Forced Migration Simulation OR Research Project.
Forced Migration Simulation
Your task is to design a simulation quiz in a “choose-your-own-adventure” style in order to
teach the general public about the forced migration experience. The assignment consists of:
1. Opening Scenario: Describe who “you” are, the context of your forced migration, and
anything else that is needed. One to two paragraphs (max 150 words)
2. Questions, Options and Consequences: at least 6 multiple choice questions with at least
two options per question and specific consequences for each option. Each set of
questions, options and consequences should contain reference(s) to course materials.
Max 300 words per set (300 x 6).
3. Critical Reflections: Please write about your main objectives and considerations in
designing the simulation quiz, as well as specific policy recommendations that emerge
from your simulation quiz. This section should also contain references to course
materials (max 800 words; please ensure that you have proper paragraphs).
You are expected to draw on at least 5 sources from the course. You will be asked to illustrate
key concepts, laws or policies, challenges etc., in your scenarios. No outside research is
required. Further instructions and an example will be posted on Blackboard.
Research Project
Your research project may take any of the following forms:
6
• Traditional scholarly essay (1500 to 2000 words)
• Academic Blog (1500 – 2000 words)
• Podcast, script, and shownotes (10-15 minutes)
A list of suggested topics, “how to” directions, and evaluation expectations will be provided on
Blackboard.
All research projects, regardless of form of delivery, require reference to at least 5 sources, 3 of
which are peer reviewed academic articles or chapters in edited books. Appropriate non-
academic sources include investigative journalism, academic blogs, NGO reports, news articles,
documentaries.
Author: admin
-
Title: “Forced Migration: A Simulation of the Experience and Its Impact”
-
“Exploring the Rules of Procedure: Applying Florida Law to the Case of Rompilla v. Beard”
Introduction
There are hundreds of jurisdictions in the United States on the state and federal level. Each jurisdiction can have its own set of laws, including rules of evidence and procedure that govern how an individual’s rights are protected. A defendant may receive greater protections in one state jurisdiction than in another. During our review of the material, in the book, understand that often you’re learning about federal law or common law. However, Florida law mirrors federal law very closely. For example, the Federal Rules of Evidence and Florida Rules of Evidence are nearly identical substantively and are even numbered similarly. Florida simply adds a “90” in front of its rules of evidence. Federal Rule of Evidence 403 is 90.403 in Florida. As we learn more about the different laws that govern criminal procedure feel comfortable that your knowledge will be easily applied to any Florida scenario. Unless specified, please use Florida law when answering your assignments.
Case
View the video–Court Shorts: Right to CounselLinks to an external site.. Read the case of Rompilla v. Beard, in Chapter 12, Page 499 of your textbook; Was He Denied His Right to “Effective” Counsel?
Directions
Each FRCP assignment is an opportunity for you to explore and learn more about the rules of procedure for Florida. The rules of procedure are extensive, but once you learn to navigate them they will provide answers to most criminal procedure questions a person may encounter. You will apply the rules of procedure that are relevant to the legal scenario in your book. To complete your FRCP Assignment, you must:
Identify two rules of procedure that apply to the legal issues discussed in the case;
Summarize the meaning of two rules, including the relevant subsections;
Explain why you think the rules apply to the legal issues in the case (support your opinion by citing specific references to the language in the case). -
Summary of Lifespan Theories (Chapter 9.2) In Chapter 9.2 of the textbook “Psychology 2e,” the focus is on lifespan theories, specifically the psychosocial theory of Erik Erikson and
READ 9.1, 9.2, and 9.3 but this summary is ONLY about 9.2.
