Author: admin

  • “The Impact of Intercultural Marriage on Children: A Research Proposal” Introduction: Intercultural marriage, also known as mixed or interracial marriage, refers to a union between individuals from different cultural backgrounds. With the increasing globalization and migration, interc

    please write a research proposal about the effects of intercultural marriage on children. I have written part of an introduction and have found a few sources. I’ll attach pictures of the assignment aswell.

  • Title: Critical Appraisal and Its Role in Research Analysis

    Create a Microsoft Word document and answer the following questions. Your response should be a minimum of 3–5 sentences in length, original (in your own words), and use professional writing.
    What skill sets do you need to carry out a good quantitative or qualitative critical appraisal?
    What are the three main purposes of the critical appraisal process?
    How would you explain rapid appraisal to a fellow student?
    What does it mean when someone says that the critical appraisal tool must match the study design?
    Compare reliability, external validity, and internal validity in quantitative paradigms to dependability, credibility, and transferability in qualitative paradigms?

  • “The Cost and Benefits of Dating: An Exploration of SET Theory in Romantic Relationships”

    DISCUSSION POST ACTIVITY:
    Hypothetical Dating Scenario Activity 
    You have been dating X for a month now. You met through a mutual friend. Although you don’t find X extremely attractive, you cannot help but have a good time with him/her/them. You share a lot of the same interests and find yourself frequently sharing a good laugh. And although you don’t always agree on what constitutes a ‘‘good’ movie, you usually have a lively discussion of why you enjoy certain movies. One night, you are at a party with friends (and not X), and you are introduced to Y. You are immediately physically attracted to Y. However, you seem to have a difficult time holding a conversation with Y. You aren’t sure if that’s because you are nervous or because Y just isn’t very interesting or personable. Throughout the rest of the night, you continue to exchange flirtatious gazes with Y and get excited every time you catch Y’s eye. At the end of the night, Y asks you out. Do you accept and go out with Y or stay with X? A few weeks later, you are shopping at your favorite store. The line to make your purchase is quite long, so you strike up a conversation with Z who is in line behind you. Z is not your ‘‘typical’ type but is attractive, nonetheless. From your conversation, it seems Z is well off financially. As you near the checkout counter, Z offers to pay for your purchase and invites you out on a seemingly luxurious and exciting date. Do you accept Z’s offer or stay with your previous date?  
    So, which one are you choosing? X, Y, or Z? In this scenario, we are going to assume everyone is monogamous.  
    Why did you ultimately choose X, Y, or Z?  
    a) What were the greatest benefits you imagine you would receive from your date selection?  
    b) What do you believe would be the greatest cost/risk of being in a relationship  with your date selection? 
    How, if at all, do you think your gender affected the decision that you made?
    How, if at all, would your decision have been affected if you had been dating X for a longer period of time?
    How, if at all, do you think your choices would vary if you were currently at a different point and time in your life?
    Beyond your choices in this activity, how often do you believe you weigh the pros  and cons of a relationship?
    What may make you more or less aware of this process of weighing the pros and cons of a relationship? 
    I just want to remind everyone here that SET is not focused solely on romantic relationships, Homans, Blau, and Emerson argue we use it in every relationship and interaction. It is easy to see how we do perhaps weigh the cost/benefits of romantic relationships, but do you all think that we do this for other relationships just as much?  
    I also want yall to think about power for your response. How important is power in relationships and interactions? And while thinking about power, how does inequality come into play in this theory? Does race, gender, ability, and sexuality change interactions and if so, does the theory still work? And for fun, what of altruism? Do we think humans can act altruistically? Why or why not? 
    ATTACHED BELOW IS WHAT WAS ATTACHED WITH THE POST

  • The Pros and Cons of Government Surveillance: A Discussion on the Use of Stingray Systems by Law Enforcement

    Prepare a typed essay of 3 page in length (1-inch margins, double line
    spacing), briefly summarizing discussing your views on how the use
    of Government Surveillance Systems may have both positive and
    negative consequences.
    the government surveillance system i picked was the Stingray systems cops use

  • “UCONN Accelerated Second Bachelor Degree Program Admission Essays and Application Questions”

    Hello,
    I am seeking assistance with writing two Admission Essays (350 to 450 words each) for the UCONN Accelerated Second Bachelor Degree Program, along with answering six additional questions on the application (approximately 300 to 350 words per answer).
    I have attached the scoring rubric for both the essays and the questions. Please refer to the document titled “Copy for Writing – UCONN Application,” where the essay topics and application questions are highlighted in red. I have also included specific details about myself after each question, which can be utilized when crafting the answers.
    My goal is to ensure that both the essays and the responses to the questions meet the “Exceeds Expectations” criteria on the rubric to achieve a high score.
    Thank you so much!

