this assignment allows you to practice presenting arguments about an issue in a very particular style to acknowledge a hostile audience.
Author: admin
-
“Reflecting on Feedback to Refine and Improve My Lesson Plan”
Reflecting on original lesson plan (before practice teaching session): Before teaching your lesson, identify changes you would make to your lesson plan based on tutor and peer feedback to improve and/or refine your original lesson. This reflection will a) identify specific changes or additions to be made (e.g., timing or sequencing, use of different teaching strategies, resources, ways to better engage or scaffold learning, etc.) and b) provide a justification of why these changes and additions should be made with links to the concepts and theories in your readings.
For the peer feedback, I would like you to review my lesson plan as if you were giving me feedback, then for you to include it in the paragraph -
“Substance Abuse Prevention Strategies for Hispanic Adolescent Males: A Health Promotion Approach”
TOPIC: Substance abuse prevention in Hispanic adolescents
Target cultural population: Hispanic adolescent males
*3 pages excluding title and reference.
* i have provide three scholarly articles that can be used for the paper.
1. Introduction establishes the paper’s purpose and describes why the topic is important to health promotion in the target population in your area.
2. The introduction stimulates the reader’s interest.
3. Conclusion includes the main ideas from the body of the paper.
4. Conclusion includes the major support points from the body of the paper.
Relate Topic to Target Population
Required criteria
1. Describe the topic and target cultural population.
2. Includes statistics to support the significance of the topic.
3. Explain how the project relates to the selected Healthy People 2020 topic area.
4. Applies health promotion concepts.
Aritcles:
https://chamberlain.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/01CUCON_INST/f6kb8f/cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2570113109
https://chamberlain.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/01CUCON_INST/f6kb8f/cdi_informaworld_taylorfrancis_310_1080_10826084_2020_1843056
https://chamberlain.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/01CUCON_INST/f6kb8f/cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7665830 -
“Unleashing My Passion for Technology: A Personal Essay”
In order to learn more about you beyond your grades, test scores and accomplishments, we ask that you provide a written essay on a topic of your choice. Whatever the topic may be, it must tie back to you in some way. We are looking for your ability to write clearly and concisely, using your own voice. The length of your essay should range between 250-650 words.
I need NO AI in the following essay. I had this essay done by someone in essay pro already and failed to follow instructions of no external help (AI), THIS IS ESSENTIAL. The essay I was given, i took a look and uploaded it to an AI detector by each paragraph it had AI. I need this paper to be AI free. Some things you should know about me, I’m majoring in computer science and would like to take a stab to technology and the field of computers. I’m currently transferring from my current college. I need this ASAP. Latest tomorrow by 9:40am to check it and make sure there isn’t anything worth adding. If you want put it in blank where the college name is supposed to be in the essay I’m goi no to use this essay for multiple colleges but I this for tomorrow Morning the latest as i alredy expressed because one of my most important options is two hours after the deadline. Creative writing. ONCE AGAIN NO AI. Thank you if this is done correctly and professionally, wait to hear back from for other tasks. This College, University is also in Boston you could also talk about that. -
Title: A Tale of Two Museums: A Comparative Analysis of the Guggenheim Museum Bilbao and the Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum New York
by comparing and contrasting your selected building, interior, or designed landscape with a second building, interior, or designed landscape (2500-3000 words for the complete essay, but excluding the works cited list).
The second building, interior, or designed landscape may be in any global location, and from any time period. But it must have at least one area of historical commonality. with your first selection, and this aspect should be the focus of your analysis. This might include any of one the following themes:
The historical development of a relevant design typology (e.g. museum, public park, housing )
You will also need to provide a physical description of your first and secondary selected place as part of your comparative analysis. -
Title: The Impact of Political Polarization on Society: A Call for Unity and Understanding
Whatever you produce for this assignment can become the basis for the final essay you will write for this course. However, you are not locked in. If you want to change your topic for the final essay, you can. And, anyway, even if you do stick with what you develop for this assignment, you will want to revise it heavily, incorporating feedback from your TA.