https://openstax.org/books/psychology-2e/pages/9-introduction
above is where you will find what to read, I attached what it is supposed to look like, and remember only do the summary on 9.2 which is lifespan theories -
Title: Understanding and Treating Anxiety in Samantha Miller: A Case Analysis
Case File: Samantha Miller
Samantha Miller, a 20-year-old Caucasian female, is a sophomore college student majoring in Psychology at Southwest Virginia Community College. She resides with her parents and younger sibling in a rural neighborhood, coming from a middle-class background. Samantha presents with symptoms of excessive worry and tension that permeate multiple facets of her daily life. She frequently finds herself on edge, grappling with an overwhelming sense of unease that she struggles to manage. This persistent anxiety manifests in various physical symptoms, including restlessness, irritability, and muscle tension, which significantly disrupt her ability to focus on her academic studies and participate in social activities. Despite her efforts, Samantha feels constantly besieged by anxious thoughts that invade her mind, making it challenging to concentrate or enjoy leisure activities. Her concerns extend beyond the present moment, as she frequently expresses worry about her academic performance and future career prospects. These apprehensions contribute to her overall distress, exacerbating her feelings of anxiety and further compromising her well-being.
Instructions: read the case file, Samantha Miller. Provide the following details in your analysis: client demographics, presenting problem, diagnostic impressions, etiology of the problem/disorder, and treatment recommendations.
Format:
Include a title page, 1-2 pages of content, and a references page.
Use Times New Roman 12-point font and 1” margins.
Use a minimum of two peer-reviewed sources. Your references should be cited in a proper APA format. -
“Exploring the Impact of Social Media on Society: A Comprehensive Analysis”
See attached instructions. I am looking for someone that can do all 4 parts including this assignment
-
“Developing a Comprehensive Care Coordination Plan: Addressing Health Issues, Utilizing Community Resources, and Considering Ethical and Policy Implications”
Build on the preliminary plan document you created in Assessment 1. Your final plan should be a scholarly APA-formatted paper, 5–7 pages in length, not including title page and reference list.
Supporting Evidence
Support your care coordination plan with peer-reviewed articles, course study resources, and Healthy People 2030 resources. Cite at least three credible sources.
Grading Requirements
The requirements, outlined below, correspond to the grading criteria in the Final Care Coordination Plan Scoring Guide, so be sure to address each point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.
Design patient-centered health interventions and timelines for a selected health care problem.
Address three health care issues.
Design an intervention for each health issue.
Identify three community resources for each health intervention.
Consider ethical decisions in designing patient-centered health interventions.
Consider the practical effects of specific decisions.
Include the ethical questions that generate uncertainty about the decisions you have made.
Identify relevant health policy implications for the coordination and continuum of care.
Cite specific health policy provisions.
Describe priorities that a care coordinator would establish when discussing the plan with a patient and family member, making changes based upon evidence-based practice.
Clearly explain the need for changes to the plan.
Use the literature on evaluation as a guide to compare learning session content with best practices, including how to align teaching sessions to the Healthy People 2030 document.
Use the literature on evaluation as guide to compare learning session content with best practices.
Align teaching sessions to the Healthy People 2030 document.
Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.
Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling. -
“Implementing Success: A Comprehensive Business Consulting Plan” Business Consulting Plan Part 3: Implementation “Implementing a Business Consulting Plan: Evaluating ROI, Creating Urgency, and Communicating with Stakeholders” “Developing an Effective Communication Plan: Strategies, Stakeholders, and Implementation Timeline” “Implementing a Recommendation: Next Steps and Responsible Parties” “Improving Writing Clarity and Organization: Utilizing Quality Sources and SWS Style”
Your Business Portfolio
Throughout your journey in the program, you have completed many deliverables that could be added to a professional business portfolio to share with future employers. It is recommended that you add one core assignment to the business portfolio in each course within the program. These assignments will demonstrate your strategic thinking in each area, and they will also reflect your own growth and development.
This will be your business portfolio assignment for this course.
Overview
Throughout this course, you have created assignments for a business consulting pitch deck. In your Week 3 assignment you shared important data and insights about your company. In Week 6 you analyzed the data and provided a targeted recommendation for the challenge or opportunity faced by the company. In this assignment, you will continue in your role as a hired consultant and compile an implementation plan that addresses communication, collaboration, motivation, and return on investment. This is your final (cumulative) pitch deck presentation.
Instructions
The goal of this assignment is to convince leadership at the company to accept your recommendation and implement the strategies in your proposal.
