I don’t know if anyone can do this it is 8 side powepoint assignme t on crime scene investigation procedures.
Author: admin
-
Title: Choosing the Appropriate Study Approach for Answering a Research Question
For this assignment, you will describe the study approach (case-control, cross-sectional, cohort, etc.) you will use for your study to answer your research question. You should justify the study approach that you are choosing to use based on the factors that impact the most appropriate study design, based on what we discussed in class.
I’ve attached the instructions below -
“The Death Penalty: A Moral and Just Practice?”
Write a 5-7 page (double spaced) essay in which you argue for your position on the death penalty. In your essay, you will argue whether you believe the death penalty to be a just and moral practice.
Grading
In your essay, I want to see that you have thought carefully and critically about this topic. Essays will be primarily graded based on the strength and thoughtfulness of your argument.
In your essay, you must:
Take a position on the issue and state that position in the essay introduction
Support your position using arguments that are thoughtful and well-grounded
Use at least one of the authors (Pojman or Nathanson or Rachels) covered in this course
Present and then respond to a counterargument to your position
Include parenthetical citations or footnotes and a bibliography
Bibliography and Outside Sources
Sources other than the ones used in class need not be used, though you are free to use them.
Your essay must cite your sources using both:
Bibliography – indicate the sources used (including the Pojman, Nathanson, or Rachels papers)
Footnotes or parenthetical citation – include footnotes or parenthetical citations whenever quoting or paraphrasing an outside source
The books you should be sourcing
“A Defense of the Death Penalty” by Louis Pojman
“Why We Should Put The Death Penalty To Rest” Stephan Nathanson -
“Developing a Health Care Policy: Addressing Quality Care and Ethical Issues”
Episode 1: Policy Analysis and Development
Overview see guidance and attached transcript.
In this episode, you will be in a health care policy internship program in a Senator’s office in Washington, D.C. The Senator wants to develop policy that requires all health care organizations that receive federal funds to implement the recommendations presented in the Institute of Medicine reports on quality care. You will develop a policy, so that it can become proposed legislation. You must collect data, describe the problem, solutions and related ethical issues, examine the cost-benefit analysis, identify stakeholders (such as lobbyists from American Hospital Association, health care providers, health care corporations, pharmaceuticals, insurers, etc.), and impact. Based on this information, you will create a policy description that will be the foundation for a bill. You will describe critical issues that would be in the bill such as requirements of hospitals to:
Monitor and report medical errors to the Department of Health and Human Services
Use root cause analysis on a certain percentage of errors
Track and report patient outcomes focused on the clinical problems identified in the National Health Care Quality Report
Integrate the 5 healthcare profession core competencies into staff education and track outcomes
Establish a no-blame culture
*I suggest that you do some research on your own, and if you use outside sources to help you compile your policy description, be sure to reference them (following an APA format) at the end of your post.
To-Do for this Assignment:
You will post a policy description to this discussion board forum. Make sure to identify a plan that addresses legal and ethical issues in a health care policy.
Below are the characters from this LearnScapes scenario (LearnScapes for Health Policy 1):
The Student (which is you), Health Care Policy Intern for Congress
The student used to work within the Bright Road Health Care System, and had a special interest in policy. The student is thinking about moving into politics, hoping to make a difference at that level. The student has just been accepted into the internship; this is the student’s first big project.
Peter Shackley, Senior Policy Staff Member
The student’s mentor, Peter, is a young and feisty staff member. In his late 20s, Pete has been interested in politics since he was President of his high school student body. He’s especially passionate about policy-making and how the process works. Pete will help guide the student through the policy-making process.
Gretchen Wilde, Senator Chief of Staff
Gretchen is in her 30s and has been the Senator’s Chief of Staff for about 2 years now. She’s very professional, and holds high expectations for everyone in the Senator’s office, including interns. Gretchen is responsible for reviewing policy ideas and descriptions before giving the approval to create a bill.
Marian Powers, Senator
Senator Powers is a Senator in her late 40s. She’s extremely busy with legislative issues, and trusts her staff members implicitly so does not spend a lot of time working directly with the team on this policy.
However, the student and other staff members sometimes contact her for information about state issues, reaction of stakeholders, etc. -
Title: The Future of Social Security Taxes and Retirement: An Analysis and Relevance to the Business Climate Overview/Summary: The article discusses the potential changes to Social Security taxes and retirement benefits in the near future. It highlights the growing concern over
1. Read article
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/16/business/social-security-taxes-retirement.html
2.
a. Overview/Summary
b. Opinion/Analysis – The Opinion/Analysis section should demonstrate your critical thinking and analysis of the subject matter.
c. Relevance to business climate. – The Relevance section should offer an insight-building summary, recommendations, findings and conclusions.
