Hello I attached the instructions for this essay as well as the three articles that he is wanting to be refernced in this essay. I also attached screenshots of the rubric. sorry there are so many screenshots it wouldnt allow me to condense them. Thanks so much let me know if you have nay issues with any of the documents.
Author: admin
-
“Strategic Planning for a Pediatric Sports Medicine Program: Creating Barriers to Entry in a Competitive Market”
Your orthopedic group has developed a pediatric sports medicine program. Recently, your marketing director has returned to you and began to discuss the concept of a “silver tsunami.” Your partnership is reflecting on the marketplace, as the group is located in Northeast Ohio. A strategic retreat of the group is coming up in which there will be a discussion about recruiting and planning for the service mix in the next 5 years. It is the first such specialized program in the metropolitan area. You have recently heard that your largest competitor is thinking of entering the market with a similar offering. Suggest three possible barriersto entry that you might be able to create to make it a challenge for new competitive entries
-
Part 1: Art Creation Title: “Finding Beauty in the Mundane” Inspiration Piece: Title: “Diner” Artist: Gregory Crewdson Year: 1998 Place of Origin: United States Link:
Part 1: Art Creation
Select a photograph or film art piece to use as a point of inspiration. Create an art piece of photography or cinematography inspired by your selected art piece. Videos should be no longer than 5 minutes and must be in MP4 format.
Note: If your art creation requires a separate file submission, please submit in the Art Creation Submission (Recordings) area following this assignment.
Part 2: Reflection
Write a reflection about the relationship between your art production and the inspiration piece. Include the following in the reflection paper:
Introduction
Inspiration Piece
Include the inspiration photograph or cinematography within the document. Use a link in the case of cinematography.
Record the title, artist/director, year, and place of origin.
Briefly explain the background of the inspiration piece.
Your Art Piece
Include your original photograph within the document. If you selected cinematography, submit as a separate file in the Art Creation Submission (Recordings) area following this assignment.
Provide a title.
Explain the background of your piece.
Connection
Explain the thematic connection between the two pieces.
How are they similar and different?
Are they the same medium? How does the medium impact what the viewer experiences?
For photography, how do the formal elements of design compare to one another?
Original Artwork Requirements
Methods: photo or video
No computer-generated pieces
You are not graded on your skill as a photographer or cinematographer -
Title: Choosing the Best Grant for Disease Research Funding: A Committee Member’s Perspective As a member of the charitable foundation committee, I have carefully reviewed and considered the grant applications for research on specific diseases. After much deliberation, I have chosen
You serve on a committee for a charitable foundation that
will vote and decide how to fund grant requests for research on specific
diseases. This research could lead to better understanding of disease
mechanisms or new therapies/interventions. The applications for the grants have
been narrowed down to three choices.
Out of these choices, you
may only choose one to vote for:
1. Fibrodysplasia ossificans
progressiva
2. Myasthenia gravis
3. Huntington’s disease
you will state your choice, explain the normal anatomy of
the system the disease impacts the most, explain how the disease disrupts this
system, and why you chose to vote this way using appropriate and sufficient
evidence.
·
Length: 250-500
words
·
12pt
font
·
All
sources (three required not including your textbook, which must also be
cited if you use it) must be properly cited (see APA source citation below)
· State and explain your choice. When stating
the evidence, consider the challenges that others may have to your evidence and
how you could counter those respectful challenges.
APA Source Citation
You must use at
least three reputable scientific references to support your post (not
including your textbook- if you use your textbook, you must also cite it).
Reputable sources= peer reviewed scientific journal articles, accredited
websites, or books. Google, Wikipedia, etc. are not acceptable sources. -
“Exploring the Intersection of Literature and Trauma: A Critical Review of the “Companion to Literature and Trauma” with a Focus on Theatre and Drama”
I need a book review rewritten to adhere to the journal’s publication guidelines. The review focuses on the “Companion to Literature and Trauma,” published in 2020, with specific emphasis on the chapter devoted to theatre and drama.