Important: In this assignment you will combine the three assignments (PPT decks) together into a single, final pitch deck that could be presented to your company leadership. Be sure you have made the necessary changes to your previous assignments based on instructor feedback. You will also update your Sources slide to include all resources used throughout the project.
The assignment must be completed in the provided PowerPoint template.
Download and save the Week 9_Assignment_Template [PPTX] Download Week 9_Assignment_Template [PPTX].
Follow the guidelines provided in the Strayer Library: SWS Guidelines for Slideshow Presentations.
Review the rubric carefully before you begin working on the assignment.
Review and incorporate the instructor feedback from your week 3 and week 6 assignments. Those slides will be incorporated into this deck and submitted as part of this assignment for the full presentation.
Using the template, complete seven additional slides that will be the final part of a pitch deck for the company that hired you as a business consultant. Each slide should include 1-2 paragraphs of speaker notes that will be utilized to explain the content to the company leadership.
Important note: This final presentation will be 20 slides in total: five content slides from assignment #1 [exclude the title and sources slides], six slides from assignment #2 [exclude the title and sources slides], and nine slides from this assignment [including a title slide and cumulative sources slide].
Slide 1: Title slide. Add the name of the company as a subtitle and your name and the date.
Slide 2: Describe the potential impact of not acting on the selected challenge or opportunity. Use data to support your conclusion. (Detailed explanation should be placed in the speaker notes.)
Slide 3: Evaluate the potential return on investment (ROI) for acting on this challenge or opportunity. Use data to support your explanation. (Detailed explanation should be placed in the speaker notes.)
Slide 4: Implementation strategy that advises the company’s leadership on how to create a sense of urgency and shared mission around implementing the business consulting plan. (Detailed explanation should be placed in the speaker notes.)
Slides 5-8 will come from your Week 7 communication plan. (Note: Be sure you have addressed and incorporated instructor feedback.)
Slide 5: State the overall objective of the communication plan and the key stakeholders who are directly or indirectly impacted by the recommended strategy. Indicate if the stakeholder will be leading or following the change(s). (Detailed explanation should be placed in the speaker notes.)
Slide 6: Determine the appropriate stakeholder communication channels to provide information and actively listen to concerns or recommendations. Explain how this is inclusive and motivating to the organizational culture. (Detailed explanation should be placed in the speaker notes.)
Slide 7: Provide a timeline for the implementation including important milestones and deadlines. (Detailed explanation should be placed in the speaker notes.)
Slide 8: Summarize the next steps in the recommendation and specify the key individuals or departments responsible for executing and overseeing the implementation plan. This promotes accountability and clarity in the process. (Detailed explanation should be placed in the speaker notes.)
Slide 9: Sources slide. Use three or more quality sources to support your writing. Choose sources that are credible, relevant, and appropriate. Cite each source listed on your source slide at least one time within your assignment. (Note: The final sources slide should be cumulative to include all sources used in the three assignments.)
For help with research, writing, and citation, access the library.
Combine all of your slides from week 3, week 6, and this week’s assignment together into one singular presentation file. This is your full pitch deck that you would present to the company leadership. (Note: See the guide in the resources section for help on how to reuse and combine slides together in a PowerPoint presentation.)
Produce writing that is clear and well organized and applies appropriate Strayer Writing Standards (SWS) style. Writing contains accurate grammar, mechanics, and spelling.
This course requires the use of Strayer Writing Standards (SWS). The library is your home for SWS assistance, including citations and formatting. Please refer to the Library site for all support. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
Resources
SWS Guidelines for Slideshow Presentations
The following tools available in the Strayer Library will help you with your research:
Company, Industry, and Market Research using Business Source UltimateLinks to an external site. (Start with this resource – it will be very helpful as you search for specific information.)
Business Source Ultimate Library Guide
Business Source Ultimate Database
Market Line Company Profiles – Type the company name in the 2nd field (Note: your company may or may not be listed here.)
SWOT analyses can be found under the publication type.
