Trusted Essay Writer

Author: admin

  • Title: Summary of Paper on [Topic] Introduction: The purpose of this paper is to summarize the key points and findings of the original paper on [topic]. The paper discusses [main topic] and its impact on [relevant subject]. The goal

    I started writing the paper, I need it to be summarized in two pages max in aerial font 12,
    Please follow the instructions and the same format(memo) shown in the instruction document. if each paragraph can have short sentences in the active voice (15 words max)that would be great. it does not have to be 1100 words it can be shorter.

  • “Ensuring Compliance: A Health Care Manager’s Responsibility and Response to Regulations and Violations”

    Your initial/original responses to the discussion questions need to show your understanding of the content being discussed. You may use your e-text as a reference you must use APA formatting when citing references. I would suggest you try to relate “real world” experiences as much as possible to the discussions. 
    Write a response to one (or all if you wish) for the following discussion questions:
    Discussion 1 How will you as a health care manager ensure regulations are applied in your organization to maintain compliance? Provide an example. 
    Discussion 2 What would you do if you were a new CEO and found out the hospital has an Office of Inspector General [OIG] outstanding report for violations of federal laws and regulations regarding noncompliance of environmental, health, and safety violations?

  • Best Practices for Addressing Mental Health in Primary Care Settings Overview: Mental health is a significant health care problem that affects individuals of all ages and backgrounds. According to the National Institute of Mental Health, approximately one in five adults in the United

    For this assessment, research best practices related to a current health care problem. Your selected problem or issue will be utilized again in Assessment 4. To explore your chosen topic, you should use the first two steps of the Socratic Problem-Solving Approach to aid your critical thinking.
    Select one of the health care problems or issues presented in the Assessment 02 Supplement: Applying Research Skills [PDF] Download Assessment 02 Supplement: Applying Research Skills [PDF]resource. Write a brief overview of the selected health care problem or issue. In your overview:
    Summarize the health care problem or issue.
    Describe the professional relevance of this topic.
    Describe any professional experience you have with this topic.
    Identify peer-reviewed articles relevant to this health care issue or problem.
    Conduct a search for scholarly or academic peer-reviewed literature related to the topic and describe the criteria you used to search for articles, including the names of the databases you used. You will select four current scholarly or academic peer-reviewed journal articles published during the past 3–5 years that relate to your topic.
    Refer to the NHS-FPX4000: Developing a Health Care Perspective Library Guideto help you locate appropriate references.
    Use keywords related to the health care problem or issue you are researching to select relevant articles.
    Assess the credibility and explain relevance of the information sources you find.
    Determine if the source is from an academic peer-reviewed journal.
    Determine if the publication is current.
    Determine if information in the academic peer-reviewed journal article is still relevant.
    Analyze academic peer-reviewed journal articles using the annotated bibliography organizational format. Provide a rationale for inclusion of each selected article. The purpose of an annotated bibliography is to document a list of references along with key information about each one. The detail about the reference is the annotation. Developing this annotated bibliography will create a foundation of knowledge about the selected topic. In your annotated bibliography:
    Identify the purpose of the article.
    Summarize the information.
    Provide rationale for inclusion of each article.
    Include the conclusions and findings of the article.
    Write your annotated bibliography in a paragraph form. The annotated bibliography should be approximately 150 words (1–3 paragraphs) in length.
    List the full reference for the source in APA format (author, date, title, publisher, et cetera) and use APA format for the annotated bibliography.
    Make sure the references are listed in alphabetical order, are double-spaced, and use hanging indents.
    Summarize what you have learned while developing an annotated bibliography.
    Summarize what you learned from your research in a separate paragraph or two at the end of the paper.
    List the main points you learned from your research.
    Summarize the main contributions of the sources you chose and how they enhanced your knowledge about the topic.
    Example Assessment: You may use the following to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like:
    Assessment 2 Example [PDF] Download Assessment 2 Example [PDF].
    Your assessment should also meet the following requirements:
    Length: 3–5 typed, double-spaced pages, not including the title page and reference page.
    Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.
    APA tutorial: Use the APA Style Paper Tutorial [DOCX] for guidance.
    Written communication: Write clearly and logically, with correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and mechanics.
    Content: Provide a title page and reference page following APA style.
    References: Use at least four scholarly or academic peer-reviewed journal articles.
    APA format: Follow current APA guidelines for in-text citation of outside sources in the body of your paper and also on the reference page.