“The rejection is primarily because the text reads more like partial notes on the book’s summary and the specific theatre chapter rather than a coherent review. The structure lacks critical analysis and an in-depth assessment of the book. What is missing is a deeper reflection on how the themes are treated, what the contribution is, what the strengths and weaknesses of the book are, etc. Additionally, the text does not guide the reader effectively, making it difficult to navigate both the book under review and the review itself.” -
“Improving Nurse Practitioner Practice: A Evidence-Based Approach” “Implementing Evidence-Based Practice: A PICOT Approach”
Title Slide
Introduction (1 slide): Slide should identify concepts to be addressed and sections of the presentation. Include speaker’s notes that explain, in more detail, what will be covered.
Practice Issue (1-3 slides): Describe the area of interest and practice issue/problem related to NP practice selected in week 2. Explain why the issue/concern is important to nurse practitioner practice and its impact on health outcomes. Provide speaker notes. Provide scholarly references to support your ideas.
PICOT Question (1 slide): Provide the PICOT question developed in week 2. Describe each element of your PICOT question in one or two sentences, being sure to address all the following:
P-Population and problem – What is the nursing practice concern or problem and whom does it affect?
I–Intervention – What evidence-based solution for the problem would you like to apply?
C–Comparison – What is another solution for the problem? Note that this is typically the current practice, no intervention at all, or alternative solutions.
O–Outcome – Very specifically, how will you know that the intervention worked? Think about how you will measure the outcome.
T–Time frame – What is the Timeframe involved for the EBP initiative or the target date of completion?
Literature review (2-4 slides):Summarize the literature review completed in week 5. Discuss themes and special concerns. Discuss any unique insight or perspective offered from the literature. Provide speaker notes. Speaker notes and/or slides include citations from scholarly nursing literature which support the assertions presented.
Recommendations (3 slides):
Slide 1: Identify the evidence-based recommendation for the identified practice change. Speaker’s notes should fully explain the recommended change and rationale for the change. Provide support from scholarly references to support the recommendation.
Slide 2: Identify the key stakeholders impacted by the recommended change. Speaker’s notes add detail.
Slide 3: Analyze the recommendation in terms of fit, feasibility, and appropriateness as discussed by Dang and Dearholt (2018), Ch. 8. Speaker’s notes add detail. *Note: information regarding stakeholders, fit, feasibility, and appropriateness may be based on personal experience or on information you found in your research. If the identified factors come from the literature, provide reference citations to support your ideas.
Conclusion: (1 slide)Slide provides summary points of presentation. Speaker’s notes provide final comments on the topic.
References: Reference elements provided in APA format, may use bullets. Hanging indents not required.
Application: Use Microsoft Power Point to create the presentation. Submit as a .ppt or .pptx file.
Length: The PowerPoint presentation should be between 9-13 total slides (excluding title and reference slides).
Speaker notes should be used and include in-text citations when applicable. Use the Notes Page view feature in PowerPoint to include speaker notes.
I Have attached the PICO question paper that is related to this powerpoint.
Grading Rubric
ASSIGNMENT CONTENT
Category
Points
%
Description
Introduction
(1 slide)
10
5%
Introduction includes concepts to be addressed. Identify sections of the PowerPoint presentation. Speaker notes include details of what will be covered in the presentation.
Nursing Practice Issue/Problem
20
10%
Describes one specific issue or concern within the selected area of advanced practice nursing. Explanation of the impact of this issue or concern on health outcomes. Provide speaker notes. Speaker notes and/or slides include citations from scholarly nursing literature which validate the importance of the issue or concern.
*The nursing practice issue/problem description may be reused from the Week 2 worksheet
PICOT question
20
10%
Includes the PICOT question in the standard PICOT question format with each letter separately, such as:
P =
I =
C =
O =
T =
PICOT question =
Speaker notes accurately and clearly describe each of the PICOT elements.