Library of Congress Research GuidesLinks to an external site. (See their left-hand menu.)
The following websites can provide helpful data on budgets and spending:
U.S. National Debt: Implications for Organizations
Government spending (Mind map)
Fiscal Data US Treasury Dept.Links to an external site.
USA SpendingLinks to an external site.
Video tutorial on how to reuse (combine) slides in PowerPoint presentations:
Video tutorial on adding speaker notes to PowerPoint presentations:
The specific course learning outcome associated with this assignment is the following:
Propose a leadership implementation and communication strategy that is inclusive and motivating to the organizational culture.
View Rubric
Week 9 Assignment – ePortfolio – Business Consulting Plan Part 3: Implementation
Week 9 Assignment – ePortfolio – Business Consulting Plan Part 3: Implementation
CriteriaRatingsPts
Describe the potential impact of not acting on the challenge or opportunity. Use data to support your conclusion. Speaker notes are used correctly for detailed explanation.17.5 to >15.74 pts
Exemplary
Described the potential impact of not acting on the challenge or opportunity. Used data to support your conclusion. Speaker notes are used correctly for detailed explanation.15.74 to >13.99 pts
Competent
Described the potential impact of not acting on the challenge or opportunity. Used data to support your conclusion. Speaker notes are used correctly but need to be more detailed for a full explanation.13.99 to >12.24 pts
Satisfactory
Identified the potential impact of not acting on the challenge or opportunity. Did not use accurate or sufficient data to support your conclusion. Speaker notes are used correctly but need to be more detailed for a full explanation.12.24 to >10.49 pts
Needs Improvement
Identified the potential impact of not acting on the challenge or opportunity. Did not use data to support your conclusion. Speaker notes with explanation are missing.10.49 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
Did not submit or did not describe the potential impact of not acting on the challenge or opportunity./ 17.5 pts
Evaluate the potential return on investment (ROI) for acting on this challenge or opportunity. Use data to support your explanation. Speaker notes are used correctly for detailed explanation.
17.5 to >15.74 pts
Exemplary
Evaluated the potential return on investment (ROI) for acting on this challenge or opportunity. Used data to support your explanation. Speaker notes are used correctly for detailed explanation.15.74 to >13.99 pts
Competent
Evaluated the potential return on investment (ROI) for acting on this challenge or opportunity. Used data to support your explanation. Speaker notes are used correctly but need to be more detailed for a full explanation.13.99 to >12.24 pts
Satisfactory
Described the potential return on investment (ROI) for acting on this challenge or opportunity. Did not use accurate or sufficient data to support your explanation. Speaker notes are used correctly but need to be more detailed for a full explanation.12.24 to >10.49 pts
Needs Improvement
Described the potential return on investment (ROI) for acting on this challenge or opportunity. Did not use data to support your explanation. Speaker notes are missing.10.49 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
Did not submit or did not evaluate the potential return on investment (ROI) for acting on this challenge or opportunity./ 17.5 pts
Create an implementation strategy that advises the company’s leadership on how to create a sense of urgency and shared mission around implementing the business consulting plan. Speaker notes are used correctly for detailed explanation.
17.5 to >15.74 pts
Exemplary
Created an implementation strategy that advises the company’s leadership on how to create a sense of urgency and shared mission around implementing the business consulting plan. Speaker notes are used correctly for detailed explanation.15.74 to >13.99 pts
Competent
Created an implementation strategy that advises the company’s leadership on how to create a sense of urgency and shared mission around implementing the business consulting plan. Speaker notes are used correctly but need to be more detailed for a full explanation.13.99 to >12.24 pts
Satisfactory
Identified some steps for an implementation strategy but did not provide enough detail or evidence to create a sense of urgency or shared mission around implementing the business consulting plan. Speaker notes are used correctly but need to be more detailed for a full explanation.12.24 to >10.49 pts
Needs Improvement
Identified some steps for an implementation strategy but did not provide enough detail or evidence to create a sense of urgency or shared mission around implementing the business consulting plan. Speaker notes are missing.10.49 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
Did not submit or did not create an implementation strategy that advises the company’s leadership on how to create a sense of urgency and shared mission around implementing the business consulting plan./ 17.5 pts
State the overall objective of the communication plan and the key stakeholders who are directly or indirectly impacted by the recommended strategy. Indicate if the stakeholder will be leading or following the change(s). Speaker notes are used correctly for detailed explanation.