  • “Ethical Frameworks in Conflict: Exploring the Purpose and Impact of the Geneva Conventions”

    The Geneva Conventions are an attempt at creating a separate, rules-based global ethical framework. In this discussion, you will explain the purpose of the Geneva Conventions and examine a part of the conventions that resonates with your personal ethics. Discussing the Geneva Conventions with your peers can help you learn more about how ethical frameworks aid in understanding human actions. 
    Discussing challenges that face our world often means investigating opinions and ideas different from your own. Remember to remain thoughtful and respectful toward your peers and instructor in your initial and response discussion posts. 
    Create one initial post and respond to at least two of your classmates. 
    For your initial post, address the following:
    How would you explain the purpose of the Geneva Conventions to someone who has never heard of them?
    Describe a part of the conventions that resonates with your personal ethics and build an argument for why this should apply to all people and nation-states. 
    For your response posts, address the following:
    What do you think of your peer’s explanation of the Geneva Conventions?
    Consider your peer’s argument and argue the opposite. Why should your peer’s chosen part of the conventions not apply to all people and nation-states? 
    50 words each reply
    1. Cody EDELMAN posted Jun 11, 2024 1:29 AM
    The Geneva Conventions, a series of international treaties, establish rules and protections to ensure humane treatment during wartime, particularly for those not directly involved in the conflict, such as civilians, wounded soldiers, and medical personnel. Their primary aim is to mitigate the horrors of war by setting ethical standards that all participating nations must adhere to, thereby safeguarding human dignity even amidst hostilities. The consequences of not adhering to these conventions are dire, leading to the erosion of trust between nations, the escalation of violence, and the disregard for human life and dignity.
    A specific aspect of the Geneva Conventions that resonates deeply with me is the protection of medical personnel. This principle asserts that those providing medical care to the wounded and sick should be safeguarded from attack and allowed to perform their duties without interference. This aligns with my belief in the sanctity of life and the importance of humanitarian aid. Ensuring the safety and neutrality of medical workers not only saves lives but also upholds a fundamental aspect of human compassion and decency, which is crucial during the chaos of war. Imagine the potential if all nations universally adhere to this principle-a more humane and respectful approach to conflict, acknowledging the invaluable role of those who work to alleviate suffering and save lives.
    2. James Cannon posted Jun 10, 2024 2:00 PM
    If I had to describe the Geneva Conventions to someone unfamiliar with them, I’d say they are guidelines for nations involved in war for how to act ethically without causing unnecessary harm or death recklessly. Ultimately, they are there to protect only the most vulnerable and those who aren’t directly in the fight (like civilians, medical workers). The part of the Geneva Conventions that resonate with my personal values is the Fourth Convention, which aims to protect civilians even in occupied territory. Even in the military, you’d be hard pressed to find those who want war, but still they took an oath to defend their country willingly so they fully understand what they’re getting into and the risks involved. But, with an example like Ukraine, they did not ask to be invaded and want no part in armed conflict that’s been placed on them. It would be extremely depressing if civilians living peacefully in their homes could be brutally slaughtered because of political disputes, and unfortunately it still happens constantly, but there’s at least things in place to try to mitigate this, which is a good start.

  • “Bridging the Gap: Addressing Mental Health Differences Between Generations” “Applying Sociology to Real-World Issues: A Research Paper on Social Change and Community Collaboration” “Researching and Citing Sources in APA Style: A Guide for University Students”