3. 300 words or more
4. Resources only – Chapter 11 (attached PPTX) and News Article -
Title: Gender Differences in Willingness to Provide Data: A Study of Male and Female Respondents
Here are the preliminary results. I have embedded comments to help you understand them. Please review with your group.
Within your group, you must identify hypotheses (minimum of three), you wish to test. You will forward these to me, and I will run the results. Hypotheses must examine two or more variables. These should be based upon theory. For example, you may want to examine what data respondents are willing to provide by gender. Are there differences between men and women? These are the two largest categories for gender. -
Annotated Bibliography: Educational Research and Teaching Methods
INSTRUCTIONS: Create an annotated bibliography based on the 9 sources below:
Abualadas, H. M., & Xu, L. (2023). Achievement of learning outcomes in non‐traditional (online) versus traditional (face‐to‐face) anatomy teaching in medical schools: A mixed method systematic review. Clinical Anatomy, 36(1), 50-76. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.23942
da Silva, F. L., Slodkowski, B. K., da Silva, K. K. A., & Cazella, S. C. (2023). A systematic literature review on educational recommender systems for teaching and learning: research trends, limitations and opportunities. Education and Information Technologies, 28(3), 3289-3328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11341-9
Hiver, P., Al-Hoorie, A. H., Vitta, J. P., & Wu, J. (2024). Engagement in language learning: A systematic review of 20 years of research methods and definitions. Language teaching research, 28(1), 201-230. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211001289
Meylani, R. (2023). A Comparative Analysis of Traditional and Modern Approaches to Assessment and Evaluation in Education. Batı Anadolu Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 15(1), 520-555. https://doi.org/10.51460/baebd.1386737
Monnelly, K., Marshall, J., & Cruice, M. (2022). Intensive Comprehensive Aphasia Programmes: a systematic scoping review and analysis using the TIDieR checklist for reporting interventions. Disability and Rehabilitation, 44(21), 6471–6496. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2021.1964626
Praveen, C. K., & Srinivasan, K. (2022). Psychological impact and influence of animation on viewer’s visual attention and cognition: A systematic literature review, open challenges, and future research directions. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine, 2022(1), 8802542. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8802542
Van der Linden, S., van der Meij, J., & McKenney, S. (2022). Teacher video coaching, from design features to student impacts: A systematic literature review. Review of Educational Research, 92(1), 114–165. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543211046984
Wang, T., Du, Z., & Liu, J. (2024). The Effects of video lecture design on Learners in Online Learning: A Systematic review. Journal of Information & Knowledge Management, 23(01), 2350052.https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219649223500521
Zhang, L., & Ma, Y. (2023). A study of the impact of project-based learning on student learning effects: A meta-analysis study. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1202728. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1202728 -
“The Rise of Teenage Depression in the Modern World: Causes and Consequences” The Rise of Teenage Depression in the Modern World: Causes and Consequences Depression is a serious mental health issue that affects individuals of all ages, but
Are more teenagers depressed today than in the past? What are some of the causes of teenage depression in the modern world? (2 -pages). Please make sure you include at least 5 sources that are credible and are therefore from websites ending in .org, .edu, .gov, or are published in journal articles.
-
“Exploring Case Study Qualitative Research Design: A Comparison of Yin and Stake Approaches and Their Relevance in Public Administration”
Overview:
Although Yin and Stake base their approaches to case studies on a constructivist paradigm
(researcher and participant are in close collaboration), they offer different definitions and
approaches.
Define case study qualitative research design, what are the Yin and Stake approaches, and which
one do you think should be used in public administration?
As doctoral students, your assignments are expected to follow the principles of high-quality
scientific standards and promote knowledge and understanding in the field of public
administration. You should apply a rigorous and critical assessment of a body of theory and
empirical research, articulating what is known about the phenomenon and ways to advance
research about the topic under review. Research syntheses should identify significant variables, a
systematic and reproducible search strategy, and a clear framework for studies included in the
larger analysis. Your writing should be scholarly and avoid irrelevant facts.
Cite only literature and theory pertinent to the specific issue and not those that are of only
tangential or general significance. When summarizing earlier works, avoid nonessential details;
instead, emphasize pertinent findings, relevant methodological issues, and major conclusions.
Citation of relevant earlier literature is a sign of scholarly responsibility and it is critical for the
growth of a doctoral student in public administration.
Manuscripts should not be written in first person (“I”). All material should be 12-point, Times
New Roman type, double-spaced with margins of one inch.
All manuscripts should be written clearly and concisely. Please do not use jargon, slang, idioms,
colloquialisms, or bureaucratese. Use acronyms sparingly and spell them out the first time you
use them. Please do not construct acronyms from phrases you repeat frequently in the text.