17.5 to >15.74 pts
Exemplary
Stated the overall objective of the communication plan and the key stakeholders who are directly or indirectly impacted by the recommended strategy. Indicated if the stakeholder will be leading or following the change(s). Speaker notes are used correctly for detailed explanation.15.74 to >13.99 pts
Competent
Stated the overall objective of the communication plan and the key stakeholders who are directly or indirectly impacted by the recommended strategy. Did not indicate if the stakeholder will be leading or following the change(s). Speaker notes are used correctly but are lacking necessary detail for a full explanation.13.99 to >12.24 pts
Satisfactory
Stated the overall objective of the communication plan. Did not identify the key stakeholders who are directly or indirectly impacted by the recommended strategy. Did not indicate if the stakeholder will be leading or following the change(s). Speaker notes are used correctly but are lacking necessary detail for a full explanation.12.24 to >10.49 pts
Needs Improvement
Stated the overall objective of the communication plan. Did not identify the key stakeholders who are directly or indirectly impacted by the recommended strategy. Did not indicate if the stakeholder will be leading or following the change(s). Speaker notes are missing. Instructor feedback was not addressed from communication plan activity.10.49 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
Did not submit or did not state the overall objective of the communication plan./ 17.5 pts
Determine the appropriate stakeholder communication channels to provide information and actively listen to concerns or recommendations. Explain how this is inclusive and motivating to the organizational culture. Speaker notes are used correctly for detailed explanation.
17.5 to >15.74 pts
Exemplary
Accurately determined the appropriate stakeholder communication channels to provide information and actively listen to concerns or recommendations. Explained how this is inclusive and motivating to the organizational culture. Speaker notes are used correctly for detailed explanation.15.74 to >13.99 pts
Competent
Accurately determined the appropriate stakeholder communication channels to provide information and actively listen to concerns or recommendations. Explained how this is inclusive and motivating to the organizational culture. Speaker notes are used but lack necessary details for a full explanation.13.99 to >12.24 pts
Satisfactory
Determined the stakeholder communication channels to provide information and actively listen to concerns or recommendations with 1-2 errors or omissions. Explained how this is inclusive and motivating to the organizational culture. Speaker notes are used but lack necessary details for a full explanation.12.24 to >10.49 pts
Needs Improvement
Determined the stakeholder communication channels to provide information and actively listen to concerns or recommendations with 3-4 errors or omissions. Or did not explain how this is inclusive and motivating to the organizational culture. Speaker notes are missing. Instructor feedback was not addressed from communication plan activity.10.49 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
Did not submit or did not determine the appropriate stakeholder communication channels./ 17.5 pts
Provide a timeline for the implementation including important milestones and deadlines. Speaker notes are used correctly for detailed explanation.
17.5 to >15.74 pts
Exemplary
Provided a timeline for the implementation including important milestones and deadlines. Speaker notes are used correctly for detailed explanation.15.74 to >14.45 pts
Competent
Provided a timeline for the implementation that is missing important milestones and deadlines. Speaker notes are used but lack necessary details for a full explanation.14.45 to >12.24 pts
Satisfactory
Provided a timeline for the implementation that is missing important milestones and deadlines. Speaker notes are missing. Instructor feedback was not addressed from the communication plan activity.12.24 to >10.47 pts
Needs Improvement
Provided a timeline for the implementation that is missing important milestones and deadlines. Speaker notes are missing. Instructor feedback was not addressed from communication plan activity.10.47 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
Did not submit or did not provide a timeline for the implementation./ 17.5 pts
Summarize the next steps in the recommendation and specify the key individuals or departments responsible for executing and overseeing the implementation plan. This promotes accountability and clarity in the process. Speaker notes are used correctly for detailed explanation.