    ***Topic***
    The subject I will be discussing is the differences in mental health across different generations. I will demonstrate how the younger generation have a greater understanding of mental health from a perspective standpoint compared to past generations. However, the crucial elements will be around how we may effectively connect and close this divide. Multiple individuals bear responsibility, however, our current focus should be on improving ourselves. The older generation faced significant social disapproval when seeking assistance, and those who did receive aid often had incorrect diagnoses. The majority of doctors were unaware of the underlying causes of mental health issues in that generation. However, another contributing factor was the promotion of newer medications to patients who lacked comprehension of their own condition. I will discuss the high rate of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among elderly veterans who have not received proper instruction on coping mechanisms for this condition. The absence of knowledge contributes to suicidal conduct and substance abuse. I will collect data to substantiate my claim that the older generation may require greater assistance in addressing mental health issues compared to the younger generation, primarily owing to their limited understanding.
    ***Assignment instructions***
    You should also review any relevant materials assigned this term that you’re using for your final research paper. Reach out early in the week with any questions you have for your instructor about your final paper and consider going over a draft with a coach in the Writing Center.
    In this course, you will research a topic that interests you or a subject you wish to learn more about. You will submit a topic in Week 3, and in Week 4, you’ll have an opportunity to interact with and receive feedback from your peers. Always reach out to your professor with any questions you may have.
    References Page: An APA References list is required for your research paper. Always double-check with your professor about your sources if you’re uncertain about their legitimacy. For the most part, academic journal articles and scholarly books are appropriate and credible; however, periodicals like Time, USA Today, or Cosmopolitan may or may not be advisable. Remember to cite accordingly, including information from class lectures, television and radio programs, and other media sources. Please use the latest edition of the APA Style Guide (American Psychological Association). Please use caution with information taken from sources more than five years old. Refer to the campus library for more details about sources and to the Writing Center for how to cite sources correctly in APA.
    Please make use of the Writing Center’s Research Paper Project Management PlanLinks to an external site. resource in addition to reviewing these steps involved in writing a research paper:
    Find a subject. Review the topics covered in class.
    Do preliminary research on the subject. This is important because if a topic is too hard to research, you must consider it more.
    Ask yourself why this research is essential to you. You may want to sit back after you’ve looked at your Topic and ask, “So what?” Consider why the issue or topic is crucial to narrow it down and decide if you want to pursue it.
    Prepare a preliminary bibliography that you will revise and return to often. Note the most interesting reads so that you can use those readings for your Annotated Bibliography.
    Take notes from appropriate sources (for some, it helps to use notecards).
    Construct a brief draft describing your topic, thesis statement, and relevancy. This will act as a guide to the rest of the research and writing process.
    Write a first draft.
    Revise the draft.
    Make sure there is a clear, strong introduction that maps out the problem/issue you are looking at and tells the reader your intentions for the remainder of the paper.
    Have a firm conclusion, discussing options for further research.
    Insert your in-text citations at the Revision stage.
    Finalize your paper, ensuring you’ve incorporated any feedback from your peer(s) or writing coach.
    A research paper receiving an “A” as a final grade will be free of mechanical errors. It is advisable to use GrammarlyLinks to an external site. before submitting your paper. It also helps to read documents aloud because you’ll likely hear things you didn’t notice during the reading and writing stages. Grades are based on content, demonstrated ability to do proper research, presentation, engagement with course themes, and following the guidelines outlined in these instructions.
    You might also consider submitting your papers to the Writing Center’s Paper ReviewLinks to an external site., which can help with organization and idea development.
    A reasonable conclusion restates the thesis while summarizing your main points. If the thesis and conclusion are consistent, not only with each other but also with the main points, you will have clearly and competently presented your research and arguments.
    A note on interviewing people:
    If you’d like to conduct personal interviews, that’s fine! This can enhance research and make it even more enjoyable. Should you choose to do this, you must do two things:
    If you are interested in interviewing for their research, must let your instructors know, fill in an Informed Consent Form Download Informed Consent Form, and have your instructors sign off on the project.
    Create interview questions and have them cleared and approved by your professor.
    You must do both tasks to move forward with your interviews.
    Your Doing Sociology Research Paper will reflect any significant changes you made in your work, paying heed to any instructor feedback provided and that you’ve received during the peer review.
    In your paper,
    Identify your chosen issue as one that enables you to engage in applied sociology.
    Summarize your topic as a social problem that would be improved by social change theory and applied sociology.
    Distinguish clearly the group that would be directly impacted by an applied sociological approach to the problem.
    Build a plan to resolve the issue that includes collaborating with the impacted group or community.
    Describe what you have learned in practicing applied sociology.
    The Doing Sociology Research Paper,
    must be seven to nine double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA StyleLinks to an external site. as outlined in the Writing Center’s APA Formatting for Microsoft WordLinks to an external site. resource.
    must include a separate title page with the following in title case:
    title of paper in bold font
    Space should appear between the title and the rest of the information on the title page.
    student’s name
    name of institution (The University of Arizona Global Campus)
    course name and number
    instructor’s name
    due date
    must utilize academic voice. Review the Academic VoiceLinks to an external site. resource for additional guidance.
    must include an introduction and conclusion paragraph.
    Your introductory paragraph must do the following:
    Contain a clear thesis statement that indicates the purpose of your paper and a clear overview of your topic.
    Address the topic of the paper with critical thought.
    Conclude by reaffirming your thesis or direction of your paper.
    For assistance on writing Introductions & ConclusionsLinks to an external site. and Writing a Thesis StatementLinks to an external site., refer to the Writing Center resources.
    must use at least five credible sources in addition to the course text, including a minimum of 2 from the University of Arizona Global Campus Library. Check out the UAGC Library’s Library OneSearchLinks to an external site. to help you gather resources.
    The Scholarly, Peer-Reviewed, and Other Credible SourcesLinks to an external site. table offers additional guidance on appropriate source types. If you have questions about whether a specific source is appropriate for this assignment, please contact your instructor. Your instructor has the final say about the appropriateness of a specific source.
    To assist you in completing the research required for this assignment, review Quick and Easy Library ResearchLinks to an external site. tutorial, which introduces the University of Arizona Global Campus Library and the research process, and provides some library search tips.
    must document any information used from sources in APA Style as outlined in the Writing Center’s APA: Citing Within Your PaperLinks to an external site. guide.
    must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA Style as outlined in the Writing Center.
    Review the APA: Formatting Your References ListLinks to an external site. resource in the Writing Center for specifications.
    Carefully review the Grading RubricLinks to an external site. for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.