Instructions:
Items to include are outlined as follows:
• Headings should be included and must conform to the content categories mentioned
above. Use sections and section titles. Begin with an introduction section and end with a
conclusion section.
• All ideas must be supported with sound reason and citations from the required readings
and presentations for the module, and additional research. Use 10 peer reviewed sources
including required readings and presentations. No business sources; use public
administration sources.
• All cites/references must be from peer-reviewed journal articles, dissertations, textbooks,
and government documents. No blogs, Wikipedia, encyclopedias, dictionaries, or non-
peer reviewed websites or other sources should be used.
• Integrate biblical principles within the analysis of the paper.
• Documents should be double-spaced, 8 to 10-pages (not including references and title
page), and in APA current edition format including any cites and references.
Read:
(Chapter 10) Lune, Howard, & Berg, Bruce L. (2017). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (9th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education. ISBN: 9780134202136
On Doctoral Student Development: Exploring Faculty Mentoring in the Shaping of African American Doctoral Student Success
Connections and Collaborations of Local Water Management Organizations of Utah
Watch:
https://youtu.be/4S_xiW_vwWM?si=RQMZT_m_A0iKLdkl
https://cdnapisec.kaltura.com/index.php/extwidget/preview/partner_id/2167581/uiconf_id/39959791/entry_id/1_1f2363bm/embed/dynamic
https://cdnapisec.kaltura.com/index.php/extwidget/preview/partner_id/2167581/uiconf_id/39959791/entry_id/1_a4llebjs/embed/dynamic
https://cdnapisec.kaltura.com/index.php/extwidget/preview/partner_id/2167581/uiconf_id/39959791/entry_id/1_a2zobk8r/embed/dynamic -
Title: Health Promotion Plan for Addressing Bullying in a Hypothetical Community “Streamlining Your Plan: The Importance of Clear and Concise Writing”
The Topic is: Bullying is a repeated aggressive
behavior that is intentional and involves an imbalance of power or
strength. It can take many forms, such as physical, verbal, or
relational
aggression.
– Potential Health Impacts: Victims may experience depression,
anxiety, low self-
esteem,
physical health problems, suicidal thoughts, and academic problems.
Communities
with prevalent bullying can have a general atmosphere of fear and
mistrust
For this assessment, you will propose a hypothetical health promotion plan addressing a particular health concern or health need affecting a fictitious individual or group living in the community.
o complete your hypothetical health promotion plan, please use the following outline to guide your work:
Health Promotion Plan
After you select a specific health concern or health need from the resource above, next investigate the concern or need and best practices for health improvement, based on supporting evidence.
Create a scenario as if this project were being completed face-to-face.
Identify the chosen population and include demographic data (location, lifestyle, age, race, ethnicity, gender, marital status, income, education, employment).
Describe in detail the characteristics of your chosen hypothetical individual or group for this activity and how they are relevant to this targeted population.
Discuss why your chosen population is predisposed to this health concern or health need and why they can benefit from a health promotion educational plan.
Based on the health concern for your hypothetical individual or group, discuss what you would include in the development of a sociogram. Take into consideration possible social, economic, cultural, genetic, and/or lifestyle behaviors that may have an impact on health as you develop your educational plan in your first assessment. You will take this information into consideration when you develop your educational plan in your fourth assessment.
Identify their potential learning needs. Collaborate with the individual or group on SMART goals that will be used to evaluate the educational session (Assessment 4).
Identify the individual or group’s current behaviors and outline clear expectations for this educational session and offer suggestions for how the individual or group needs can be met.
Health promotion goals need to be clear, measurable, and appropriate for this activity. Consider goals that will foster behavior changes and lead to the desired outcomes.
Document Format and Length
Your health promotion plan should be 3–4 pages in length.
Supporting Evidence
Support your health promotion plan with peer-reviewed articles, course study resources, and Healthy People 2030 resources. Cite at least three credible sources published within the past five years, using APA format.
Graded Requirements
The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide, so be sure to address each point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.
Analyze the health concern that is the focus of your health promotion plan.
Consider underlying assumptions and points of uncertainty in your analysis.
Explain why a health concern is important for health promotion within a specific population.
Examine current population health data.
Consider the factors that contribute to health, health disparities, and access to services.
Explain the importance of establishing agreed-upon health goals in collaboration with hypothetical participants.
Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.
Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.
Write with a specific purpose and audience in mind.
Adhere to scholarly and disciplinary writing standards and APA formatting requirements.
Before submitting your assessment for grading, proofread it to minimize errors that could distract readers and make it difficult for them to focus on the substance of your plan.