17.5 to >15.74 pts
Exemplary
Accurately summarized the next steps in the recommendation and specified the key individuals or departments responsible for executing and overseeing the implementation plan. Promoted accountability and clarity in the process. Speaker notes are used correctly for detailed explanation.15.74 to >14.45 pts
Competent
Summarized the next steps in the recommendation and specified the key individuals or departments responsible for executing and overseeing the implementation plan. Promoted accountability and clarity in the process. Speaker notes are used but lack necessary details for a full explanation.14.45 to >12.24 pts
Satisfactory
Identified the next steps in the recommendation. Specified individuals or departments responsible for executing and overseeing the implementation plan with 1-2 errors or omissions. Did not clearly promote accountability and clarity in the process. Speaker notes are used but lack necessary details for a full explanation.12.24 to >10.47 pts
Needs Improvement
Identified the next steps in the recommendation with errors or omissions. Did not specify individuals or departments responsible for executing and overseeing the implementation plan. Did not promote accountability and clarity in the process. Speaker notes are missing.10.47 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
Did not submit or did not summarize the next steps in the recommendation./ 17.5 pts
Combine all three assignments (weeks 3, 6, and 9) together into one singular presentation including speaker notes and one cumulative sources slide.
17.5 to >15.74 pts
Exemplary
Accurately combined all three assignments together into one singular presentation including speaker notes and a cumulative sources slide.15.74 to >14.45 pts
Competent
Combined all three assignments together into one singular presentation including speaker notes and a cumulative sources slide. 1-2 errors or omissions.14.45 to >12.24 pts
Satisfactory
Combined all three assignments together into one singular presentation. Missing speaker notes on more than one slide. Sources slide with 3-4 errors or omissions.12.24 to >10.47 pts
Needs Improvement
Combined all three assignments together into one singular presentation. No speaker notes and/or no sources slide.10.47 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
Did not submit or did not accurately combine all three assignments together into one singular presentation./ 17.5 pts
Produce writing that is clear and well organized and applies appropriate SWS style. Writing contains accurate grammar, mechanics, and spelling.
17.5 to >15.74 pts
Exemplary
Produced writing that is clear and well organized and applies appropriate SWS style. Writing contains accurate grammar, mechanics, and spelling. Errors are minimal (0–3).15.74 to >14.45 pts
Competent
Produced writing that is clear and well organized and applies appropriate SWS style. Writing contains accurate grammar, mechanics, and spelling. There may be minor errors (4–5), but they do not impact the ability of the reader to understand the writing.14.45 to >12.24 pts
Satisfactory
Produced writing that attempts to be clear and well organized and to apply appropriate SWS style. Writing contains some errors in grammar, mechanics, and spelling. Overall, errors are moderate (6–7) and have some impact on the ability of the reader to understand the writing.12.24 to >10.47 pts
Needs Improvement
Produced writing that has noticeable issues with clarity, organization, and the application of SWS style. Errors in grammar, mechanics, and spelling detract from readability. Overall, errors are major (8–9) and have a definite impact on the ability of the reader to understand the writing.10.47 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
Produced writing that lacks clarity, organization, or does not apply SWS style. There are significant issues with grammar, mechanics, and spelling. Overall, errors are significant (10 or more), and the reader will have difficulty understanding the writing./ 17.5 pts
Use at least three quality sources to support your writing. Choose sources that are credible, relevant, and appropriate. Cite each source listed on your source page at least one time within your assignment.