*The PICOT question and explanation may be reused from the Week 2 worksheet
Literature Review
50
25%
Summarize the literature review completed in week 5. Discuss themes and special concerns. Discuss any unique insight or perspective offered from the literature. Provide speaker notes. Speaker notes and/or slides include citations from scholarly nursing literature which support the assertions presented.
Recommendations Slide 1: Identify EBP change
20
10%
Slide 1: Identify the evidence-based recommendation for the identified practice change. Speaker’s notes should fully explain the recommended change and rationale for the change. Provide support from scholarly references to support the recommendation.
Recommendations Slide 2: Identify key stakeholders
20
10%
Slide 2: Identify the key stakeholders impacted by the recommended change. Speaker’s notes add detail.
Recommendations Slide 3: Analyze fit, feasibility, and appropriateness
20
10%
Slide 3: Analyze the recommendation in terms of fit, feasibility, and appropriateness as discussed by Dang and Dearholt (2018), ch. 8. Speaker’s notes add detail.
*Note: information regarding stakeholders, fit, feasibility, and appropriateness may be based on personal experience or on information you found in your research. If the identified factors come from the literature, provide reference citations to support your ideas.
Conclusion
(1 slide)
10
5%
Summarize key information presented in PowerPoint presentation. Provide speaker notes.
170
85%
Total CONTENT Points= 170 pts
ASSIGNMENT FORMAT
Category
Points
%
Description
APA Format
10
5%
Ideas and information that come from scholarly sources must be cited and referenced correctly. In-text and parenthetical citations must be used and may be provided on the slide or within the speaker notes. Slides, speaker notes, and reference elements are consistent with current APA format. May use bullets on the reference slide. Hanging indents not required.
Presentation of Slides
10
5%
PowerPoint presentation includes title slide, 9-13 content slides, and reference slide(s). Presentation of slides is professional in appearance and tone. Balance among space, words and graphics, and color is effective.
Writing Mechanics
10
5%
Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are followed and consistent with formal written work as found in the current APA manual.
30
15%
Total FORMAT Points = 30 pts
ASSIGNMENT TOTAL = 200 points -
Assessment Traits: Analyzing Two Quantitative Research Articles in Healthcare Title: Assessment of Statistical Methods Used in a Research Study “Evaluation of Statistical Methods and Writing Mechanics in Research Analysis”
Assessment Traits
Requires Lopeswrite
Assessment Description
Search the GCU Library and find two new health care articles that use quantitative research. Do not use articles from a previous assignment or articles that appear in the topic Resources or textbook.
Complete an article analysis for each using the “Article Analysis 2” template.
Refer to “Patient Preference and Satisfaction in Hospital-at-Home and Usual Hospital Care for COPD Exacerbations: Results of a Randomised Controlled Trial” in conjunction with “Article Analysis: Example 2,” for an example of an article analysis.
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
American Association of Colleges of Nursing Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education
This assignment aligns to AACN Core Competencies 4.1.
Attachments
HLT-362V-RS3-ArticleAnalysisExample-2.docxHLT-362V-RS-T3-ArticleAnalysis-2-Template
Rubric Criteria
Collapse All Rubric CriteriaCollapse All
Two Quantitative Articles
13 points
Criteria Description
5. Target
13 points
Two articles are presented and are based on quantitative research.
4. Acceptable
11.05 points
N/A
3. Approaching
9.75 points
Two articles are presented, but only one article is based on quantitative research.
2. Insufficient
8.45 points
N/A
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Fewer than two articles are presented and do not use quantitative research.
Article Citations and Permalinks
13 points
Criteria Description
5. Target
13 points
Article citations and permalinks are presented. Article citations are accurately presented in APA format. Page numbers are accurate and used in all areas when citing information.
