore our own or others’ identity without racism and discrimination?
    https://mediaplayer.pearsoncmg.com/assets/_video.true/sociology_2017_blue_chalk_videos-colorblind_racism