I have too much homework to do, I need someone who is good at subjects from 9th grade to tutor me. In addition, you can relax with me while playing a small world cup to reduce stress.
Author: admin
-
Title: Understanding the Federal Acquisition Process: A Summary and Analysis of Current Research The federal acquisition process is a complex and highly regulated system that governs how the US government acquires goods and services from the private sector. It involves a series of
Assignment 1
Watch these videos regarding Federal Acquisition Process.
Link: https://youtu.be/PBf4pduLgzo
Link: https://youtu.be/3k1qB-y0NFg
After watching these videos, reflect upon the federal acquisition process and then research some aspect of the federal acquisition process. For this paper, you will need to find an article in the library that relates to any aspect of the federal acquisition process and summarize and discuss the article in the required paper. Feel free to compare your article to which aspect of a Smores and remember to include a link to the article.
Write a two-page paper, plus the title page and a reference page. As always, read all the lesson notes in Week 2 before you start this assignment as new or current events may have been updated since the start of class.
Instructions:
•Written communication: Written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message.
•APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to APA style and formatting.
•Length of paper: typed, double-spaced pages with no less than a two-page paper.
•Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point. -
“Building a Solid Foundation: Network and Hardware Strategies for Company Success”
Connect the Dots for Your Company
Write a 2-3 page paper.
In your paper address the following:
Create the network and hardware portion of your real or fictitious company strategic plan.
Include information about computers that will house the information and devices that will be used to access the information.
Discuss contingency plan for what happens if there is a hardware failure.
Mention what should be done to keep this section of the plan up to date.
Include a title page and 3-5 references. Only one reference may be from the internet (not Wikipedia). The other references must be from the Grantham University online library. Please adhere to the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (APA), (6th ed., 2nd printing) when writing and submitting assignments and papers.
Using journal references are ok -
Title: Enhancing Conflict Resolution Through Video Conferencing Technology
Prior to beginning work on this discussion forum, read Chapter 9 in your course textbook and the Five Conflict Management Strategies Download Five Conflict Management Strategiesarticle.
Management periodically engages in conflict resolution. In a 250- to 300-word initial post,
Explain how the features of video conferencing programs can be used to enhance the conflict resolution process.
Interpret, from a management lens, how this technology might help with rectifying an issue.
Use at least one source to support your key points.
Be sure to cite your credible source using proper APA formatting according to APA StyleLinks to an external site. -
DRAFT – Collaborative Proposal: Rebuilding the USF Library
Please upload a draft of your team’s proposal to DRAFT–Collaborative Proposal in USF Writes . Remember that this is only a draft, which means that it is unfinished and imperfect. Try to write as much of the proposal as your team can and address any obvious issues you notice, but assume that you’ll have plenty of time to fix major problems or write additional sections before the final draft.
Your team’s proposal should run approximately1,000 to 1,250 words (approx. 4-5 pages) and include:
a detailed description of a problem affecting the USF campus or local area
a well-supported potential solution that provides evidence for its claims
at least three visual elements (charts, graphs, or other images) that emphasize important points in the proposal
You may borrow formatting from any of the example proposals we’ve looked at this semester, or your team can determine what format works best for the information you want to present.
Re build USF Library -
The Ties Between Institutional Racism and Our Past: Examining Inequity and Nativism in the United States
Discuss how Institutional Racism, inequity, and racial injustice today in the United States are tied to our past. Give some examples both past and present to support your answer. Include as one of your examples how nativism played a role. Understanding these definitions will help you with your response, but you do not need to define them (inequity, nativism etc.) here. These definitions impact many living in the United States today, so use multiple examples. Look to the chapters over slavery, immigration and women in the textbook to help support your response.
RUBRIC: Your reply should be a minimum of eight sentences, and you should reply to two of your peers in at least three sentences each (for full points). Points will be deducted if you respond with less than eight (full) sentences and/or do not reply to a peer or peers; if you reply to a peer with one or two sentences; If you copy and paste peer replies (repetition). 20 points – your reply is a minimum of 8 sentences and reply to two peers with a minimum of 3 sentences each with no repetition, copy and paste. Replies should not be in fragment sentences, brief, standard replies. Your peer replies should not be standard, identical replies; For example, Peer One “John, I liked your reply. You made some good points. I think you used good examples.” Peer Two “Jane, I liked your reply. You made some good points. I think you used good examples.” Take the time to read and give in depth comments to your peers (for full points).
All posts should be in your own words; nothing copy and pasted from outside sources and nothing AI generated. Any of these will result in you receiving zero points for the discussion. You need to state your opinion, words, your work, and this may take reading and assessing the information, critical thinking and asserting your opinion (thoughts). -
“Maintaining Academic Integrity: Navigating Turnitin Without AI”
No AI, this paper runs through Turnitin. The instructions are uploaded along with the video and the sample papers.
-
“Analyzing Stock Performance: A Data-Driven Presentation for Business Decision Making”
Instructions Create an approximately 10-12 slide PowerPoint presentation with detailed presenter’s notes including citations on slides and in Notes area of the slide. You may also add a recorded voice-over in which you present and interpret data, graphs, descriptive statistics, et cetera. but the voice-over is not required. Format your presentation as follows: • One title slide. • Introduction slides explaining the business context. • Four graphics slides: One for each of the four charts in your report. Be sure to add moving average to your stock price chart. • One slide on descriptive stats. • Two or more conclusion slides explaining the application of each graph in the chosen business context. • One slide calling for discussion and questions. • One slide thanking everyone for their attention. • One slide with APA-formatted references.
-
Title: “Exploring Paradigms and Stereotypes in Human-Environment Relationships”
The instructions for your Discussion Board post indicate that you must include 3 references (or cites) to the assigned reading material, and 3 references to the audiovisual material
In lecture, I described three theoretical paradigms that have been important in the anthropological analysis of human-environment relationships — cultural ecology, political ecology, and ontological analysis.
1. Select the two paradigms that you think were most important in “Relatives of the Living Forest” and find specific sections of the chapter to illustrate why you picked those two.
2. In analyzing Indigenous relationships with nature, anthropologists often contrast Indigenous ideas to two stereotypical portrayals of “Western” culture. The first stereotype paints Westerners as people who see “nature” as something to be harvested and managed for the benefit of humans, without much regard for the wellbeing of the plants or animals. The second stereotype (usually used to describe Western environmentalists, conservation biologists, and New Age devotees) paints Westerners as people who think “nature” and “biodiversity” should be revered and appreciated as “sacred.” Think about your own relationship to plants, animals, and “nature” more broadly. Do your ideas and relationships fit into either of these two Western stereotypes? Explain your answer.
*You can make anything up for the second question, I know it’s asking for a personal opinion. I’m okay with anything as long as it’s nothing negative. I can help with any questions if needed*
When referring to the audiovisual can you please add time stamp as well.