4. Acceptable
11.05 points
Article citations and permalinks are presented. Article citations are presented in APA format. Page numbers are used to cite information. There are minor errors.
3. Approaching
9.75 points
Article citations and permalinks are presented. Article citations are presented in APA format, but there are errors. Page numbers to cite information are missing, or incorrect, in some areas.
2. Insufficient
8.45 points
Article citations and permalinks are presented. There are significant errors. Page numbers are not indicated to cite information, or the page numbers are incorrect.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Article citations and permalinks are omitted.
Broad Topic Area/Title
7.8 points
Criteria Description
5. Target
7.8 points
Broad topic area and title are fully presented and accurate.
4. Acceptable
6.63 points
Broad topic area and title are presented. There are some minor errors, but the content overall is accurate.
3. Approaching
5.85 points
Broad topic area and title are summarized. There are some minor inaccuracies.
2. Insufficient
5.07 points
Broad topic area and title are referenced but are incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Broad topic area and title are omitted.
Null and Alternative Hypotheses
13 points
Criteria Description
5. Target
13 points
Hypotheses are accurate and clearly defined.
4. Acceptable
11.05 points
Hypotheses are clearly defined. There are some minor inaccuracies.
3. Approaching
9.75 points
Hypotheses are generally defined. There are some minor inaccuracies.
2. Insufficient
8.45 points
Hypotheses are summarized. There are major inaccuracies or omissions.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Hypotheses are omitted.
Independent and Dependent Variable Types and Data for Variable
13 points
Criteria Description
5. Target
13 points
Variable types and data for variables are presented and accurate.
4. Acceptable
11.05 points
Variable types and data for variables are presented. Minor detail is needed for accuracy.
3. Approaching
9.75 points
Variable types and data for variables are presented. There are inaccuracies.
2. Insufficient
8.45 points
Variable types and data for variables are presented. There are major inaccuracies or omissions.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Variable types and data for variables are omitted.
Population of Interest for the Study
6.5 points
Criteria Description
5. Target
6.5 points
Population of interest for the study is presented and accurate.
4. Acceptable
5.52 points
Population of interest for the study is presented. Minor detail is needed for accuracy.
3. Approaching
4.88 points
Population of interest for the study is presented. There are inaccuracies.
2. Insufficient
4.23 points
Population of interest for the study is presented. There are major inaccuracies or omissions.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Population of interest for the study is omitted.
Sample
6.5 points
Criteria Description
5. Target
6.5 points
Sample is presented and accurate. Page citation for sample information is provided.
4. Acceptable
5.52 points
Sample is presented. Minor detail is needed for accuracy. Page citation for sample information is provided.
3. Approaching
4.88 points
Sample is presented. There are inaccuracies.
2. Insufficient
4.23 points
Sample is presented. There are major inaccuracies or omissions.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Sample is omitted.
Sampling Method
6.5 points
Criteria Description
5. Target
6.5 points
Sampling method is presented and accurate.
4. Acceptable
5.52 points
Sampling is presented. Minor detail is needed for accuracy.
3. Approaching
4.88 points
Sampling is presented. There are inaccuracies. Page citation for sample information is omitted.
2. Insufficient
4.23 points
Sampling is presented. There are major inaccuracies or omissions.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Sampling method is omitted.
How Was Data Collected?
6.5 points
Criteria Description
5. Target
6.5 points
The means of data collection are presented and accurate. Page citation for sample information is provided.
4. Acceptable
5.52 points
The means of data collection are presented. Minor detail is needed for accuracy. Page citation for sample information is provided.
3. Approaching
4.88 points
The means of data collection are presented. There are inaccuracies. Page citation for sample information is omitted.
2. Insufficient
4.23 points
The means of data collection are presented. There are major inaccuracies or omissions.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
The means of data collection are omitted.
Inferential Statistics
13 points
Criteria Description
Clearly identify which hypothesis tests were used and the results.