  • “Exposing the Dark Reality of Child Labor: A Cultural Issue Close to My Heart” References: 1. “The Global Problem of Child Labor.” International Labor Organization, 2021, www.ilo.org/global/topics/child-labor/lang–

    Let’s examine what cultural issue pulls at your heart. What dangers or abuses or issues do you want to expose to your readers? The first part of your assignment, then, is to do some research into the issue that you choose.  You will need to find 4 references – these can be online, books, scholarly or newspaper articles, perhaps even a well sourced blog or a personal interview. What is important is that the issue matters to you. As you are researching, compile an annotated bibliography. That is, write down your reference and then follow your citation with 4 or 5 sentences that tell what information is contained in the source. How will this information inform your detective story? Jot down your ideas. This is your script. 
    Now that you have prepared your script, make a video presentation for your classmates. Using Video Note is the easiest and most efficient way to video your presentation. You might prefer to use your phone and record for You Tube. Or if you are comfortable with Apple or some other software, you can use that, but do double check that we can download it. Your presentation will only be about 2 minutes or so in length. Be sure that you mention your four references as you talk about the issue that concerns you and how you intend to weave this issue into your detective story.
    Cite your references at the end of your video and type them into the comments or description area in case your classmates want to find them.
    Upload a link to your video in the Discussion box so that you can share with your classmates. Then comment on several of your classmates’ posts. 16 points.
    Video Report – Research on a cultural issue
    Discussion Topic

  • “Designing a Nursing Poster or PowerPoint Presentation: Incorporating a Nursing Theory Framework” Introduction: In the field of nursing, the use of posters or PowerPoint presentations is a common method of disseminating information and sharing knowledge. These visual aids

    This assignment will discuss the framework of your poster or powerpoint for your final paper.  You will also discuss the nursing theorist that you chose to use in your paper.  Finally, you will discuss the design of your paper. 
    Each of these sections should be no more than 500-1000 words. 
    APA #7
    Free of errors
    References should be included. 
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8999008/
    do this assignment based on the article provided above 

  • Title: Literature Review on Post Licensure BSN Capstone Project “Improving the Quality of Research Sources: A Critical Examination of Common Mistakes and Best Practices”

    Find 5 peer reviewed articles about your capstone project.  Write a literature review.
    Please follow the assignment rubric
    A literature review is not an annotated bibliography in which you summarize briefly each article that you have reviewed. 
    While a summary of what you have read is contained within the literature review, it goes well beyond merely summarizing professional literature.
    It focuses on a specific topic of interest and includes your critical analysis of the relationship among different works, and relating this research to your work.
    In this case, your work will be your capstone project.
    It may be written as a stand-alone paper or to provide a theoretical framework and rationale for a research study (such as a thesis or dissertation).
    Your literature review will be written as a standalone paper.
    Below is information about the structure of the literature review, finding credible information for research assignments, formulating research questions, search strategies and a literature review template:
    Literature Review Template
    Post Licensure BSN Assignment 9.2019
    Post Licensure BSN Assignment 9.2019
    Criteria Ratings Pts
    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntentional Learning and Reflection
    15 pts
    Exemplary
    Identifies/addresses a relevant topic and a thesis that provides direction for the content that is engaging and thought provoking. The thesis clearly and concisely states the position, premise, or hypothesis and is consistently the focal point throughout the presentation. Demonstrates a sophisticated understanding and careful, critical analysis of the research topic and thesis (argument). Compares/contrasts perspectives, considers counter arguments or opposing positions, and draws original and thoughtful conclusions with future implications.
    10 pts
    Accomplished
    Identifies/addresses a relevant topic and a thesis that provides adequate direction for the content with some degree of interest for the reader. The thesis states the position, premise, or hypothesis, and is the focal point of the paper for the most part. Demonstrates an understanding and some critical analysis of the research topic and thesis (argument). Adequately compares/contrasts perspectives, counter-arguments, or opposing positions but broader connections and/or implications are not as thoroughly explored
    5 pts
    Developing
    Identifies a research topic but may be too broad in scope and/or the thesis is somewhat unclear and needs to be developed further. Focal point is not consistently maintained throughout the paper. Demonstrates general understanding with limited critical analysis of the research topic and thesis (argument). Summarizes perspectives, counter-arguments, or opposing positions.
    0 pts
    Unsatisfactory – Beginning
    Fails to identify a relevant research topic or is not clearly defined and/or the paper lacks focus throughout. Demonstrates a lack of understanding and inadequate analysis of the research topic and thesis. Analysis is superficial based on opinions and preferences rather than critical analysis.
    15 pts
    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDecision Making and Clinical Reasoning
    15 pts
    Exemplary
    Provides distinguishing, and accurate evidence base analyzing and integrating the main concept beyond the required (5) peer-reviewed sources. Research sources are relevant, accurate, current (less than 5 years old) reliable, reflecting and validating the strength of the content.
    10 pts
    Accomplished
    Provides distinguishing, and accurate evidence base analyzing and integrating the main concept beyond the required (5) peer-reviewed sources. Research sources are relevant, accurate, current (less than 5 years old) reliable, reflecting and validating the strength of the content.
    5 pts
    Developing
    Provides some evidence to support the central position with less than 5 acceptable research sources. Some sources may not be relevant, accurate, and reliable, greater than 5 years old and may not be from scholarly sources.
    0 pts
    Unsatisfactory – Beginning
    Lacks sufficient research sources to support the central position and/or, if included, are generally not relevant, accurate, or reliable. Contains numerous factual mistakes, omissions, or oversimplifications.
    15 pts
    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization & Presentation
    15 pts
    Exemplary
    Content is effectively organized. Ideas are arranged logically, flows smoothly, with a strong progression of thought from paragraph to paragraph connecting to the central position. Includes all required components (introduction, body, conclusion, citations, references, etc.). For a slide presentation, the design, font size, style, and spacing are optimal for audience viewing
    10 pts
    Accomplished
    Content is adequately organized. Ideas are arranged reasonably with a progression of thought from paragraph to paragraph connecting to the central position. Includes required components of an introduction, body, and conclusion. For a slide presentation, one or more components of the design, font size, style, and spacing may be less than ideal for audience viewing.
    5 pts
    Developing
    Content is somewhat organized. For a paper, occasionally ideas from paragraph to paragraph may not flow well and/or connect to the central position or be clear as a whole. May be missing a required component and/or components may be less than complete. For a slide presentation, multiple aspects of the design require further development for optimal audience viewing.
    0 pts
    Unsatisfactory – Beginning
    Content lacks logical organization and impedes readers’ comprehension of ideas. For a paper, central position is rarely evident from paragraph to paragraph and/or the paper is missing multiple required components. For a slide presentation, the design lacks clarity for optimal viewing by an audience.
    15 pts
    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting and APA Formatting
    15 pts
    Exemplary
    Content is well written and uses standard English characterized by elements of a strong writing style. Basically, free from grammar, punctuation, spelling, usage, or formatting errors. APA guidelines for formatting are consistently followed. Includes in-text citations and references that are written correctly.