17.5 to >15.74 pts
Exemplary
Cited three or more credible, relevant, and appropriate sources.15.74 to >14.45 pts
Competent
Cited two credible, relevant, and appropriate sources.14.45 to >12.24 pts
Satisfactory
Cited one or two sources or one source was not credible, relevant, or appropriate.12.24 to >10.47 pts
Needs Improvement
Cited sources that are not credible, relevant, or appropriate.10.47 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
Did not cite any sources./ 17.5 pts
Total Points: 0 -
Title: “Exploring the Efficacy and Safety of a Newly Released Pharmacological Agent: A Review of
in “ rubric is attatched but please make sure sources are scholarly (within 5 years) &
Choose a pharmacological agent that has been on the market less than 5 years. APA format -
Title: Critical Appraisal of Medical Applications for Clinical Decision Making “Implementing a Mobile App in Healthcare: Improving Patient Care in a Private Practice Setting”
Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to this question from any other website since I am already well aware of this. I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure that the answer comes up with way less than 18% on Studypool’s internal plagiarism checker since anything above this is not acceptable according to Studypool’s standards. I will not accept answers that are above this standard.
No AI or Chatbot! I will be sure to check this.
PREPARATION AND PAPER OUTLINE:1. PART 1: The medical application selection for this assignment is contingent upon the month of your birthday. Use the table below to identify the Medical App for this assignment.
Your Birth MonthMedical App for Assignment
January, FebruaryMDCalc
March, April, MayMedscape
June, July, AugustThe Chief Complaint
September, OctoberDrugs.com
November, DecemberSingleCare
Use the Google Play Store for Android devices or the Apple iTunes App Store for Apple devices to search for the medical application as determined by the table above.
In order to complete the following guided appraisal, download the app to a mobile device (smartphone or tablet). The apps are free and do not require purchase to complete this assignment.
Provide proof of download by attaching a screenshot of the device screen in JPEG or PDF format to the assignment upload tab (in addition to submitting this assignment). Following the general instructions below for smartphone devices (specific device instructions may vary):Android 4.0 and Newer: (Galaxy SIII, Galaxy S 4, Galaxy Note, HTC One, Nexus phones, Droid phones)Any Android phone running Ice Cream Sandwich (4.0) or later can easily take a screenshot. Hold the Power and Volume Down buttons together until the screen flashes and you hear the shutter sound. The screenshot image will appear in your Gallery app, usually inside the Screenshots folder
iPhoneThe method for taking a screenshot in iOS has been the same since version 2.0. Hold the Power (Sleep/Wake) and Home buttons together until the screen flashes and you hear the shutter sound. The screenshot image will appear in your Photos app under Camera Roll.
2. PART 2: Answer the Medical App Critical Appraisal questions thoughtfully and comprehensively. Use the criteria headings on this outline as the headings on your properly APA- formatted paper.
NAME: What is the name of the app?
AUTHOR: Who created, developed, or maintains the app? Explain.
ENDORSEMENT: Is the app licensed by the Food and Drug Administration, other government agency, or endorsed by an academic institution or medical professional organization? Explain.
OPERATION: Which platform (mobile or web-based) is suitable for the app and why?
AESTHETICS: Is the information displayed in a way that is easy to navigate? Is it easy to use? Can you use it without instructions? Explain.
PURPOSE: What is the intended purpose or use of the app?
CLINICAL DECISION MAKING: What influence does the app have on clinical decision making? Explain.
SAFETY: Is there potential for patient harm? Explain.
PRIVACY/SECURITY: Does the app have privacy statement or setting? Is there a clear privacy policy stating information will be encrypted and not shared with third parties? Does the app share information on social networks? Are users notified in the event of a breach of privacy and health information? Explain.
USER: For whom is the app intended (providers, patients, or others)? Explain.
DISTRIBUTION: Is it designed for local use or wider distribution? Explain.
CREDIBILITY: How credible are the sources of information? How do you know? Explain.
RELEVANCE: How current is the information in the app? When was the last update? Is the content consistent with evidence-based literature or best practices/standards of care? Explain.
3. PART 3: Provide one example of an appropriate patient or clinical scenario for this app. The example should include the following details:
Patient Age-population (Pediatric, Adult, Geriatric)
Clinical Setting (Hospital, Private Practice, Extended Living Facility)
History of Present Illness and Diagnosis or Condition
Provide a detailed description of the app in your example. When will the app be implemented (at the Point-of-care or elsewhere)? Who will use the app? What potential impact will it have on the scenario? Incorporate the critical appraisal information from Part 2. Provide one evidence-based scholarly article as a reference to support clinical decision-making.