5. Target
13 points
The inferential statistics thoroughly identify which hypothesis tests were used and the results.
4. Acceptable
11.05 points
The inferential statistics clearly identify which hypothesis tests were used and the results.
3. Approaching
9.75 points
The inferential statistics generally identify which hypothesis tests were used and the results but are lacking relevant detail.
2. Insufficient
8.45 points
The inferential statistics identifying which hypothesis tests were used are incomplete or incorrect.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
The inferential statistics identifying which hypothesis tests were used are omitted.
Assess the Appropriateness of Statistical Methods Used in This Study
19.5 points
Criteria Description
Provide rationale to support your response.
5. Target
19.5 points
Explanation of the appropriateness of statistical methods used in this study is thorough.
4. Acceptable
16.58 points
Explanation of the appropriateness of statistical methods used in this study is complete.
3. Approaching
14.63 points
Explanation of the appropriateness of statistical methods used is included but lacks relevant supporting details.
2. Insufficient
12.68 points
Explanation of the appropriateness of statistical methods used is incomplete or incorrect.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Explanation of the appropriateness of statistical methods used is not included.
Mechanics of Writing
6.5 points
Criteria Description
Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc
5. Target
6.5 points
No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.
4. Acceptable
5.52 points
Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.
3. Approaching
4.88 points
Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
2. Insufficient
4.23 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.
Format/Documentation
5.2 points
Criteria Description
Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.
5. Target
5.2 points
No errors in formatting or documentation are present.
4. Acceptable
4.42 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
3. Approaching
3.9 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.
2. Insufficient
3.38 points
Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.
Total130 points -
Title: Identity Development in Adolescence: A Guide for Educators and Parents Introduction: During adolescence, individuals undergo significant changes in their physical, cognitive, and social development. This period is also crucial for the development of one’s identity, which
For this assignment you will locate and apply several scholarly resources related to identity development during adolescence and develop a 2 page handout of key points for a formal group; high school guidance counselors, parents, or people who work with adolescents.
Your handout should explain:
Identity development (both theory and research) at this stage and provide a general guide.
Summarize Erikson’s ideas about the stage of adolescence address the task of constructing an identity faced by adolescents.
Summarize Marcia’s ideas about identity development, address the most common shifts in identity statuses from early adolescence to middle and late adolescence
Talk about the influences on Identity Development, such as parenting styles, peer relationship, social media etc.
Talk about the outcomes associated with identity development based on Erikson’s and Marcia’s theories.
Provide tips on how to faciliate adolescents identity development for educators and parents.
Be creative with this assignment but be sure to cover identity development well via the scholarly resources you locate.
You may use bullet points and a brief description of each resource vs. standard essay format.
Always cite as needed and provide a reference page at the end. -
The Impact of Individuals with Disabilities on Families: A Literature Review Article 1: The relationship between adverse childhood experiences and developmental disorders: Implications for family support and child advocacy In this article, Alford et al. (2024) explore
An in depth literature review with personal summaries of each peer reviewed article on how individuals with disabilities impact faamilies or have an affect on families using these articles: References
Alford, A. Y., Riggins, A. D., Cowan, L. T., Chopak-Foss, J., Mitchell, C. E., Nwoanumah, E. C., Oloyede, T. F., Sejoro, S. T., Azu, E. U., Kutten, W. S., & Adom, D. A. (2024). The relationship between adverse childhood experiences and developmental disorders: Implications for family support and child advocacy. Children’s Health Care, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/02739615.2024.2307021
Bagur, S., Cañas-Lerma, A. J., Mut-Amengual, B., & Verger, S. (2023a). The impact of family characteristics on the level of empowerment and the level of family quality of life of parents using early childhood intervention services. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/20473869.2023.2232561
Bagur, S., Cañas-Lerma, A. J., Mut-Amengual, B., & Verger, S. (2023b). The impact of family characteristics on the level of empowerment and the level of family quality of life of parents using early childhood intervention services. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/20473869.2023.2232561