  • “A Critical Analysis of Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics: Validity and Limitations”

    Description:  Every student in Phil. class is required to write a philosophy paper, minimum 1000 word count. The title page must include your total word count for your entire paper. This includes the entire content of your paper, from title page to cited source page.  It is to be double spaced, 12 font Times New Roman, MLA format, minimum two sources. The book and the notes can be used as sources, also academic journals, websites etc. Title page and works cited page required. Grading Rubrics: You will be graded on the following: paper outline, format, and bibliographical entries; which is your ability to illustrate an understanding of the topics and themes chosen for study, including explanation of issues, and lastly, the conclusions and outcomes which speak of student’s logical and reflective insights from the data and information that you have studied.  All quoted and gleaned material must be encased in quotations or if over 4 sentences must be indented.  Your quoted material must also be referenced to your citation page. Otherwise it will be considered plagiarized material. 
    Topic Selection: Explain and summarize Aristotle’s Nichomachean Ethics. Do you think it is a valid ethical system? Why or why not?

  • “Reflecting on Business Concepts: A Journey Through Commerce and Business Studies”

    1. Need to write 5 reflection
    * 1st Reflection topic: Demographics/Target Market   ( Subject: Year 10 Commerce)   
    **2nd Reflection Topic: Achieving Business Goals     (Subject: Year 11 Business)
    ***3rd Reflection Topic: Key Business Functions     ( Subject: Year 10 Commerce) 
    ***4th Reflection Topic:Achieving Business Goals    (Subject: Year 11 Business)
    *****5th Reflection: Types of law  ( Subject: Year 9 Commerce) 
    2. No word limit.
    3. AI & Plagiarsim Report .
    4. Sample Reflection is attached for your reference
    5. I have attached a Lesson Reflection Template in pdf format you have to write in this template.

  • “Examining Amazon’s Impact on the Global Retail Industry: A Literature Review” Title: The Prevalence of Academic Dishonesty in the Digital Age: Exploring the Impact of Technology on Cheating in Higher Education