4. This assignment will be graded on the quality of the information, inclusion of one evidence-based scholarly resource, use of citations, use of Standard English grammar, and organization based on the required components (see the paper headings and content details in Part 1).
5. The length of the paper is to be between 1,000 and 1,500 words, excluding title page and reference list.
6. Create this assignment using Microsoft (MS) Word. You can tell that the document is saved as a MS Word document because it will end in “.docx.”
7. APA format is required in this assignment, explicitly for in-text citations and the reference list. Use 12-point Times New Roman font with 1-inch margins and double spacing. See the APA manual for details regarding proper citation. See resources under Course Resources, “Guidelines for Writing Professional Papers” for further clarification.
* Scholarly Sources: Only scholarly sources are acceptable for citation and reference in this course. These include peer-reviewed publications, government reports, or sources written by a professional or scholar in the field. The textbooks and lessons are NOT considered to be outside scholarly sources. For the threaded discussions and reflection posts, reputable internet sources such as websites by government agencies (URL ends in .gov) and respected organizations (often ends in .org) can be counted as scholarly sources. The best outside scholarly source to use is a peer-reviewed nursing journal. You are encouraged to use the Chamberlain library and search one of the available databases for a peer-reviewed journal article. The following sources should not be used: Wikipedia, Wikis, or blogs. These websites are not considered scholarly as anyone can add to these. Please be aware that .com websites can vary in scholarship and quality. For example, the American Heart Association is a .com site with scholarship and quality. It is the responsibility of the student to determine the scholarship and quality of any .com site. Ask your instructor before using any site if you are unsure. Points will be deducted from the rubric if the site does not demonstrate scholarship or quality. Current outside scholarly sources must be published with the last 5 years. Instructor permission must be obtained BEFORE the assignment is due if using a source that is older than 5 years.
Requirements: 1,000-1,500 Words Times New Roman Size 12 Font Double-Spaced APA Format Excluding the Title and Reference Pages
Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to this question from any other website since I am already well aware of this. I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure that the answer comes up with way less than 18% on Studypool’s internal plagiarism checker since anything above this is not acceptable according to Studypool’s standards. I will not accept answers that are above this standard.
No AI or Chatbot! I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure to include an introduction paragraph with a clear thesis statement in the last sentence of the introduction paragraph and a conclusion paragraph.
Please be sure to carefully follow the instructions.
No plagiarism & No Course Hero & No Chegg. The assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
Please be sure to include at least one in-text citation in each body paragraph. -
“The Ethical Dilemma of a Small Business Owner: Choosing Between Dishonesty and Financial Struggle”
Imagine yourself owning a small business that repairs and refinishes antique furniture. You employ a staff of 15 and have been in business for about 10 years. During that time, you have built a reputation for yourself by only delivering the highest quality restorations. In the past year, you have fallen on hard times because of a slumping economy.
One Friday, your office manager comes to you and says, “We won’t have enough money to make payroll unless we deliver the following five jobs, but the production foreman just told me that they all have flaws.” You inspect the jobs and think you can pass the workmanship off to the customer if you lie and tell them some of the defects were there when the furniture was brought in. Your only other option is to not deliver the jobs and tell your employees you cannot pay them.
What do you do, why will you do it and what will be the outcome of your decision (how will it affect your employees, your business and your view of yourself)?
Rules: It’s an either-or; you can’t borrow from the bank again. You can’t borrow from your friends. You can’t steal the money. You can’t sell your car or do a “go fund me”. You have to make a choice from the two options presented and defend your decision. You will also need to discuss the fallout from your decision and tell how you will deal with it. This is not an easy decision but it is one that many small business owners face and is one that you may face in the future. I ask that you look into yourself before answering this quesiton and answer honestly. Your grade is based upon your level of self reflection and how in-depth you answer the question.
Citations are not needed for this
Please send me your 1.15 spaced, two full page response formatted in Microsoft Word.