Author: admin

Please refer to assignment 1 
Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. At a minimum, be sure to address each point. In addition, you are encouraged to review the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.
Describe the health care problem or issue you selected for use in Assessment 2 and provide details about it.
As you describe the topic you explored in Assessment 2, use the first four steps of the Socratic Problem-Solving Approach to aid your critical thinking. This approach was introduced in Assessment 2.
Identify possible causes for the problem or issue.
Use scholarly information to describe and explain the health care problem or issue and identify possible causes for it.
Identify at least three scholarly or academic peer-reviewed journal articles about the topic.
You may find the How Do I Find Peer-Reviewed Articles? library guide helpful in locating appropriate references.
You may use articles you found while working on Assessment 2 or you may search the Capella library for other articles.
You may find the applicable Undergraduate Library Research Guide helpful in your search.
Review the Think Critically About Source Quality to help you complete the following:
Assess the credibility of the information sources.
Assess the relevance of the information sources.
Analyze the health care problem or issue.
Describe the setting or context for the problem or issue.
Describe why the problem or issue is important to you.
Identify groups of people affected by the problem or issue.
Provide examples that support your analysis of the problem or issue.
Discuss potential solutions for the health care problem or issue.
Describe what would be required to implement a solution.
Describe potential consequences of ignoring the problem or issue.
Provide the pros and cons for one of the solutions you are proposing.
Explain the ethical principles (Beneficence, Nonmaleficence, Autonomy, and Justice) if potential solution was implemented.
Describe what would be necessary to implement the proposed solution.
Explain the ethical principles that need to be considered (Beneficence, Nonmaleficence, Autonomy, and Justice) if the potential solution was implemented.
Provide examples from the literature to support the points you are making.
Example Assessment: You may use the following to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like:
Assessment 4 Example [PDF] Download Assessment 4 Example [PDF].
Your assessment should also meet the following requirements:
Length: 3–5 typed, double-spaced pages, not including the title page and reference page.
Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.
APA tutorial: Use the APA Style Paper Tutorial [DOCX] for guidance.
Written communication: Write clearly and logically, with correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and mechanics.
Content: Provide a title page and reference page following APA style.
References: Use at least four scholarly or academic peer-reviewed journal articles.
APA format: Follow current APA guidelines for in-text citation of outside sources in the body of your paper and also on the reference page.

The purpose of this assessment is to demonstrate your understanding of and ability to analyze a root cause of a specific safety concern in a health care setting. You will create a plan to improve the safety of patients related to the safety quality issue present in your Assessment Supplement PDF in Assessment 1. Based on the results of your analysis, using the literature and professional best practices as well as the existing resources at your chosen health care setting, provide a rationale for your plan.
Use the Root-Cause Analysis and Improvement Plan [DOCX] Download Root-Cause Analysis and Improvement Plan [DOCX]template to help you to stay organized and concise. This will guide you step-by-step through the root cause analysis process.
Additionally, be sure that your plan addresses the following, which corresponds to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Please study the scoring guide carefully so you understand what is needed for a distinguished score.
Analyze the root cause of a specific patient safety issue in an organization.
Apply evidence-based and best-practice strategies to address the safety issue.
Create a feasible, evidence-based safety improvement plan to address a specific patient safety issue.
Identify organizational resources that could be leveraged to improve your plan.
Communicate in writing that is clear, logical, and professional, with correct grammar and spelling, using current APA style.
Example Assessment: You may use the following to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like but keep in mind that your Assessment 2 will focus on the quality issue you selected in Assessment 1.
Length of submission: Use the provided Root-Cause Analysis and Improvement Plan template to create a 4–6 page root cause analysis and safety improvement plan pertaining to a specific patient safety issue.
Number of references: Cite a minimum of 3 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your findings and considerations. Resources should be no more than 5 years old.
APA formatting: Format references and citations according to current APA style.
I have attached assessment 1 prompts which i picked the Delayed Response to Deteriorating Patient Condition in Healthcare: A patient’s
condition can change rapidly, and timely interventions are often crucial to prevent further
deterioration or even save a life. For nursing students, understanding the implications of
delayed responses to such changes is vital. Here’s why:
o Patient Safety and Outcomes: The most immediate concern with delayed
responses is the potential harm to the patient. Rapid interventions can prevent
complications, reduce the severity of outcomes, and in some cases, be the
difference between life and death.
o Window of Intervention: Many medical conditions have a critical window during
which interventions are most effective. Delays in recognizing and responding can
narrow or close this window, limiting treatment options and reducing the
likelihood of positive outcomes.
o Increased Complexity of Care: A patient who has deteriorated further due to a
delayed response often requires more complex and aggressive treatments than if
the issue had been addressed promptly. This can involve higher-risk procedures,
more medications, and longer recovery times.
o Emotional and Psychological Impact on Patients and Families: Witnessing a
loved one deteriorate without prompt intervention can be traumatic for families. It
can lead to feelings of helplessness, frustration, and mistrust towards the
healthcare system.
o Professional Implications: Delays in responding to deteriorating patients can
have significant repercussions for healthcare professionals. These might include
disciplinary actions, loss of licensure, legal consequences, and damage to one’s
professional reputation.
o Economic Costs: Delays can lead to extended hospital stays, additional
treatments, and potential lawsuits, all of which result in increased costs for
healthcare systems and patients.
o Team Dynamics and Morale: Repeated incidents of delayed responses can
strain team dynamics. It can lead to blame, guilt, and tensions among team
members, impacting the overall functioning and morale of the unit.

Here’s a summary of the instructions for the MSN Project Proposal assignment
Assignment Purpose and Overview:
The assignment aims to guide the development of an evidence-based practice quality improvement project.
It involves completing all sections of the project proposal template, with some sections possibly reusing information from previous assignments.
Course Learning Outcomes:
Apply leadership and management theories for planned change within healthcare settings.
Identify needs for change that improve health and organizational outcomes.
Create and evaluate a plan for an evidence-informed change initiative.
Due Date and Points:
Suggested due date is Sunday at the end of Module 6, with a final due date at the end of Module 7.
The assignment is worth a total of 200 points.
Assignment Instructions:
Follow Chamberlain College of Nursing Academic Integrity Policy.
Complete all sections of the project proposal template.
Use sources no older than five years, unless approved by the professor.
Adhere to APA formatting and style guidelines.
Grammar, spelling, punctuation, and formal scholarly writing are expected.
Assignment Criteria and Ratings:
The proposal is divided into several sections: area of interest, problem statement, background, stakeholders, PICO question, literature review, project setting, barriers, ethical considerations, expected outcomes, and milestones.
Each section has specific requirements for content and scholarly support.
Points are allocated based on the completeness and quality of information provided in each section.
APA and Writing Style:
The paper must follow strict APA format including font style, margins, citations, and references.
Graduate-level writing quality is required, focusing on clarity, organization, and a scholarly tone.

create a soap note if glaucoma
chief complain: my vision is getting worse 52 years old
Hispanic male .
primary diagnosis glaucoma icd H40.9