INSTRUCTIONS
Pick one of the following topics:
Artificial Intelligence
Climate Change
The Housing Crisis
Political Polarization
Now that you have picked a topic, write an introductory paragraph that sets up and elaborates the thesis you will argue.
Your introductory paragraph should follow the common structure for introductory-paragraph writing as discussed in lecture:
– Hook [optional]
– Context and Topic
– Thesis Statement [one to three sentences max.]
– Elaboration / “Road Map” to Argument
– Statement of Significance
Your introductory paragraph should be between 150- and 300-words long, give or take a few words. You should use MLA Style for formatting and citations. However, you do not need to integrate any quotations for this assignment unless you want to.
After you have written your introductory paragraph, break your argument down into three or more sections. List these in bullet-point form underneath your paragraph as a kind of skeleton outline for the essay as a whole. These sections should be clearly derived from your thesis elaboration.
ASSESSMENT
Your assignment will be graded for its use of the common introductory paragraph structure (40 points), its clarity of expression (20 points), the strength of its thesis (20 points), and the persuasiveness and plausibility of its elaboration and outline (20 points). -
“Critical Analysis of a Quantitative Research Article: A Comparative Study of Different Teaching Strategies for Improving Math Skills in Elementary Students”
For this assignment students will critique a quantitative OR a qualitative research article. Select one article from the list provided in the attachment. Use the guidelines from the text and other resources from the course (Cathala & Moorley, 2018; Coughlan et al., 2007; Moorley & Cathala, 2019; Ryan et al., 2007) to set benchmarks to critique the research study. Cite the benchmark source for each area of the critique and describe how the study authors met or did not meet the benchmark criteria listed below. Use the appropriate criteria for the type of study: qualitative or quantitative
You must use the format template in the attachment to complete the assignment please choose ONE article of your choice from the list attached the references are attached to each article choice -
“The Importance of Screening for Postpartum Depression: A Proposal for a YouTube Video Intervention”
My assignment was written by one of your writers. I am not satisfied with the body os essay. I feel it did not corolate with the instruction I gave him. Please rewrite base on the instruction below. Please thoroughly read the proposal sample paper on Trauma informed Care in the uploaded file.
Please include definitions for key terms in your proposal. This is so that the reader can situate the term relative to your project in the specific practice setting. For example, does mental health nurse refer to a registered nurse working in mental health, an LPN, a psychiatric nurse and is the nurse working in the community or acute Research Question & Literature Review
I want to reiterate that creating your research question and completing your literature search is an iterative process. That is, you may have a research question and once you start your literature search you may find that you have too many or too few articles and may need to revise your research question. You may find this frustrating; however, needing to tweak your research question along the way is a very normal part of the process.
You are required to name the databases that you used in your literature search. A minimum of three databases are required and they should align with your topic. For example, PsychInfo is a useful database for mental health related topics and ERIC is a good database to use for topics related to education.
References
The number of references that you have for your literature review depends on your project and your literature search. After thinking a bit more about this, you will want between 10-20 articles from your literature search. You will also want additional articles to support why this topic is important for your clinical practice and to support the type of intervention. For example, if you choose to do a focus group or an in-service, you will need to have a reference for why this is an effective intervention.
Literature must be within 10 years for it to be considered current unless it is a seminal study.
Proposal
Your proposal will contain your literature review and identify what you would like to do for your project. For example, the intervention may be that you want to hold an in-service to share what you have learned with your colleagues and get some feedback from them about how this topic applies in your practice setting. Another example may be that you noticed that staff are not documenting a risk assessment properly. As a result, your literature review could look at the importance of documenting a risk assessment and your intervention could be a review workshop on the importance of documenting a risk assessment with a practice case study.
In your methods section of your proposal, you will name the databases that you searched, your key terms, how you combined your key terms to do your literature search, and the outcomes of your searches (number of articles).
Appendices are not required; however, if you have information that is supplemental then this should be placed in an appendix.
Your proposal should be formatted according to APA 7th edition.?