    I tried this before and the teacher got a 31%. The teachers feedback is below. I would like my topic to be the same and still about Amazon (see attachment) – 
    ==========================================================
    What i originally wrote (attached) – was my paper that failed. I want the same topic. 
    the template (attached) – is from the assignment and should also help. 
    Note that whoever i choose to do this – you will also be hired to do the reaseach paper
    ============================================================
    CLASS IS —  ITMG498 I001
    For your draft, include all of the following
    Submit 8-10 double-spaced page literature review based on
    your topic.
    Submit your Final Paper in a Word file for grading. 
    Provided at least 10 references to support selected topic in
    the reference area.
    You need all of the following for your draft.
    Title Page
    Table of contents – Use Word to generate a table of contents
    Abstract
    Introduction
    The background of the topic
    Statement of the Problem
    Statement of the Purpose
    Research Questions
    Significance of the Study
    References
    Turnitin™
    This assignment
    will be submitted to Turnitin™.
    Instructions
    Rough Draft Paper:
    Submit 8-10
    double-spaced page literature review based on your topic.
    Submit your
    Final Paper in a Word file for grading.  
    Provided at
    least 10 references to support selected topic in the
    reference area.
    Specific
    Instructions for the Term Paper:
    1. Customize the title page for your
    own paper. This includes editing the “Running Head” in the page header, the
    title of your paper, and your name. If you don’t know how to edit a header in
    Word, Google for instructions on how to edit a header in the version of Word
    you are using and follow the instructions.
    2.  Add a table of content with
    an outline of all your major points and subpoints.
    3. Write a 150-250 word abstract for
    your term paper (on p. 2 of the Paper Template). The abstract should be a
    brief summary of your paper.
    4. Add an Introduction
    Introduction goes after the
    Abstract. Be sure the students include all of the following using level 2
    heading:
    The background of the topic
    Statement of the Problem
    Statement of the Purpose
    Research Questions
    Significance of the Study
    5. For each major section of the
    paper, you need to customize the sub-headings.  You may add additional
    sub-headings, as needed, but each section must have a minimum of three
    sub-headings, except for the Recommended Improvement section, which must have
    a minimum of five sub-headings.  Be sure to be descriptive in your
    sub-heading names, so that I know what content you intend to cover in each
    sub-heading.
    6. Add your references.
    NOTE: This assignment
    has the classroom TII (TurnItIn) feature turned on. This means that once your
    assignment has been submitted to this area, it will automatically be
    submitted to Turnitin.com database to generate an Originality Report with an
    Originality Index. It takes anywhere from a minute to 24 hours (or longer)
    for this report to be generated and returned to the classroom assignment
    area. Check often to see if the report has been generated.
    The acceptable criteria for the
    Originality Index (matching percent) in this course is a maximum of 15%,
    which means 15% of the submitted paper has been matched with sources in the
    database and hence is not original to the student’s work not including your
    references. Turnitin is used in this class to assess the originality
    of your work–you must have less than 15% Similarity/matching. Paraphrase
    instead of using direct quotes to reduce your matching percent to 15% or
    less.
    Submission
    Instructions:
    Written communication is an
    essential tool for any professional. As with any skill, writing well is the
    result of practice followed by feedback and the use of relevant and
    appropriate sources. Therefore, the quality of writing is graded as part of
    this assignment. It is easy for students to plagiarize – cut and paste right
    into a text document. It has been note, “Many college papers are
    published on the web and students can even become members of e-groups which,
    for a small fee, promise to deliver ‘A+’ papers on every topic. Ways to cheat
    are abundant on the Web.”
    Additional
    Sources:
    The APUS Library video
    Research Methods Information
    The Research Proposal
    APA Game (This
    will only function correctly on a mobile device or a modern web browser)
    What is
    a Scholarly Article—see the link: https://myclassroom.apus.edu/shared/commonfolder/science-and-technology-common/ITCC/ITCC500/APA%20Resources/What%20is%20a%20Scholarly%20Article.pdf
    Purdue Online Writing Lab
    Writing Commons: https://writingcommons.org/
    APA and MLA Citation Game Home
    Page
    What i originally wrote (attached) – was my paper that failed. I want the same topic. 
    the template (attached) – is from the assignment and should also help. 
    Note that whoever i choose to do this – you will also be hired to do the reaseach paper.

  • “Ethical Guidelines for Academic Writing”

    do not use AI and plagiarism, 
    do not contractors, I, YOU, YOUR, AND MY
    use full sentences and just paraphrase 
    do not add or remove any information
    use full sentences 

  • Title: The Debate on Art Restoration: Examining the Case of Leonardo da Vinci’s St. John the Baptist Introduction The restoration of artworks has been a controversial topic among historians for decades. On one hand, restoration can help preserve the physical

    Consider the debate among historians about art restoration. For example, in 2016 the Louvre Museum made the decision to restore Leonardo da Vinci’s St. John the Baptist. This sparked a debate regarding the altering of the image and artist intent. In this discussion students should consider the positions of the historians and decide should the artwork undergo restoration. Be specific in your reasons as you detail what the restoration would imply (the removal of glazing or varnish) and how it might impact (or if it will not) the artist work. Compare and contrast the results from the Da Vinci restoration.
    Did the restoration alter the artist’s work?
    How did the removal of the varnish change the work?
    Or was the varnish altering the artist’s work? How so?
    Does it change the way we experience the work? Or the content/meaning of the work?
    Requirements:
    Your original post answers should appear in paragraph format with a minimum of 500 words.