  • “Social Media as Evidence in Criminal Investigations”

    Create a video presentation discussing the use of social media as evidence for criminal investigations.
    For this assignment, you will record a video presentation using Canvas Studio. The video should be between 3 and 4 minutes in length. instructions for using Canvas StudioLinks to an external site..
    TOPIC: Discuss the methods and strategies employed by the police to use social media as a tool for gathering evidence related to criminal activities. Cite two specific instances where social media was used successfully by law enforcement as a source of evidence. Identify and explain one constitutional challenge or concern that arises when police use social media for evidence collection.
    Structure:
    Introduction: Briefly introduce the topic and provide an overview of your main points.
    Main Body:
    Discuss how police can utilize social media to gather evidence of criminality.
    Provide two concrete examples of instances where the police used social media as evidence.
    Discuss one constitutional challenge that law enforcement faces when using social media as evidence.
    Conclusion: Recap the main points of your presentation, tying them together to underline their relevance to policing and law enforcement.
    Ensure that your arguments are well-researched and supported by reliable sources.
    For assistance with Canvas Studio, creating or uploading your file, please review the instructions for using StudioLinks to an external site..
    Optional: If you are more comfortable expressing your ideas in written form, you may choose to submit a 2–3 page paper instead, addressing the same points.

  • Exploring the Impact of Social Contexts on Child Psychology and Development: A Critical Analysis of Racism, Prejudice, Socioeconomic Status, and Poverty

    Exploring the Impacts of Social Contexts on Child Psychology and Development
    Title Examples: “Exploring the Impact of Racism/Prejudice/Socio-economic 
    status/Poverty on Child Development”
    Content: Reflect on what you have learned about the role of social contexts on 
    child psychology and development. Your blog should include:
    Course Connection: Based on what you learned in class, how has 
    racism/prejudice/SES/poverty impacted child development?
    Research: Choose one area (mental health, education, peer relationships, physical development) and discuss how racism/prejudice/socioeconomic have impacted these areas.
    Include a summary and critique of one scholarly, peer review study 
    that was published in the last 10 years (anything earlier will receive a deduction in points) and one secondary source (i.e., podcast or news report at minimum 10 minutes long and produced within the last 10 
    years)
    Conclusion Section. Taking everything that you have learned together 
    (course material, research, and podcast/news report), what conclusions 
    can you draw? What are some of your personal reflections from these 
    resources? What are some key takeaways for your reader?
    Be sure to include the following:
    Photos/images throughout the blog (at least 3).
    Link to the article and podcast that you discussed.
    Structure of Blog
    Begin with a summary of what you learned in class related to your chosen topic (100-200 words)
    Summary of the research study that you found on your chosen topic (100-200 words).
    Summary of the podcast or news report (100-200 words)
    Critique of the study and podcast/news report.
    Conclusion, personal reflections, and key takeaways from your blog entry.
    Formatting
    Can be any font style that is legible to the reader, but font size must be no  larger than 14.
    Minimum word count for blog entries is 600 words.
    Blogs must be written in paragraph form, no bullet points allowed.
    Proper grammar and punctuation must be used. Blogs can be written in 
    first, second, or third person point of view.
    Citations must be included. You must cite the book, your article, and the 
    podcast in APA style. Citations should be included in-text and a separate 
    reference section should be included at the end of your blog.