PLEASE NOTE. THE GAP IN MY UNIT IS LACK OF SCREENING TOOL FOR POSTPARTUM DEPRESSION; THEREFORE, MY PROPOSAL IS TO MAKE A YOUTUBE VIDEO WHERE I WILL EMPHASIS ON THE IMPORTANCE OF SCREENING FOR PPD FOR ALL THE PP MOTHERS. I WILL FORWARD THE VIDOE TO MY MANAGER, CLINICAL INSTRUCTOR AND MY WORK COLLEAGUES TO WATCH THE VIDEO AND GIVE ME FEED BACK. THE LITERATURE REVIEW SHOULD LOOK AT THE IMPORTANCE OF SCREENING FOR PPD AND MY INTERVENTION IS TO MAKE A YOUTUBE VIDEO FOR MY WORK COLLEAGUES. THANK YOU. -
Opinion on the Violation of Miranda Rights and the Reid Technique in the Case of Jason Madoa Opinion on the Violation of Miranda Rights and the Reid Technique in the Case of Jason Madoa As a judge, it is my
For this week’s discussion, we will pretend you are a judge. Based upon the cases you read (and cite at least 3 to explain why) write a short “opinion” on the attached facts.
“Jason Madoa, a 19-year-old college student, was arrested by the Metro City Police Department on suspicion of armed robbery. After being taken into custody, Doe was brought to the police station for questioning.
Upon arriving at the station, the police informed Madoa that he had the right to an attorney at his upcoming trial, but did not advise him of his right to have counsel present during interrogation.
When Madoa asked the officers, “Can I have an attorney here with me now?”, the police refused to answer his question. They immediately placed Doe in an isolated interrogation room.
The officers then utilized the “Reid Technique,” aggressively interrogating Madoa while refusing to allow him access to a phone or permit an attorney to be present. The officers relentlessly questioned Doe over an extended 5-hour period, asserting that witnesses identified him and urging him to confess with implications of leniency.
After nearly 5 grueling hours of this intense interrogation, an exhausted Madoa verbally agreed to confess to the robbery, implicating himself. Only at this point did the officers finally read Doe his Miranda rights against self-incrimination and right to counsel. They then had him sign a written confession statement.
At Madoa’s trial, his public defender moved to suppress the confession as violating his 5th Amendment right against self-incrimination and 6th Amendment right to counsel”
The 3 cases from this week and the links as follows…
Escobedo v Illinois (1964). https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/378/478/
Miranda v. Arizona (1966). https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/384/436/
Edward v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477 (1981). https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/451/477/ -
“Protecting Free Speech Rights for Public Employees: A Case Analysis of Bennett v. Metro. Gov’t of Nashville & Davidson County”
There is no minimum or maximum page count required for this assignment. The last one was 4-6 pages
Using the case attached and at least two outside sources:
Briefly describe the facts of the case leading up to Bennett being terminated. While supporting facts are necessary for the story to flow, you should concentrate your efforts on the facts that are most important related to whether Bennett was retaliated against for protected First Amendment speech. Using this case and at least two outside sources, thoroughly explain the balance between the public employee’s freedom of speech and the public employer’s right to require limits to that speech. Explain what this case tells us about the public employee’s rights related to free speech. Finally, this case mentions the due process rights HCC afforded Bennett. Using our readings, explain why public employees like Bennett are afforded due process, where that requirement comes from, and what is generally considered adequate due process. Your paper should be double spaced with one 1” margins. There is no minimum or maximum page count. Your grade will be based on how well you explain the concepts and not how long or short your paper is. A complete and concise addressing of the points is welcome. Your reader should not need to be familiar with the case of have an advanced understanding of the law understand the principles you explain in your paper.
You should use the points to be addressed as headers in your paper.
Facts of the case
Balancing of First Amendment rights
What this case tells us
Due process for public employees Case Link: Bennett v. Metro. Gov’t of Nashville & Davidson
https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/common/viewFile.d2lfile/Database/ODg3NDUxNDY/Bennett%20v.%20Metro.%20Gov%27t%20of%20Nashville%20_%20Davidson%20Cnty.%20(6th%20Cir.%202020).pdf?ou=1032573