Research Question/Topic: Indicate the basic question or topic of your research.
Cyberbullying
& Education
Disciplines: Identify two distinct disciplines that will help you to answer this research question or address this topic.
Psychology,
educational policy and administration
Significance of the Research: State why you believe this research is important.
Knowledge Base: Indicate what you already know about the subject matter of your paper.
What I Need to Learn: Indicate knowledge gaps you will need to fill in order to complete your project well.
Potential Thesis Statement: State the conclusion you think you may defend in your paper. (Note: your final thesis will likely end up as a revision of this initial statement.)
Working Bibliography: Cite 3-4 peer-reviewed scholarly sources relevant to your research project from each of the disciplines noted above (a total of 6-8 peer-reviewed essays.
Author: admin
-
Title: The Impact of Cyberbullying on Education: A Cross-Disciplinary Analysis
-
Title: Comparison of Healthcare Data Sets: UHDDS, UACDS, and MDS 1) Uniform Hospital Discharge Data Set (UHDDS) for inpatients: – Data elements: This data set includes information on patients admitted
Review the three data sets below and describe each data set element. Also list 1 similarity and 1 difference between the data sets.
1)Uniform Hospital Discharge Data Set (UHDDS) for inpatients
2)Uniform Ambulatory Care Data Set (UACDS) for outpatient or ambulatory patients
3)Minimum Data Set (MDS) for long term care
Be sure to support your information by citing at least 2 references using APA format. -
“The Search for Truth: Examining the Philosophies of Socrates, Descartes, Hume, and Hegel” “Exploring Philosophical Perspectives on History, Capitalism, and Human Existence: A Comparative Analysis of Hegel, Marx, and Sartre”
Term Paper Topics
Pick one of the following topics and write your term paper on it. Indicate which topic you have selected in your paper’s title.
Papers should be a minimum of 3 typewritten pages in MLA format using Times New Roman 12 point font, double-spaced. When you quote from your book, please make sure to use correct MLA citation formatLinks to an external site.. Remember to create a Works Cited page and list all sources you quote in the paper. If you need help with MLA formatting and citation, please check out the MLA GuideLinks to an external site. at Purdue’s Online Writing Lab.
Socrates & Plato
Topic A:
Suppose Meletus overheard the discussion in the Crito and went to Plato’s Socrates saying “In your discussion with Crito you indicated you were able to propose and defend substantive theses–you claimed to know whether escape would be just, that it is never right to return a wrong for a wrong, and you claimed to know what sort of life is worth living. In making such claims you show you do not really believe that human wisdom amounts to little. That is, you lied during the trial when you professed ignorance. It seems to me your sentence is just!”
How would you respond to this charge? Is Plato’s Socrates inconsistent or contradictory? Can Plato’s Socrates both claim to be ignorant and to know moral truths?
Topic B:
Suppose you encountered someone who maintained:
much of what Socrates went through at the end of his life could have been easily avoided if he had only taken his own advice and lived a private life (Apology, 32a). He would not have offended the rich and powerful, he would not have been put on trial, and he would not have had to reason with Crito about the appropriateness of escaping.
How would you reply? Would “being private” in this sense mean giving up anything that he holds to be important? If so, clarify what would have to be forsaken, and why you think he would not be willing to do so.
Descartes
Topic C:
Consider the Problem of Error: if God exists, and he is not a deceiver, then why is it so often the case that he allows humans to form false beliefs? What is Descartes’ reply to the Problem of Error? Is his reply successful? You may find it worthwhile to critique Descartes’ model of how error arises in Meditation IV. Are there cases of error which can’t be covered on the model? Does the model succeed in solving the Problem of Error?
Topic D:
Descartes famously argues “I think, therefore I am” (though he doesn’t say this in Meditation II). What is Descartes’ basis for the conclusion that he exists? Is his argument compelling? What does he take himself to be? Consider one of your own objections to Descartes’ proof that he exists. How would Descartes respond, and would that response be adequate?
Hume
Topic E:
Sometimes, Hume seems to have meant to suggest that we revise our beliefs about causal relations: instead of thinking there is a necessary connection between cause and effect we should just think in terms of constant conjunctions. In other places in the text, he seems to have held that we will inevitably believe in necessary connections between cause and effect. Explain each option, listing what you see as its most important advantages and disadvantages. Which way of thinking about causal relations do you think we should adopt?
Topic F:
How are impressions and ideas related to the psychological laws of association? What role do matters of fact and relations of ideas have in Hume’s philosophy? Show how all of these concepts work together to form a picture of the human mind. Do you think Hume’s picture is complete? Why or why not?
Hegel
Topic G:
What is the role of Reason in history, according to Hegel? How is Reason related to the development of Spirit in Hegel’s philosophy? Focus your paper by defining what Hegel means by Reason and Spirit before attempting to explain their relationship. Does this analysis of history seem plausible? Why or why not?