Bagur, S., Cañas-Lerma, A. J., Mut-Amengual, B., & Verger, S. (2023c). The impact of family characteristics on the level of empowerment and the level of family quality of life of parents using early childhood intervention services. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/20473869.2023.2232561
Fengbo, L., Ning, L., & Yue, X. (2024). Impacts of family functioning on social avoidance and distress among people with disabilities: A moderated mediating model. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-05937-2
Humphreys, C., Novy, L., Cergovski, N., Lai, H. C., & McVilly, K. (2023). The impact of covid-19 lockdown on parents and young people with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Australian Social Work, 77(2), 183–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/0312407x.2023.2186254
Jacobsen, S. E. (2023). Social class, disability, and institutional interactions: The case of families with disabled children in the welfare state. Disability & Society, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2023.2230349
Kelley, K. N., Caporino, N. E., & Falkenstein, M. J. (2024). Family accommodation in intensive/residential treatment for adults with OCD: A cross-lagged panel analysis. Behavior Therapy, 55(2), 391–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2023.07.012
Renley, B. M., Salafia, C., Simon, K. A., Caba, A. E., Argenyi, M. S., Easton, L., & Watson, R. J. (2024). Disability status and associations with family social support and identity disclosure among Gender Minority Youth. LGBTQ+ Family: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 20(3), 233–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/27703371.2024.2327048
Scheibner, C., Scheibner, M., Hornemann, F., Arélin, M., Hennig, Y. D., Kiep, H., Wurst, U., Merkenschlager, A., & Gburek‐Augustat, J. (2023). Parenting stress in families of children with disabilities: Impact of type of disability and assessment of attending pediatricians. Child: Care, Health and Development, 50(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/cch.13193 -
The Impact of Technology on Business Communication Key Concept Explanation: The key topic of this assignment is the impact of technology on business communication. According to an article by Hargittai and Shafer (2016), technology has greatly transformed the way businesses
The Thread
Use the Internet to search for at least 5 scholarly resources that relate to the topic and have been published within the last 5 years. Find articles that discuss opposing views of the topic or highlight problems in implementation and achieving above or below expectations. Academic articles and journals must be reputable and obtained from professional websites that address the content of this course. Popular magazines and online sources such as Wikipedia are not permissible.
After reading the articles, select 1 article relating to the topic and address its purpose, analysis, conclusions and recommendations. If the formatting could be lost from the text box, attach a Word file to your thread, and adhere to the following format:
Key Concept Explanation: Define the key topic by using a source other than the textbook. Give a clear, concise overview of the essential elements relevant to understanding the key topic. In addition, explain why you are interested in this topic (e.g., academic curiosity, application to a current issue related to employment, or any other professional rationale) (about 200 words).
Comparison: Compare your research with what you have studied during the module/week in which the key topic/thread is assigned. Note differences or commonalities about the key topic, providing evidence that you have extended your understanding of this topic beyond the textbook readings. Hence the need to find opposing/cautionary/beneficial perspectives in your research. This is an opportunity for you to cite the additional articles you originally researched. Note: All references must be used at some point in the body of your main submission and replies. References without application to your narratives will be discounted. This section must be at least 300 words.
Article Summary: In your own words, provide a clear and concise summary of the article you selected. This section must be at least 200 words.
Application: Specifically state how the key topic has been applied to real-world businesses or describe the potential the key topic must influence today’s business world. Consider also the potential for overstating expectations. Your application must possess a professional rationale that demonstrates the significance of the key topic. This section must be at least 300 words.
Annotated Bibliography: Cite the articles you researched in current APA format. An annotation must accompany each citation. Each annotation will consist of a descriptive and evaluative paragraph that is at least 100 words. The annotations are designed to help your classmates in their understanding of the topic. In addition, provide a persistent link for each article.