Topic H:
Hegel writes that with philosophic history, one considers history’s raw materials according to “thoughts, a priori.” Explain this statement and show how the rest of his Introduction to the Philosophy of History reflects Hegel’s definition. Use examples drawn from the text and be sure to cite any quotations you pull to illustrate them.
Marx
Topic I:
Describe Marx and Engels’ views on the development of capitalism found in the Communist Manifesto and compare it to this definition standard of capitalism: “Capitalism is an economic system based on the private ownership of the means of production and their operation for profit. Characteristics central to capitalism include private property, capital accumulation, wage labor, voluntary exchange, a price system, and competitive markets.” How would Marx and Engels add to the definition? Formulate a new definition based on your understanding of their work.
Topic J:
Outline the various types of socialism mentioned in the Communist Manifesto. How is socialism distinct from communism, according to Marx and Engels? How is each type of socialism related to the development of capitalism? Try to find examples of each type of socialism in current-day politics to illustrate Marx and Engels’ categories.
Sartre
Topic K:
What does Sartre mean by the claim that existence precedes essence? According to Sartre, what follows from this? That is, what does it tell us about human beings and the nature of free choices? What does this tell us about human freedom? Do you agree? Disagree? Why or why not?
Topic L:
How does Sartre establish atheistic existentialism? How are anguish and despair related to atheistic existentialism? Does Sartre succeed in explicating a “coherent atheistic position”? Why or why not? -
Title: The Role of Applied and Basic Research in the Doctoral Capstone Project at Liberty University
Basic and applied research each have their own place in the world of research. When completing the capstone project at the doctoral level at Liberty University, you will be conducting action research, a type of applied research. First, explain why applied research is more applicable than basic research in framing your study. Then, explain why basic research should be more prominent in your literature review than applied research. Finally, discuss what problem you are looking to solve in your research and why it is important to do so.
-
“Addressing Mental Health and Substance Abuse Issues in the Probation Case of Roger Brown” Introduction Roger Brown, a 30-year-old black male, has a history of mental health disorders and substance abuse. He was recently arrested for aggravated
Roger Brown
Case Study
Roger Brown is a 30-year-old black male arrested for aggravated assault. Roger was originally placed on 5 years’ probation for possession of crack cocaine in January 2022. Roger has a history of mental health disorders and has been on the mental health probation case load previously. Roger has a long history of being on and off his psychotropic medication. Roger was off his medication during the last incident when he was arrested. Roger is currently on a high level of supervision reporting twice monthly to probation officials. Roger has been reporting as instructed and available for home visits, as required.
Roger was hanging out at a local convenience store when he got into a verbal argument with another male at the store. The subject of the argument is unknown to officials at this time. The store owner came out and asked both men to leave the premises. Roger refused and began to argue with the store owner, as well. Roger became combative and struck the store owner with his backpack. The owner fell, hit his head on a concrete, and suffered a head injury requiring 25 stitches. Roger ran away from the scene. Roger was arrested a week later by police at his probation appointment.
Roger is currently employed as a construction worker (11 months) and living at home with his mother. Roger’s mother is currently unemployed. Roger’s mother reports he does well at home and does not give her any problems. She reports he pays most of the bills for there household. However, the neighbors report there are often loud arguments and the smell of marijuana coming from the backyard. Roger does not have a GED or HS diploma. Roger did complete a city sponsored program that helped him get the job in construction. Roger’s boss reports Roger is a good employee and has not missed a day of work. Roger is married but is currently separated from his wife and child at this time. Roger is also non-compliant with a child support order and in arrears for 6,000 dollars. Roger has had no contact with his wife or child.
Roger did test positive for THC and trace amounts of PCP when given a drug test at the probation department. This will be his first time testing positive for drugs. Roger has been going to see his MH counselor and psychiatrist but has been dishonest about taking his required medications. Rogers’s labs report he has not taken his meds in quite some time. What is your plan of action for Roger? You need to be detailed and address the specific issues outlined in his case. You do not have to address the specific law violations for this case study.
Use Chapter 6 as a resource for your plan for Roger.
Please fully explain your logic.
500-600 words
7th Edition APA format -
Title: The Concept of Home: A Personal Definition
Compose an essay of 1,000 words defining the word home. In your definition, make sure to include examples that help the reader understand your definition and descriptive language to help your reader see what you mean.
Your first body paragraph may compare your definition to the dictionary definition. Your second and possibly third body paragraphs must use one (per paragraph) strategy from the lecture slides: Connotation, Negation, or Analogy.
For this essay, you may use personal examples for your concrete details. This means you will need to use the first person pronouns (I, me, my), but do not use the second person pronouns (you, your, yours). -
“Designing a Sustainable Community: A Project Proposal” Introduction: The world is facing numerous environmental and social challenges, such as climate change, pollution, and social inequality. As a result, there is a growing need for sustainable solutions that can address these
I have provided all information I was given. if there is anything you need please let me know. I have never created a project for their more do not know how to approach this aside from all information given to me -
“Ensuring Accuracy: The Importance of Multiple Checks in Pharmacy Prescription Filling” Pharmacy prescriptions are an essential part of patient care, and it is crucial that they are filled accurately to avoid potential harm to the patient. To prevent prescription filling
Case Study 2 – Pharmacy Prescriptions.Write a short essay of approximately 250 words on the following case study
including major points listed below.
To prevent prescription filling errors, pharmacy assistants are taught to check
each prescription at least four times during the filling process.
In your short essay, include the following:
a) List and describe each step.
b) Is one step more important than the other?
c) What should be presented for the pharmacist final check?
d) What is another way(s) for a pharmacy assistant to minimize medication
errors in the community pharmacy?
https://www.thehonestapothecary.com/2015/01/22/prescription-verification-tips-for-the-new-pharmacist-or-student/
https://www.pharmacytimes.com/view/pharmacy-technicians-play-key-role-in-medication-error-prevention
https://www.pharmacytimes.com/view/preventing-medication errors-in-pharmacy
https://www.digitalpharmacist.com/blog/8-ways-to-reduce-medication-errors-at-your-pharmacy/
https://invatechhealth.com/resources/blogs/the-end-of-final-checking/ -
“Minimizing Legal Risks for Nurses: Recommendations Based on TERCAP Analysis” Title: “Enhancing Licensure Requirements and Continuing Education for Nurses: A Proposal Based on TERCAP Report Findings”
Scenario
The Board of Nursing in your state has decided to utilize a tool developed by the National Council of State Boards of Nursing called the Taxonomy of Error, Root Cause Analysis Practice- Responsibility (TERCAP). Your nurse manager has provided you with a summary of the completed TERCAP report by your Board of Nursing’s Disciplinary Action Committee. She has asked you to review this summary and to develop a proposal of suggestions for continuing education topics on ways to minimize legal risks for your hospital’s practicing nurses. The nurse educators will develop an education series based upon your recommendations.
Instructions
Prepare a proposal based on the summary of the TERCAP with recommendations and suggestions on minimizing legal risks that:
Part One – Review summary of completed TERCAP report below.
A patient, aged 54, admitted for back surgery secondary to compressed vertebrae and intense pain. The difficulty with pain management has caused the patient some depression and insomnia over the last month. During her first post-operative day, the patient fell attempting to go from the bed to the bathroom without assistance. Her injury was serious and involved significant harm requiring two additional days of hospitalization and an addition six weeks of physical therapy.
A review of the case determined that her assigned nurse on night shift was an RN (age 24) with nine months of experience in this unit. This was her third 12 hours shift in a row, and she was 29 weeks pregnant. There were 28 beds occupied with only two RNs and one patient technician, due to one vacancy and a call-in for illness. This community facility has experienced a turnover rate of 12% in the last year (community average of 4.5%), and has a high number of new graduates working on medical surgical units, particularly on the 7 pm- 7 am shift.
A review of the chart showed that the patient had been advised by the out-going nurse, who admitted her to the unit post-operatively, that she needed to ask for assistance with toileting for at least the next 24 hours due to the extensive back surgery and post-anesthesia response and pain medication. The RN coming on shift had received bedside shift report at 7 pm and noted the patient sleeping, so the issue of patient assistance was not repeated. She checked on her again at 8 pm and administered the requested prn medication (morphine) for pain. She was busy with other patients and did not see the patient again until the patient fell at 9:51 pm.
The patient reported that she did not recall having been instructed to ask for assistance, as she was very groggy from the anesthesia. She stated that she had pushed the nurse call button for assistance and “no one came.” There was no clerical support at the nursing station and the three staff members had been very busy with patients, so this statement could not be substantiated.
The risk manager found that the RN had not followed nursing policy for patient assessment 20 minutes after receiving pain medication, and had not done the recommended hourly rounding on the patient to assess for the need for elimination, pain, and patient comfort. The note in the chart indicated only that the patient requested pain medication, but did not provide specific nursing assessment details or comment that the patient had received the same dosage of morphine two hours earlier.
Part Two – Factors and Actions
Discusses the factors that contributed to event and how these factors could be addressed to minimize legal risks.
Situational factors
Nursing factors
Human factors
Organizational factors
Explains whether the nurse was negligent or did her actions reach the level of malpractice and support your reasoning with research.
Determines what options the nursing board had regarding this nurse’s license to practice nursing.
Describes your reasoning for what action would you recommend (warning, probation, revocation of license) if you were on the disciplinary committee of your Board of Nursing.
Explains how the level of nursing behavior relates to your proposed recommendation on licensure.
Part Three – Continuing Education
Summarizes a list of topics to be provided to the education department based on the summary of the TERCAP report.
Provides stated ideas with professional language and attribution for credible sources with correct APA citation, spelling, and grammar in the proposal.